|
APM itself is useless. I know a guy who's taken games off of progamers who plays at like 180-220 max. Normally he plays ~150 -_-.
I play between 150-180 and I suck ass.
I've beaten players with 300+APM before.
I've lost to players with 90APM before. (They were protoss, go figure)
Having a higher APM can mean two different things...either you're that great at multitasking, or you're that great at button mashing.
Try to play faster, don't try to hit keys faster.
|
APM is important, but it isn't what you should aim to improve directly. It will go up as you simply get better to be honest. As for how to get better, I would say multitasking in general. This could mean quickly going back to your expo to send idle probes to mine, building more probes, grouping newly made units with your current hotkeyed units, macroing, microing, keeping your BO in order, scouting the map, etc. As you get better at doing main things like those, you will need more APM to do them before you need to loop over them again, and you will have to push yourself to do those things. Aiming to do things like those improves your APM, you shouldn't be thinking "shit shit shit what is there to do right now??? I guess ill reset my rally points" even when you don't need to. You should have stuff in mind to do, and the more games you play, the faster you will become at it.
This guide for mechanics goes over that a bit I believe.
|
United States12237 Posts
In the event that this is a troll post, I'll be succinct. APM is important enough to matter, but not important enough to offset a poor strategy or decision.
|
10387 Posts
On November 05 2009 15:24 PH wrote: APM itself is useless. I know a guy who's taken games off of progamers who plays at like 180-220 max. Normally he plays ~150 -_-.
I play between 150-180 and I suck ass.
I've beaten players with 300+APM before.
I've lost to players with 90APM before. (They were protoss, go figure)
Having a higher APM can mean two different things...either you're that great at multitasking, or you're that great at button mashing.
Try to play faster, don't try to hit keys faster. replays??
|
On November 05 2009 15:56 ArvickHero wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2009 15:24 PH wrote: APM itself is useless. I know a guy who's taken games off of progamers who plays at like 180-220 max. Normally he plays ~150 -_-.
I play between 150-180 and I suck ass.
I've beaten players with 300+APM before.
I've lost to players with 90APM before. (They were protoss, go figure)
Having a higher APM can mean two different things...either you're that great at multitasking, or you're that great at button mashing.
Try to play faster, don't try to hit keys faster. replays?? It's Dino. I really don't feel like drawing extra attention by asking him for reps and posting them here.
If you want current reps of him smashing lower level players, pick up his reps from the CSL+ replay packs. He plays for my school.
|
|
|
On November 05 2009 15:20 resonance wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2009 15:07 Drakonis wrote: Yeah, hopefully I improve enough by the time SCII comes out (which could be anytime between now and the time I get old and die) to be somewhat decent at the game. Thankfully I've been around bw long enough to understand the units and strategies, I just need to learn to do everything as quickly and as efficiently as possible. Are you aiming to be a pro-gamer? 
No not a pro-gamer, but good enough not to get stomped on by the average-everyday-player. I guess I'll just have to start practicing my multitasking ability, but I don't really mind doing that because it just means I have to play more starcraft.
|
one little addition:
i'm a d+ zerg, and my apm are around 120 - but currently i'm improving rather quickly, because i've simply stopped spamming.
NEVER start spamming just to get high APM. it totally fucks up your game, because you can't concentrate on the important things anymore. (micro, macro, timings...) like other people already said: find yourself a hotkey system that suits your physis and style and play a lot. once you've mastered basic concepts like hotkeying you'll start to improve.
|
APM is an objective measure of Starcraft skill. You can determine your iccup rank from your APM and vice versa using the following table.
D- 0-50 D 50-100 D+ 100-150 C- 150-200 C 200-250 C+ 250-300 B- 300-350 B 350-400 B+ 400-450 A- 450-500 A 500-550 A+ 550-600 Olympic 600+
|
I think the "Generally high skill requires high APM, but having high APM does not mean you are skilled." quote from Liquipedia very accurate when talking about the importance of APM.
|
On November 06 2009 03:07 okum wrote: APM is an objective measure of Starcraft skill. You can determine your iccup rank from your APM and vice versa using the following table.
D- 0-50 D 50-100 D+ 100-150 C- 150-200 C 200-250 C+ 250-300 B- 300-350 B 350-400 B+ 400-450 A- 450-500 A 500-550 A+ 550-600 Olympic 600+
But then by that logic, in my ZvT game where I had 67 APM, and my opponent had 191 APM, I should have been demolished because he would have been 2 ranks higher than me?
|
On November 06 2009 03:29 Drakonis wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2009 03:07 okum wrote: APM is an objective measure of Starcraft skill. You can determine your iccup rank from your APM and vice versa using the following table.
D- 0-50 D 50-100 D+ 100-150 C- 150-200 C 200-250 C+ 250-300 B- 300-350 B 350-400 B+ 400-450 A- 450-500 A 500-550 A+ 550-600 Olympic 600+ But then by that logic, in my ZvT game where I had 67 APM, and my opponent had 191 APM, I should have been demolished because he would have been 2 ranks higher than me?
And also by that logic, no one is actually an A/A+/olympic player
|
On November 06 2009 03:29 Drakonis wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2009 03:07 okum wrote: APM is an objective measure of Starcraft skill. You can determine your iccup rank from your APM and vice versa using the following table.
D- 0-50 D 50-100 D+ 100-150 C- 150-200 C 200-250 C+ 250-300 B- 300-350 B 350-400 B+ 400-450 A- 450-500 A 500-550 A+ 550-600 Olympic 600+ But then by that logic, in my ZvT game where I had 67 APM, and my opponent had 191 APM, I should have been demolished because he would have been 2 ranks higher than me?
oh god. you do understand that not everyone who types a post is being serious right?
|
On November 06 2009 03:29 Drakonis wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2009 03:07 okum wrote: APM is an objective measure of Starcraft skill. You can determine your iccup rank from your APM and vice versa using the following table.
D- 0-50 D 50-100 D+ 100-150 C- 150-200 C 200-250 C+ 250-300 B- 300-350 B 350-400 B+ 400-450 A- 450-500 A 500-550 A+ 550-600 Olympic 600+ But then by that logic, in my ZvT game where I had 67 APM, and my opponent had 191 APM, I should have been demolished because he would have been 2 ranks higher than me?
I believe okum was joking.
EDIT: Cools the three of us posted on the same minute!
|
APM can be useful to analize your own gameplay. APM can have a different interpretation for every player and they don't mean anything on the surface, apart the average number of actions per minute (orly?). I'll throw in a couple examples I've seen from past WCG and on myself about this. Last year in Cologne I watched Stork and Nony play. The first at that time had about 220-250 APM, the second about 300. The weird thing is that both of them were really, really slow. Especially Stork, if you see him playing you would never say he could reach 240 APM, yet he does. Same goes for Nony, he was playing right next to Draco who had like 250-270 APM but Draco was way way faster than him, you could see it just watching their monitors. ChinaTTT on the other hand had like 250-300 APM but was probably the fastest player there, by far. This is mostly because the main source of APM is your keyboard, and spamming on your keyboard while playing is very easy if you get used to it. What matters the most in a game is how you use your mouse and that you do the right stuff at the right time. Sometimes it means having 400 APM over 5 seconds is necessary to do all your stuff when you need it, sometimes it means having 150 APM over 10 minutes is enough. Good players tend to keep APM as high as possible to not lose their focus on the game, yet if you can concentrate well you don't really need it, sometimes it might also be bad for your game. There are players with low APM who do good, and they aren't probably much slower than your average 250 APM keyboard spamming guy. The thing I'd recommend to anyone who approaches this game is to not try having high APM at all costs. I injured my wrist some years ago, proud of my useless 400+ spammed APM, and it was totally meaningless. Just play the game and focus on getting faster, and try to understand what comes out from your APM statistics, don't just look at them like they are a trophy.
|
APM matters alot. Anyone who has a different opinion sucks at the game.
APM is most important for terran/zerg and less so for protoss. Oh and please don't make this into a EAPM vs "spam" thread. Spam has a function obviously
|
this thread needs to die in a fire
After reading it there are actually some pretty good responses, but this is one of those things that are just like wow this is why we have a search function
On November 06 2009 03:29 Drakonis wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2009 03:07 okum wrote: APM is an objective measure of Starcraft skill. You can determine your iccup rank from your APM and vice versa using the following table.
D- 0-50 D 50-100 D+ 100-150 C- 150-200 C 200-250 C+ 250-300 B- 300-350 B 350-400 B+ 400-450 A- 450-500 A 500-550 A+ 550-600 Olympic 600+ But then by that logic, in my ZvT game where I had 67 APM, and my opponent had 191 APM, I should have been demolished because he would have been 2 ranks higher than me?
you do realise in theory it is entirely possible to beat someone better than you
|
There is no product of APM, APM is a product of improving so it's almost useless to try to explain. If you have not played much you think it is worth something but it really is not at all. Just keep practicing and it will go up because your gameplay becomes much smoother and quicker...
|
On November 05 2009 16:37 KrAzYfoOL wrote: hahahhahaha Dino
this alone leads me to believe this is a troll post. LOL
|
Please use the search function.
|
|
|
|
|
|