On August 19 2009 01:03 Myst- wrote: I actually don't prefer skinny women and I for sure hell don't like fat bitches. I like my women built in the right places. I absolutely love a big ass(Big and built, not some cottage cheese shit) and of course, big tits.
Here is a good example of a perfectly built woman(IMO):
Naomi?
she has a horse face
Pretty much a horse body too. I can't tell if she's standing like that to make her ass look bigger, or if she really has a completely contorted and inhuman spine.
And in the end, who is really attracted to a whore like this? Like maybe a few teenagers fantasize about abusing her for an hour, and then throwing her in the trash, but to me something isn't attractive if you don't want to keep it.
You are the epitome of stuck up internet guy, jesus
Sorry, Jibba.
I've got a better taste in sports teams and I come from a way better state, thank you very much.
On August 20 2009 04:14 ghostWriter wrote: Apparently the "a sexy chinese girl dancing" girl is not actually Chinese.
Of course she isn't she's actually got an ass and a set of tits!
On August 18 2009 18:30 zealing wrote: Lol at this blog... And I hope the world ends up like Wall-E, I would weigh 300+ to get that kind of chair man, those things had everything.
Lol, if those chairs existed, I would so be a fatass.
Btw. you should warn people about those pictures, my sister almost walked in on me, and if she did, she would think that I was watching porn.
Okay, one of the reasons why men are attracted to skinny females is because most men want to feel dominant and want to be the one that 'protects' her. It's logical that if the female is smaller or skinnier than the male, the male would feel that he is the dominant one in the relationship and would feel that he has the 'power' to protect his partner.
On August 18 2009 18:30 zealing wrote: Lol at this blog... And I hope the world ends up like Wall-E, I would weigh 300+ to get that kind of chair man, those things had everything.
Lol, if those chairs existed, I would so be a fatass.
Btw. you should warn people about those pictures, my sister almost walked in on me, and if she did, she would think that I was watching porn.
Okay, one of the reasons why men are attracted to skinny females is because most men want to feel dominant and want to be the one that 'protects' her. It's logical that if the female is smaller or skinnier than the male, the male would feel that he is the dominant one in the relationship and would feel that he has the 'power' to protect his partner.
Something like that. Kind of hard to explain...
i cant believe this is being discussed seriously
youre not going to date a girl with a huge ass if your peewee is small/standart size. You might, but it would be ludicrous. Some people got a taste for things like that, but in general its something that black people go for. Thats a part of a reason why every fat white woman still has a hope in this country. Whole booty thing is blown out of proportion here and blacks/latinos are a huge part of that. Youd see most europeans( not UK/ireland) seriously disgusted with obese people
On August 18 2009 19:21 Daigomi wrote: Why we prefer skinny women has to do with our culture, not with evolution. Some of the things you mentioned, like hips etc., are argued to be evolutionary. However, body weight has very little impact on species survival, and has changed a lot historically, which implies that it is cultural rather than fixed.
The reason why Reubens painted so many chubby girls, is because having more body weight than is needed implied that the person was rich, thus successful, thus should have appealing qualities. That doesn't mean that the said "wow, that women is ugly, but she must be intelligent." Being fat was perceived as being attractive, because it implied all these things. Many African cultures today still find overweight women more attractive. Women who are skinny are looked down upon in these cultures.
However, if you think about the attitudes we hold towards overweight people in first world countries, then it's easy to see where our predilection for skinny women comes from. Overweight people are assumed to be lazy, slothful, unsuccessful people, while someone in peak physical condition is considered to be hardworking, dedicated, and generally successful. So in countries where most people aren't skinny due to starvation, and where everyone has the abillity to become obese, becoming obese is seen as indicative of a weak character, while maintaining a healthy weight is seen as a sign of success.
good points, but different races of people are generally built in different ways to adapt to their locale. Native american/mexican peoples tended to have shorter stalkier builds with barrel chest which evolved from the mountain traveling/migrating they had to do. Black people are taller and have longer limbs so they could run from predators etc. So certain things like that may be more attractive based on race more than culture.
Why is it that most asian guys like blonde white chicks and lots of white guys like asian chicks? Is it just another subliminal product of evolution?
lots of nerds like asian girls from anime and games and shit.
Im amazed at some of the incredibly bland looking asian chicks with 0 curves that some of these guys drool over.
I like hot chicks.......I dont care where they are from =-)
but I agree with the OP. All of our attraction mechanisms are rooted in our dna, from millions and millions of years of evolution. Anything you find "attractive" about somebody means you think their genes would benefit your children.
It morphs from age to age (ie chubby women used to be sexy because it meant they had enough food = fed babies) but all the underlying reasons have remained unchanged.
On August 19 2009 14:54 KingofHearts wrote: this is what i call perfect body
Body comments aside - thanks for the link. Her site has some really nice ideas for recipes etc. Being a woman on TL I find seeing some of the people commenting calling women 'whales' pretty depressing, but each to their own I guess. I admit I have seen British men in the past with those big pot-bellies and gone 'ewh.' There's almost nothing less attractive than a man who looks pregnant aside from a man who is considered 'good looking' but has a rotten personality - for me that is the worst type of all.
what about the type of man that is really ugly and also has a rotten personality
I asked my sister who is a sociology/anthropology graduate (i'm not exactly sure what her credentials are, I just know she is into this kind of stuff). Query to her: + Show Spoiler +
Hey, I got a question for you; some people disagree with the thought that evolution controls much/most of how we select our mates. They suggest that it's most if not 100% all culture social conditioning, citing old england and places where fat=wealth and therefor more attractive as a mate. Or even 3rd world where food is scarce and everyone is skinny already. But I am more inclined to believe that evolution/adaptation play the major role with things like: Big beasts: More milk, more baby food. Better chance of baby survival. Hips/Ass: Big booty, less chance for birth complication, and more space for baby to chill. Athletic build: No run, no live. Long legs: bigger stride and jump. Also skinny girls are obviously not pregnant, So you can tell which mates are ready for seeding.
I'm not saying this is the only thing that drives it, but I'm assuming that it is the primary catalyst that even sets off the 'cultural evolutiuon' (if you wanna call it that). What do you think?
And this is what she had to say:
Well really there is no arguement because evolution and culture etc, are part of the same mechanism...they really are talking about the same things. Cultural change or choice if you want to call it that is still survival of the fittest even if it is persuaded by thought of the times, it is still part of evolution. They cannot really be pieced out in that way, they are interrelated. Kinda like nature vs. nurture, it is both, not either or. Cultural or social choices though are more short term evolutionary trends, whereas evolution as a whole is seen as a slow=going kind of thing...it really has fast parts to it as well. Hard to explain, but true.
By the way...larger breasts do not carry more milk...that is a myth, so there is another reason they are currently being selected by mates in much of the world the last 30-50 years, but these trends change and this one has been on the rise for some time but they are not universal or permanent. Maybe it is just persuasion of the cinema and media and fashion and liberation that caused the trend, or maybe it is the misunderstanding of males who think that they carry more milk, or maybe it is completely outside of any logic and we just don't know why these things occur completely. Males are also attracted to larger eyes, smaller jaw structures and fuller bottom lips...how do all of those things make sense?
On August 20 2009 08:20 KurtistheTurtle wrote: oh my GOD that redhead
but I agree with the OP. All of our attraction mechanisms are rooted in our dna, from millions and millions of years of evolution. Anything you find "attractive" about somebody means you think their genes would benefit your children.
It morphs from age to age (ie chubby women used to be sexy because it meant they had enough food = fed babies) but all the underlying reasons have remained unchanged.
I wondered about it myself once, why the hell would a non fat person be more attractive aesthetically and sexually? I think it's fairly obvious, fat implies that the person isn't physically active and does not care about his appearance, is lazy and there is always a genetic or mental reason behind it. And you only want the best, most evolved genes to mix your genes with so your progeny is even more improved genetically than yourself.
to express, but in better constructed english.
In our age of prosperity and food paradise fat sucks, it's way less necessary than before. Hovewer i'm not sure if it was ever a true sexual attraction, rather than just a short term trend in various societies.
And i forgot to comment about by far the most important point of the thread, this female is just ridiculously good. If there is more of her, post it or PM.
On August 20 2009 14:37 CharlieMurphy wrote: Males are also attracted to larger eyes, smaller jaw structures and fuller bottom lips...how do all of those things make sense?
Interesting point too, ultimately most of us seek signs that a female is fragile, feminine in a delicate way, with useless and even terrible for survival features like thin arms, big ass and well shaped breasts. We subconsciously consider women to be a jar, with geometrically flawless shape of body and face implying state of overall dna's unfaulty (hence symmetrical face and body that are considered more appealing) and genetic development and hormonal sufficiency (delicate curvy features that required work of many generations), we really only care for her to carry our kids, and the more precious the jar is, the better, and the more of different quality jars, the better also. We don't need our females to be able to survive by themselves, their survival is kind of our business.
and unsexiness of fat ones, it isn't about athletic and survivability part but it gives clues to assume if these women are active, lively and healthy or not.
I'm not sure about in the West, but I've heard that in Korea and China, being fat was a sign of your economic and social status because there wasn't enough food for everyone to eat. Being fat meant that you had enough money to eat enough to sustain life and then some. But now, with most people being able to purchase enough food to stay alive (in developed countries) and healthier foods like fruits and vegetables are more expensive than processed foods (like what you can find in McDonalds) that encourage weight gain, being skinnier seems to display your social and economic status. Also, being skinny means you have time to exercise and maybe even have some machines in your house or a gym membership which also cost time and money.
On August 20 2009 14:37 CharlieMurphy wrote: I asked my sister who is a sociology/anthropology graduate (i'm not exactly sure what her credentials are, I just know she is into this kind of stuff). Query to her: + Show Spoiler +
Hey, I got a question for you; some people disagree with the thought that evolution controls much/most of how we select our mates. They suggest that it's most if not 100% all culture social conditioning, citing old england and places where fat=wealth and therefor more attractive as a mate. Or even 3rd world where food is scarce and everyone is skinny already. But I am more inclined to believe that evolution/adaptation play the major role with things like: Big beasts: More milk, more baby food. Better chance of baby survival. Hips/Ass: Big booty, less chance for birth complication, and more space for baby to chill. Athletic build: No run, no live. Long legs: bigger stride and jump. Also skinny girls are obviously not pregnant, So you can tell which mates are ready for seeding.
I'm not saying this is the only thing that drives it, but I'm assuming that it is the primary catalyst that even sets off the 'cultural evolutiuon' (if you wanna call it that). What do you think?
Well really there is no arguement because evolution and culture etc, are part of the same mechanism...they really are talking about the same things. Cultural change or choice if you want to call it that is still survival of the fittest even if it is persuaded by thought of the times, it is still part of evolution. They cannot really be pieced out in that way, they are interrelated. Kinda like nature vs. nurture, it is both, not either or. Cultural or social choices though are more short term evolutionary trends, whereas evolution as a whole is seen as a slow=going kind of thing...it really has fast parts to it as well. Hard to explain, but true.
By the way...larger breasts do not carry more milk...that is a myth, so there is another reason they are currently being selected by mates in much of the world the last 30-50 years, but these trends change and this one has been on the rise for some time but they are not universal or permanent. Maybe it is just persuasion of the cinema and media and fashion and liberation that caused the trend, or maybe it is the misunderstanding of males who think that they carry more milk, or maybe it is completely outside of any logic and we just don't know why these things occur completely. Males are also attracted to larger eyes, smaller jaw structures and fuller bottom lips...how do all of those things make sense?
Alright, I can't go on any longer without pointing out how wrong "athletic build: no run, no live" really is. First of all, it's got nothing to do with Africans. There's like half a dozen different major archetypes of Africans and they're mostly not tall and muscular. Growing big and strong is a function of the food you have to eat. N. Koreans don't get enough protein so they're tiny. S. Koreans and Japanese have grown significantly since WW2 because they get more protein in their diets. Second, humans don't outrun wild land predators. We're not strong and we're not fast, but we have big brains and that's why we get in groups and poke things with sticks.
Also, I don't know how many super fit chicks you know, but it's more difficult for athletic women to get pregnant than non-athletic women. That's kind of a shitty feature if you want to grow your species. Big breasts are also less practical, and I don't really know what to say about the "long legs=bigger jump" comment. The growth of civilization didn't take place in Prince of Persia towers.
Also, being "fat" and having a slow metabolism are good things when we're talking about the evolutionary process. For the first 99% of human existence, no one ever died from eating too much.
On August 18 2009 17:37 CharlieMurphy wrote: So really it's not a surprise or even something so bad when fat kids get made fun of in school, or obese people are such a circus act when viewed in public. Deep down we all know that they wouldn't survive in a survival of the fittest (literally).
Surely it's no surprise. Though why do you say it's not a bad thing? I strongly disagree.
Nature doesn't dictate morality. Simply because something can be seen in accordance with the natural order of things does not make it acceptable. While it may be perfectly acceptable for animals, we are not so innocent. Human beings are actually intelligent enough to be conscientious of their thoughts and actions.