EPT
[Signup/Poll] Coach-Pupil League - Page 16
| Forum Index > BW General |
l10f
United States3241 Posts
| ||
|
Gao Xi
Hong Kong5178 Posts
On December 07 2009 02:15 Mekhami wrote: PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE vote python OUT of the maps pool, vote col2 or match point instead, nobody wants to play on python!! On December 07 2009 05:28 TheAntZ wrote: Vast majority dont want python. I think most people will want current maps, such as HBR, Desti, Match point, etc etc Well, wouldn't it be easier for people to improve if they're using maps like Python or Destination, since those maps are played a lot on iCCup? They should have like Python and other common maps in the map pool along with like Fighting Spirit or some of the newer maps, so there is a balance. On December 07 2009 08:10 Nevuk wrote: It's pointless to practice on python. It has almost no relation to modern maps. Python should be in it, since its pretty simple, so people could work on macro and stuff like that, instead of overcomplicating things with like strategies that don't work on all maps. | ||
|
l10f
United States3241 Posts
| ||
|
Chaos
United States772 Posts
On December 06 2009 17:24 Chaos- wrote: I signed up for being a co-coach but I'm only C rank highest. Possibly capable of getting higher but probably not this season. Maybe I can get a high ranked player for a co-coach? I really like teaching players and I think my game knowledge should be good enough to help anyone D- to C- pretty well. Hey no one commented on this. Does it seem like a possibility I can get a high ranked player to be a co-coach? I don't want to hinder a team just because I'm not a super high level. At the same time though I thinking having a coach/helper at a level closer to the players could help a lot for practice games. | ||
|
TheAntZ
Israel6248 Posts
| ||
|
LCC
Canada348 Posts
On December 07 2009 15:41 TheAntZ wrote: What criteria will you be using to discern which players are selected to be pupils? How active you are, availability, rank (D-/D probably guaranteed). | ||
Kinky
United States4126 Posts
| ||
|
Shinshady
Canada1237 Posts
| ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On December 07 2009 14:58 Gao Xi wrote: Well, wouldn't it be easier for people to improve if they're using maps like Python or Destination, since those maps are played a lot on iCCup? They should have like Python and other common maps in the map pool along with like Fighting Spirit or some of the newer maps, so there is a balance. Python should be in it, since its pretty simple, so people could work on macro and stuff like that, instead of overcomplicating things with like strategies that don't work on all maps. No, I mean, that's the point. Strategies that work on python don't work on newer maps. The difficult to take third means that 2base/1base strategies are heavily encouraged, which is the opposite of modern maps. It's very difficult to FE as P in pvz due to the wide nat. The ability to slowpush also makes tvp/pvt very different. Python probably will wind up making it in, and it's played really frequently, but it's out of date for any matchup but mirror matchups by a few years. There are people who are really good on python and terrible on other maps. | ||
|
Gao Xi
Hong Kong5178 Posts
For example, the maps could be like: Python Destination Fighting Spirit Match Point Moon Glaive So that people can learn to use 2base/1base strategies and also learn to do more modern strategy. If we only use new maps, it will probably be really tough for people to learn, because there could be like many possibilities, since the newer maps are a lot more complex than the older ones. | ||
|
Dark.Carnival
United States5095 Posts
| ||
|
Gao Xi
Hong Kong5178 Posts
On December 07 2009 14:58 Gao Xi wrote: Python should be in it, since its pretty simple, so people could work on macro and stuff like that, | ||
|
Nikon
Bulgaria5710 Posts
| ||
|
FyRe_DragOn
Canada2053 Posts
| ||
|
Gao Xi
Hong Kong5178 Posts
On December 07 2009 18:20 Nikoner wrote: Python is just terrible. It lends itself to early agression a bit too much since the rush distance is so short, and the quality of the games is rarely satisfying. That's just imo, but still... Helping people improve is more important than deciding whether the game was satisfying or not. | ||
|
Nikon
Bulgaria5710 Posts
| ||
|
QibingZero
2611 Posts
On December 07 2009 17:32 Gao Xi wrote: Since Python is simple, people could learn to macro better, since there isn't as much strategy needed. If you want a macro map, why not pick a better one? Andromeda is right there! | ||
|
BookTwo
1985 Posts
 | ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
| ||
|
Gao Xi
Hong Kong5178 Posts
On December 07 2009 20:03 QibingZero wrote: If you want a macro map, why not pick a better one? Andromeda is right there! Andromeda isn't as simple as Python | ||
| ||
