EPTCHUPAZI con butthijole vato
Los patas comé Tierra agua y feo kaka
TL Mafia LXIX: Carol Of The Bells - Page 264
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
CHUPAZI con butthijole vato Los patas comé Tierra agua y feo kaka | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On December 24 2014 01:57 sicklucker wrote: I thought you were trying to be scummy so you dont get killed and that totally worked? But ya your "town game" totally feel off from your first one After N2, when Trfel and OWS were lost, oh yes, absolutely it was a race to the bottom. It was clear as day they wanted all the PRs gone. But people were scumreading me prior to N2, which makes sense and that is where I am concerned because I knew I had trouble with reading a lot of people and stringing cases/arguments. It will be problematic regardless of whether I am a VT or PR if I can't get that part together, hopefully I can pick it up in the next few games. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
You will be better than my 50+ games by the time you reach 15 probably | ||
|
LightningStrike
United States14276 Posts
| ||
|
justanothertownie
16316 Posts
On December 24 2014 02:29 LightningStrike wrote: Slam any tips bro? I know you tried to coach me but I was dead to fast at that game (Campus Mafia). Alway follow the way of CHUPAZI. Trust the BAMCIS players like BH and never let the mafia SVENGALI you. Hijole | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On December 24 2014 02:39 justanothertownie wrote: Alway follow the way of CHUPAZI. Trust the BAMCIS players like BH and never let the mafia SVENGALI you. Hijole Basically Like most I can say is from a scum perspective, which you weren't this game? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
Like yeah I can only do so much I follow my gut (the way of hitleric uncanny CHUPAZI) so often I don't even know why my opinion has formed until I figure it out I am still right a lot though xD | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On December 24 2014 00:21 Koshi wrote: I got #yolo shot... How many of these disgruntled workers were there? That branch manager was just another vigi like this. Scum had 2 vigis. Interesting. I thought the workers had to claim before they would be able to be shot. Not... Strange stuff. what happened was that i originally made the branch manager role to kill claimed millers. But then Palmar decided it could be shot any time and just lose the bullet if they missed, and didn't update the wording i'd written for branch manager. there were 3 disgruntled workers total, one got lynched d1, kita was the other that got factional killed, so essentially mafia had a 1/20 shot in hitting the remaining disgruntled worker (you) and they hit it. Very nice for them. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On December 24 2014 01:18 rsoultin wrote: lol, GB, your initial case was bad, probably because your initial read was based on a gut read and you were trying to articulate it in a way to present as evidence. Read good, case bad, execution worse. Between that and the screaming I turned off to everything else you said for too long. My bias, most definitely, and I need to learn that a bad case (Vivax had a couple) =/= scum or wrong. But you did kind of dig yourself a hole there, at least with me. SL has that effect on me, too. All the present talk made me inclined to ignore the good point you guys brought up about the present and HF later. I'm a bullheaded dingbat, but thinking things out before you present them will help you guys, I'm pretty sure. Palmar already said it but you have to understand that a different style to yours (which is slow, logical, methodical) does not equal mafia. You were throwing suspicion on GB for his very, very, very townie push, and you were also pushing suspicion on sicklucker who was actually just incredibly townie in every facet. And essentially you didn't have mafia on HF for ages (despite the damning voting on d2 but that's something else) because he posted in a way you approved of with his cases. This was quite a strange game in one way because normally I feel a lot of mafia members are too bus-happy, whereas in this game all the mafia had a hard-on for defending other mafia at almost every turn, and in the end it tied them all together. Trfel, liancourt, and sicklucker especially understood what happened d2 with great game-reading sense - essentially all the mafia piled on KsC in an attempt to save Holyflare. Xatalos and KsC cross-defended each other repeatedly, Xatalos+Oats defended HF constantly, HF defended Xatalos, etc etc. Oats' play was just dire, but if mafia had played the d2 lynch better and/or Xata had judiciously bussed HF at the right time, mafia might have stood more of a chance. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On January 10 2012 04:28 Qatol wrote: Good? I doubt there will be much debate on this; it's a matter of consistency more than anything else. Not that it was a huge deal this game, but this is the second game in a row that this has been brought up. I know Palmar clarified things in the vote count, but that kinda conflicts with how the deadlines work in the model OP, so in the future I think we should try to stick to accepting votes up to and including the time listed in the OP to avoid confusion. The ghosts interaction with the Scrooge role was cool. It's too bad that it never got to be used. I liked the present idea too though I suppose there were issues with confirming players based on their use of the role. For instance, a mafia player who didn't want to risk getting blown up was punished for receiving a present. Might work better in a closed setup though with less confirmed information. Overall, there seemed to be way too many claims early on in the game regarding players roles and who received presents, especially in setups with role specific vig's and roleblockers. Even if you are safe from these vig's, you're narrowing down the pool for others to get targeted with a claim. I get what you were trying to do with the single mason, but I'm not sure that trying to teach town a lesson about not to solve the game with roles was worth the risk of a possible mafia fake claiming the mason partner, not geting counter-claimed, and have a 300 page thread go to waste over a misunderstanding of the setup. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
On December 24 2014 03:20 marvellosity wrote: what happened was that i originally made the branch manager role to kill claimed millers. But then Palmar decided it could be shot any time and just lose the bullet if they missed, and didn't update the wording i'd written for branch manager. there were 3 disgruntled workers total, one got lynched d1, kita was the other that got factional killed, so essentially mafia had a 1/20 shot in hitting the remaining disgruntled worker (you) and they hit it. Very nice for them. I liked your idea better. Punishes bad play (claims) instead of rewarding luck. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On December 24 2014 03:30 marvellosity wrote: Palmar already said it but you have to understand that a different style to yours (which is slow, logical, methodical) does not equal mafia. You were throwing suspicion on GB for his very, very, very townie push, and you were also pushing suspicion on sicklucker who was actually just incredibly townie in every facet. And essentially you didn't have mafia on HF for ages (despite the damning voting on d2 but that's something else) because he posted in a way you approved of with his cases. This was quite a strange game in one way because normally I feel a lot of mafia members are too bus-happy, whereas in this game all the mafia had a hard-on for defending other mafia at almost every turn, and in the end it tied them all together. Trfel, liancourt, and sicklucker especially understood what happened d2 with great game-reading sense - essentially all the mafia piled on KsC in an attempt to save Holyflare. Xatalos and KsC cross-defended each other repeatedly, Xatalos+Oats defended HF constantly, HF defended Xatalos, etc etc. Oats' play was just dire, but if mafia had played the d2 lynch better and/or Xata had judiciously bussed HF at the right time, mafia might have stood more of a chance. Hehe. I've often been far too happy to bus so I basically tried to defend my team this time around  It worked somewhat well too. Well, in the end it kind of gave me away... But if there weren't some unfortunate blunders on our side or if HTS didn't use her role (almost) perfectly, I think the chances were good for a (near) flawless victory. I wasn't really suspected for my associating with scum until very later either. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 24 2014 04:37 Damdred wrote: I enjoyed playing with xata, and koshi again I would say the same, but I haven't read day one yet. Probably never will | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 24 2014 04:37 Damdred wrote: I enjoyed playing with xata, and koshi again I think you played the best in the game btw | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
Like I am terrible at scum lately because I am getting better at town and my acting memory hasn't caught up, but srs When you bus nobody can solve the game like this. see Lian HTS GB op hey But If everybody bussed I question if it would have been so | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On December 24 2014 03:30 marvellosity wrote: Palmar already said it but you have to understand that a different style to yours (which is slow, logical, methodical) does not equal mafia. You were throwing suspicion on GB for his very, very, very townie push, and you were also pushing suspicion on sicklucker who was actually just incredibly townie in every facet. And essentially you didn't have mafia on HF for ages (despite the damning voting on d2 but that's something else) because he posted in a way you approved of with his cases. This was quite a strange game in one way because normally I feel a lot of mafia members are too bus-happy, whereas in this game all the mafia had a hard-on for defending other mafia at almost every turn, and in the end it tied them all together. Trfel, liancourt, and sicklucker especially understood what happened d2 with great game-reading sense - essentially all the mafia piled on KsC in an attempt to save Holyflare. Xatalos and KsC cross-defended each other repeatedly, Xatalos+Oats defended HF constantly, HF defended Xatalos, etc etc. Oats' play was just dire, but if mafia had played the d2 lynch better and/or Xata had judiciously bussed HF at the right time, mafia might have stood more of a chance. Lol, yup. Learning experience. I'm like this irl, too...emotion makes me turn off. I'll get it eventually ^^ | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
Lovin dat cellular data sson | ||
| ||
