|
On April 14 2018 19:06 Holyflare wrote:
You're not even evaluating the cop checks properly at all. You think we should "resolve" it but that means lynching me or rayn and if you lynch me you auto rayn next cycle and if one of those roles do exist you just lose.
I think one of you two should be the lynch as it stands, yes. Unless someone drops a case for scum!ExO.
But if that results in a ML then you never ever auto next cycle since that would be LYLO.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I think it's rber rolee cop and miller with rayn or myself being a miller.
|
On April 14 2018 19:12 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2018 19:06 Holyflare wrote:
You're not even evaluating the cop checks properly at all. You think we should "resolve" it but that means lynching me or rayn and if you lynch me you auto rayn next cycle and if one of those roles do exist you just lose. I think one of you two should be the lynch as it stands, yes. Unless someone drops a case for scum!ExO. But if that results in a ML then you never ever auto next cycle since that would be LYLO.
so trust the check
but don’t trust the check
|
like if you believe the check you lycnh both fucking players 100%.
you cant lynch one, flip a townie and go well fuck guess I was wrong about the check being right and not kill the second player because that is admitting you never believed the check in the first place
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 14 2018 19:12 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2018 19:06 Holyflare wrote:
You're not even evaluating the cop checks properly at all. You think we should "resolve" it but that means lynching me or rayn and if you lynch me you auto rayn next cycle and if one of those roles do exist you just lose. I think one of you two should be the lynch as it stands, yes. Unless someone drops a case for scum!ExO. But if that results in a ML then you never ever auto next cycle since that would be LYLO.
So resolve the claim arbitrarily and then do analysis on whether the other person is mafia :D
|
On April 14 2018 19:12 Holyflare wrote:
Even if you think we definitely contain mafia in this 50/50 there's 2 mafia left outside of the claims.
9 players left, in a group of 3 you think one is definitely mafia for some unknown reason.
5 players (don't include yourself obviously from your perspective) contain 2 mafia. One of those players (ts) is claimed blue. So you have 4 players to find 2 mafia in:
Ch, vivax, Skynx, oats.
I'm pretty sure I've seen you say vivax is town maybe (could be completely bs that I just made up but he's either mafia playing the most spammy game of his life by almost double the filter size or town) so that's oats/ch/skynx contains two mafia.
Why do you want to lynch a shit show that might not even contain mafia when you have a 66% chance (or higher, 100%! if we were framed!) to find mafia?
I think the NKs point to at least one (dunno how many) of you/ rayn/ Vivax because why else would AFK people keep dying over you guys? So when ExO popped in and was like "hai guys rayn and HF are different alignments" I figured that deciding which one of you is mafia = good idea since I figured "50:50 or better". I still think the role stuff is unhelpful and I don't care for it.
I do think Oats is likely mafia now. But I do not know who the third one is. Either it's the more 'conventional' solution where CH is mafia or one of Skynx/ Vivax is bussing. This paragraph doesn't contain deep analysis as to which world is more likely because I do not know.
|
On April 14 2018 19:15 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2018 19:12 Calix wrote:On April 14 2018 19:06 Holyflare wrote:
You're not even evaluating the cop checks properly at all. You think we should "resolve" it but that means lynching me or rayn and if you lynch me you auto rayn next cycle and if one of those roles do exist you just lose. I think one of you two should be the lynch as it stands, yes. Unless someone drops a case for scum!ExO. But if that results in a ML then you never ever auto next cycle since that would be LYLO. So resolve the claim arbitrarily and then do analysis on whether the other person is mafia :D
good way of telling us to lynch rayn while voting calix?
if you want rayn, vote rayn
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 14 2018 19:19 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2018 19:15 Holyflare wrote:On April 14 2018 19:12 Calix wrote:On April 14 2018 19:06 Holyflare wrote:
You're not even evaluating the cop checks properly at all. You think we should "resolve" it but that means lynching me or rayn and if you lynch me you auto rayn next cycle and if one of those roles do exist you just lose. I think one of you two should be the lynch as it stands, yes. Unless someone drops a case for scum!ExO. But if that results in a ML then you never ever auto next cycle since that would be LYLO. So resolve the claim arbitrarily and then do analysis on whether the other person is mafia :D good way of telling us to lynch rayn while voting calix? if you want rayn, vote rayn
When did I say anything about rayn?
|
Isn't that the best case scenario? You just lynch rayn and then do analysis on yourself on whether you are mafia. Damn Im a genius
|
On April 14 2018 19:15 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2018 19:12 Calix wrote:On April 14 2018 19:06 Holyflare wrote:
You're not even evaluating the cop checks properly at all. You think we should "resolve" it but that means lynching me or rayn and if you lynch me you auto rayn next cycle and if one of those roles do exist you just lose. I think one of you two should be the lynch as it stands, yes. Unless someone drops a case for scum!ExO. But if that results in a ML then you never ever auto next cycle since that would be LYLO. So resolve the claim arbitrarily and then do analysis on whether the other person is mafia :D
The plan is to analyse you guys today and only consider whether role fuckery happened if someone gets MLed :D
Because right now I couldn't give two shits about that as a possibility tbh. Role mechanics talk is boring and repetitive. I'm only talking about it because people keep making it a thing.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 14 2018 19:19 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2018 19:12 Holyflare wrote:
Even if you think we definitely contain mafia in this 50/50 there's 2 mafia left outside of the claims.
9 players left, in a group of 3 you think one is definitely mafia for some unknown reason.
5 players (don't include yourself obviously from your perspective) contain 2 mafia. One of those players (ts) is claimed blue. So you have 4 players to find 2 mafia in:
Ch, vivax, Skynx, oats.
I'm pretty sure I've seen you say vivax is town maybe (could be completely bs that I just made up but he's either mafia playing the most spammy game of his life by almost double the filter size or town) so that's oats/ch/skynx contains two mafia.
Why do you want to lynch a shit show that might not even contain mafia when you have a 66% chance (or higher, 100%! if we were framed!) to find mafia? I think the NKs point to at least one (dunno how many) of you/ rayn/ Vivax because why else would AFK people keep dying over you guys? So when ExO popped in and was like "hai guys rayn and HF are different alignments" I figured that deciding which one of you is mafia = good idea since I figured "50:50 or better". I still think the role stuff is unhelpful and I don't care for it. I do think Oats is likely mafia now. But I do not know who the third one is. Either it's the more 'conventional' solution where CH is mafia or one of Skynx/ Vivax is bussing. This paragraph doesn't contain deep analysis as to which world is more likely because I do not know.
If I'm pushing a town vivax non-stop and shitting up the thread and would vote him why would mafia stop me doing that?
|
|
|
yo tube I want your opinion
skynx
calix
oats
vivax
which one most likely to be scum?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 14 2018 19:22 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2018 19:15 Holyflare wrote:On April 14 2018 19:12 Calix wrote:On April 14 2018 19:06 Holyflare wrote:
You're not even evaluating the cop checks properly at all. You think we should "resolve" it but that means lynching me or rayn and if you lynch me you auto rayn next cycle and if one of those roles do exist you just lose. I think one of you two should be the lynch as it stands, yes. Unless someone drops a case for scum!ExO. But if that results in a ML then you never ever auto next cycle since that would be LYLO. So resolve the claim arbitrarily and then do analysis on whether the other person is mafia :D The plan is to analyse you guys today and only consider whether role fuckery happened if someone gets MLed :D Because right now I couldn't give two shits about that as a possibility tbh. Role mechanics talk is boring and repetitive. I'm only talking about it because people keep making it a thing.
Why analyse us and mislynch when you have a 66-100% chance of finding mafia outside it? What the fuck kind of nonsense are you peddling.
|
On April 14 2018 19:22 Vivax wrote:
/shitposting
hold my beer
scumteam is:
calix
skynx
vivax
x marks the spot
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 14 2018 19:22 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2018 19:19 Calix wrote:On April 14 2018 19:12 Holyflare wrote:
Even if you think we definitely contain mafia in this 50/50 there's 2 mafia left outside of the claims.
9 players left, in a group of 3 you think one is definitely mafia for some unknown reason.
5 players (don't include yourself obviously from your perspective) contain 2 mafia. One of those players (ts) is claimed blue. So you have 4 players to find 2 mafia in:
Ch, vivax, Skynx, oats.
I'm pretty sure I've seen you say vivax is town maybe (could be completely bs that I just made up but he's either mafia playing the most spammy game of his life by almost double the filter size or town) so that's oats/ch/skynx contains two mafia.
Why do you want to lynch a shit show that might not even contain mafia when you have a 66% chance (or higher, 100%! if we were framed!) to find mafia? I think the NKs point to at least one (dunno how many) of you/ rayn/ Vivax because why else would AFK people keep dying over you guys? So when ExO popped in and was like "hai guys rayn and HF are different alignments" I figured that deciding which one of you is mafia = good idea since I figured "50:50 or better". I still think the role stuff is unhelpful and I don't care for it. I do think Oats is likely mafia now. But I do not know who the third one is. Either it's the more 'conventional' solution where CH is mafia or one of Skynx/ Vivax is bussing. This paragraph doesn't contain deep analysis as to which world is more likely because I do not know. If I'm pushing a town vivax non-stop and shitting up the thread and would vote him why would mafia stop me doing that?
If vivax is stubborn town mule and is shitting up the thread and will only ever vote hf why would mafia kill him?
|
On April 14 2018 19:23 currentlyhomeless wrote:
yo tube I want your opinion
skynx
calix
oats
vivax
which one most likely to be scum?
that guy whose name doesnt end with x does look like he doesn't fit
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 14 2018 19:24 currentlyhomeless wrote:hold my beer scumteam is: calix skynx vivax x marks the spot
Why vivax?
|
On April 14 2018 19:22 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2018 19:19 Calix wrote:On April 14 2018 19:12 Holyflare wrote:
Even if you think we definitely contain mafia in this 50/50 there's 2 mafia left outside of the claims.
9 players left, in a group of 3 you think one is definitely mafia for some unknown reason.
5 players (don't include yourself obviously from your perspective) contain 2 mafia. One of those players (ts) is claimed blue. So you have 4 players to find 2 mafia in:
Ch, vivax, Skynx, oats.
I'm pretty sure I've seen you say vivax is town maybe (could be completely bs that I just made up but he's either mafia playing the most spammy game of his life by almost double the filter size or town) so that's oats/ch/skynx contains two mafia.
Why do you want to lynch a shit show that might not even contain mafia when you have a 66% chance (or higher, 100%! if we were framed!) to find mafia? I think the NKs point to at least one (dunno how many) of you/ rayn/ Vivax because why else would AFK people keep dying over you guys? So when ExO popped in and was like "hai guys rayn and HF are different alignments" I figured that deciding which one of you is mafia = good idea since I figured "50:50 or better". I still think the role stuff is unhelpful and I don't care for it. I do think Oats is likely mafia now. But I do not know who the third one is. Either it's the more 'conventional' solution where CH is mafia or one of Skynx/ Vivax is bussing. This paragraph doesn't contain deep analysis as to which world is more likely because I do not know. If I'm pushing a town vivax non-stop and shitting up the thread and would vote him why would mafia stop me doing that?
In that world, there's always the possibility that you reconsider and end up lynching mafia instead.
|
On April 14 2018 19:23 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2018 19:22 Calix wrote:On April 14 2018 19:15 Holyflare wrote:On April 14 2018 19:12 Calix wrote:On April 14 2018 19:06 Holyflare wrote:
You're not even evaluating the cop checks properly at all. You think we should "resolve" it but that means lynching me or rayn and if you lynch me you auto rayn next cycle and if one of those roles do exist you just lose. I think one of you two should be the lynch as it stands, yes. Unless someone drops a case for scum!ExO. But if that results in a ML then you never ever auto next cycle since that would be LYLO. So resolve the claim arbitrarily and then do analysis on whether the other person is mafia :D The plan is to analyse you guys today and only consider whether role fuckery happened if someone gets MLed :D Because right now I couldn't give two shits about that as a possibility tbh. Role mechanics talk is boring and repetitive. I'm only talking about it because people keep making it a thing. Why analyse us and mislynch when you have a 66-100% chance of finding mafia outside it? What the fuck kind of nonsense are you peddling.
You've made the assumption that I'd analyse, have none of my reads change, and then keep voting for you, presumed townie. This is not necessarily the case. But there is no way I am leaving cop stuff unresolved and ripe for MORE WIFOM unless I filter dive and conclude that you're both leprechaun green and there must have just obviously been a false check somewhere.
And yeah, I'd obviously look at CH, Skynx, Vivax, Oats, etc, too. I have a lot of stuff to reread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
