EPTI hope people can actually see how terrible your answer. Why not wait until four people jumped on you. I highly doubt anyone else would jump onto you there since Robik already got to four.
Noir Mini Mafia: Chapter 2 - Page 28
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
I hope people can actually see how terrible your answer. Why not wait until four people jumped on you. I highly doubt anyone else would jump onto you there since Robik already got to four. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
this is gg's filter from his last scum game. he is plenty capable of making posts like that as scum. | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
On July 18 2014 16:03 kushm4sta wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/451317-detention-mafia?user=gobbledydook this is gg's filter from his last scum game. he is plenty capable of making posts like that as scum. okay. now why isnt he capable of making that post as town? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On November 14 2012 11:11 Blazinghand wrote: I claimed half way through day 1 and we're better off for it. If you think I'm scum, feel free to come at me. On May 22 2014 05:15 Blazinghand wrote: To be more clear, because I don't want to be lynched, and my role still works fine as long as scum don't know the deets. You have to admit, it DID get people to unvote me, so it was a good move. Mid-D1 claim is imo a perfectly acceptable strat and use of a blue role. etc etc Also, the reason "hard" vs "soft" or whatever is important is because, as it became clear, you fuckign fakeclaimed blue in a 1-blue game, possibly as a townie. I needed you to make it Abso fucking LUTELY clear that you were claiming so that if I got lynched, I knew who to tell town to lycnh after me I don't even know why i'm arguing with you, I might as well be debating economics with a freaking throw pillow | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
On July 18 2014 16:03 kushm4sta wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/451317-detention-mafia?user=gobbledydook this is gg's filter from his last scum game. he is plenty capable of making posts like that as scum. You have one game of me as mafia and none as town. I'm sure that's a very good representation of my meta. /s | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On July 18 2014 16:07 gobbledydook wrote: You have one game of me as mafia and none as town. I'm sure that's a very good representation of my meta. /s The meta doesn't show that you're scum. It shows that you could be scum. | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
On July 18 2014 16:07 kushm4sta wrote: one thing that looks pretty townie about MM is his townread of snickers. Snickers is a potential mislynch, so I wouldn't expect scum to townread him so easily. this i can understand. the only thing that bugs me about it is that he called snickers town for no reason whatsoever. | ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
you are 100% lynch/mislynch material and you seem to be the only one thats unaware of it. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On July 17 2014 14:37 gobbledydook wrote: That is just weak. First your third one on the bandwagon theory is just wifom. Even if it were commonly accepted that those who jump in the middle were more scummy would scum not then game that? And as far as I can tell there is no evidence to suggest the alignment of players on a bandwagon based on time of jump and nor have you advanced your own theory. Second you dismiss me and obi's arguments as weak but did not even bother to explain. It seems to me your arguments are the weakest of all. And your defence that you were trying to get conversation going? There was already conversation going and your baseless accusations do not help. You look like someone who is trying to say something without saying anything. ##unvote ##vote snickers This is something I see scum doing a lot. They make a big post defending themselves, then use their defense to justify a vote on someone. A defense of yourself isn't a reason why someone else is scum. Then at the end is the one justification of why snickers might be scum. It's an unspecific phrase that means nothing. | ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
On July 18 2014 16:17 kushm4sta wrote: This is something I see scum doing a lot. They make a big post defending themselves, then use their defense to justify a vote on someone. A defense of yourself isn't a reason why someone else is scum. Then at the end is the one justification of why snickers might be scum. It's an unspecific phrase that means nothing. yeah, i remember doing this in wc. i can get behind this i think. just remember that mm1 did the exact same thing. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
On July 18 2014 16:17 kushm4sta wrote: This is something I see scum doing a lot. They make a big post defending themselves, then use their defense to justify a vote on someone. A defense of yourself isn't a reason why someone else is scum. Then at the end is the one justification of why snickers might be scum. It's an unspecific phrase that means nothing. The whole post is a refutation of his post showing why it is weak and you say I slip in a note at the end with the lynch. You need glasses. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On July 18 2014 15:57 gobbledydook wrote: If I don't elaborate my logic then you say I am being vague and scumread me. I still think on the balance robik is actually blue. You don't like my read that's fine. But who do you think is the real blue? All you've done is snipe from the sidelines without giving reads. Here he starts to OMGUS me. He did the same thing when fuba suspected him in detention mafia. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
On July 18 2014 16:23 kushm4sta wrote: so gg, because snickers's read is wrong he's scum? No, it's not only that it's wrong. Being wrong is fine, I'm probably wrong on some of my reads too, this being a 'guessing game of epic proportions'. But it's that he was offering one line posts (no effort), then trying to justify his no effort with a weak argument that therefore I refuted and used as evidence to vote him. Do note that this was in the first half of the first page of his filter. Since then he has contributed more, possibly because of the votes pressuring him. And then he does the weird fake claim shit, I mean wtf? I don't even know what to think of that. | ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
##unvote ##vote gobbledydook | ||
| ||
.
