|
http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=15881927
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 7750 Kuma 2.7GHz MOBO: GIGABYTE GA-MA78GM-US2H AM2+/AM2 AMD 780G RAM: PNY OPTIMA 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 HDD: Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 ST31000528AS 1TB 7200 RPM PSU: Antec earthwatts EA380 380W Continuous Power ATX12V v2.0 Graphics: on board
Probably going to end up ordering it tonight.
Any comments / recommendations? This computer is going to be handling vigorous, vigorous web surfing, sometimes maybe over 4 tabs at a time!
|
|
It will be able to handle most things. You could probably run oblivion on it without much lag and you could run TF2/HL2 with a little lag on it, it should be able to take like 10 tabs easily.
|
Looks good to me if the only thing you're going to do is vigorous web surfing :D
|
$330 for this madness? man, technology is upgrading so fast..
|
Dominican Republic106 Posts
You could probably drop an extra hundred bucks for a video card and you would be able to play a lot of stuff on that comp.
|
|
why on board graphics instead of a cheap card?
|
I'd splurge that extra $20 for 2x2 ddr2 if it's going to be onboard video. That or the $40 for a low profile video card. Or both
|
On July 11 2009 04:30 geometryb wrote: why on board graphics instead of a cheap card? mainly because i want to keep it quiet and not spend too much on it. there are a lot of cheap passive cooling cards for like $50 but if the on board graphics can handle vista then might as well save $50, if not we could always purchase a card later.
|
On July 11 2009 04:29 decafchicken wrote:on baord graphics? BLASPHAME. at least get something oh i would but it's not for me and the person using it doesn't play any games.
|
On July 11 2009 04:36 mahnini wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2009 04:30 geometryb wrote: why on board graphics instead of a cheap card? mainly because i want to keep it quiet and not spend too much on it. there are a lot of cheap passive cooling cards for like $50 but if the on board graphics can handle vista then might as well save $50, if not we could always purchase a card later.
if you want to later upgrade your graphics card, you're gonna need to get a new mobo along with it cus its integrated graphics. So later on down the road, its not going to cost just $50 for a new vid card.
|
On July 11 2009 04:41 renegade_zerg wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2009 04:36 mahnini wrote:On July 11 2009 04:30 geometryb wrote: why on board graphics instead of a cheap card? mainly because i want to keep it quiet and not spend too much on it. there are a lot of cheap passive cooling cards for like $50 but if the on board graphics can handle vista then might as well save $50, if not we could always purchase a card later. if you want to later upgrade your graphics card, you're gonna need to get a new mobo along with it cus its integrated graphics. So later on down the road, its not going to cost just $50 for a new vid card. hm? it has a pci e x16 slot. am i safe in assuming i can just plug in another card and just ignore the on board?
|
United States24495 Posts
On July 11 2009 04:20 Jusciax wrote: $330 for this madness? man, technology is upgrading so fast.. So true. It wasn't that long ago that hard drives were under 100 gigs (my earliest computers were under 1 gig lol), processors were under a gigabit (iirc I had a 760 celeron not all that long ago), and memory was God knows how tiny. Large monitors were also 75 pounds, there was no reasonable analogue to usb, mouses/mice sucked, keyboards sucked, portable media sucked.
Now it's so convenient but young people take it for granted.
|
On July 11 2009 04:43 mahnini wrote: hm? it has a pci e x16 slot. am i safe in assuming i can just plug in another card and just ignore the on board?
Yes you can.
|
On July 11 2009 04:41 renegade_zerg wrote: if you want to later upgrade your graphics card, you're gonna need to get a new mobo along with it cus its integrated graphics. So later on down the road, its not going to cost just $50 for a new vid card. This is not how onboard graphics works.
|
On July 11 2009 04:41 renegade_zerg wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2009 04:36 mahnini wrote:On July 11 2009 04:30 geometryb wrote: why on board graphics instead of a cheap card? mainly because i want to keep it quiet and not spend too much on it. there are a lot of cheap passive cooling cards for like $50 but if the on board graphics can handle vista then might as well save $50, if not we could always purchase a card later. if you want to later upgrade your graphics card, you're gonna need to get a new mobo along with it cus its integrated graphics. So later on down the road, its not going to cost just $50 for a new vid card. lol
I'd say, go with a cheap set of 2x2GB DDR2-800 ram rather than 2x1 and go with a 64-bit system. No reason not to nowadays. Especially since most sets hover a little over $40. Something like this: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227267
Otherwise it all looks good.
Edit: Might want to switch to a different case with free shipping, as it will cost you at least 20 bucks no matter what size you choose, throwing off your budget a bit.
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
This isn't intel integrated graphics. It's AMD integrated graphics. The onboard graphics is equivalent to a ATI 3200 chip. You could play games on this. It also handles HD video very well.
|
damn i really need to upgrade mine T.T
|
|
|
|