|
On July 29 2010 16:59 ssj114 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2010 16:55 ilovezil wrote:On July 29 2010 16:53 ssj114 wrote:On July 29 2010 16:43 ilovezil wrote:On July 29 2010 16:18 ssj114 wrote:On July 29 2010 16:13 ilovezil wrote:On July 29 2010 15:12 ssj114 wrote:On July 29 2010 14:50 ilovezil wrote:On July 29 2010 14:29 ssj114 wrote:On July 29 2010 14:08 EvilTeletubby wrote: [quote]
There are a lot of contributing reasons why divorce rate is higher, but this ain't really one of the major ones. This is your opinion only though. We can't read every single person's mind for exact reasons as to why they file for divorce. Now ain't that ironic? You might want to look up the definition of irony. Ain't it ironic you're telling me to look up ironic. You're cracking me up. You clearly don't understand what irony is. Regardless, of course whatever I write is also my opinion. I never said it wasn't. Anyway, go look up irony please. ?? How do u know my taste in iron? It is only your opinion what ironic means to me. So therefore, ur wrong. Except you used the word "ironic", not "irony". Sorry, but you lose. Fell into the trap. ?? U told me to look up "irony". U said I don't know what "irony" is, so look it up. Where am i wrong?? That was the trap. You wrote "ironic" twice yourself. See above posts.
But..
When I said ur statement was "ironic", u told me I should look up "irony". Then u told me I don't know what "irony" means, even if I use "ironic". SO i look up "irony" as u say, then u switch the focus to "ironic".
The fact that you looked up "irony" shows that you are wrong.
But how can i be wrong if u specifically tell me to look up "irony"?
Lol, i thought u smart :p
User was warned for this post
|
intrigue
Washington, D.C9933 Posts
in love for sure? oh dear. you'll get over your first true love, like everybody else on the planet has.
|
On July 29 2010 16:54 ssj114 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2010 16:51 EvilTeletubby wrote:On July 29 2010 14:29 ssj114 wrote:On July 29 2010 14:08 EvilTeletubby wrote:On July 29 2010 13:47 ssj114 wrote: There's a problem with this type of thinking, and it explains why the divorce rate is so high. There are a lot of contributing reasons why divorce rate is higher, but this ain't really one of the major ones. This is your opinion only though. We can't read every single person's mind for exact reasons as to why they file for divorce. Yeah, just my own personal opinion.None of those links even really mention your theory, and that's just the first page of random google results. Anyways, whether it's intentional or not, you need to stop trolling, like, ASAP. Those links you mentioned probably have correct information. But it doesn't mean I'm wrong. As I said, it's all in the mind-set, which leads to all those reasons.
rofl lets just say reality isnt real and nothing matters!
god logic like yours hurts my head
also i agree with the original ett post about age actually being a contributing factor to what you think love is, though that is probably an evolving feeling anyways
|
On July 29 2010 13:47 ssj114 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2010 12:23 Rekrul wrote: people like to trick themselves into thinking they know what real love is whilst they go through the emotional roller coasters, bungee jumps, and sky dives of relationships, crushes, or flings, but in reality true love with the opposite sex is like walking on the moon, you think you know, but you never will truly know until u've landed, and you won't wanna go home
i personally am ok with earth for now There's a problem with this type of thinking, and it explains why the divorce rate is so high. The way I see it, the definition of "true love" varies for every single individual. It all depends on your mind-set. Even talking about it shows that you don't have much wisdom, and that includes myself haha (since I'm talking about it). "True love" can't be examined and can't be compared to walking on the moon or with anything else. I think one reason why the divorce rate is so high is that we generally feel the need to have "true love" in the relationship. The problem (as I already said) is that the definition of "true love" varies for every single individual. The ultimate problem is "relativity", or simply the idea of it. If you understand what this means, then you won't reply to this thread again.
I think a key in true love is the other person kind of has to love you back, and if they're that disinterested that you're not in any kind of relationship, it's not love. Period.
e; awww late to the party
|
On July 29 2010 17:02 ssj114 wrote: By the way, il0seonpurpose, you mention that you're so happy you are going to college. Well, I wish you all the happiness (and momentary relief), but you'll be exposed to a lot of similar situations. Don't worry though, you'll likely be able to handle it "better" with the experience you've gained.
Ah, I see you got banned... it's okay and thanks for the encouragement.
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
encouragement in situations like these is code for re-inforcing ignorance
|
United States4796 Posts
It's okay bro. You deserve better.
|
On July 28 2010 16:28 Faraday wrote: There's plenty of fish in the sea, another girl will make you forget about her(who by the way if she does this she's not right for you and will only hurt you more and more as time passes) and make sure you don't let her reel you in for more if and when she pleases. I know the type...not what they seem at all...
You know what else is in the sea? Crabs, and those things that seaguls always choke on be sure to avoide them at all costs.
|
|
|
|