EPT
Why is it wrong........
| Blogs > nimysa |
|
nimysa
United States383 Posts
| ||
|
arb
Noobville17922 Posts
On November 12 2008 09:08 nimysa wrote: Why is it wrong to give a child candy with the purpose of calming the child down, if the child was screaming and angry with the parent originally? Because you need to beat that little fuckers ass. | ||
|
Folca
2235 Posts
| ||
|
Mutalisk
288 Posts
| ||
|
nimysa
United States383 Posts
| ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
| ||
|
Little-Chimp
Canada949 Posts
| ||
|
Nytefish
United Kingdom4282 Posts
| ||
|
Folca
2235 Posts
On November 12 2008 09:12 nimysa wrote: No no, if the child was furious with the parent, and the parent tries to make him calm down by using candy and other stuff, what would be wrong with that? What if it wasn't a child but a eigth grader or high schooler? Parents are being selfish because they're not necessarily teaching their child, more like bribing, I think | ||
|
Nytefish
United Kingdom4282 Posts
| ||
|
aqui
Germany1023 Posts
| ||
|
il0seonpurpose
Korea (South)5638 Posts
On November 12 2008 09:14 Nytefish wrote: Because it encourages them to scream for candy. | ||
|
ThE_OsToJiY
Canada1167 Posts
 | ||
|
Jonoman92
United States9109 Posts
I mean sometimes it's ok, like if the kid has a legitimate reason for being upset but if he's just doing it to try and get something it's a nono. | ||
|
G5
United States2921 Posts
| ||
|
Nitrogen
United States5345 Posts
edit: except arb, wtf? | ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
| ||
|
krazymunky
United States727 Posts
id rather have a candy than a beating :p | ||
|
StarN
United States2587 Posts
On November 12 2008 09:08 nimysa wrote: Why is it wrong to give a child candy with the purpose of calming the child down, if the child was screaming and angry with the parent originally? It depends on what the child is screaming for. If the child has all his primary needs taken care of (food, water, enough attention, comfort, etc.) then reinforcing him for screaming just solely because he wants more will make him or her spoiled. You want the baby to eventually stop crying all the time for unnessary wants, thus you want to negatively reinforce him to stop crying through not giving into his whims and ignoring it. | ||
|
TheNikeYork
United States389 Posts
On November 12 2008 09:09 arb wrote: Because you need to beat that little fuckers ass. Qft | ||
|
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
| ||
|
d_so
Korea (South)3262 Posts
On November 12 2008 09:09 arb wrote: Because you need to beat that little fuckers ass. post of the year | ||
|
d_so
Korea (South)3262 Posts
On November 12 2008 10:49 krazymunky wrote: im asian and my parents beat the shit out of me when i was little lol id rather have a candy than a beating :p you need to get beat more if you've got the nerve to complain | ||
|
arb
Noobville17922 Posts
thanks | ||
|
shavingcream66
United States1219 Posts
| ||
|
prOxi.swAMi
Australia3091 Posts
Give them candy when they're not screaming. Take stuff from them when they are screaming. This is not rocket science. | ||
|
Archaic
United States4024 Posts
On November 12 2008 09:09 arb wrote: Because you need to beat that little fuckers ass. Honestly, this is the real way to do it. | ||
|
Ilikestarcraft
Korea (South)17743 Posts
On November 12 2008 09:18 aqui wrote: because you reward its screaming and next time it wants candy it will do it again??? it... | ||
|
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
positive punishment is for winners and is also negative reinforcement negative punishment is for pussies lol psychology | ||
| ||
