EPT
How well-behaved are you? - Page 5
| Blogs > Scorch |
|
ShaLLoW[baY]
Canada12499 Posts
| ||
|
Foucault
Sweden2826 Posts
On January 16 2010 07:03 CharlieMurphy wrote: I've never been banned and I have a shit load of posts. But you've been pretty close man | ||
|
ulszz
Jamaica1787 Posts
| ||
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
unless i feel you've wronged me or 1 of my friends then i go fking ballistic and am capable of very devious acts | ||
|
tarpman
Canada717 Posts
| ||
|
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
always well behaved | ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22247 Posts
On January 16 2010 05:24 MountainDewJunkie wrote: Someone called Flash a bunker rushing nigger, and I quoted it in case he tried to edit it so he would hopefully get banned (exact post: "Quoted for future ban"), which I've seen others do on TL before. But EvilTelitubby (or whatever) banned me for 2 days, too. Seemed unwarranted. Maybe a "We don't need your help" would have been fine, but there was no warning, didn't really do anything wrong *shrugs* A few reasons went into that decision: 1) "Quoted for future ban" really comes off as backseat moderating. As everyone figures out pretty quickly, we generally don't like that, and TBH, we DO catch a lot of things on our own and take care of business pretty quickly IMO. 2) Whether someone posted something bannable or not, by quoting them, you are allowing the derailment of the thread to continue. Again, we will take out the trash. 3) We can read edited posts. 4) There were numerous people in that live report thread iirc all derailing it... I wanted to keep everything on topic. People should know better at this point. | ||
|
KH1031
United States862 Posts
Guess the mods didn't like it. | ||
|
Disregard
China10252 Posts
| ||
|
Nitrogen
United States5345 Posts
i totally deserved both of them, haha. especially the week ban where i just posted "rage essay" in a strategy forum thread. | ||
|
Zapdos_Smithh
Canada2620 Posts
| ||
CaucasianAsian
Korea (South)11568 Posts
| ||
|
ghostWriter
United States3302 Posts
On January 16 2010 08:15 EvilTeletubby wrote: A few reasons went into that decision: 1) "Quoted for future ban" really comes off as backseat moderating. As everyone figures out pretty quickly, we generally don't like that, and TBH, we DO catch a lot of things on our own and take care of business pretty quickly IMO. 2) Whether someone posted something bannable or not, by quoting them, you are allowing the derailment of the thread to continue. Again, we will take out the trash. 3) We can read edited posts. 4) There were numerous people in that live report thread iirc all derailing it... I wanted to keep everything on topic. People should know better at this point. I always edit twice. | ||
|
ShaLLoW[baY]
Canada12499 Posts
Pretty sure that doesn't work anymore. | ||
| ||
