|
On July 31 2015 02:07 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:04 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:53 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:46 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:39 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:
So according to Rels, n00bKing is Mafia because he tried hard to defend Tictock while according to Breshke I'm Mafia because I didn't do much to defend Tictock besides saying he's going to flip town.
k carry on Wrong. On July 30 2015 23:49 Rels wrote:3 - noobking defended TikTock too hard ... It's not the fact that he defend tictock. It's the way he defended him, which you failed to mention at all. Yes. Rels is saying that n00bKing defended Tictock too hard. Which for some reason you have a problem with. Here's the problem moosy, let me make it clear: 1) YOU say that n00bking KNEW that scott was cop. 2) WHEN scott claims cop, n00king STILL wants to vote for him when he is un-CC'd. So either you're wrong about n00bking, or n00bking is doing something completely illogical and against town win condition. I already explained this before you went to sleep. I even quoted how rayn was thinking the same thing and quoted his posts where he was saying the same thing is n00bKing.
The difference is that Rayn didn't KNOW that scott was cop beforehand, which you say that n00bking did.
|
On July 31 2015 02:05 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 11:11 Breshke wrote:
Also rels i don't think you should be using the fact that some people unvoted scott straight after his cop claim to make them more townie. I don't really think that logic holds up. Rels doesn't use logic. Rels is immune to logic. ruXxar posted a "TownShield" and Rels has a "LogicShield."
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
|
Why don't you make a case on who you believe is mafia then?
|
On July 31 2015 02:01 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 01:59 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:51 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:50 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:46 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:40 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Unfortunately your argument against n00bKing is all refutable. Your only good point is #4 but ruXxar was the one to ask that question and neither of us wish to answer questions from ruXxar for reasons stated before and as clearly demonstrated in Page 91. As for Point #5, you're guilty of that as well so you can't really say that without being hypocritical. That's fine. This game is already over for me. Just the formalities left at this point. Good. In that case why don't you be gracious and not be a dick? I'm trying to hold my anger in but you're not helping. Thank you. Real talk though moosy. I have no ill feeling towards you. I still love playing with you. Next game we're gonna wreck scum ok? <3 Next game you're going to tunnel in on me again. This is my second game as townie with you and you still tunnel in on me. This is my standard townie play. If you think I'm scum for it you're going to think I'm scum for it in our next game. No moosy. I know you have to say this not to go against your win condition, but I know your playstyle, and you play different as town. Being afk all day 1 and ad hom attacks? That's not you moosy, you are better than that and I know it. I know you have a lot of respect for n00bking from our first game, I also have a ton of respect for n00bking. I'm not going to hold this game against you both. I know you have to do dirty things as mafia. Believe me, I hate rolling mafia too. I thought it would be fun, but no, it's boring as shit. I won't tunnel on you next game if you are town moosy. I do have a lot of respect for you and being part of my first mafia game you will always hold a special place in my heart. I still remember your insane accurate read of me in the first game, I had tears in my eyes when I read how you were describing my mentality. I had goosebumps knowing that you could read me like that. Someone that actually gets me. Well moosy, I've said before how this game makes you do shitty stuff, and for me personally it feels really unnatural to say these things since it's nothing like my personality in real life. So yeah, that's my lifestory. I hope we both roll town next game and we'll tag team fuck up those scums <3. No you're the one who's wrong. I am a town. I am literally asking LightningStrike for a modkill right now so that I will flip and you guys will see it and not waste this day on mislynching n00bKing. I can still read you plain as day in this game too. And anyone's play evolves. My play has evolved into this. You either hate it or leave it.
OK. Waiting for this to happen then.
Will not directly to you anymore until it happens. That s good for noobking too. Might attack your defense if townies start to believe you.
|
On July 31 2015 02:08 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:07 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:04 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:53 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:46 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:39 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:
So according to Rels, n00bKing is Mafia because he tried hard to defend Tictock while according to Breshke I'm Mafia because I didn't do much to defend Tictock besides saying he's going to flip town.
k carry on Wrong. On July 30 2015 23:49 Rels wrote:3 - noobking defended TikTock too hard ... It's not the fact that he defend tictock. It's the way he defended him, which you failed to mention at all. Yes. Rels is saying that n00bKing defended Tictock too hard. Which for some reason you have a problem with. Here's the problem moosy, let me make it clear: 1) YOU say that n00bking KNEW that scott was cop. 2) WHEN scott claims cop, n00king STILL wants to vote for him when he is un-CC'd. So either you're wrong about n00bking, or n00bking is doing something completely illogical and against town win condition. I already explained this before you went to sleep. I even quoted how rayn was thinking the same thing and quoted his posts where he was saying the same thing is n00bKing. The difference is that Rayn didn't KNOW that scott was cop beforehand, which you say that n00bking did.
1) I said that we all knew that scott had a possibility of being PR. Obviously after scott claimed we know he's a cop now.
2) This was already explained and I quoted where even rayn had the same thought process.
|
On July 31 2015 02:11 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:01 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:59 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:51 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:50 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:46 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:40 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Unfortunately your argument against n00bKing is all refutable. Your only good point is #4 but ruXxar was the one to ask that question and neither of us wish to answer questions from ruXxar for reasons stated before and as clearly demonstrated in Page 91. As for Point #5, you're guilty of that as well so you can't really say that without being hypocritical. That's fine. This game is already over for me. Just the formalities left at this point. Good. In that case why don't you be gracious and not be a dick? I'm trying to hold my anger in but you're not helping. Thank you. Real talk though moosy. I have no ill feeling towards you. I still love playing with you. Next game we're gonna wreck scum ok? <3 Next game you're going to tunnel in on me again. This is my second game as townie with you and you still tunnel in on me. This is my standard townie play. If you think I'm scum for it you're going to think I'm scum for it in our next game. No moosy. I know you have to say this not to go against your win condition, but I know your playstyle, and you play different as town. Being afk all day 1 and ad hom attacks? That's not you moosy, you are better than that and I know it. I know you have a lot of respect for n00bking from our first game, I also have a ton of respect for n00bking. I'm not going to hold this game against you both. I know you have to do dirty things as mafia. Believe me, I hate rolling mafia too. I thought it would be fun, but no, it's boring as shit. I won't tunnel on you next game if you are town moosy. I do have a lot of respect for you and being part of my first mafia game you will always hold a special place in my heart. I still remember your insane accurate read of me in the first game, I had tears in my eyes when I read how you were describing my mentality. I had goosebumps knowing that you could read me like that. Someone that actually gets me. Well moosy, I've said before how this game makes you do shitty stuff, and for me personally it feels really unnatural to say these things since it's nothing like my personality in real life. So yeah, that's my lifestory. I hope we both roll town next game and we'll tag team fuck up those scums <3. No you're the one who's wrong. I am a town. I am literally asking LightningStrike for a modkill right now so that I will flip and you guys will see it and not waste this day on mislynching n00bKing. I can still read you plain as day in this game too. And anyone's play evolves. My play has evolved into this. You either hate it or leave it. OK. Waiting for this to happen then. Will not directly to you anymore until it happens. That s good for noobking too. Might attack your defense if townies start to believe you.
I'm giving out all my hints before LightningStrike reads my PM. My win condition is for town to win and I'm literally asking for a modkill for us to win even if it means I get banned from TL Mafia......and it's all because you people won't listen.
|
On July 30 2015 16:39 Rels wrote:
They both used ad hom attacks to attack the credibility of people multiple times.
Only after your pitiful "arguments" had been pummeled into the ground, and you blindly refused to acknowledge it. What are we supposed to do at that point?
On July 30 2015 16:39 Rels wrote:
noobking saying "I know TT is town".
And? Town players say things like that ALL the time. Only Mafia players are more careful to avoid sounding certain about the things they KNOW are true. Me saying that is TOWN-indicative.
On July 30 2015 16:39 Rels wrote:
noobking being OK lynching un cc cop over TT.
As was rayn for a time, despite having Ticktock as his TOP SCUM READ before the claim. Think about that. Ticktock was his TOP SCUM READ. And then when Scott claims Cop, the claim is SO ILLOGICAL, that rayn moved his vote to Scott. Meanwhile, Ticktock was one of my TOP TOWN READS. Of course I would not lynch him over an illogical Cop claim.
On July 30 2015 16:39 Rels wrote:
Moosy claiming nookbing knew about scott being cop.
That's not the phrasing I read. Hey look, you're misrepresenting someone's position. Yet again.
On July 30 2015 16:39 Rels wrote:
noobking and Moosy both claiming that "if Rels is cop, he wouldn't check noobking", but they still didn't explain it.
It's COMMON SENSE. And NO ONE besides you and ruXtard have tried to indicate they don't understand.
Do you know nothing of deductive reasoning? If A, then B.
If Rels the Cop says that if he were the Cop, he would check n00bKing (and offers the Cop no other suggestions)
THEN
Rels the Cop WILL NOT check n00bKing
It's like a LAW of the universe. Like I said before, I've NEVER seen any investigative role do something like that, and I never WILL see any investigative role do something like that.
Go ahead and pretend you were the Cop in this game. And pretend that during Night 1, you said that "If I was the Cop, I would check n00bKing" and that you offered no other suggestions to the Cop.
Is it likely (or probable, or whatever else you want to call it) that you would then turn in a check on n00bKing?
Yes
or
No
|
On July 31 2015 02:13 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:08 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 02:07 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:04 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:53 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:46 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:39 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:
So according to Rels, n00bKing is Mafia because he tried hard to defend Tictock while according to Breshke I'm Mafia because I didn't do much to defend Tictock besides saying he's going to flip town.
k carry on Wrong. On July 30 2015 23:49 Rels wrote:3 - noobking defended TikTock too hard ... It's not the fact that he defend tictock. It's the way he defended him, which you failed to mention at all. Yes. Rels is saying that n00bKing defended Tictock too hard. Which for some reason you have a problem with. Here's the problem moosy, let me make it clear: 1) YOU say that n00bking KNEW that scott was cop. 2) WHEN scott claims cop, n00king STILL wants to vote for him when he is un-CC'd. So either you're wrong about n00bking, or n00bking is doing something completely illogical and against town win condition. I already explained this before you went to sleep. I even quoted how rayn was thinking the same thing and quoted his posts where he was saying the same thing is n00bKing. The difference is that Rayn didn't KNOW that scott was cop beforehand, which you say that n00bking did. 1) I said that we all knew that scott had a possibility of being PR. Obviously after scott claimed we know he's a cop now. 2) This was already explained and I quoted where even rayn had the same thought process.
1) Wrong. I had NO IDEA or SUSPICIONS that scott was cop.
Please QUOTE where EVERYONE suspected that scott was a PR.
Thank you.
|
On July 30 2015 22:58 Breshke wrote:
Someone said that noobking and NM are probably not a team but i dont reamember who?
If I remember right, disformation said it was unlikely, and it was rayn who called it "impossible."
On July 30 2015 22:58 Breshke wrote:
This could just be him not keeping a straight story but I want to lynch moosy first and when he flips scum ill probably want to lynch NM over Noobking
Moosy won't flip Red. But if he did, there's no way you could get Tweedledum and Tweedledee to lynch NM over me.
|
@ N00bking
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
|
On July 31 2015 02:09 scott31337 wrote:
Why don't you make a case on who you believe is mafia then?
See this is where I'm confused too. I've been saying that a Mafia is in Breshke/Sulf/NocturneMage. And I do think that one Mafia is in here. But if we manage to lynch the right one, due to alignment reads, none of them can be teammates. Which means that there has to be a scum hiding somewhere in the townie circle I set up. It's a bad feeling but it's akin to the feeling I got from my first Mafia Newbie game where two of my townie circle ended up being Mafia. And my feelings have been right for all of this game so I'm inclined to follow them but if I post my thoughts people will actually lynch me for them. Which is why I've been saying that you townies should grab your tinfoil because you'll need them.
|
On July 31 2015 02:16 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:13 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:08 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 02:07 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:04 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:53 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:46 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:39 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:
So according to Rels, n00bKing is Mafia because he tried hard to defend Tictock while according to Breshke I'm Mafia because I didn't do much to defend Tictock besides saying he's going to flip town.
k carry on Wrong. On July 30 2015 23:49 Rels wrote:3 - noobking defended TikTock too hard ... It's not the fact that he defend tictock. It's the way he defended him, which you failed to mention at all. Yes. Rels is saying that n00bKing defended Tictock too hard. Which for some reason you have a problem with. Here's the problem moosy, let me make it clear: 1) YOU say that n00bking KNEW that scott was cop. 2) WHEN scott claims cop, n00king STILL wants to vote for him when he is un-CC'd. So either you're wrong about n00bking, or n00bking is doing something completely illogical and against town win condition. I already explained this before you went to sleep. I even quoted how rayn was thinking the same thing and quoted his posts where he was saying the same thing is n00bKing. The difference is that Rayn didn't KNOW that scott was cop beforehand, which you say that n00bking did. 1) I said that we all knew that scott had a possibility of being PR. Obviously after scott claimed we know he's a cop now. 2) This was already explained and I quoted where even rayn had the same thought process. 1) Wrong. I had NO IDEA or SUSPICIONS that scott was cop. Please QUOTE where EVERYONE suspected that scott was a PR. Thank you.
Well then, of course not you.
What I meant to say was everyone who read my posts about how scott could be a PR and stopped to think for a moment and used their brains.
|
On July 31 2015 02:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:16 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 02:13 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:08 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 02:07 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:04 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:53 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:46 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:39 ruXxar wrote:
[quote]
Wrong.
On July 30 2015 23:49 Rels wrote:3 - noobking defended TikTock too hard ... It's not the fact that he defend tictock. It's the way he defended him, which you failed to mention at all. Yes. Rels is saying that n00bKing defended Tictock too hard. Which for some reason you have a problem with. Here's the problem moosy, let me make it clear: 1) YOU say that n00bking KNEW that scott was cop. 2) WHEN scott claims cop, n00king STILL wants to vote for him when he is un-CC'd. So either you're wrong about n00bking, or n00bking is doing something completely illogical and against town win condition. I already explained this before you went to sleep. I even quoted how rayn was thinking the same thing and quoted his posts where he was saying the same thing is n00bKing. The difference is that Rayn didn't KNOW that scott was cop beforehand, which you say that n00bking did. 1) I said that we all knew that scott had a possibility of being PR. Obviously after scott claimed we know he's a cop now. 2) This was already explained and I quoted where even rayn had the same thought process. 1) Wrong. I had NO IDEA or SUSPICIONS that scott was cop. Please QUOTE where EVERYONE suspected that scott was a PR. Thank you. Well then, of course not you. What I meant to say was everyone who read my posts about how scott could be a PR and stopped to think for a moment and used their brains.
EVERYONE WHO SUSPECTED SCOTT WAS COP BASED ON MOOSYS POSTS PLEASE REPORT IN.
IT'S YOUR TOWN DUTY.
Thank you.
|
On July 31 2015 02:23 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:16 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 02:13 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:08 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 02:07 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:04 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:53 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:46 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:
[quote]
[quote]
... It's not the fact that he defend tictock. It's the way he defended him, which you failed to mention at all. Yes. Rels is saying that n00bKing defended Tictock too hard. Which for some reason you have a problem with. Here's the problem moosy, let me make it clear: 1) YOU say that n00bking KNEW that scott was cop. 2) WHEN scott claims cop, n00king STILL wants to vote for him when he is un-CC'd. So either you're wrong about n00bking, or n00bking is doing something completely illogical and against town win condition. I already explained this before you went to sleep. I even quoted how rayn was thinking the same thing and quoted his posts where he was saying the same thing is n00bKing. The difference is that Rayn didn't KNOW that scott was cop beforehand, which you say that n00bking did. 1) I said that we all knew that scott had a possibility of being PR. Obviously after scott claimed we know he's a cop now. 2) This was already explained and I quoted where even rayn had the same thought process. 1) Wrong. I had NO IDEA or SUSPICIONS that scott was cop. Please QUOTE where EVERYONE suspected that scott was a PR. Thank you. Well then, of course not you. What I meant to say was everyone who read my posts about how scott could be a PR and stopped to think for a moment and used their brains. EVERYONE WHO SUSPECTED SCOTT WAS COP BASED ON MOOSYS POSTS PLEASE REPORT IN.
IT'S YOUR TOWN DUTY.Thank you.
I can't wait for the overwhelming response to this 
|
On July 31 2015 02:27 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:23 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 02:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:16 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 02:13 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:08 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 02:07 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:04 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:53 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:46 ruXxar wrote:
[quote]
It's not the fact that he defend tictock. It's the way he defended him, which you failed to mention at all. Yes. Rels is saying that n00bKing defended Tictock too hard. Which for some reason you have a problem with. Here's the problem moosy, let me make it clear: 1) YOU say that n00bking KNEW that scott was cop. 2) WHEN scott claims cop, n00king STILL wants to vote for him when he is un-CC'd. So either you're wrong about n00bking, or n00bking is doing something completely illogical and against town win condition. I already explained this before you went to sleep. I even quoted how rayn was thinking the same thing and quoted his posts where he was saying the same thing is n00bKing. The difference is that Rayn didn't KNOW that scott was cop beforehand, which you say that n00bking did. 1) I said that we all knew that scott had a possibility of being PR. Obviously after scott claimed we know he's a cop now. 2) This was already explained and I quoted where even rayn had the same thought process. 1) Wrong. I had NO IDEA or SUSPICIONS that scott was cop. Please QUOTE where EVERYONE suspected that scott was a PR. Thank you. Well then, of course not you. What I meant to say was everyone who read my posts about how scott could be a PR and stopped to think for a moment and used their brains. EVERYONE WHO SUSPECTED SCOTT WAS COP BASED ON MOOSYS POSTS PLEASE REPORT IN.
IT'S YOUR TOWN DUTY.Thank you. I can't wait for the overwhelming response to this
If no one responds that means no on read or no one thought. Which is bad for town in both ways. I'm pretty sure rayn caught on based on his posts but he's dead so I guess he can't help me out.
|
ruXxar, you can ask me to act against the Town's interests all you want. But I told you that I won't.
|
Off to work. Town Case on n00bKing should hopefully be later today. There are parts of it that ruXxar AND Rels have already both failed to address. So I don't expect they'll have any answers this time either. And you know why they won't be able to come up with answers?
Because I'm Town.
|
Wow you're so active ruxx pretty cool
As long as one of damdred disfo nocturne sulfu breshke doesn't start doubting noobking being mafia I'll just read the thread
|
On July 31 2015 02:31 n00bKing wrote:
ruXxar, you can ask me to act against the Town's interests all you want. But I told you that I won't.
WHICH YOU ALREADY DID BY WANTING TO VOTE FOR OUR UN'CC'D COP?!!
I'm going to spam this until you answer. IDGAF.
@ N00bking
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
|
On July 31 2015 02:33 Rels wrote:Wow you're so active ruxx pretty cool
If you guys want I can get you two a night in a hotel together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
24825
4872
3794
EPT
