|
On March 26 2008 07:57 Wysp wrote: Also, if this splitting causes the wrong person to be lynched, he can just be pardoned (not sure if this has been mentioned, I haven't time right now but to skim.)
after tonight's killings + the info we already know, I'm almost certain tomorrow is going to be nuts.
|
Aceeeeeee
what are your notes on me!
Lol...and the first impression...xD
|
I dont have anything on you, you probably started posting actively after I stopped taking notes :/
|
Hope chuiu feels better soon. Tomorrow looks like its going to be more fun than this.
|
Oh...Damn...Lol...I didn't post during the mayoral elections except in support of Emp...
=/
Now I feel left out ;-;
|
I dont have notes on a lot of people. only...43 people.
btw, what ever happened to Klive5ive?
|
I'm still here, haven't had time to properly look over the clues due to Easter and can't think of anything meaningful to say so yeah... I'm reading it all though, GJ so far.
|
just wondering, you were active in the beginning and kinda disappeared :/
|
On March 26 2008 07:46 JeeJee wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2008 07:01 Ace wrote:On March 26 2008 05:39 Scorch wrote:Ace himself said that he doesn't care about clues, but behaviour exclusively This way inactive Mafia members are just as much as a burden to them. We've got a few inactive townies, but I guess having about only ~20 or less players missing isn't a big deal right? /sarcasm as for the 3 spammers in this thread (aznval, showtime, shallow), stfu. a lot of people don't want to read that shit. Say what you want. I'll stop the spam but nothing is going to stop me from posting humor here and there. If you still have problems with humor, not my problem.
|
If Chuiu stays on the 48 hour basis (assuming he can type out the day post through the pain he's going through, poor guy), then Day 3 post will be up around 10 PM PST.
|
whoops, sorry bout that ace. still, i can't imagine mafia didn't think of that, they'd have to be pretty retarded, and if that's the case, saying that won't help them anyway.
|
no shit, use your head
fuck, I thought I had cottonmouth. God damnit, back to the drawing board. T_T
|
On March 26 2008 08:00 Naib wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2008 06:35 qrs wrote:
(...)
Ahrara, the logic behind Ace's plan is very simple: simply a way to narrow down who the Mafia are. It only works if people follow it. Why would you abstain? There aren't enough detectives to check everyone individually (...)
That's why he said he'll vote for a random person, so the detective can check the group along with him (if he votes with a small herd, a detective checking that out [unlimited ability: "How many of the people that voted for X are mafia?" question] could easily validate his trustworthyness to Ace) Please, guys, this is like the 3rd time a question like this comes up. At least try to remember what each member of the game can do (especially detectives, everyone seems to forget their abilities) Edit #2: screwed up quoting, that was the reason for my edit Yes, I understood what he meant. My point remains, we don't have enough detectives to check everyone individually. They only have one check a night. It's far more efficient to check large groups and narrow them down, as per the plan Ace is following, then to check groups of 1, or small groups.
So what were your notes on me, Ace?
|
On March 26 2008 09:38 qrs wrote: So what were your notes on me, Ace? Why can't everyone just wait until the end of the game so that there wouldn't be a need to post them separately each time someone asks?
|
|
Hold on, I just thought of something. Why not just have the group of 7 split into two like Ace said, but only perform a DT check on one of those groups? It's pretty obvious that if the check shows no mafia, then it would be the other group that contains the mafia. This way, we save DT ability usage.
|
On March 26 2008 10:42 butidigress wrote: Hold on, I just thought of something. Why not just have the group of 7 split into two like Ace said, but only perform a DT check on one of those groups? It's pretty obvious that if the check shows no mafia, then it would be the other group that contains the mafia. This way, we save DT ability usage.
Because new people will be voting so they will still need to check both groups. Unless all mafia are accounted for.
|
On March 26 2008 11:00 randombum wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2008 10:42 butidigress wrote: Hold on, I just thought of something. Why not just have the group of 7 split into two like Ace said, but only perform a DT check on one of those groups? It's pretty obvious that if the check shows no mafia, then it would be the other group that contains the mafia. This way, we save DT ability usage. Because new people will be voting so they will still need to check both groups. Unless all mafia are accounted for. New people shouldn't be voting for lynching you and Ace so you should have 3 and 4 votes each, so you would only need on DT check for you and him.
But the other ones you'd need them.
|
New people shouldn't be voting for lynching you and Ace so you should have 3 and 4 votes each, so you would only need on DT check for you and him.
Unless someone is inactive.
|
On March 26 2008 08:22 Ace wrote: I dont have notes on a lot of people. only...43 people Well im sure im in that group so what was ur first impression of me :D?
|
|
|
|