|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:00 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 18:58 marvellosity wrote:
phagga could be mafia. Holy is basically defending him like an ass because he's tunnelled on thrawn. For now, I don't know/care. i'm not, it's more likely prpl is mafia than thrawn but i liked phagga's reasoning for voting palmar and thought it looked alright and the rest of thrawns case was stuff that i had also done and i'm town so therefore it invalidates the rest of his case
I don't really think prplhz is mafia.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes Holyflare that's how it's supposed to be read.
Ahhh that makes sense
|
On March 28 2014 19:20 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:00 Holyflare wrote:On March 28 2014 18:58 marvellosity wrote:
phagga could be mafia. Holy is basically defending him like an ass because he's tunnelled on thrawn. For now, I don't know/care. i'm not, it's more likely prpl is mafia than thrawn but i liked phagga's reasoning for voting palmar and thought it looked alright and the rest of thrawns case was stuff that i had also done and i'm town so therefore it invalidates the rest of his case I don't really think prplhz is mafia.
I concur.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:20 marvellosity wrote:On March 28 2014 19:00 Holyflare wrote:On March 28 2014 18:58 marvellosity wrote:
phagga could be mafia. Holy is basically defending him like an ass because he's tunnelled on thrawn. For now, I don't know/care. i'm not, it's more likely prpl is mafia than thrawn but i liked phagga's reasoning for voting palmar and thought it looked alright and the rest of thrawns case was stuff that i had also done and i'm town so therefore it invalidates the rest of his case I don't really think prplhz is mafia. I concur.
Elaborate because you went afk half the day policy voting him and never returned
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
One other thing to note, and without giving an opinion on alignments particularly because I cba to argue.
If marv is coming after Palmar hard and in the end produces a case that is very very very likely to get Palmar lynched, then mafia have to decide what they do.
Do they agree with the case and then backtrack really dully later even when it's clear Palmar is getting lynched with or without them, or do they try to look as good as possible from the flip with a decent vote?
|
meh he was angry because i was annoying and then he took a day off from my bullshit and now he sees that i'm playing like i play in my last town games with him so i'm probably town
|
On March 28 2014 19:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 16:22 thrawn2112 wrote:On March 28 2014 16:14 Holyflare wrote:
The part where he loves to lynch all liars and agrees that you lied when me and rayn were talking about you and then 180's on you completely and ignores everything about you. i didn't lie, nothing in the shit you said I did consitutes a lie, saying it does over and over doesn't make it true thrawn i wanted to ask you about this: Why are you being so overly defensive here? You are not even addressing what Holyflare says here.
it's annoying,
he;s saying I lied. nothing in what he';s saying I did is a lie. and even without that, there';s nothing in what he;s saying i did that makes me scummy
tbh I think that;s the main reason so many people sheeped the thrawn wagon, like they just casually read hf's stuff and assumed it must be true or something. i've made a few posts about how it no such lie exists and hf keeps coming back with "no you lied gg no re" and it's getting really irritating
tldr hf is an ass
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:28 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 28 2014 16:22 thrawn2112 wrote:On March 28 2014 16:14 Holyflare wrote:
The part where he loves to lynch all liars and agrees that you lied when me and rayn were talking about you and then 180's on you completely and ignores everything about you. i didn't lie, nothing in the shit you said I did consitutes a lie, saying it does over and over doesn't make it true thrawn i wanted to ask you about this: Why are you being so overly defensive here? You are not even addressing what Holyflare says here. it's annoying, he;s saying I lied. nothing in what he';s saying I did is a lie. and even without that, there';s nothing in what he;s saying i did that makes me scummy tbh I think that;s the main reason so many people sheeped the thrawn wagon, like they just casually read hf's stuff and assumed it must be true or something. i've made a few posts about how it no such lie exists and hf keeps coming back with "no you lied gg no re" and it's getting really irritating tldr hf is an ass
But not mafia 
You draw no conclusions from people that sheeped me without reading?
|
iirc phagga defended me at first? then all the sudden he flipped this switch and I became mafia for the rest of his filter
so much so that he said that even though he was reading palmar as wishy washy maybe scum, he'd still rahter lynch thrawn
then it became obvuous that palmar would be lynched and phagga decided he didn't care too much about his thrawn read
|
On March 28 2014 19:28 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 28 2014 16:22 thrawn2112 wrote:On March 28 2014 16:14 Holyflare wrote:
The part where he loves to lynch all liars and agrees that you lied when me and rayn were talking about you and then 180's on you completely and ignores everything about you. i didn't lie, nothing in the shit you said I did consitutes a lie, saying it does over and over doesn't make it true thrawn i wanted to ask you about this: Why are you being so overly defensive here? You are not even addressing what Holyflare says here. it's annoying, he;s saying I lied. nothing in what he';s saying I did is a lie. and even without that, there';s nothing in what he;s saying i did that makes me scummy tbh I think that;s the main reason so many people sheeped the thrawn wagon, like they just casually read hf's stuff and assumed it must be true or something. i've made a few posts about how it no such lie exists and hf keeps coming back with "no you lied gg no re" and it's getting really irritating tldr hf is an ass
No that is not what Holyflare is saying there!!!
|
well then enlighten me please
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Talking about palmar on you
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Really relying on what Palmar said about anyone is kinda ridiculous.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Nothing to do with what he said and more to do with his vote and unvote..?
|
On March 28 2014 19:37 Holyflare wrote:
Talking about palmar on you
this directed at me? if so I am lost
|
On March 28 2014 19:16 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 17:52 prplhz wrote:dunno really i think your "wait up people, if palmar didn't read his pm we shouldn't lynch him" was a little too crazy for you to be scum with him though at the same time i don't see what people likes about phagga so much, his interactions with palmar don't seem like something you couldn't pull off as scum. also in this post he's all "meh i dno" about palmar but then here he's all "marv's case is really good", if he think that marv has a really good case on palmar why is his read on palmar then so meh? you were also around for lynch while phagga wasn't and that's bonus points for you and deductions for phagga I wasn't "meh i dno", I said he could be scum for the way he behaves, specifically for not commenting on anything and instead bicker uselessly with Marv. How does my agreement with marvs case contradict that statement? And I'm assuming for now that the last sentence is a joke. do you still think i'm mafia?
Yes, because I haven't had time to read up on you, so I'm still on the same stance as yesterday
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:40 Holyflare wrote:
Nothing to do with what he said and more to do with his vote and unvote..?
You need to learn to be a lot clearer about what you're referring to tbh.
|
On March 28 2014 19:42 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:16 thrawn2112 wrote:On March 28 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 17:52 prplhz wrote:dunno really i think your "wait up people, if palmar didn't read his pm we shouldn't lynch him" was a little too crazy for you to be scum with him though at the same time i don't see what people likes about phagga so much, his interactions with palmar don't seem like something you couldn't pull off as scum. also in this post he's all "meh i dno" about palmar but then here he's all "marv's case is really good", if he think that marv has a really good case on palmar why is his read on palmar then so meh? you were also around for lynch while phagga wasn't and that's bonus points for you and deductions for phagga I wasn't "meh i dno", I said he could be scum for the way he behaves, specifically for not commenting on anything and instead bicker uselessly with Marv. How does my agreement with marvs case contradict that statement? And I'm assuming for now that the last sentence is a joke. do you still think i'm mafia? Yes, because I haven't had time to read up on you, so I'm still on the same stance as yesterday
you replies to a bigass case i wrote against you and you didn';t think about your thrawn read during that?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:42 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:40 Holyflare wrote:
Nothing to do with what he said and more to do with his vote and unvote..? You need to learn to be a lot clearer about what you're referring to tbh.
It's in the nested quotes...... And the thread
|
On March 28 2014 19:18 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 17:52 prplhz wrote:dunno really i think your "wait up people, if palmar didn't read his pm we shouldn't lynch him" was a little too crazy for you to be scum with him though at the same time i don't see what people likes about phagga so much, his interactions with palmar don't seem like something you couldn't pull off as scum. also in this post he's all "meh i dno" about palmar but then here he's all "marv's case is really good", if he think that marv has a really good case on palmar why is his read on palmar then so meh? you were also around for lynch while phagga wasn't and that's bonus points for you and deductions for phagga I wasn't "meh i dno", I said he could be scum for the way he behaves, specifically for not commenting on anything and instead bicker uselessly with Marv. How does my agreement with marvs case contradict that statement? And I'm assuming for now that the last sentence is a joke. i simply just think that "completely agree[ing]" with a giant marv case would lead to a stronger read than what your expressed in your list
Agreeing with marvs case came after I made that list. I don't see the issue.
last sentence isn't a joke
You don't know my schedule, you don't know if it was possible for me to be there or not which makes it a joke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
