Russo-Ukrainian War Thread - Page 276
Forum Index > General Forum |
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. | ||
KwarK
United States41470 Posts
| ||
a_ch
Russian Federation240 Posts
On October 12 2022 09:33 Sermokala wrote: Just wait until you find out about our video games books movies and tv shows about Russia. -well, that's one sort of things (and in my 40-s I've seen lots of it), but lying to your own people in order to form public opinion, or manipulate them into doing something - I thought was possible only in Russia, with most of the media belonging to the state. On October 12 2022 09:47 aseq wrote: Disregarding the exact % and levels of poverty, I think it's preposterous when you're the biggest country in the world, with a relatively small population, you have the most natural resources of any country and you've been exporting these for 50 years, yet you can't manage to increase average wealth above average European levels. And then you want to expand into land with people who don't want to be part of your country to force them to the same standard? Some self-reflection would be in place. -considering economics, Russia did a really good job in the last ~20 years. A good specialist in Moscow can now earn +- the same as in any large European cities. There are problems still, but incomparable to what has been in the 1990s. As it was mentioned here recently, Ukrainian GDP pc is ~3 times lower, so "force them to the same standard" doesn't look that bad - and I believe that was the prime reason for Crimea people voting for joining Russia in 2014. Regarding the Ukrainian territories - there has been the case that Russian troops left the northern Ukrainian regions after negotiations in April - without being really forced to. The annexiations in the south-east also happened only 1/2 year after those territories have been captured. So at least at the start of the war the land grab didn't look like the ultimate goal | ||
Artesimo
Germany535 Posts
On October 12 2022 15:47 schaf wrote: The Lord giveth and the lord taketh away. Elon Musk limits Starlink use in frontline regions: Report on the effects: https://www.ft.com/content/9a7b922b-2435-4ac7-acdb-0ec9a6dc8397 I thought the outages on the frontline were because Starlink was deactivated in russian occupied territory and ukraine was simply advancing too fast. If that is not the case I really hope these outages are because russia has figured out a way to jam it locally. I really don't want to wake up to some news that Musk aligns with russia now. Or that he got pissed because the former ukrainian ambassador to germany insulted him on twitter and decided to teach ukraine a lesson. EDIT: To specify, with align I don't mean his recent stupid twitter brainfarts, but more actively working in their interest. | ||
Broetchenholer
Germany1840 Posts
| ||
Acrofales
Spain17677 Posts
On October 12 2022 16:39 Artesimo wrote: I thought the outages on the frontline were because Starlink was deactivated in russian occupied territory and ukraine was simply advancing too fast. If that is not the case I really hope these outages are because russia has figured out a way to jam it locally. I really don't want to wake up to some news that Musk aligns with russia now. Or that he got pissed because the former ukrainian ambassador to germany insulted him on twitter and decided to teach ukraine a lesson. EDIT: To specify, with align I don't mean his recent stupid twitter brainfarts, but more actively working in their interest. I don't think we have to attribute actual Russia-favouring intent here. Elon Musk is a spoiled manchild with an ego the size of the moon. Maybe Zelensky's tweet hurt him, so he's taking his ball and walking. Because Elon Musk being a giant asshole should really not come as a surprise to anybody. | ||
0x64
Finland4492 Posts
On October 12 2022 16:33 a_ch wrote: -well, that's one sort of things (and in my 40-s I've seen lots of it), but lying to your own people in order to form public opinion, or manipulate them into doing something - I thought was possible only in Russia, with most of the media belonging to the state. -considering economics, Russia did a really good job in the last ~20 years. A good specialist in Moscow can now earn +- the same as in any large European cities. There are problems still, but incomparable to what has been in the 1990s. As it was mentioned here recently, Ukrainian GDP pc is ~3 times lower, so "force them to the same standard" doesn't look that bad - and I believe that was the prime reason for Crimea people voting for joining Russia in 2014. Regarding the Ukrainian territories - there has been the case that Russian troops left the northern Ukrainian regions after negotiations in April - without being really forced to. The annexiations in the south-east also happened only 1/2 year after those territories have been captured. So at least at the start of the war the land grab didn't look like the ultimate goal Lol, Crimea voting to join Russia. Voting and Russia in the same sentence does not work. You can't vote with a gun pointed at your head. The power of denial is incredibly huge in Russian culture. I guess that's what happen when everyone not in denial leaves the country or is killed (I am talking about the 20th century, not the last 30 years). Not teaching about the atrocity of the Stalinian regime in school after the fall of communism was the biggest mistake that was made. Not being able to solve political assassinations is already by itself living 50 years in the past. You can earn all the money in the world, quality of life will not follow but for a small percentage. You may be one of the privileged one, but I can assure you that life is hard in the suburbs of Moscow and Saint-Petersburg. Not even closely comparable to what I've seen in other large cities in Europe. For me it was quite a shock to see the quality of infrastructure, it is a miracle people are not dying every day from the electrical work. I though it was a cliché to have the light dim when the neighbour use an electrical drill until I saw it from my own eyes. It is clear that last 20 years has seen a lot of improvement and that the posh area around the city center is getting huge. But just like it took a long time to see improvements, it will take some time for you to notice the decline. And you will be told "but at least we are not declining as fast as Europeans" and that will keep you happy. | ||
RolleMcKnolle
Germany1054 Posts
On October 12 2022 16:50 Broetchenholer wrote: Yeah, because back then the northern front was so incredibly overextended that even Russian political leadership understood that it was untenable. And in the south they probably wanted to wait until they actually controlled all of the regions they now claimed as part of Russia. They still had hopes that their special operation would end in a victory, allowing them to hold a little less ridiculous referendums. In regards to Germany trying to bleed out a geopolitical opponent, dude, if anything, Germany is an economic empire. The only thing that would make sense for Germany to increase its imperial standing would be to end this war as quickly as possible to go back to normal. How stupid would German government need to be to intentionally stagnate the economy for economic imperial reasons? I was actually unclear in my wording, the main power trying to bleed out Russia are the US. Germany is/was interested in ambivalent relations to Russia, cutting into their zone of influence while still keeping the trade relations up. So the US are doubly winning here by bleeding out Russia on the one hand and destroying European-Russian relations on the other hand. All projects of Euro-Asian integration like NordStream 2 or by now even NordStream 1 and Russian trade are off the table. This takes away a lot of potential German influence independent of the US, especially since Europe is now going to be very dependent of LNG which can be way easier influenced by the US than Russian gas. I think Germany would have preferred to not have this war break out and Russia be a petrol station. The US on the other hand are very happy about it. | ||
Ardias
Russian Federation592 Posts
On October 12 2022 18:18 0x64 wrote: Lol, Crimea voting to join Russia. Voting and Russia in the same sentence does not work. You can't vote with a gun pointed at your head. The power of denial is incredibly huge in Russian culture. I guess that's what happen when everyone not in denial leaves the country or is killed (I am talking about the 20th century, not the last 30 years). Not teaching about the atrocity of the Stalinian regime in school after the fall of communism was the biggest mistake that was made. Not being able to solve political assassinations is already by itself living 50 years in the past. You can earn all the money in the world, quality of life will not follow but for a small percentage. You may be one of the privileged one, but I can assure you that life is hard in the suburbs of Moscow and Saint-Petersburg. Not even closely comparable to what I've seen in other large cities in Europe. For me it was quite a shock to see the quality of infrastructure, it is a miracle people are not dying every day from the electrical work. I though it was a cliché to have the light dim when the neighbour use an electrical drill until I saw it from my own eyes. It is clear that last 20 years has seen a lot of improvement and that the posh area around the city center is getting huge. But just like it took a long time to see improvements, it will take some time for you to notice the decline. And you will be told "but at least we are not declining as fast as Europeans" and that will keep you happy. I live 1200 km from Moscow and 750 km from St. Petersburg in an apartment building that is older than my parents and work at a job that is on the average by Russian standards. Yet I have to find ton of hardships in my life. What exactly is hard for me here and how it differs from Europe? I still try to get some kind of exact answer from this thread. | ||
a_ch
Russian Federation240 Posts
On October 12 2022 18:18 0x64 wrote: Lol, Crimea voting to join Russia. Voting and Russia in the same sentence does not work. You can't vote with a gun pointed at your head. The power of denial is incredibly huge in Russian culture. I guess that's what happen when everyone not in denial leaves the country or is killed (I am talking about the 20th century, not the last 30 years). Not teaching about the atrocity of the Stalinian regime in school after the fall of communism was the biggest mistake that was made. Not being able to solve political assassinations is already by itself living 50 years in the past. You can earn all the money in the world, quality of life will not follow but for a small percentage. You may be one of the privileged one, but I can assure you that life is hard in the suburbs of Moscow and Saint-Petersburg. Not even closely comparable to what I've seen in other large cities in Europe. For me it was quite a shock to see the quality of infrastructure, it is a miracle people are not dying every day from the electrical work. I though it was a cliché to have the light dim when the neighbour use an electrical drill until I saw it from my own eyes. It is clear that last 20 years has seen a lot of improvement and that the posh area around the city center is getting huge. But just like it took a long time to see improvements, it will take some time for you to notice the decline. And you will be told "but at least we are not declining as fast as Europeans" and that will keep you happy. >>The power of denial is incredibly huge in Russian culture. I guess that's what happen when everyone not in denial leaves the country or is killed -tells me a person, who believes that the voting in Crimea was done under a gunpoint. There are plenty of videos of mass celebrations on that day in Sevastopol. If that's not a good indicator of a strong public opinion on the matter, I don't know what is. In regrads to infrastructure problems - there definitely are, but I see lots of them being solved, and not only in the Moscow center. And as I mentioned before, my relatives live in Munich - so if it was so much worse here, I'd long left the country. | ||
Silvanel
Poland4662 Posts
I also used to work with a guy who fled Crimea in 2014 in fear of his life (cause he dint want to speak Russian). Yeah those refernedums are really trustworthy... Entire world wants to be Russia, such a prosperous, rich and happy country | ||
Simberto
Germany11194 Posts
On October 12 2022 18:56 a_ch wrote: >>The power of denial is incredibly huge in Russian culture. I guess that's what happen when everyone not in denial leaves the country or is killed -tells me a person, who believes that the voting in Crimea was done under a gunpoint. There are plenty of videos of mass celebrations on that day in Sevastopol. If that's not a good indicator of a strong public opinion on the matter, I don't know what is. In regrads to infrastructure problems - there definitely are, but I see lots of them being solved, and not only in the Moscow center. And as I mentioned before, my relatives live in Munich - so if it was so much worse here, I'd long left the country. Like the other Russian guy before you, you have no fucking clue how elections are supposed to work. I would highly recommend you read the English language Wikipedia entry of the 201 Crimean referendum. It is fun, and clearly shows how fair and legal the procedure was. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum A few choice bits: (Runup to the referendum) On February 27, Russian forces cut the Crimean Peninsula off from the mainland Ukraine and took over Supreme Council of Crimea. Under armed occupation, the Crimean regional government was dissolved and reformed, and voted to hold a referendum on the status of Crimea on May 25. "it is impossible to find out whether all the 64 members of the 100-member legislature who were registered as present, when the two decisions were voted on or whether someone else used the plastic voting cards of some of them" because due to the armed occupation of parliament it was unclear how many members of parliament were present. Russian militia commander Igor Girkin recounted that his squad "collected" the deputies into the chambers, and had to "forcibly drive them to vote". And some fun stuff about the procedure itself: The voting boxes were transparent and the ballots were not placed in envelopes in such a way as to make the marked ballots visible through the box walls. I know that you have no experience with fair elections in Russia. But come on. An election where everyone can see what you voted for, while the country is currently occupied by an armed foreign military, can be fairly described as "At gunpoint". And it must be obvious even to a Russian that this process will not lead to a fair and unbiased view on the opinions of the population. There is a reason that elections need to be secret in any country that gives a shit about democracy. | ||
a_ch
Russian Federation240 Posts
On October 12 2022 19:22 Silvanel wrote: Mass celebrations, love those things, I still remmeber communist times when people had to attend them and celebrate or else... I also used to work with a guy who fled Crimea in 2014 in fear of his life (cause he dint want to speak Russian). Yeah those refernedums are really trustworthy... I'm sure there were people in Crimea who were unhappy with joining Russia. The question is whether they were the majority or not. And it is quite easy to differ a mass event with obligatory attendance from a real one, especially since here we are quite experienced in observing both of the types | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21157 Posts
On October 12 2022 18:56 a_ch wrote:-tells me a person, who believes that the voting in Crimea was done under a gunpoint. Its literally the world vs the likes of Syria and Bolivia on this. When even your own supposed allies like China refuse to recognise your actions maybe you should have a hard think about whether your on the right side of history. | ||
zatic
Zurich15302 Posts
On October 12 2022 19:32 a_ch wrote: I'm sure there were people in Crimea who were unhappy with joining Russia. The question is whether they were the majority or not. And it is quite easy to differ a mass event with obligatory attendance from a real one, especially since here we are quite experienced in observing both of the types No, that's not the question. Even if - if - there was a majority for joining Russia in Crimea, the vote was still done at gun point after foreign invasion. But again, because it was done at gun point after foreign invasion we can't possibly know that. | ||
a_ch
Russian Federation240 Posts
On October 12 2022 19:36 Gorsameth wrote: Its literally the world vs the likes of Syria and Bolivia on this. When even your own supposed allies like China refuse to recognise your actions maybe you should have a hard think about whether your on the right side of history. I don't see where I stated what is right or wrong. My claim is that the popular opinion in Crimea at that time was strongly favored towards joining Russia, period. Even the Wikipedia article dosn't put any statements, claiming this is utterly wrong; just some minor details, like blaming transparent boxes (though I'd rather believe in attempts of ballots stuffing /which was the main reason for introducing transparent boxes in the first place/, than to the idea of an FSB officer monitoring how you voted), etc. My own opinion at that time was strongly against annexiation, as my wife was a regular visitor of these places, and the referendum has resulted in drastic changes in Crimea, many of which unfavorable. | ||
Simberto
Germany11194 Posts
On October 12 2022 19:48 a_ch wrote: I don't see where I stated what is right or wrong. My claim is that the popular opinion in Crimea at that time was strongly favored towards joining Russia, period. Even the Wikipedia article dosn't put any statements, claiming this is utterly wrong; just some minor details, like blaming transparent boxes (though I'd rather believe in attempts of ballots stuffing /which was the main reason for introducing transparent boxes in the first place/, than to the idea of an FSB officer monitoring how you voted), etc. My own opinion at that time was strongly against annexiation, as my wife was a regular visitor of these places, and the referendum has resulted in drastic changes in Crimea, may of which unfavorable. And you have put forth exactly nothing to support your claim, except that "there were celebrations". Furthermore, no. Voting is a solved problem. We know how to conduct fair, equal and secure elections. Transparent booths are not involved in that. The fact that you don't believe that those might be problematic shows very clearly that you have no clue about how actually good elections are run. And the fact that the voting in Crimea was handled like that shows very clearly that "fair, secure and equal" was not a goal of that "referendum". The core idea that you seem unable to grasp is that if the voting process is majorly flawed, the result is completely worthless and should not be used in an argument for anything. And transparent booths while under occupation is the definition of a majorly flawed process. And honestly, i find it really hard to believe that you don't grasp this. | ||
a_ch
Russian Federation240 Posts
On October 12 2022 19:43 zatic wrote: No, that's not the question. Even if - if - there was a majority for joining Russia in Crimea, the vote was still done at gun point after foreign invasion. But again, because it was done at gun point after foreign invasion we can't possibly know that. >but how would you imagine the opposite? Like, US, Europe and UN observers come and monitor the voting? In this case they'd likely to have to acknowledge the results, which apparently is not the case if joining Russia wins. Similar as why no UN or western-media guys visit Elenovka prison after the explosion that killed 60 Azov POWs? Any other reasons other than "it has to be Russians as they are evil"? | ||
Ardias
Russian Federation592 Posts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballot_box#/media/File:Виборчі_урни_в_Україні.jpg "Big ballot boxes in Ukraine, with control blank already in them on the beginning of voting day of the Election of the President of Ukraine of March 31, 2019, polling station 800143, Kyiv." | ||
Velr
Switzerland10534 Posts
Different countries do this stuff different but having them basically at gunpoint is a big nono for obvious reasons. | ||
Silvanel
Poland4662 Posts
Regarding the numbered ballot boxes, I can imagine two situations: -Several voting districts voting in same physical place and each ballot box is for different district -Several elections being held at the same time (local and national for example) and each ballot box is for different election Four seems like a big number though and makes errors likely in case You that number matters. | ||
| ||