|
Ok so i have the final test in my physics class tomorrow and my brain has just been freezing up all day. I can't even make this work, so now I'm asking for your help.
From this equation
I need to get what gamma equals. My own attempts so far has failed since gamma can't be 1 or lower for the 2nd equation to work.
This is what I've done so far, and it's not correct just thought I'd share what I've tried:
I know that's not right since that would mean that
So could someone PLEASE help me get gamma out of that equation. I know its really fucking simple but I feel like a dumbass.
(if you wanna test it out m = 9,1094*10^-31, c = 3*10^8 and E = 3,98*10^-17)
|
On May 21 2010 07:38 Julmust wrote:This is what I've done so far, and it's not correct just thought I'd share what I've tried: I know that's not right since that would mean that Your second equation here does not follow from your first. You messed up the algebra.
You have g = (E + mc^2)/(mc^2) So g = E/(mc^2) + 1
|
gamma=(E+mc^2)/(mc^2)
how do u get (E+mc^2)/(mc^2) = E
o_o
(E+mc^2)/(mc^2) = (E/(mc^2)) + 1
|
E/mc^2 + mc^2/mc^2 = gamma is your mistake, I believe.
|
What you got here is the formula for "total energy" and "mass energy". Total energy = mass energy + kinetic energy. As a result, kinetic energy = total energy - mass energy, which is what you are doing here.
E = ymc^2-mc^2 => E = mc^2(y-1) => y = E/mc^2+1
y being gamma, idk how to make the symbol in windows.
dont do what the above poster did, you can use that formula as well to get the answer, but that's not how the "official" formula is, the relativistic formula for kinetic energy is: Ek = (y-1)m^2) If you don't get to the official formula, chances are your answer will be deemed incorrect.
|
|
As an aside, I'm not sure where your first equation for E is coming from.
Relativistic energy is E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2; this does not simplify to E = (gamma)mc^2 - mc^2 unless I'm missing something.
|
thanks for the help guys, gonna need lots of luck tomorrow (or rather later today) if this is gonna work out.
|
Factor out the mc^2: E=mc^2(y-1)
Divide both sides: E/(mc^2)=y-1
Add one to both sides: (E/(mc^2))+1=y
|
Formula for total relativistic energy is: Etot = ymc^2 Formula for relativistic kinetic energy is: Ek = (y-1)mc^2 Formula for mass energy / ("hvileenergi" in norwegian) E0 = mc^2
E0 + Ek = Etot if that wasn't clear.
|
And crate, it does: E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2 => E^2 = (γmc^2)^2 + (mc^2)^2 => E = (γmc^2) + (mc^2) => E=(γ-1)mc^2
|
On May 21 2010 08:07 tYsopz wrote: E^2 = (γmc^2)^2 + (mc^2)^2 => E = (γmc^2) + (mc^2)
This is wrong. a^2 = b^2 + c^2 a != b + c
edit: your last equation also doesn't follow, it should be (γ+1)(mc^2) instead of (γ-1)(mc^2) as you've written.
If the original equation is referring to relativistic kinetic energy as E it's correct I think, but I dislike calling that E instead of E_k or T since it's misleading.
|
that is awkward, yeah i was a bit too quick ><
Edit: you know how it is when you know what it is supposed to look like :p
You sure about that formula, never seen it?
Edit: also, my formula for relativistic momentum is wrong.
|
|
Since the formula is correct, you should be able to get to E = mc^2(y-1) from E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2
unless the fact it is 4 hours past my bedtime is putting a stopper to my ability to think.
|
Calgary25954 Posts
i think your problem is basic math, not physics.
Edit: To be clearer, the request doesn't even make sense. How are we going to just "get rid" of a variable?
|
Um,.. all i can say is good luck taking calculus(and harder physics), if you aren't comfortable with simple fractions. @ Chill , he meant "out of the equation", instead of "get out" So like, "help me get gamma, out of that equation." Also -insert obligatory pout about homework threads in a very biased manner-
|
On May 21 2010 08:36 Chill wrote: i think your problem is basic math, not physics.
my problem was that my brain wasn't functioning correctly, I solved the problem (which, as it shows, had nothing to do with this equation ) and now it's back online.
|
E^2=(pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2 => E^2 = (γmvc)^2 + m^2c^4 => E^2 = γ^2m^2v^2c^2 + m^2c^4 => E^2 = (1/(1-(v^2/c^2)))m^2v^2c^2 + m^2c^4 => E^2 = (1/((c^2-v^2)/c^2)))*m^2v^2c^2 + m^2c^4 => E^2 = (c^2/(c^2-v^2)*m^2v^2c^2 + m^2c^4 => E^2 = m^2c^4(v^2/(c^2-v^2)+1) => E^2 = m^2c^4(v^2+c^2-v^2)/(c^2-v^2) => E^2 = m^2c^4(c^2/(c^2-v^2)) => E^2 = m^2c^4(1/(c^2-v^2)/c^2) => E^2 = m^2c^4(1/(1-v^2/c^2)) => E^2 = m^2c^4γ^2 => E = γmc^2
Uggh, should have used my scanner.
|
I'm going to college next year, will these sorts of things become useful in the near or far future if I'm going into physics?
@tYsopz: I'm going to assume that y^2 = 1/(1-v^2/c^2)
|
|
|
|