EPTTL Mafia XX - Page 32
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
| ||
|
Versatile
United States396 Posts
On March 14 2010 10:50 Vivi57 wrote: I'd be fine with an L lynch tomorrow. I've been suspicious of him from the start and was actually considering arranging a voteswitch off L to make him not pardoner myself. Now L is going OMGUS towards bill over a clearly town intended wagon. He's either scum pushing for a mislynch to delay the town or he's town still butthurt about being killed last game and trying to get revenge. But even though I wasn't there, I will stand behind keeping L out of office as a pro town play. He refused to claim as a dt, even denying being a dt completely, all the while talking about the "other" dt. Now he's pushing towards a townie's lynch. Seriously, don't let L get away with this so easily. talk about last words...lmao. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
citi.zen
2509 Posts
On March 14 2010 11:08 L wrote: And nothing of value was lost. ROLF - you're right, thanks to his last post nothing of value was lost. First coherent thing you've posted all game. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
| ||
|
d3_crescentia
United States4053 Posts
| ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
On March 14 2010 11:21 Ace wrote: someone actually killed Vivi Night 1? ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha I know right? | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On March 14 2010 11:21 Ace wrote: someone actually killed Vivi Night 1? ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Rofl, why would you hit vivi day 1 | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
As for the mafia hits, Massive hilarity. I will have a more comprehensive post up hopefully soon, but as I said, may take me awhile to do. | ||
|
d3_crescentia
United States4053 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
and sidesprang/madnessman for being retards | ||
|
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
| ||
|
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
back to the underworld I go carry on. | ||
|
Vivi57
United States6599 Posts
| ||
|
Fulgrim
United States560 Posts
On March 14 2010 11:08 L wrote: And nothing of value was lost. haha thanks L. Its probably a good thing that I was killed, because I just got raped in the face by real life on friday and couldn't have really been active at all. GL town, I'm 3-0 in mafia, so don't let me down now. | ||
|
madnessman
United States1581 Posts
On March 14 2010 04:59 L wrote: Don't see how you can be disappointed that a green who actively tried to fuck with the town is gone via the day 1 lynch. This was probably one of the best day 1 lynches in history. Just because people don't want you in a mayoral position... How does them make them trying to "fuck" with town? How can they be fucking with the town if we don't even know for certain that you're blue? Maybe you're mafia and they're actually doing the town a favor? It's pompous posts like this that caused me to change my vote. And to those questioning my voting patterns... We have three of the most experienced players ALL RUNNING FOR MAYOR AND ALL CLAIMING BLUE. How can I vote with absolute certainty and without any qualms whatsoever when this is quite suspicious, and I am filled with uncertainty and suspecting that one of them might be lying..but don't know which one? | ||
|
madnessman
United States1581 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On March 14 2010 13:44 madnessman wrote: I have a question. Mafia KNOWS L is a confirmed blue role. And yet they don't kill him. Does nobody else find this odd? Just because people don't want you in a mayoral position... How does them make them trying to "fuck" with town? How can they be fucking with the town if we don't even know for certain that you're blue? Maybe you're mafia and they're actually doing the town a favor? It's pompous posts like this that caused me to change my vote. And to those questioning my voting patterns... We have three of the most experienced players ALL RUNNING FOR MAYOR AND ALL CLAIMING BLUE. How can I vote with absolute certainty and without any qualms whatsoever when this is quite suspicious, and I am filled with uncertainty and suspecting that one of them might be lying..but don't know which one? Not believing people's claim is all find and good. Its normal to not believe till someone proves it. However, when people literally at the very last few minutes of a vote attempt to swing it. It appears scummy. If a green is doing it, its still a bad move. L is right, JeeJee's stunt was terrible. It doesn't matter that L would have or wouldn't have been in office from it. By causing a vote swing that late shows terrible play. It just can't be tolerated, ever. | ||
|
citi.zen
2509 Posts
My head is still spinning over the claim/no claim/will claim later conversation. Let's assume L is blue. After roles were assigned he immediately made a post with a soft-claim about being given a role which really makes him want to be mayor, even dropping the "other DT" pearl in there. Later on he tells Zona he is "on the right track" thinking L was blue/DT. At this point, if he is blue, he is CLEARLY a mafia target. His best chance to survive is to get elected, perhaps by a straight role-claim (worked pretty well for BC; remember BC stated expressly he planned to role-claim before the election even if vivi did not do it for him; he was just trying to gather more PM intel first). Yet L doesn't do this, instead preferring to lash out at everyone who calls him Blue/DT (calls them idiots who can't read, who are probably red too). It is not logical to make it 99% clear for the mafia you are blue, but keep the town guessing (unlike the mafia, the town doesn't know who is town aligned). Why bother to paint a target on your back but then confuse those who can protect you? Then JeeJee gets lynched, and L goes on for 2 pages trying to defend JeeJee's pre-death accusations and his lynching. Since this was BC's decisions, all L had to say was "ask BC, I thought JeeJee was shifty but not top of my list". When I ask him about this defensive attitude he hits back (at me, of course): On March 14 2010 09:04 L wrote: 1) Nah, i said JeeJee should also be a target. Woulda preferred BM, but oh well. 2) If your team hits me, you're probably going to lose the game for your team. So tell them to hit someone else. I probably have a medic on me anyways. Naturally, since I point a finger at him I must be red. Fortunately he tells us WHY he thinks I am red as well: On March 14 2010 09:21 L wrote: Oh, you noticed citi.zen's voting pattern too. Good show. That would be the reason for my suspicion of him, as exemplified in the last two pages. Ok, the man has a reason. Let us examine my "voting pattern": On March 11 2010 11:51 citi.zen wrote: Incognito. Then L (soft?) role-claims. On March 11 2010 12:48 citi.zen wrote: I change my vote to L. Then BC role-claims, with L saying he never did role-claim. Then changing his mind 20 more times. On March 12 2010 04:37 citi.zen wrote: Change my vote to BloodyC0bbler pretty please. With a cherry on top. My final decisions, plainly explained right in the voting thread comes over 24h before Flamewheel's final tally on March 13 2010 11:13: choose to have both BC (clear blue claim) and L (soft blue claim) in office, since Incognito at that point had not claimed at all. On March 12 2010 08:45 citi.zen wrote: I change my vote to L (again). I want both of them in office, and BC seems to have plenty of votes at the moment. Throughout the election I wanted elected officials to have blue, verifiable roles. I changed my vote to try to make that happen, as I explain concisely here: On March 13 2010 12:53 citi.zen wrote: My vote did change, but my approach remained consistent: vote people who claimed blue. So yeah, you can hope I will change my mind. But will it happen? BOO! Summary: * L's actions during the election make no sense. * His defensives stance after jeejee's lynching is a bit much for me. * He is accusing me (and others, but I only have so much patience to put together careful posts) based on very flimsy "evidence", ignoring obvious and repeated explanations. This is not a pro-town person making an honest effort to figure anything out. * vivi57's last post was oh-so-timely + Show Spoiler + On March 14 2010 10:50 Vivi57 wrote: I'd be fine with an L lynch tomorrow. I've been suspicious of him from the start and was actually considering arranging a voteswitch off L to make him not pardoner myself. Now L is going OMGUS towards bill over a clearly town intended wagon. He's either scum pushing for a mislynch to delay the town or he's town still butthurt about being killed last game and trying to get revenge. But even though I wasn't there, I will stand behind keeping L out of office as a pro town play. He refused to claim as a dt, even denying being a dt completely, all the while talking about the "other" dt. Now he's pushing towards a townie's lynch. Seriously, don't let L get away with this so easily. Following this post L will probably try to call me red once again. He is wrong, and I am curious what he will come up with next. It had better be more innovative than the "voting pattern". + Show Spoiler + In going through L's history to construct this post I can't help but notice how in-sync he is with Foolishness. | ||
| ||
