|
On October 20 2015 05:11 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2015 05:09 Eversince wrote:
Oh I'm not. I hated your pointless spam so much yesterday. I would of happily lynched you if I came back today and you were high on the list. right...so you thought moosy and I were having this massive "shitfight" as mafia partners? because your whole argument against me, and to a lesser extent scum read of shining sort of shows you were town reading him.
I bolded what I missed. My case was that your first entire 2 pages of filter was angry early game and then getting into it with Moosy. Nothin' to do whatsoever with you being mafia together.
|
Or at least that's the way I interpreted that at the time. I think I may be over emphasizing it now I think, but I hadn't had enough time to let it stew, didn't like the way it looked, and said as much...
|
Just to be clear, I still don't like it. It accomplished nothing at the time. But, unless I'm mistaken (highly possible right now), Moosy never actually did answer you. So I can understand why you did it. I just don't understand why you did it so soon, or as pervasive as you did. But that doesn't make you mafia on it's own and I'm not convinced you are based on the rest of your play since then either. So I'm happy you didn't get lynched today.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On October 20 2015 05:29 Eversince wrote:
If you wanna' know anything else feel free to ask. Or if I confused you in some way I'll try to elaborate. I didn't catch that mafia association from your post at all lol. I'm glad you pointed it out
I guess I would like some kind of concise and clear train of thought that makes this happen.
So you don't really play the game to start with then you say you managed to catch up with the whole thread. After that you say shining is scum for his opening post and ff is scum for giving his list of reads. Then you decide that I was the biggest scum of the game but rather than actually having a reason you then go and dig back through my filter trying to find things to call me scummy for, you take almost each post I do and call me mafia, which you now admit were all bad reasons. After I dispute all those reasons you just disappear. But this was all an attempt to make it seem like you were contributing?
You don't say anything about moosy even though he was the biggest spammer who you didnt't like.
You then return around deadline time to shove a vote on scott.
Perhaps you can see why i'm "confused" and i'd probably ask why I shouldn't lynch you.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On October 20 2015 05:35 Eversince wrote:
Just to be clear, I still don't like it. It accomplished nothing at the time. But, unless I'm mistaken (highly possible right now), Moosy never actually did answer you. So I can understand why you did it. I just don't understand why you did it so soon, or as pervasive as you did. But that doesn't make you mafia on it's own and I'm not convinced you are based on the rest of your play since then either. So I'm happy you didn't get lynched today.
oh you're not convinced i'm mafia anymore. that's cute
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
after the night I guess you have 48 hours to convince me otherwise you're getting lynched.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
|
On October 20 2015 05:36 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2015 05:29 Eversince wrote:
If you wanna' know anything else feel free to ask. Or if I confused you in some way I'll try to elaborate. I didn't catch that mafia association from your post at all lol. I'm glad you pointed it out I guess I would like some kind of concise and clear train of thought that makes this happen. So you don't really play the game to start with then you say you managed to catch up with the whole thread. After that you say shining is scum for his opening post and ff is scum for giving his list of reads. Then you decide that I was the biggest scum of the game but rather than actually having a reason you then go and dig back through my filter trying to find things to call me scummy for, you take almost each post I do and call me mafia, which you now admit were all bad reasons. After I dispute all those reasons you just disappear. But this was all an attempt to make it seem like you were contributing? You don't say anything about moosy even though he was the biggest spammer who you didnt't like. You then return around deadline time to shove a vote on scott. Perhaps you can see why i'm "confused" and i'd probably ask why I shouldn't lynch you.
Ok. I'm just going to clear this up one last time. I'm not going to repeat it because it's just filler but people can't seem to realize that I've already said it. I have not had internet at my house since the game started on Saturday. I did not get home on Saturday until about 23:00 that day. I had no way of playing that night. The cable company my complex uses does not have customer service on Sunday's, resulting in my inability to address this yesterday.
I went to the library, read the game, and posted. Sorry the library isn't open long on Sunday's either but I at least tried.
If my train of thought wasn't coherent it likely wasn't. I am not a fast reader. I am also not a fast typer. This results in bad play because I am trying to do both quickly and thus I miss things.
|
On October 20 2015 05:36 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2015 05:29 Eversince wrote:
If you wanna' know anything else feel free to ask. Or if I confused you in some way I'll try to elaborate. I didn't catch that mafia association from your post at all lol. I'm glad you pointed it out I guess I would like some kind of concise and clear train of thought that makes this happen. So you don't really play the game to start with then you say you managed to catch up with the whole thread. After that you say shining is scum for his opening post and ff is scum for giving his list of reads. Then you decide that I was the biggest scum of the game but rather than actually having a reason you then go and dig back through my filter trying to find things to call me scummy for, you take almost each post I do and call me mafia, which you now admit were all bad reasons. After I dispute all those reasons you just disappear. But this was all an attempt to make it seem like you were contributing? You don't say anything about moosy even though he was the biggest spammer who you didnt't like. You then return around deadline time to shove a vote on scott. Perhaps you can see why i'm "confused" and i'd probably ask why I shouldn't lynch you.
hey look...its like you read my case!
|
Also I pointed out one really odd post he made when he generally hadn't done squat else. How does that make me mafia?
"This thing looks strange to me" -presumes people will chat about it until I can be around again-
"Burn her!"
|
As I'm catching up, I'll write down my notes on what I think about certain posts.
On October 20 2015 01:07 LoneMeow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2015 00:05 Rels wrote:On October 19 2015 23:45 LoneMeow wrote:On October 19 2015 23:29 Rels wrote:On October 19 2015 23:20 LoneMeow wrote:On October 19 2015 08:02 boxerfred wrote:my moosy read sucks I agree but I still think he's scum, boom. he's doing the same spammy shit he did when we played together. kelsier/farah town. sicklucker hasn't done batshit but oneliners but if i remember correctly, it's not scum indicative for him. dunnno how kelsier townreads him off of that but he does. eversince's post on kelsier is shit, those quotations are kinda standalone and feel tryhard. that makes me townread him. ##vote lonemeowEnters thread in defense of GB, then votes kelsier for no reason. Goes on to interact with Rels, doesn't follow up. On October 18 2015 21:49 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:46 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 21:32 LoneMeow wrote:GlowingBear is Top town for me right now, not only did he get the game to move on from the "joke" phase but there's also this: On October 18 2015 05:58 GlowingBear wrote:
There is no such thing as "deciding a meta". You play to win and that's all.
This is town thinking. As for the FarahBlackwing, there's a ParanOid scenario I can see where the whole thing was orchestrated in advance but that's not relevant for now, I suppose. Unflipped players and all that. On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
GlowingBear's list post: Before looking in detail at what he posted it feels too early to be making a list post. Half the game hasn't posted, it doesn't feel correct. Furthermore I can't understand why he feels the need to make a list post for one townlean that Has doubt to it, one scumlean and then just null players. the only post that anyone would have cared about at all was him calling me scummy.
Why wouldn't he make a list post? Some reads are needed to get the "serious" phase of the game started, I don't quite see that list post being scum motivated at all. On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
His scumread of me is, in typical GB fashion, wrong. I've explained my post above.
The Rest of his list doesn't make logical Sense to me but again that is typical GB.
I WanT to wait and see but if the lynch was now i'd lynch GB and Moosy.
So the read is wrong (ie. he's town misreading) but you'd WanT to lynch him (ie. he's scum)? What? again where did I say he was town? reading is really hard for some people. If his read on you is wrong then you are clearly implying he's town. Scum doesn't have "right" or "wrong" reads. This is constructed bullshit. In the context of that conversation, start of D1, there's no way for that kind of thinking. It's constructed and puts pressure on KSC for the sake of, well, pressuring, while still leaving the vote without any reasons. Stirring up chaos and setting up a potential mislynch. On October 18 2015 22:06 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:59 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 21:58 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:54 KelsierSC wrote:
[quote]
how is this of any value if you already decided he was town? I'm interested in your alignment, and you explaining your though process and logic helps in that. then why vote me before asking? Vote is also a tool to provoke reactions. Why do you not want to help me figure out your alignment? So he provoked a reaction from Kelsier. Now that the wagon kind of started, he's nowhere to be seen. So all we have is a push on kelsier because "well I can and a vote is pressure". That feels like scum stirring up chaos to me. Before we go any further into this, I want to know: a) Have you read the entire thread or just skimmed some parts? b) What's your read on Rels and why? Can you answer the same question pretty please ? I skimmed some MoosyDoosy's posts, for some reason they give me a headache. So when you answered BF's posts above, you had already read the whole thread ? I started writing it before I had finished but posted it after. Show nested quote +On October 20 2015 00:05 Rels wrote:On October 19 2015 23:45 LoneMeow wrote:And I read you as fairly strong town lean. I like the posts where you refuted Eversince's case on KelsierSC and the points on the MoosyDoosy/Vonthin affair. I'm not sure I agree on MoosyDoosy being scum though, there are some posts that seem fairly emotional in a way that I think would be hard to emulate as scum. For example this: On October 19 2015 09:32 MoosyDoosy wrote:
I kind of want to be lynched just to see boxerfred's reaction. Him thinking he can read me off of one game is pretty funny. What do you make of boxerfred's switch from me to scott31337? Nothing alignment indicative about the switch. I noticed that his arguments for scumreading you were super bad though. Don't you think ? To me the switch seemed kind of opportunistic, like he was trying to push me and then just jumped to someone else when that didn't stick. Note how all the reasons he uses to call scott31337 scum are already out when he makes his case on me - so it frankly doesn't make sense to me that he'd case me first, then just jump off like that.
That's bullshit. Remember why I voted you in the first place, wanted to play the game you played with Kelsier. I didn't even make a "case".
On October 20 2015 01:16 MoosyDoosy wrote:
If you read boxerfred's post, it's super awful where he switches between me and The SHining then comes up with a BS reason to try and scumread me. Even before that he blamed me for gif wars when I didn't post any. lol.
Gonna bring that up because I don't want to let this stand. My read on you happened partially on a false prerequisite. Note that while I think you're probably scum, it's not enough to cast my vote on you. I might be bad at persuading people especially since english isn't my first language but I'm able to think. Also it's fun to get this comment from a guy who basically spams all the time and makes the thread hard to read, thanks.
On October 20 2015 01:23 LoneMeow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2015 01:14 Rels wrote:On October 20 2015 01:07 LoneMeow wrote:On October 20 2015 00:05 Rels wrote:On October 19 2015 23:45 LoneMeow wrote:On October 19 2015 23:29 Rels wrote:On October 19 2015 23:20 LoneMeow wrote:On October 19 2015 08:02 boxerfred wrote:my moosy read sucks I agree but I still think he's scum, boom. he's doing the same spammy shit he did when we played together. kelsier/farah town. sicklucker hasn't done batshit but oneliners but if i remember correctly, it's not scum indicative for him. dunnno how kelsier townreads him off of that but he does. eversince's post on kelsier is shit, those quotations are kinda standalone and feel tryhard. that makes me townread him. ##vote lonemeowEnters thread in defense of GB, then votes kelsier for no reason. Goes on to interact with Rels, doesn't follow up. On October 18 2015 21:49 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:46 KelsierSC wrote:
[quote]
again where did I say he was town?
reading is really hard for some people.
If his read on you is wrong then you are clearly implying he's town. Scum doesn't have "right" or "wrong" reads. This is constructed bullshit. In the context of that conversation, start of D1, there's no way for that kind of thinking. It's constructed and puts pressure on KSC for the sake of, well, pressuring, while still leaving the vote without any reasons. Stirring up chaos and setting up a potential mislynch. On October 18 2015 22:06 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:59 KelsierSC wrote:
[quote]
then why vote me before asking? Vote is also a tool to provoke reactions. Why do you not want to help me figure out your alignment? So he provoked a reaction from Kelsier. Now that the wagon kind of started, he's nowhere to be seen. So all we have is a push on kelsier because "well I can and a vote is pressure". That feels like scum stirring up chaos to me. Before we go any further into this, I want to know: a) Have you read the entire thread or just skimmed some parts? b) What's your read on Rels and why? Can you answer the same question pretty please ? I skimmed some MoosyDoosy's posts, for some reason they give me a headache. So when you answered BF's posts above, you had already read the whole thread ? I started writing it before I had finished but posted it after. Oh yeah ? In this post you both asked BF if he had read the thread properly and asked for his read on me: On October 19 2015 23:20 LoneMeow wrote:On October 19 2015 08:02 boxerfred wrote:my moosy read sucks I agree but I still think he's scum, boom. he's doing the same spammy shit he did when we played together. kelsier/farah town. sicklucker hasn't done batshit but oneliners but if i remember correctly, it's not scum indicative for him. dunnno how kelsier townreads him off of that but he does. eversince's post on kelsier is shit, those quotations are kinda standalone and feel tryhard. that makes me townread him. ##vote lonemeowEnters thread in defense of GB, then votes kelsier for no reason. Goes on to interact with Rels, doesn't follow up. On October 18 2015 21:49 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:46 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 21:32 LoneMeow wrote:GlowingBear is Top town for me right now, not only did he get the game to move on from the "joke" phase but there's also this: On October 18 2015 05:58 GlowingBear wrote:
There is no such thing as "deciding a meta". You play to win and that's all.
This is town thinking. As for the FarahBlackwing, there's a ParanOid scenario I can see where the whole thing was orchestrated in advance but that's not relevant for now, I suppose. Unflipped players and all that. On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
GlowingBear's list post: Before looking in detail at what he posted it feels too early to be making a list post. Half the game hasn't posted, it doesn't feel correct. Furthermore I can't understand why he feels the need to make a list post for one townlean that Has doubt to it, one scumlean and then just null players. the only post that anyone would have cared about at all was him calling me scummy.
Why wouldn't he make a list post? Some reads are needed to get the "serious" phase of the game started, I don't quite see that list post being scum motivated at all. On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
His scumread of me is, in typical GB fashion, wrong. I've explained my post above.
The Rest of his list doesn't make logical Sense to me but again that is typical GB.
I WanT to wait and see but if the lynch was now i'd lynch GB and Moosy.
So the read is wrong (ie. he's town misreading) but you'd WanT to lynch him (ie. he's scum)? What? again where did I say he was town? reading is really hard for some people. If his read on you is wrong then you are clearly implying he's town. Scum doesn't have "right" or "wrong" reads. This is constructed bullshit. In the context of that conversation, start of D1, there's no way for that kind of thinking. It's constructed and puts pressure on KSC for the sake of, well, pressuring, while still leaving the vote without any reasons. Stirring up chaos and setting up a potential mislynch. On October 18 2015 22:06 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:59 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 21:58 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:54 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 21:53 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:51 KelsierSC wrote:
[quote]
no it just says he is wrong. Okay, so why exactly is he scum? Why was the list post bad at the time it was made, besides being a list post? To me it seems much more like town mentality to try to get the game moving in a more serious direction after the "joke phase" as some call it. how is this of any value if you already decided he was town? I'm interested in your alignment, and you explaining your though process and logic helps in that. then why vote me before asking? Vote is also a tool to provoke reactions. Why do you not want to help me figure out your alignment? So he provoked a reaction from Kelsier. Now that the wagon kind of started, he's nowhere to be seen. So all we have is a push on kelsier because "well I can and a vote is pressure". That feels like scum stirring up chaos to me. Before we go any further into this, I want to know: a) Have you read the entire thread or just skimmed some parts? b) What's your read on Rels and why? You just said you had read the thread completely before posting this. Seems that you missed something ?? On October 19 2015 19:59 boxerfred wrote:Moosy/scott interaction is also interesting because of this: On October 18 2015 06:33 scott31337 wrote:On October 18 2015 05:15 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Also I kind of regret signing up for BH games in the first place. I always roll town in them which is getting super super boring. This seems like your trying to push this a little too much - just a thought here... On October 18 2015 05:26 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 18 2015 05:25 GlowingBear wrote:On October 18 2015 05:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:
GB can i bus you again? And there is a QT to discuss this Moosy, you shouldn't be telling that to everyone else welp too late. ##Vote: GlowingBear And a shit early vote. Now he's spamming up the thread. I'm not caring for this play so far. GB is a slight townlean - and that's about it. I don't think this is a scum interaction. Moosy pushes me, scott nullifies that plus points out negative things in moosy's playstyle. So I don't think at all they are mafia together. Scott keeps it up: On October 18 2015 06:57 scott31337 wrote:On October 18 2015 06:38 MoosyDoosy wrote:
I mean. I'll give you guys a legitimate reason to scumread me if you want it. Right now the stuff ya'll are flinging is weak. Explain your vote on GB like I'm five years old. Pressure, questions, and then he drops it: On October 18 2015 07:35 scott31337 wrote:On October 18 2015 07:00 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 18 2015 06:57 scott31337 wrote:On October 18 2015 06:38 MoosyDoosy wrote:
I mean. I'll give you guys a legitimate reason to scumread me if you want it. Right now the stuff ya'll are flinging is weak. Explain your vote on GB like I'm five years old. I decide to have a bit of fun as GB was my Mafia partner in the game where I doubled bused my partners. As a result, I ask him as a joke if I can bus him this game. GB understands the joke and says that I should say it in the QT. As a continuation of the joke I say it's too late and remark that I'll be confirmed town after the "bus" and then vote for GB. Just was making sure - Thank you. To Shining on the GB read - a bit of meta (I've guessed him correctly the last three games) - a bit of playfulness and making sense. I mean I didn't like Kelsier's entrance persay either, but I was going to wait until later in the day to see if he shows up. I didn't see anything else really worth pointing out when I read the thread. And now he disappears. I mean I can see the things on scott but I can't imagine scum scott and scum moosy interacting in that way that early in the game, it just doesn't make sense. So I'd say we have scum in between moosy/scott but I wouldn't say both are scum. I townread kels and I clearly townread rels from what I see so i'm glad to help on that wagon. ##unvote ##vote scott12345 So you read the thread, you read BF's posts I assume because he's someone you suspect; but you have missed that he townread me ? Do note that I asked him why which was what I was mostly interested in. Show nested quote +On October 20 2015 01:14 Rels wrote:On October 20 2015 01:07 LoneMeow wrote:On October 20 2015 00:05 Rels wrote:On October 19 2015 23:45 LoneMeow wrote:And I read you as fairly strong town lean. I like the posts where you refuted Eversince's case on KelsierSC and the points on the MoosyDoosy/Vonthin affair. I'm not sure I agree on MoosyDoosy being scum though, there are some posts that seem fairly emotional in a way that I think would be hard to emulate as scum. For example this: On October 19 2015 09:32 MoosyDoosy wrote:
I kind of want to be lynched just to see boxerfred's reaction. Him thinking he can read me off of one game is pretty funny. What do you make of boxerfred's switch from me to scott31337? Nothing alignment indicative about the switch. I noticed that his arguments for scumreading you were super bad though. Don't you think ? To me the switch seemed kind of opportunistic, like he was trying to push me and then just jumped to someone else when that didn't stick. Note how all the reasons he uses to call scott31337 scum are already out when he makes his case on me - so it frankly doesn't make sense to me that he'd case me first, then just jump off like that. Re evaluating is a town indicative thing. It super weird to me that you put suspicion on BF on re evaluating reads, which is town indicative; and not on his god awful case on you. Re-evaluating would be fine, but I just don't see anything in the posts that hints at that; I'd expect a re-evaluating townie to at least note something like "X is still scum but Y looks even worse" when switching from the guy he cased to someone else. I suppose the trap is no longer going to work anyway, so yes, the horribleness of the case was why I originally started suspecting him. I was trying to trap him on you having essentially done the same thing he based his case on me yet calling you town and me scum.
Gonna repeat it, I didn't case you, stop making up reasons to push me.
____
I like the case on Eversince a lot. I'm fine with ES/scott and of course Moosy. However I'll be in for a Moosy lynch pretty much anytime. Scott would be the lurker scum but I think it's important to note that he's rather inactive when he's town while there's a really solid case on ES. Decisions, decisions.
____
On October 20 2015 01:59 MoosyDoosy wrote:
I mean, I'll sheep whatever you guys want tbh. For D1 at least.
What a huge fucking awesome useless dumb post. I want to vote you for this. And for your general posting style.
On October 20 2015 02:03 Vonthin wrote:My thoughts on everyone now that I've read their filters. Moosy- Slight scum read, I didn't like his opening spam shitpost crap, and some of the reason Rels brought up after I made my post the other night. He has some posts though where I can see town motivation but the useless posts outweigh them for me. LoneMeow- I think he is town, I see clear motivation behind the things he is doing trying to get reads on people. Sicklurker-Leaning slight scum on him, lots of fluff in his filter, I don't understand his Lonemeow vote, I don't see anything to go on besides him not posting a lot to make him scum. Show nested quote +On October 19 2015 22:44 sicklucker wrote:
like he starts with scott "easy town read"
then he follows up on the next guy "not much to read on" like you could have used that on scott lol. Then he just lists the two easy people as scum Never said lol ez town read or that he was my top read just because I typed his read first in the list., He was just under my list for people who I thought were town for the time. I liked the posts he made and he had no fluff. My strongest town read at the time I made that list was GB. He seemed to made his opinions of me without reading my posts then read them and changed them after someone called him out on his and read them. GB- Still town, I don't see any scum motivation behind his posts. Boxer-- Null still, I understand his reasoning behind his cases but I don't agree with most of them. Has some fluff here and there and his posts/opinions vary so I don't really understand him. Scott-Besides not posting a lot, his posts still read town to me. I understand lynching for inactivity though. Rels- I think he is town, I like most of his posts up un till his recent ones with his case against Lonemeow which I think is a pretty weak case for day1. Farah--Town, Clear town motivation behind her posts, no fluff. Her case against Ever is clear and thought out and makes sense. Ever-- The big thing that leaps out to me in his filter is the big post with all the quote about his case against KSC, was a big jumbled mess and a somewhat weak case. His thoughts are all over the place in the start but It could just be him being new and reacting to the posts he sees. Shining- I think he is town, I like his posts and arguments, has some things I don't like but the things I like outweigh the ones I don't. KSC - He started off looking scum to me but he started to look town since the last day. I like his reads and questions since he stopped posting fluff and being so negative at the start Fecal- Seems scummy, posts seem half assed which shit reads that doesn't give any explanations. Not enough to go on for a Day 1 lynch. Would Lynch: Lurker, Ever, Moosy Needs more posts/convincing: Fecal If anyone has specific questions for me hit me up fast since I have to go to my afternoon classes soon.
How do you read Shining as town? Why is that? I'd scumlean him. Also, how do you understand my reasong if even I say that the reasoning of MD is bullshit? How can you townread scott based that his posts were absurd (as Rels and me pointed out)? Scumlean for you.
On October 20 2015 02:58 KelsierSC wrote:
i'd actually much prefer a scott lynch over ever right now
scott's return has been atrocious
vonthin putting his vote there and trying to keep scott alive looks really sketchy to me.
Having read this, yes. Scott's return is bullshit. However if he'd be scum and if he'd have read the thread before, why wouldn't he just go down the "I'm a low volume poster as town" road? Me and someone else mentioned that. Bad scum or genuine excuse, I have no idea but tend to believe the first thing. He jumps the Eversince wagon but I think that's NAI.
On October 20 2015 03:00 FarahBlackwing wrote:
I think its interesting moosey is blindly sheeping onto boxer who id his biggest scum read currently. And totally disregards case on ever and misrepresents it.
YES YES YES (I fixed that you wrote Moosydoosy in the original post, you corrected in later)
On October 20 2015 03:11 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2015 03:02 KelsierSC wrote:On October 20 2015 03:02 FarahBlackwing wrote:
Autocorrect got me, boxer his biggest scum read is on Scott hut he totally just sheeped onto Scott with him. Oh well moosy did say he would be happy lynching scott earlier. Show nested quote +On October 20 2015 02:54 MoosyDoosy wrote:
##unvote
##vote scott31337
sounds cool
So what, lynch scum!boxerfred's scumread?
I'm on page 31 now. Pizza arrived  .
tl;dr
would lynch between scott/eversince/moosy, would look into glowingbear and fecalfeast since they dropped under the radar, need to check for lurkers. rels/kelsier/farah town, sicklucker lololol no idea.
|
add leomeow to the list of "would lynch", forgot that one. also add vonthin as someone who needs to answer my questions.
|
gj ur late boxer.
And no, I didn't sheep scott because of you no matter how egotistical you are. I sheeped Rels onto scott because he was the first person to bring it up. And I already said that I'd let you pushing me for BS and false reasons go so I don't see why there's a contradiction there.
...Are you sure you're reading?
|
mmm...Eversince's change in story is vaguely concerning to be honest.
|
|
|
On October 20 2015 06:21 Eversince wrote:
What change in story?
Why didn't you post anything about me at all when you were so willing to lynch me?
|
On October 20 2015 06:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:Why didn't you post anything about me at all when you were so willing to lynch me?
Because you talk a lot. It was half way through the day, I hadn't had time to actually think about anything I'd read. I believe you're entirely capable of doin' nothing but spam. I haven't played with anyone here enough to use meta so I generally toss it. Resulting in your entire filter being highly annoying, but having at least one game to assume, I figured I would wait and see how you play the rest of the game. But as I have no idea of half the players right now I would have totally lynched you if you had been a main train to save my own butt.
I'm re-reading, I will post thoughts later if people are around or tonight if I fall asleep. I'm really tired and only stayed up to read in the first place because I lived.
|
Boxerfred would scum lean me and I'm not on his would lynch list. Hrm.
|
which makes perfect sense since I have others valued higher on that list than you. also I won't read the rest I'll go to bed. good night people.
|
On October 20 2015 05:00 Blazinghand wrote:Day 1 Vote Count scott31337 (7): KelsierSC, Rels, boxerfred, MoosyDoosy, GlowingBear, Fecalfeast, Eversince, Lonemeow Eversince (5): FarahBlackwing, The Shining, scott31337, Vonthin, GlowingBear LoneMeow (1): sicklucker, boxerfredKelsierSC (0): GlowingBear, LoneMeow, EversinceVonthin (0): Fecalfeastsicklucker (0): GlowingBearboxerfred (0): MoosyDoosyGlowingBear (0): MoosyDoosyNot voted (0): Currently, scott31337 is set to be lynched. Day 1 ends at Monday, Oct 19 8:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) in . Voting is mandatory! Voting is done here in this thread. PM the hosts if the vote count is not correct.
rofl I missed the lynch. I'm done. Good night.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
