|
On July 31 2015 01:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:
We all knew that scott had a chance of being PR. It was stated multiple times by me and others as well. If you hadn't read it then you're doing a bad job as town. As to why we have a PR Rels, go to page 91 where I dunk ruXxar into the ground but he runs away because he can't refute my points there.
So you are saying:
1 - noobking knew Scott had a chance at being pr
2 - when Scott claimed noobking called his claim illogical
3 - noobking was OK to lynch Scott over tictock
Confirm ?
|
On July 30 2015 20:16 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 19:20 ruXxar wrote:
Rels, will you play another game after this one? Sure! Love playing this game (=
^^. Think i'll play another 13 man mafia, more fun than the big games.
Maybe thinking of the cannon game. Looks interesting with new rules!
The desert mafia game is also tempting, but not so full yet.
I'm just hoping to be able to flow from 1 game to the next without waiting too long inbetween 
|
On July 31 2015 01:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:
We all knew that scott had a chance of being PR. It was stated multiple times by me and others as well. If you hadn't read it then you're doing a bad job as town. As to why we have a PR Rels, go to page 91 where I dunk ruXxar into the ground but he runs away because he can't refute my points there.
Yeah I ran away
On July 30 2015 09:12 ruXxar wrote:
I'm signing out for the night guys.
Stay strong town, we are on the cusp of winning this.
N00bking + moosy last mafia.
You can write that on my grave stone.
|
On July 31 2015 01:31 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 01:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:
We all knew that scott had a chance of being PR. It was stated multiple times by me and others as well. If you hadn't read it then you're doing a bad job as town. As to why we have a PR Rels, go to page 91 where I dunk ruXxar into the ground but he runs away because he can't refute my points there. So you are saying: 1 - noobking knew Scott had a chance at being pr 2 - when Scott claimed noobking called his claim illogical 3 - noobking was OK to lynch Scott over tictock Confirm ?
Not saying that exactly. Saying this:
On July 30 2015 08:37 MoosyDoosy wrote:So for your simple brain to process #2:
BEFORE CLAIM:
- scott has likely chance of being PR
AFTER CLAIM:
- scott says he has green check on me
- It's weird that Flexes was able to put in an action because he was inactive for more than 24 hours
- scott could have been lying
- n00bKing and rayn point this out
AFTERWARDS:
- no one counter claims -> means that scott has to be cop as weird as it may seem
On July 30 2015 08:48 MoosyDoosy wrote:For reference ruXxar here are rayn's posts who you seemed to trust so much: Him basically asking about whether or not Flexes got replaced automatically due to inactivity or whether Flexes asked for it. Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 06:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Waitwaitwiat.
if a power role gets replaced while having not sent in an action, what happens? Is there no action or what? rayn's flip flopping after initially realizing that scott's vote made no sense. Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 06:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I dont care.
It doesnt make any sense at all.
The dude is in the middle of writing a reads post.
He disappears, as a cop. He never comes back, gets replaced.
BUT HE HAS SOMEHOW SENT IN A COP CHECK?!?!?!
rofl Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 06:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
NOBODY SENDS A COP CHECK 24H INTO DAY FUCKING ONE. Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 06:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Whatever.
Lets not lynch scott then unless cc.
##unvote
##vote tictock And n00bKing did the same thing but you want to lynch him? Right....smart thinking man.
|
On July 31 2015 01:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:
So according to Rels, n00bKing is Mafia because he tried hard to defend Tictock while according to Breshke I'm Mafia because I didn't do much to defend Tictock besides saying he's going to flip town.
k carry on
Wrong.
|
On July 31 2015 01:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Unfortunately your argument against n00bKing is all refutable. Your only good point is #4 but ruXxar was the one to ask that question and neither of us wish to answer questions from ruXxar for reasons stated before and as clearly demonstrated in Page 91. As for Point #5, you're guilty of that as well so you can't really say that without being hypocritical.
That's fine. This game is already over for me. Just the formalities left at this point.
|
Btw, I'm still waiting for an explanation of n00bkings statement on rels.
10$ directly to your paypal if you can give me an explanation moosy.
|
On July 31 2015 01:39 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 01:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:
So according to Rels, n00bKing is Mafia because he tried hard to defend Tictock while according to Breshke I'm Mafia because I didn't do much to defend Tictock besides saying he's going to flip town.
k carry on Wrong.
On July 30 2015 23:49 Rels wrote:3 - noobking defended TikTock too hard
...
|
So...you're saying Rels is wrong? Good to know.
|
On July 31 2015 01:40 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 01:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Unfortunately your argument against n00bKing is all refutable. Your only good point is #4 but ruXxar was the one to ask that question and neither of us wish to answer questions from ruXxar for reasons stated before and as clearly demonstrated in Page 91. As for Point #5, you're guilty of that as well so you can't really say that without being hypocritical. That's fine. This game is already over for me. Just the formalities left at this point.
Good. In that case why don't you be gracious and not be a dick? I'm trying to hold my anger in but you're not helping. Thank you.
|
On July 31 2015 01:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 01:39 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:
So according to Rels, n00bKing is Mafia because he tried hard to defend Tictock while according to Breshke I'm Mafia because I didn't do much to defend Tictock besides saying he's going to flip town.
k carry on Wrong. ...
It's not the fact that he defend tictock. It's the way he defended him, which you failed to mention at all.
|
On July 31 2015 01:46 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 01:40 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Unfortunately your argument against n00bKing is all refutable. Your only good point is #4 but ruXxar was the one to ask that question and neither of us wish to answer questions from ruXxar for reasons stated before and as clearly demonstrated in Page 91. As for Point #5, you're guilty of that as well so you can't really say that without being hypocritical. That's fine. This game is already over for me. Just the formalities left at this point. Good. In that case why don't you be gracious and not be a dick? I'm trying to hold my anger in but you're not helping. Thank you.
What's up moosy old buddy?
|
On July 31 2015 01:46 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 01:40 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Unfortunately your argument against n00bKing is all refutable. Your only good point is #4 but ruXxar was the one to ask that question and neither of us wish to answer questions from ruXxar for reasons stated before and as clearly demonstrated in Page 91. As for Point #5, you're guilty of that as well so you can't really say that without being hypocritical. That's fine. This game is already over for me. Just the formalities left at this point. Good. In that case why don't you be gracious and not be a dick? I'm trying to hold my anger in but you're not helping. Thank you.
Real talk though moosy.
I have no ill feeling towards you. I still love playing with you. Next game we're gonna wreck scum ok? <3
|
On July 31 2015 01:50 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 01:46 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:40 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Unfortunately your argument against n00bKing is all refutable. Your only good point is #4 but ruXxar was the one to ask that question and neither of us wish to answer questions from ruXxar for reasons stated before and as clearly demonstrated in Page 91. As for Point #5, you're guilty of that as well so you can't really say that without being hypocritical. That's fine. This game is already over for me. Just the formalities left at this point. Good. In that case why don't you be gracious and not be a dick? I'm trying to hold my anger in but you're not helping. Thank you. Real talk though moosy. I have no ill feeling towards you. I still love playing with you. Next game we're gonna wreck scum ok? <3
Next game you're going to tunnel in on me again. This is my second game as townie with you and you still tunnel in on me. This is my standard townie play. If you think I'm scum for it you're going to think I'm scum for it in our next game.
|
On July 31 2015 01:46 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 01:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:39 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:
So according to Rels, n00bKing is Mafia because he tried hard to defend Tictock while according to Breshke I'm Mafia because I didn't do much to defend Tictock besides saying he's going to flip town.
k carry on Wrong. On July 30 2015 23:49 Rels wrote:3 - noobking defended TikTock too hard ... It's not the fact that he defend tictock. It's the way he defended him, which you failed to mention at all.
Yes. Rels is saying that n00bKing defended Tictock too hard. Which for some reason you have a problem with.
|
On July 31 2015 01:51 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 01:50 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:46 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:40 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Unfortunately your argument against n00bKing is all refutable. Your only good point is #4 but ruXxar was the one to ask that question and neither of us wish to answer questions from ruXxar for reasons stated before and as clearly demonstrated in Page 91. As for Point #5, you're guilty of that as well so you can't really say that without being hypocritical. That's fine. This game is already over for me. Just the formalities left at this point. Good. In that case why don't you be gracious and not be a dick? I'm trying to hold my anger in but you're not helping. Thank you. Real talk though moosy. I have no ill feeling towards you. I still love playing with you. Next game we're gonna wreck scum ok? <3 Next game you're going to tunnel in on me again. This is my second game as townie with you and you still tunnel in on me. This is my standard townie play. If you think I'm scum for it you're going to think I'm scum for it in our next game.
No moosy.
I know you have to say this not to go against your win condition, but I know your playstyle, and you play different as town.
Being afk all day 1 and ad hom attacks? That's not you moosy, you are better than that and I know it.
I know you have a lot of respect for n00bking from our first game, I also have a ton of respect for n00bking.
I'm not going to hold this game against you both. I know you have to do dirty things as mafia.
Believe me, I hate rolling mafia too.
I thought it would be fun, but no, it's boring as shit.
I won't tunnel on you next game if you are town moosy. I do have a lot of respect for you and being part of my first mafia game you will always hold a special place in my heart.
I still remember your insane accurate read of me in the first game, I had tears in my eyes when I read how you were describing my mentality. I had goosebumps knowing that you could read me like that. Someone that actually gets me.
Well moosy, I've said before how this game makes you do shitty stuff, and for me personally it feels really unnatural to say these things since it's nothing like my personality in real life.
So yeah, that's my lifestory.
I hope we both roll town next game and we'll tag team fuck up those scums <3.
|
On July 31 2015 01:59 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 01:51 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:50 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:46 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:40 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Unfortunately your argument against n00bKing is all refutable. Your only good point is #4 but ruXxar was the one to ask that question and neither of us wish to answer questions from ruXxar for reasons stated before and as clearly demonstrated in Page 91. As for Point #5, you're guilty of that as well so you can't really say that without being hypocritical. That's fine. This game is already over for me. Just the formalities left at this point. Good. In that case why don't you be gracious and not be a dick? I'm trying to hold my anger in but you're not helping. Thank you. Real talk though moosy. I have no ill feeling towards you. I still love playing with you. Next game we're gonna wreck scum ok? <3 Next game you're going to tunnel in on me again. This is my second game as townie with you and you still tunnel in on me. This is my standard townie play. If you think I'm scum for it you're going to think I'm scum for it in our next game. No moosy. I know you have to say this not to go against your win condition, but I know your playstyle, and you play different as town. Being afk all day 1 and ad hom attacks? That's not you moosy, you are better than that and I know it. I know you have a lot of respect for n00bking from our first game, I also have a ton of respect for n00bking. I'm not going to hold this game against you both. I know you have to do dirty things as mafia. Believe me, I hate rolling mafia too. I thought it would be fun, but no, it's boring as shit. I won't tunnel on you next game if you are town moosy. I do have a lot of respect for you and being part of my first mafia game you will always hold a special place in my heart. I still remember your insane accurate read of me in the first game, I had tears in my eyes when I read how you were describing my mentality. I had goosebumps knowing that you could read me like that. Someone that actually gets me. Well moosy, I've said before how this game makes you do shitty stuff, and for me personally it feels really unnatural to say these things since it's nothing like my personality in real life. So yeah, that's my lifestory. I hope we both roll town next game and we'll tag team fuck up those scums <3.
No you're the one who's wrong. I am a town. I am literally asking LightningStrike for a modkill right now so that I will flip and you guys will see it and not waste this day on mislynching n00bKing.
I can still read you plain as day in this game too. And anyone's play evolves. My play has evolved into this. You either hate it or leave it.
|
On July 31 2015 01:53 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 01:46 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:39 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:
So according to Rels, n00bKing is Mafia because he tried hard to defend Tictock while according to Breshke I'm Mafia because I didn't do much to defend Tictock besides saying he's going to flip town.
k carry on Wrong. On July 30 2015 23:49 Rels wrote:3 - noobking defended TikTock too hard ... It's not the fact that he defend tictock. It's the way he defended him, which you failed to mention at all. Yes. Rels is saying that n00bKing defended Tictock too hard. Which for some reason you have a problem with.
Here's the problem moosy, let me make it clear:
1) YOU say that n00bking KNEW that scott was cop.
2) WHEN scott claims cop, n00king STILL wants to vote for him when he is un-CC'd.
So either you're wrong about n00bking, or n00bking is doing something completely illogical and against town win condition.
|
On July 30 2015 11:11 Breshke wrote:
Also rels i don't think you should be using the fact that some people unvoted scott straight after his cop claim to make them more townie. I don't really think that logic holds up.
Rels doesn't use logic. Rels is immune to logic. ruXxar posted a "TownShield" and Rels has a "LogicShield."
|
On July 31 2015 02:04 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2015 01:53 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:46 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:On July 31 2015 01:39 ruXxar wrote:On July 31 2015 01:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:
So according to Rels, n00bKing is Mafia because he tried hard to defend Tictock while according to Breshke I'm Mafia because I didn't do much to defend Tictock besides saying he's going to flip town.
k carry on Wrong. On July 30 2015 23:49 Rels wrote:3 - noobking defended TikTock too hard ... It's not the fact that he defend tictock. It's the way he defended him, which you failed to mention at all. Yes. Rels is saying that n00bKing defended Tictock too hard. Which for some reason you have a problem with. Here's the problem moosy, let me make it clear: 1) YOU say that n00bking KNEW that scott was cop. 2) WHEN scott claims cop, n00king STILL wants to vote for him when he is un-CC'd. So either you're wrong about n00bking, or n00bking is doing something completely illogical and against town win condition.
I already explained this before you went to sleep.
I even quoted how rayn was thinking the same thing and quoted his posts where he was saying the same thing is n00bKing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
