|
On July 31 2015 02:29 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:27 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 02:23 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 02:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:16 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 02:13 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:08 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 02:07 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:04 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:53 MoosyDoosy wrote:
[quote]
Yes. Rels is saying that n00bKing defended Tictock too hard. Which for some reason you have a problem with. Here's the problem moosy, let me make it clear: 1) YOU say that n00bking KNEW that scott was cop. 2) WHEN scott claims cop, n00king STILL wants to vote for him when he is un-CC'd. So either you're wrong about n00bking, or n00bking is doing something completely illogical and against town win condition. I already explained this before you went to sleep. I even quoted how rayn was thinking the same thing and quoted his posts where he was saying the same thing is n00bKing. The difference is that Rayn didn't KNOW that scott was cop beforehand, which you say that n00bking did. 1) I said that we all knew that scott had a possibility of being PR. Obviously after scott claimed we know he's a cop now. 2) This was already explained and I quoted where even rayn had the same thought process. 1) Wrong. I had NO IDEA or SUSPICIONS that scott was cop. Please QUOTE where EVERYONE suspected that scott was a PR. Thank you. Well then, of course not you. What I meant to say was everyone who read my posts about how scott could be a PR and stopped to think for a moment and used their brains. EVERYONE WHO SUSPECTED SCOTT WAS COP BASED ON MOOSYS POSTS PLEASE REPORT IN.
IT'S YOUR TOWN DUTY.Thank you. I can't wait for the overwhelming response to this  If no one responds that means no on read or no one thought. Which is bad for town in both ways. I'm pretty sure rayn caught on based on his posts but he's dead so I guess he can't help me out.
It means that your premise is completely false and your conclusions based on it are wrong.
|
On July 31 2015 02:41 MoosyDoosy wrote:If you guys want I can get you two a night in a hotel together.
Yeah will need that if I wait until LS read your inexistent PM.
|
On July 31 2015 02:43 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:41 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:33 Rels wrote:Wow you're so active ruxx pretty cool If you guys want I can get you two a night in a hotel together. Yeah will need that if I wait until LS read your inexistent PM.
No it exists. If not I'll just make another post about killing ruXxar and then he'll have to modkill me.
|
On July 31 2015 02:47 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:43 Rels wrote:On July 31 2015 02:41 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:33 Rels wrote:Wow you're so active ruxx pretty cool If you guys want I can get you two a night in a hotel together. Yeah will need that if I wait until LS read your inexistent PM. No it exists. If not I'll just make another post about killing ruXxar and then he'll have to modkill me.
Can't wait to see that. (=
|
On July 31 2015 02:49 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:47 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:43 Rels wrote:On July 31 2015 02:41 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:33 Rels wrote:Wow you're so active ruxx pretty cool If you guys want I can get you two a night in a hotel together. Yeah will need that if I wait until LS read your inexistent PM. No it exists. If not I'll just make another post about killing ruXxar and then he'll have to modkill me. Can't wait to see that. (=
I just hope you come to your senses after I flip town rather than being a sarcastic little prick like you are now.
|
Seriously though.
This Moosy attitude is the opposite of townie
Here is what a townie would do:
Choice 1: not sure about Rels' case, but use one of the remaining mislynches on noobking to check.
Choice 2: Rels' case is super wrong: fight against it and push his own case.
Choice 3: Rels' case is so wrong it can only be explained by Rels being mafia: make a case on Rels and push him.
Here is what a townie would not do:
Martyring.
Menacing to get modkilled.
Ad hom attacks.
|
On July 31 2015 02:58 Rels wrote:
Seriously though.
This Moosy attitude is the opposite of townie
Here is what a townie would do:
Choice 1: not sure about Rels' case, but use one of the remaining mislynches on noobking to check.
Choice 2: Rels' case is super wrong: fight against it and push his own case.
Choice 3: Rels' case is so wrong it can only be explained by Rels being mafia: make a case on Rels and push him.
Here is what a townie would not do:
Martyring.
Menacing to get modkilled.
Ad hom attacks.
So...how dumb are you going to feel when I flip town? Anyone would resort to ad hom attacks after everyone literally just says that they didn't listen to your posts and that they won't listen to your reasoning. And I already did do Choice 2...But you won't read it and listen to my reasoning...Oh wait. That sounds familiar...
|
On July 31 2015 03:05 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:58 Rels wrote:
Seriously though.
This Moosy attitude is the opposite of townie
Here is what a townie would do:
Choice 1: not sure about Rels' case, but use one of the remaining mislynches on noobking to check.
Choice 2: Rels' case is super wrong: fight against it and push his own case.
Choice 3: Rels' case is so wrong it can only be explained by Rels being mafia: make a case on Rels and push him.
Here is what a townie would not do:
Martyring.
Menacing to get modkilled.
Ad hom attacks. So...how dumb are you going to feel when I flip town? Anyone would resort to ad hom attacks after everyone literally just says that they didn't listen to your posts and that they won't listen to your reasoning. And I already did do Choice 2...But you won't read it and listen to my reasoning...Oh wait. That sounds familiar...
I will be very angry at you for playing like that:
Martyring.
Menacing to get modkilled.
Ad hom attacks.
Still can't wait for it though.
|
On July 31 2015 03:09 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 03:05 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 02:58 Rels wrote:
Seriously though.
This Moosy attitude is the opposite of townie
Here is what a townie would do:
Choice 1: not sure about Rels' case, but use one of the remaining mislynches on noobking to check.
Choice 2: Rels' case is super wrong: fight against it and push his own case.
Choice 3: Rels' case is so wrong it can only be explained by Rels being mafia: make a case on Rels and push him.
Here is what a townie would not do:
Martyring.
Menacing to get modkilled.
Ad hom attacks. So...how dumb are you going to feel when I flip town? Anyone would resort to ad hom attacks after everyone literally just says that they didn't listen to your posts and that they won't listen to your reasoning. And I already did do Choice 2...But you won't read it and listen to my reasoning...Oh wait. That sounds familiar... I will be very angry at you for playing like that: Martyring. Menacing to get modkilled. Ad hom attacks. Still can't wait for it though.
See. You're already ignoring how I said I already performed Choice 2. I also warned you about tunneling but you won't listen. I literally warned all 3 people who tunneled to not tunnel. You, n00bKing, and ruXxar.
|
So. MoosyDoosy:
D1
N1
D2
N2
D3
So. N2 MoosyDoosy appears to be super mad about the TT lynch, whom he seemingly had a godly town read on, but he didn't do much to avert. Then he gets super mad when people seem suspicious of either him and/or n00bKing who he also appears to have a godly town read on. Unfortunately from reading his filter I am not quite sure where this godly town read on n00bKing comes from (last mention was N1 when he reread n00bKing's filter).
Question:
MoosyDoosy can you explain your godly town read on n00bKing?
Can you explain your godly town read on n00bKing, without the use of meta?
Can you explain over what exactly got you so angry N2+D3? Like... n00bKing got like two votes and some ppl are suspicious of you and/or n00bKing and you proceed to overreact much?
|
MoosyDoosy has effectivly been Modkilled and I will do a flip for him at the Night Post.
|
On July 31 2015 03:15 LightningStrike wrote:
MoosyDoosy has effectivly been Modkilled and I will do a flip for him at the Night Post.
Stay strong people.
This is mafia's last ditch effort to save n00bking.
They knew they are screwed anyway, so this is their last desperate attempt.
|
On July 31 2015 02:37 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:31 n00bKing wrote:
ruXxar, you can ask me to act against the Town's interests all you want. But I told you that I won't. WHICH YOU ALREADY DID BY WANTING TO VOTE FOR OUR UN'CC'D COP?!!
There were reasons to doubt the claim that have been clearly explained to you. And a lynched Cop is not significantly worse than an outed/neutralized Cop, for reasons that have been clearly explained to you. He's a Vanilla, Ticktock was a Vanilla. There was reason to think Scott could be Scum, there were NO reasons to think Ticktock was Scum. Lynching Ticktock was what acted against the Town's interests.
|
On July 31 2015 03:17 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 03:15 LightningStrike wrote:
MoosyDoosy has effectivly been Modkilled and I will do a flip for him at the Night Post. Stay strong people. This is mafia's last ditch effort to save n00bking. They knew they are screwed anyway, so this is their last desperate attempt.
Don't know about that. Can't see mafia getting modkilled on purpose. He may have been modkilled for pretending to be modkilled I suppose but it seems weird.
|
On July 31 2015 02:05 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 11:11 Breshke wrote:
Also rels i don't think you should be using the fact that some people unvoted scott straight after his cop claim to make them more townie. I don't really think that logic holds up. Rels doesn't use logic. Rels is immune to logic. ruXxar posted a "TownShield" and Rels has a "LogicShield."
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
|
On July 31 2015 03:17 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 03:15 LightningStrike wrote:
MoosyDoosy has effectivly been Modkilled and I will do a flip for him at the Night Post. Stay strong people. This is mafia's last ditch effort to save n00bking. They knew they are screwed anyway, so this is their last desperate attempt.
Why do you NEVER think before you post?
If Moosy is going to flip Red after the modkill, then no matter who we lynch today, you're still lynching me on Day 4. And if your Moosy/n00b theory were correct, this play by Moosy has a 0% chance of success. Zero.
It's what...8/2 right now? Let's say we guess wrong with our other lynch today. 7/2. BUT Moosy flips Red in the Modkill. 7/1. Night kill makes it 6/1. If you're right, you lynch me and it's 6/0. Even if you're wrong, you lynch me and it's 5/1. Night kill makes it 4/1 and you still have ANOTHER chance after you mislynch me. If Moosy flips Red in the Modkill, there is basically NO possibility of a Scum win. How on Earth could you be foolish enough to still try to lynch me before seeing his flip, when knowing his allegiance not only tells you a ton about me, but also tells you a ton about Breshke?
This is ANOTHER instance where you are displaying a Scum mentality. You haven't done anything that remotely benefitted the Town since I don't know when.
|
On July 31 2015 03:23 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 02:05 n00bKing wrote:
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it.
How about you do talk about it.
How about I DON'T talk about it, since it would be counter-productive for me to do so. (This is without even mentioning that you would just say "Durr....I still don't get it" anyway.)
|
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:On July 30 2015 06:53 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 06:14 ruXxar wrote:
N00bking, what do you think of this post? Not impressed. He doesn't even touch on the common sense truth that the reason we know Rels the Cop would never turn in a check on me on Night 1 is because he said that's exactly what he would do if he was the Cop, and gave no alternate suggestions. I have never seen an investigative role do something like that. I WILL never see an investigative role do something like that. If Rels is the Cop, I'm not getting checked on Night 1. PERIOD. So he also didn't get your point. He never said he doesn't get that point. He just doesn't touch on it. Maybe he thought that part didn't need to be mentioned. You know...because it's common sense. On July 30 2015 07:02 ruXxar wrote:What did you think of this part? Did you in fact warn moosy that scott was cop? Also, it was able to be deduced that scott was cop for reasons that I stated before. n00bKing obviously didn't want to disclose this information so that Mafia would figure it out and he IN FACT warned me when I posted my reasoning for why scott should be town. However this ended up not mattering because Damdred made everyone pile votes on scott which made him role claim.
Gee, I guess I shouldn't talk about that, huh? Did you forget AGAIN that only Scum could be sure there won't be another Cop claim? If you want to claim Scum, there are easier ways to do it. How about you do talk about it. Did you try to warn moosy about Scott being a cop, yes or no? It's a simple question.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
On July 30 2015 16:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 07:18 n00bKing wrote:On July 30 2015 07:15 ruXxar wrote:
I asked him to SPECIFICIALLY to explain your statement on rels, so that we plebs could understand. And he failed HARD.
The fact that you don't scum-read him for that beyondworldly horrible post is confirming you as his mafia buddy.
You don't even know what he's saying in that post. But don't worry, if you want to scumread him for it, he'll probably oblige you himself. Back to work. Later, fools! What IS he saying in that post then? Give me your interpretation of it.
I don't like being ignored.
|
On July 31 2015 03:27 ruXxar wrote:
I don't like being ignored.
All you've done is ignore the good arguments posted by people like Ticktock and Moosy and myself, and instead focus on your own misguided notions, blinding yourself to everything that is actually going on in the game.
|
On July 31 2015 03:38 n00bKing wrote:All you've done is ignore the good arguments posted by people like Ticktock and Moosy and myself, and instead focus on your own misguided notions, blinding yourself to everything that is actually going on in the game.
If you think I'm going to town read you for ignoring my questions you're misguided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
