Battle of the Drams Mafia - Page 26
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
so i'm wondering how early is too early to start reading into people setting up moving votes to me later ^^ scum will be in there somewhere | ||
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 29 2015 09:29 rsoultin wrote: -squints at- so i'm wondering how early is too early to start reading into people setting up moving votes to me later ^^ scum will be in there somewhere It is never too early especially when you point out something relatively inconsequential in a half serious post where I list 3 other people besides you. | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
oh is this the post you didn't get, truffle? all i was saying was that you had already posted the "post to get reactions/discussion started" post, and that gb could move on to something more productive i don't know why i always assume these things are blindingly obvious lol >< | ||
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On September 29 2015 09:33 MoosyDoosy wrote: It is never too early especially when you point out something relatively inconsequential in a half serious post where I list 3 other people besides you. kudos for nonsense never too early to start suspecting people saying they could lynch me meets your post is inconsequential and not serious how? are you or are you not scumreading the people in your list? | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On September 29 2015 09:36 MoosyDoosy wrote: Actually on that note rsoul, what do you think of sicklucker/J Roc? leans and vague impressions not worth mentioning or i would have already | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
So basically I dunno. | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
On September 29 2015 09:33 rsoultin wrote: OH YEAH that was my argument!oh is this the post you didn't get, truffle? all i was saying was that you had already posted the "post to get reactions/discussion started" post, and that gb could move on to something more productive i don't know why i always assume these things are blindingly obvious lol >< Thank you for reminding me! Never mind, it's still somewhat valid. | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On September 29 2015 09:38 Trfel wrote: Basically my argument against rsoultin kind of doesn't work. I assumed that rsoultin had a certain reason for doing stuff and had a certain interpretation of why I was asking what I asked, but I was wrong. So basically I dunno. -facepalms- | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On September 29 2015 09:39 Trfel wrote: OH YEAH that was my argument! Thank you for reminding me! Never mind, it's still somewhat valid. then perhaps you should let us in on it | ||
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 29 2015 09:36 rsoultin wrote: kudos for nonsense never too early to start suspecting people saying they could lynch me meets your post is inconsequential and not serious how? are you or are you not scumreading the people in your list? -sighs- My post was what I was thinking, but I phrased it in a joking manner. I just find it strange that you're picking out one bit about yourself in a post that was phrased jokingly especially when I mention that one other person that you're townreading (Trfel) is scummy in my eyes. ^ I was just phrasing that bit sarcastically. | ||
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 29 2015 09:39 Trfel wrote: OH YEAH that was my argument! Thank you for reminding me! Never mind, it's still somewhat valid. Care to share? | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On September 29 2015 09:40 MoosyDoosy wrote: -sighs- My post was what I was thinking, but I phrased it in a joking manner. I just find it strange that you're picking out one bit about yourself in a post that was phrased jokingly especially when I mention that one other person that you're townreading (Trfel) is scummy in my eyes. ^ I was just phrasing that bit sarcastically. then it wasn't inconsequential and it was serious, now wasn't it? see i'm watching this pretty mislynch forming up and i'm seeing who is taking advantage, cause otherwise they have to shoot me ^^ it's still probably early for that, though the soft scumreads still don't make me feel all warm and fuzzy about you, especially when you try to downplay them like you just did | ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
On September 29 2015 09:33 rsoultin wrote: Basically, GlowingBear made this one post purely to generate discussion. His other posts before this post that you made were serious posts.oh is this the post you didn't get, truffle? all i was saying was that you had already posted the "post to get reactions/discussion started" post, and that gb could move on to something more productive i don't know why i always assume these things are blindingly obvious lol >< The post you quoted, the "I'm town" post, does nothing to promote discussion at all. My opening posts also didn't end up creating any discussion. Basically, your post claims that my opening posts actually had a purpose and created discussion, and GlowingBear was actually succeeding at making provocative posts. Both claims I disagree with. Hm, but now that I think about it I don't think that this is a good argument Wow, I'm really bad at this. | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On September 29 2015 09:44 Trfel wrote: Basically, GlowingBear made this one post purely to generate discussion. His other posts before this post that you made were serious posts. The post you quoted, the "I'm town" post, does nothing to promote discussion at all. My opening posts also didn't end up creating any discussion. Basically, your post claims that my opening posts actually had a purpose and created discussion, and GlowingBear was actually succeeding at making provocative posts. Both claims I disagree with. Hm, but now that I think about it I don't think that this is a good argument Wow, I'm really bad at this. given i was speaking to the intention of the posts and not the result... DING DING DING | ||
J Roc
96 Posts
| ||
Trfel
7015 Posts
On September 29 2015 09:45 rsoultin wrote: It's okay, you're mafia anyway XDgiven i was speaking to the intention of the posts and not the result... DING DING DING | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On September 29 2015 09:46 J Roc wrote: I am getting more and more tunneled on my Rayns/sl reads the more I think about it. The fact that SL comes in says Rayns didn't claim mafia when he did kinda just Urks me. oddly enough i don't actually hate where your head's at, cause i'm not townreading either of them | ||
| ||