|
extremism and nutjob are different
nutjob implies that human reasoning are logic are beyond a person, i.e. they're fucking crazy, crazy enough to shoot people. Extremism implies their views are very disagreeable from the mainstream.
While I would prefer not to defend white supremacists, I sincerely believe that the chance a white supremacist will go around and shoot people up is about the same as a bunch of radical environmentalists would blow up an "environmentally damaging" factory. In other words, its an outlier.
|
And it's that violent outlier that the report was concerned with.
|
Nutjob implies that the mainstream's perspective is that human reasoning and logic are beyond a person.
Oh shi-...
|
In the eyes of an increasingly out of control government, any libertarian is an extremist... Neolibs/cons are the true extremists, it just so happens that they're in power, so the opposite group (classical liberals) are the ones going to get arrested. The winners write history.
|
Not this garbage again... What, do you feel some sort of kinship with the murderers?
|
On June 11 2009 09:58 Mindcrime wrote: Not this garbage again... What, do you feel some sort of kinship with the murderers? Assuming you're talking to me, that's guilt by association. I dislike Obama, therefore I must be a racist. What murderers are we talking of?
|
The sort of extremists that the report was actually talking about; two murderers, one that murdered an abortion provider and another that attempted to shoot up the Holocaust Museum.
|
I hadn't even read the report before, but it is what it is, guild by association, 'if you believe this this and this then surely you're a potential cop-killer' sort of deal. How can you read this and not for a second think that the government may just be trying to demonize libertarians, paleo-conservatives, conspiracy theorists, or whatever else they can group together?
I've seen worse reports tbh, have you read the MIAC report? It says people who have watched America Freedom to Fascism are potential anti-government militia members. I've watched it and it's a hell of a movie, that doesn't mean I'll be up in arms shooting people, that's ridiculous. These agencies and Washington D.C. are the true conspiracy nutjobs, they believe people are out to get them. Can you believe that?
|
United States20661 Posts
The plurality of Americans are happily independent moderates free of party affiliation.
Extremists/whackos/weirdos/nutjobs are in the superminiscule minority. Unfortunately, media attention conflates their status to more than what it truly is. Something of a paper tiger in US society.
|
the thing is there is a lot of guilt by association here
"white supremacist groups, antigovernment extremists and militia movements.."
by associating antigovernment with being white supremacists, its an easy way to control freedom of speech.
|
|
|
joe the plumber never actually said that he wants to members of congress shot, so nice twisting of reality there. Not that joe the plumber is in any way relevant. The rest of the complains, i.e glenn beck, is not extremism, but rather political reality. Had you watched the video, rather than convulsing in shock that someone dared to criticize Obama, you will have seen Glenn Beck had people define what economic Fascism is. Unfortunately, Obama, America, fits that definition ATM. You don't need to butcher a minority to be a Fascist.
Anyways, I would agree that this recession/a far left president, has fueled extremist in the right. Not particularly surprising. Theres always an upswing of extremism when the economy goes south, in any nation.
|
On June 11 2009 10:20 Caller wrote: the thing is there is a lot of guilt by association here
"white supremacist groups, antigovernment extremists and militia movements.."
by associating antigovernment with being white supremacists, its an easy way to control freedom of speech.
words are important
|
On June 11 2009 10:47 fusionsdf wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2009 10:20 Caller wrote: the thing is there is a lot of guilt by association here
"white supremacist groups, antigovernment extremists and militia movements.."
by associating antigovernment with being white supremacists, its an easy way to control freedom of speech. words are important so are broad interpretations
what's to define an "antigovernment" extremist, anyways? Anarchists? Libertarians? Conservatives? Moderates?
|
extremist isnt as broad as the people in this thread are making it out to be
the amount of intellectual dishonesty in this thread is staggering.
Militia movements is real broad, brah. That could be cub scouts!
|
On June 11 2009 10:47 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2009 10:47 fusionsdf wrote:On June 11 2009 10:20 Caller wrote: the thing is there is a lot of guilt by association here
"white supremacist groups, antigovernment extremists and militia movements.."
by associating antigovernment with being white supremacists, its an easy way to control freedom of speech. words are important so are broad interpretations what's to define an "antigovernment" extremist, anyways? Anarchists? Libertarians? Conservatives? Moderates?
I dont know. Maybe antigovernment is people unsatisfied with the government and "extremists and militia movements" are, you know, people who want to act on that dissatisfaction. Pretty sure the little old lady who votes republican or libertarian isnt an extremist
|
|
Hey guys.
Voting republican has nothing to do with extremism. It has to do with being right wing.
Being right wing and killing people because of a political agenda, however, seems to fit nicely under the blanket of right wing extremism, the phenomenon mentioned in the report this thread was about. Killing people is generally distasteful and most people would seem to believe that killing people certifies you as an extremist, not voting for the GOP.
No one's saying that voting for the GOP means you're an extremist. Way to create a MASSIVE obfuscation. Intellectual dishonesty? In SPADES.
If you want to argue against the paper's predictions, your best bet is to state that the level of extremism hasn't changed and the sole differentiation between now and a few months ago was a series of statistically unimportant outbursts from that latent population of extremism. This argument, however, is severely rebuked by the statements that the perps have given; the situation is nearly exactly as was predicted in the paper.
|
On June 11 2009 11:10 L wrote: Hey guys.
Voting republican has nothing to do with extremism. It has to do with being right wing.
Being right wing and killing people because of a political agenda, however, seems to fit nicely under the blanket of right wing extremism, the phenomenon mentioned in the report this thread was about. Killing people is generally distasteful and most people would seem to believe that killing people certifies you as an extremist, not voting for the GOP.
No one's saying that voting for the GOP means you're an extremist. Way to create a MASSIVE obfuscation. Intellectual dishonesty? In SPADES.
If you want to argue against the paper's predictions, your best bet is to state that the level of extremism hasn't changed and the sole differentiation between now and a few months ago was a series of statistically unimportant outbursts from that latent population of extremism. This argument, however, is severely rebuked by the statements that the perps have given; the situation is nearly exactly as was predicted in the paper. Incrementalism. Today, you got Glenn Beck and a few reports here and there from governmental agencies. Tomorrow, there will be talks of banning their speech. That's why you got to be mad at stuff like these. The MIAC report is old news but heres a little something about it: http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin500.htm
Also militia movements aren't illegal. Guns aren't illegal. Believing in anything isn't illegal. Why portrait these people as dangerous? Simple, the government is scared of (peaceful) people who are against their increasing power.
|
|
|
|