It just makes the thread harder to read.
(also my plan has always been to protect unless town needed me to steal, which I don't think has been the case yet.)
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Lemonwalrus
United States5465 Posts
March 29 2011 04:33 GMT
#2721
It just makes the thread harder to read. (also my plan has always been to protect unless town needed me to steal, which I don't think has been the case yet.) | ||
tnkted
United States1359 Posts
March 29 2011 04:34 GMT
#2722
Sorry about that, i'll work on it. | ||
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
March 29 2011 04:34 GMT
#2723
| ||
Lemonwalrus
United States5465 Posts
March 29 2011 04:39 GMT
#2724
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
March 29 2011 04:42 GMT
#2725
| ||
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
March 29 2011 04:43 GMT
#2726
| ||
Lemonwalrus
United States5465 Posts
March 29 2011 04:43 GMT
#2727
On March 29 2011 13:43 Coagulation wrote: Dont be sorry. hes not even a real walrus. SCUM! | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6782 Posts
March 29 2011 04:52 GMT
#2728
BrownBear Eii Amber Decondou Beneather These people having been acting pretty scummy in my eyes so you can expect analysis on most of them within a day. In the meantime peace out and shut up. GGQ's argument is the only thing that makes sense in this whole shithole of a thread. | ||
LSB
United States5171 Posts
March 29 2011 04:55 GMT
#2729
On March 29 2011 12:18 Lemonwalrus wrote: I asked this a long time ago but LSB never responded, since he is active again now I'm gonna ask it here. It has almost nothing to do with the current proceedings though. If the town wins the Item Game, do surviving Item Game players get to continue to PM each other? I checked all your posts and didn't find an answer. Nope, the item game will just close. Sorry for missing your question | ||
kevconsim
United States317 Posts
March 29 2011 05:17 GMT
#2730
| ||
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
March 29 2011 06:23 GMT
#2731
On March 29 2011 13:52 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Ok people this is pathetic. GGQ thanks for being the only person who can make a coherent argument. This day has accomplished next to nothing in terms of scum hunting. I thought I'd kick back and let the IG people slug it out but since they've been reduced to screaming at each other I've really stopped paying attention. Tonight I'm going to read over the thread and try to find people outside of the item game who have acted scummy. This insesent tunneling of the item game is pretty stupid at this point because it really only nets us one scum. In advance I'll let you know my suspect list which I'll be analyzing more in depth now that ive given up trying to keep up with the IG BrownBear Eii Amber Decondou Beneather These people having been acting pretty scummy in my eyes so you can expect analysis on most of them within a day. In the meantime peace out and shut up. GGQ's argument is the only thing that makes sense in this whole shithole of a thread. Why don't you loooove meeeeeee But yeah, I probably deserve to be analyzed. I think it will turn up town, though. I need to post more, tomorrow I will definitely be contributing. It's been a rough few days, what with midterms and travel, I apologize. | ||
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
March 29 2011 07:25 GMT
#2732
If anyone has some free time to kill check out Ver's thread. I just wasted an hour of my life on it. The best hour. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
March 29 2011 07:30 GMT
#2733
| ||
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
March 29 2011 07:49 GMT
#2734
I get the whole "why tack is scum" argument, it makes sense, not so much with the "covering all bases argument", but with the "they thought coag had role-block" argument. Good, we're killing him. Meanwhile, tnked can repent and switch Jackal with Bum again (or a random person, it doesn't matter), to make sure that the IG doesn't end if we miss-lynch. And yes, I said jackal. He's the only one I believe 100% to be town in that game. HOWEVER, I'd like it if someone (preferably coag, since he's been dismissing this a lot) could explain to me why we are not even CONSIDERING the fact that Lemon could be the scum? He knew Coag had the gun so they could have used him against annul, just in case. So I don't know, I see the reason why it's more likely that Tack is scum. I don't see why we are completely dismissing Lemon though. | ||
Kavdragon
United States1251 Posts
March 29 2011 07:52 GMT
#2735
On March 29 2011 16:49 CubEdIn wrote: HOWEVER, I'd like it if someone (preferably coag, since he's been dismissing this a lot) could explain to me why we are not even CONSIDERING the fact that Lemon could be the scum? He knew Coag had the gun so they could have used him against annul, just in case. So I don't know, I see the reason why it's more likely that Tack is scum. I don't see why we are completely dismissing Lemon though. Mafia likely hit Annul, so why would they also redirect coag's bullet into him? | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6782 Posts
March 29 2011 07:58 GMT
#2736
On March 29 2011 16:30 Lanaia wrote: There has legitimately been nothing since I last posted. I'm kind of sad about that. Give me stuff to analyze for tomorrow morning, guys! Don't worry I'm working on BB right now, we'll see how many people I get through before I decide to call it a night. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
March 29 2011 07:59 GMT
#2737
On March 29 2011 16:52 Kavdragon wrote: Show nested quote + On March 29 2011 16:49 CubEdIn wrote: HOWEVER, I'd like it if someone (preferably coag, since he's been dismissing this a lot) could explain to me why we are not even CONSIDERING the fact that Lemon could be the scum? He knew Coag had the gun so they could have used him against annul, just in case. So I don't know, I see the reason why it's more likely that Tack is scum. I don't see why we are completely dismissing Lemon though. Mafia likely hit Annul, so why would they also redirect coag's bullet into him? Ugh....GGQ explains it. Mafia thought Coag had stun gun which would have disabled annul's bomb, making it safe to hit him. So they mind control Coag to "disable" bomb. What really happened was that Coag had a real gun and shot annul instead. Mafia didn't expect this. | ||
Kavdragon
United States1251 Posts
March 29 2011 08:08 GMT
#2738
On March 26 2011 07:47 Kenpachi wrote: .. and i still retain my title of never being right but im persistent. IM COMING FOR YOU GROKKEN No townie go out of his way to point out that he is always wrong. The only thing that something like this could serve to do, is make people ignore their opinions. The only people who want this are scum. Kenpachi is scum In his first (and only) analysis, he concludes that iGrok is scum because of a number of spam posts. After posting replies to comments on his analysis he starts doing the very thing that he based his accusation off of: Spam: Note: These posts were made one after the other. I didn’t edit out any posts in-between them. On March 28 2011 10:25 Kenpachi wrote: I believe i will die because no one would bother to protect me and stuff. + Show Spoiler + On March 28 2011 06:34 Kenpachi wrote: Im coming for you iGrok but im busy today so ill be back at the night post Why post this if you aren’t going to add anything? On March 28 2011 11:00 Kenpachi wrote: oh snap~ On March 28 2011 11:01 Kenpachi wrote: -_-...... On March 28 2011 11:02 Kenpachi wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2011 11:02 LSB wrote: Give me a few more secs, finding your pics is hard ;_; On March 28 2011 11:05 Kenpachi wrote: Coag. theres an error. 10 SCUM On March 28 2011 11:07 Kenpachi wrote: im greener On March 28 2011 11:07 Kenpachi wrote: oh snap On March 28 2011 11:37 Kenpachi wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2011 11:36 Coagulation wrote: BUM HOW BOUT YOU ANSWER THE QUESTION. IM NOT GONNA SIT HERE AND TWIDDLE MY THUMBS WHILE YOUR RUNNING AROUND ACTING LIKE I DIDNT SHOOT TACK LAST NIGHT WE NEED TO GET THE STORY STRAIGHT NOW. C-C-C-Chaos. Im all excited! On March 28 2011 12:42 Kenpachi wrote: ##vote: Tackster so hilarious. He’s called someone out for being scummy because of spam, yet he spams. This clearly shows that he doesn’t hold strong convictions about spam being scummy. No townie would make an analysis based on a conviction they don’t hold. Only scum would do something like this to make it look like they are contributing. Kenpachi is scum On March 29 2011 06:29 Kenpachi wrote: im always around to be analyzed. faithful bodybag Kenpachi but seriously you guys completely lost me when i was reading the last 20 pages. I think Kavdragon has the most data piled up on him but really, im lost. Tackster is accused. Something happens and LW is actually the real culprit no wait Jackal. nono its kav.. fuck you guys its GGQ or Kenpachi. no dude its Tackster/LW/Jackal/Kav. imo, lets just kill Kav because hes not an IG player and everyone is just so fussed up about mylo on IG players Scum hit me last night, and it didn’t work. Scum will try to kill me again. This obviously didn’t go very far, but there’s no way in liquidia that a townie posted this sort of crap. "I'm confused, but let's just kill kav, kk?" There is no way that a townie would see more red on my name than on Tacksters name. There is no way that Kenpachi is a townie. Kenpachi is scum To borrow the line that you borrowed from | ||
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
March 29 2011 08:13 GMT
#2739
| ||
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
March 29 2011 08:13 GMT
#2740
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Counter-Strike Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • gosughost_ 35 StarCraft: Brood War• Sammyuel 29 • IndyKCrew • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • intothetv • Kozan • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel League of Legends Other Games |
Sparkling Tuna Cup
SC Evo Complete
Dark vs Classic
kiwian vs Spirit
WardiTV Invitational
ByuN vs Clem
MaxPax vs herO
Cure vs SHIN
BSL: ProLeague
Bonyth vs Dienmax
DragOn vs Sterling
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
StarCraft2.fi
OlimoLeague
StarCraft2.fi
StarCraft2.fi
[ Show More ] The PondCast
CranKy Ducklings
|
|