|
|
they're just sad they don't work at Blizzard working on the best RTS games in the world
|
United States47024 Posts
On March 06 2010 06:16 blabber wrote:they're just sad they don't work at Blizzard working on the best RTS games in the world They're sad because Dustin Browder got out of EA and they weren't so lucky.
|
|
those noobs disgust me =)
|
They need to flip out a fucking dictionary and look up "REAL TIME", you know, as in... "REAL TIME STRATEGY".
Look at this shit...
The basic problem with RTS is that you can build units in real-time.
|
|
lol.... all the devvies that I know would hate sc2 for the DRM, not the game itself.
|
On March 06 2010 06:28 Adeny wrote:They need to flip out a fucking dictionary and look up "REAL TIME", you know, as in... "REAL TIME STRATEGY". Look at this shit... This quote alone made me not to read the whole thing. Thank you Adeny for posting this. One quote to rule them all...
How people can be so stupid in their own line of work is beyond me.
|
|
Calgary25951 Posts
I love the 'fast clicking' argument. Because I imagine a dinosauresque 70 year old man slowly pressing one key distinctly at a time, and then raging when losing to a 16-month infant slamming the keyboard as hard and fast as he can.
|
I think they don't understand that StarCraft II is a combination between mechanics and strategy. It's not just how well you can think of a strategy, but how well you execute it as well. Somehow, the superfast clicking and tapping is what further engrosses us into the game, but not everyone can get on to that interest.
Also they're just bitter that StarCraft is the only RTS worth playing =P
|
Calgary25951 Posts
On March 06 2010 06:28 Adeny wrote:They need to flip out a fucking dictionary and look up "REAL TIME", you know, as in... "REAL TIME STRATEGY". Look at this shit... hahaha awesome! my new sig
|
Good thing Starcraft isn't a Strategy game. Thats kinda what the RT is for lol
|
Baa?21242 Posts
On March 06 2010 06:28 Adeny wrote:They need to flip out a fucking dictionary and look up "REAL TIME", you know, as in... "REAL TIME STRATEGY". Look at this shit...
I haven't laughed this hard in a long, long time.
|
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
Lmao. i don't even know where to start with this....
|
Well to be fair, it's just an attack on the premise of a genre, that real-time strategy games should not exist because non-real-time strategy is inherently better and/or more strategical.
On a slightly less extreme end, there are game designers out there that understand RTS mechanics, time management, and game flow, and still think that execution should be lowered where possible (to create a better competitive game, not just to be noob-friendly).
(Not that I agree, lol.)
|
They should just "Face Palm" themselves.. -.-
|
Oh my god... Those comments. Like, imo FPS are pretty redundant (like how is one CoD different form the rest? I sure have no clue, or how are they different from counterstrike for that matter?)
I don't diss them, I just choose not to play them because I don't find them that fun.
|
|
|
|