Newbie Student Mafia XIII - Page 95

On July 31 2015 01:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:
We all knew that scott had a chance of being PR. It was stated multiple times by me and others as well. If you hadn't read it then you're doing a bad job as town. As to why we have a PR Rels, go to page 91 where I dunk ruXxar into the ground but he runs away because he can't refute my points there.

On July 30 2015 20:16 Rels wrote:

Sure! Love playing this game (=

On July 31 2015 01:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:
We all knew that scott had a chance of being PR. It was stated multiple times by me and others as well. If you hadn't read it then you're doing a bad job as town. As to why we have a PR Rels, go to page 91 where I dunk ruXxar into the ground but he runs away because he can't refute my points there.

On July 30 2015 09:12 ruXxar wrote:
I'm signing out for the night guys.
Stay strong town, we are on the cusp of winning this.

N00bking + moosy last mafia.
You can write that on my grave stone.

On July 31 2015 01:31 Rels wrote:

So you are saying:
1 - noobking knew Scott had a chance at being pr
2 - when Scott claimed noobking called his claim illogical
3 - noobking was OK to lynch Scott over tictock

Confirm ?

On July 30 2015 08:37 MoosyDoosy wrote:So for your simple brain to process #2:
BEFORE CLAIM:
- scott has likely chance of being PR

AFTER CLAIM:
- scott says he has green check on me
- It's weird that Flexes was able to put in an action because he was inactive for more than 24 hours
- scott could have been lying
- n00bKing and rayn point this out

AFTERWARDS:
- no one counter claims -> means that scott has to be cop as weird as it may seem

On July 30 2015 08:48 MoosyDoosy wrote:
For reference ruXxar here are rayn's posts who you seemed to trust so much:

Him basically asking about whether or not Flexes got replaced automatically due to inactivity or whether Flexes asked for it.


rayn's flip flopping after initially realizing that scott's vote made no sense.




And n00bKing did the same thing but you want to lynch him? Right....smart thinking man.

On July 31 2015 01:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:
So according to Rels, n00bKing is Mafia because he tried hard to defend Tictock while according to Breshke I'm Mafia because I didn't do much to defend Tictock besides saying he's going to flip town.

k carry on

On July 31 2015 01:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Unfortunately your argument against n00bKing is all refutable. Your only good point is #4 but ruXxar was the one to ask that question and neither of us wish to answer questions from ruXxar for reasons stated before and as clearly demonstrated in Page 91. As for Point #5, you're guilty of that as well so you can't really say that without being hypocritical.

On July 31 2015 01:39 ruXxar wrote:


Wrong.

On July 31 2015 01:40 ruXxar wrote:


That's fine. This game is already over for me. Just the formalities left at this point.

On July 31 2015 01:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:


...

On July 31 2015 01:46 MoosyDoosy wrote:

Good. In that case why don't you be gracious and not be a dick? I'm trying to hold my anger in but you're not helping. Thank you.

On July 31 2015 01:46 MoosyDoosy wrote:

Good. In that case why don't you be gracious and not be a dick? I'm trying to hold my anger in but you're not helping. Thank you.

On July 31 2015 01:50 ruXxar wrote:


Real talk though moosy.
I have no ill feeling towards you. I still love playing with you. Next game we're gonna wreck scum ok? <3

On July 31 2015 01:46 ruXxar wrote:


It's not the fact that he defend tictock. It's the way he defended him, which you failed to mention at all.

On July 31 2015 01:51 MoosyDoosy wrote:

Next game you're going to tunnel in on me again. This is my second game as townie with you and you still tunnel in on me. This is my standard townie play. If you think I'm scum for it you're going to think I'm scum for it in our next game.

On July 31 2015 01:59 ruXxar wrote:


No moosy.
I know you have to say this not to go against your win condition, but I know your playstyle, and you play different as town.
Being afk all day 1 and ad hom attacks? That's not you moosy, you are better than that and I know it.

I know you have a lot of respect for n00bking from our first game, I also have a ton of respect for n00bking.
I'm not going to hold this game against you both. I know you have to do dirty things as mafia.
Believe me, I hate rolling mafia too.
I thought it would be fun, but no, it's boring as shit.

I won't tunnel on you next game if you are town moosy. I do have a lot of respect for you and being part of my first mafia game you will always hold a special place in my heart.

I still remember your insane accurate read of me in the first game, I had tears in my eyes when I read how you were describing my mentality. I had goosebumps knowing that you could read me like that. Someone that actually gets me.

Well moosy, I've said before how this game makes you do shitty stuff, and for me personally it feels really unnatural to say these things since it's nothing like my personality in real life.

So yeah, that's my lifestory.

I hope we both roll town next game and we'll tag team fuck up those scums <3.

On July 31 2015 01:53 MoosyDoosy wrote:

Yes. Rels is saying that n00bKing defended Tictock too hard. Which for some reason you have a problem with.

On July 30 2015 11:11 Breshke wrote:
Also rels i don't think you should be using the fact that some people unvoted scott straight after his cop claim to make them more townie. I don't really think that logic holds up.

On July 31 2015 02:04 ruXxar wrote:


Here's the problem moosy, let me make it clear:

1) YOU say that n00bking KNEW that scott was cop.

2) WHEN scott claims cop, n00king STILL wants to vote for him when he is un-CC'd.

So either you're wrong about n00bking, or n00bking is doing something completely illogical and against town win condition.