|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
You do it all the time, Holy. Half the time it's not really obvious to me what you're talking about with the way you do/do not include quotes and the way you explain things.
And I'm pretty clever and attentive in general.
|
On March 28 2014 19:33 thrawn2112 wrote:
iirc phagga defended me at first? then all the sudden he flipped this switch and I became mafia for the rest of his filter
so much so that he said that even though he was reading palmar as wishy washy maybe scum, he'd still rahter lynch thrawn
then it became obvuous that palmar would be lynched and phagga decided he didn't care too much about his thrawn read
Where did I defend you?
And last time I checked there are 2 mafia in this game, how is it a problem when I have 2 scum reads.
|
On March 28 2014 19:43 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:18 prplhz wrote:On March 28 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 17:52 prplhz wrote:dunno really i think your "wait up people, if palmar didn't read his pm we shouldn't lynch him" was a little too crazy for you to be scum with him though at the same time i don't see what people likes about phagga so much, his interactions with palmar don't seem like something you couldn't pull off as scum. also in this post he's all "meh i dno" about palmar but then here he's all "marv's case is really good", if he think that marv has a really good case on palmar why is his read on palmar then so meh? you were also around for lynch while phagga wasn't and that's bonus points for you and deductions for phagga I wasn't "meh i dno", I said he could be scum for the way he behaves, specifically for not commenting on anything and instead bicker uselessly with Marv. How does my agreement with marvs case contradict that statement? And I'm assuming for now that the last sentence is a joke. i simply just think that "completely agree[ing]" with a giant marv case would lead to a stronger read than what your expressed in your list Agreeing with marvs case came after I made that list. I don't see the issue. You don't know my schedule, you don't know if it was possible for me to be there or not which makes it a joke.
no don't know your schedule, don't know if it was possible for you to be there or not. i know that thrawn was there and i know you weren't there. that's really it.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Only when I'm on my phone which is like half the time but it's irrelevant because i already explained about the palmar thing in regards to thrawn and the nested quotes show what rayn was pointint at
|
On March 28 2014 19:43 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:18 prplhz wrote:On March 28 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 17:52 prplhz wrote:dunno really i think your "wait up people, if palmar didn't read his pm we shouldn't lynch him" was a little too crazy for you to be scum with him though at the same time i don't see what people likes about phagga so much, his interactions with palmar don't seem like something you couldn't pull off as scum. also in this post he's all "meh i dno" about palmar but then here he's all "marv's case is really good", if he think that marv has a really good case on palmar why is his read on palmar then so meh? you were also around for lynch while phagga wasn't and that's bonus points for you and deductions for phagga I wasn't "meh i dno", I said he could be scum for the way he behaves, specifically for not commenting on anything and instead bicker uselessly with Marv. How does my agreement with marvs case contradict that statement? And I'm assuming for now that the last sentence is a joke. i simply just think that "completely agree[ing]" with a giant marv case would lead to a stronger read than what your expressed in your list Agreeing with marvs case came after I made that list. I don't see the issue. You don't know my schedule, you don't know if it was possible for me to be there or not which makes it a joke.
marv's case was waaay before you made your list though
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Alright, I suppose my point is that it's reasonable for thrawn to be confused by what you're talking about because it isn't very clear to me either.
If you're talking about his unvote/vote...
On March 28 2014 19:26 marvellosity wrote:
One other thing to note, and without giving an opinion on alignments particularly because I cba to argue.
If marv is coming after Palmar hard and in the end produces a case that is very very very likely to get Palmar lynched, then mafia have to decide what they do.
Do they agree with the case and then backtrack really dully later even when it's clear Palmar is getting lynched with or without them, or do they try to look as good as possible from the flip with a decent vote?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Why the hell does being around at the deadline for someone that claimed scum become an issue to point out?
|
On March 28 2014 19:43 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:42 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 19:16 thrawn2112 wrote:On March 28 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 17:52 prplhz wrote:dunno really i think your "wait up people, if palmar didn't read his pm we shouldn't lynch him" was a little too crazy for you to be scum with him though at the same time i don't see what people likes about phagga so much, his interactions with palmar don't seem like something you couldn't pull off as scum. also in this post he's all "meh i dno" about palmar but then here he's all "marv's case is really good", if he think that marv has a really good case on palmar why is his read on palmar then so meh? you were also around for lynch while phagga wasn't and that's bonus points for you and deductions for phagga I wasn't "meh i dno", I said he could be scum for the way he behaves, specifically for not commenting on anything and instead bicker uselessly with Marv. How does my agreement with marvs case contradict that statement? And I'm assuming for now that the last sentence is a joke. do you still think i'm mafia? Yes, because I haven't had time to read up on you, so I'm still on the same stance as yesterday you replies to a bigass case i wrote against you and you didn';t think about your thrawn read during that?
A bad case doesn't make anyone necessarily scum, although it certainly didn't make you look more townier to me. Although I agree that the fact that you said you wouldn't know why I voted palmar gave me the impression you did not read the thread which is a scummy thing.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:48 Holyflare wrote:
Why the hell does being around at the deadline for someone that claimed scum become an issue to point out?
lol, quite right.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:47 marvellosity wrote:Alright, I suppose my point is that it's reasonable for thrawn to be confused by what you're talking about because it isn't very clear to me either. If you're talking about his unvote/vote... Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:26 marvellosity wrote:
One other thing to note, and without giving an opinion on alignments particularly because I cba to argue.
If marv is coming after Palmar hard and in the end produces a case that is very very very likely to get Palmar lynched, then mafia have to decide what they do.
Do they agree with the case and then backtrack really dully later even when it's clear Palmar is getting lynched with or without them, or do they try to look as good as possible from the flip with a decent vote?
I'm talking about palmar loving to lynch all liars and agreeing that thrawn was a liar but then unvoting him at the first opportunity he could, ignoring the original lie.
|
On March 28 2014 19:47 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:43 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 19:18 prplhz wrote:On March 28 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 17:52 prplhz wrote:dunno really i think your "wait up people, if palmar didn't read his pm we shouldn't lynch him" was a little too crazy for you to be scum with him though at the same time i don't see what people likes about phagga so much, his interactions with palmar don't seem like something you couldn't pull off as scum. also in this post he's all "meh i dno" about palmar but then here he's all "marv's case is really good", if he think that marv has a really good case on palmar why is his read on palmar then so meh? you were also around for lynch while phagga wasn't and that's bonus points for you and deductions for phagga I wasn't "meh i dno", I said he could be scum for the way he behaves, specifically for not commenting on anything and instead bicker uselessly with Marv. How does my agreement with marvs case contradict that statement? And I'm assuming for now that the last sentence is a joke. i simply just think that "completely agree[ing]" with a giant marv case would lead to a stronger read than what your expressed in your list Agreeing with marvs case came after I made that list. I don't see the issue. last sentence isn't a joke You don't know my schedule, you don't know if it was possible for me to be there or not which makes it a joke. marv's case was waaay before you made your list though
I wrote here "up to page 35", marv's case is on page 37.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:49 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:47 marvellosity wrote:Alright, I suppose my point is that it's reasonable for thrawn to be confused by what you're talking about because it isn't very clear to me either. If you're talking about his unvote/vote... On March 28 2014 19:26 marvellosity wrote:
One other thing to note, and without giving an opinion on alignments particularly because I cba to argue.
If marv is coming after Palmar hard and in the end produces a case that is very very very likely to get Palmar lynched, then mafia have to decide what they do.
Do they agree with the case and then backtrack really dully later even when it's clear Palmar is getting lynched with or without them, or do they try to look as good as possible from the flip with a decent vote? I'm talking about palmar loving to lynch all liars and agreeing that thrawn was a liar but then unvoting him at the first opportunity he could, ignoring the original lie.
ok, so what I said about not really trusting anything Palmar said (or did...) comes back into play. I mean I guess I'll go back and check at some point but I don't trust something like that very far at all
|
On March 28 2014 19:48 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:48 Holyflare wrote:
Why the hell does being around at the deadline for someone that claimed scum become an issue to point out? lol, quite right.
well okay i said that before i knew there literally was a scum claim.
i was still curious about palmar's flip, don't think thrawn would have stuck around if he knew what was going to happen and the thread was empty anyway and generally being around is townie and not being around is not as townie
|
|
|
On March 28 2014 19:50 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:47 prplhz wrote:On March 28 2014 19:43 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 19:18 prplhz wrote:On March 28 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 17:52 prplhz wrote:dunno really i think your "wait up people, if palmar didn't read his pm we shouldn't lynch him" was a little too crazy for you to be scum with him though at the same time i don't see what people likes about phagga so much, his interactions with palmar don't seem like something you couldn't pull off as scum. also in this post he's all "meh i dno" about palmar but then here he's all "marv's case is really good", if he think that marv has a really good case on palmar why is his read on palmar then so meh? you were also around for lynch while phagga wasn't and that's bonus points for you and deductions for phagga I wasn't "meh i dno", I said he could be scum for the way he behaves, specifically for not commenting on anything and instead bicker uselessly with Marv. How does my agreement with marvs case contradict that statement? And I'm assuming for now that the last sentence is a joke. i simply just think that "completely agree[ing]" with a giant marv case would lead to a stronger read than what your expressed in your list Agreeing with marvs case came after I made that list. I don't see the issue. last sentence isn't a joke You don't know my schedule, you don't know if it was possible for me to be there or not which makes it a joke. marv's case was waaay before you made your list though I wrote here "up to page 35", marv's case is on page 37.
hmm
|
On March 28 2014 19:49 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:47 marvellosity wrote:Alright, I suppose my point is that it's reasonable for thrawn to be confused by what you're talking about because it isn't very clear to me either. If you're talking about his unvote/vote... On March 28 2014 19:26 marvellosity wrote:
One other thing to note, and without giving an opinion on alignments particularly because I cba to argue.
If marv is coming after Palmar hard and in the end produces a case that is very very very likely to get Palmar lynched, then mafia have to decide what they do.
Do they agree with the case and then backtrack really dully later even when it's clear Palmar is getting lynched with or without them, or do they try to look as good as possible from the flip with a decent vote? I'm talking about palmar loving to lynch all liars and agreeing that thrawn was a liar but then unvoting him at the first opportunity he could, ignoring the original lie.
Yes, this.
Now for thrawn the "correct" answer is "it does not look bad on me because what Palmar says has nothing to do with my alignment as i can't do nothing about him contradicting his policies if i am town", and not "BUT I DID NOT LIE!!!"
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:52 thrawn2112 wrote:
i'm not a liar u twat
Well everytime i point it out you just insult instead of correcting where the lie did not occur
|
On March 28 2014 19:52 thrawn2112 wrote:
i'm not a liar u twat
How can you know you didn't lie because you don't remember anything about why you posted what you did at that time?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
ok, so I went back and checked Palmar. He never particularly gave an opinion on thrawn other than "fair enough I get it now", and randomly voted for him in the voting thread based on that and nothing else, and later went back to omgusing me.
I feel pretty much vindicated in saying what I said about not reading much/anything into this.
If thrawn is mafia, it's not because of this.
|
On March 28 2014 19:54 Holyflare wrote:Well everytime i point it out you just insult instead of correcting where the lie did not occur
the thing you pointed out isn't a lie! ffs. there's literally nothing to correct becaseu you posted a bunch of random stuff and called it a lie
here's what I think you are saying I did
1 i voted rayn
2 i postes the reasons why I voted for rayb
3 later on i said that I voted rayn for different reasons, hence the lie.
the problem is with # 2. i never explained the initial reasons for why i voted for rayn. i did later on, but i did not do it at the time. i cba to look it up right now but I think i remember you calling me out for my "sneaky" vote for rayn, where I voted for rayn in the vote thread without posting why in the real. and that bascailyl dispoves your entire case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
