EPT[S] Shadowed Mini Mafia - Page 15
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17321 Posts
On February 04 2014 15:28 jaybrundage wrote: Please don't post on your phone again if its gonna be this nonsensical. Take the time to correct it on your phone and reread what your typing or just go to a computer I understand this sentiment but I think you actually did understand my posts in a sense. I was UNABLE to edit them. That is what was so bad, I could barely get it to register a tap in the words and had to use talk text. That is why I stopped. Anything that didn't make sense I will try to clarify after I catch up and probably after work. it is still morning. jaybrundage you are rapidly convincing me you are scum. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On February 05 2014 02:10 Alakaslam wrote: I understand this sentiment but I think you actually did understand my posts in a sense. I was UNABLE to edit them. That is what was so bad, I could barely get it to register a tap in the words and had to use talk text. That is why I stopped. Anything that didn't make sense I will try to clarify after I catch up and probably after work. it is still morning. jaybrundage you are rapidly convincing me you are scum. I understood them in the sense that you think im scummy and don't like some of my posts. However why you thought they were scummy is a mystery to me. I would love to hear your thinking. I still adhere to the fact that if you can't see someone's username and see who is posting what. That your reads are going to be terrible. I hope you can read the game knowing who is posting what. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17321 Posts
On February 04 2014 15:30 cakemanofdoom wrote: I think the stuff about Koshi was an example to show that randomly defending someone with no justification doesn't help anyone. I also really wanna know what alaskaslam's talking about with that second post about jay's list... also, don't really understand I don't think anyone really mentioned sidesprang after the response, so I'm not sure what this is getting at. First clarification since I saw this. I am saying I finally had reached the post where sidesprang replies to jaybrundage. He simply answers the questions. What, is he going to say "I don't know" ever? No, because sidesprang/jaybrundage work in tandem. That is the sentiment here. I have cooled off though, yesterday was a bad day and I was seeing scum everywhere and getting pissed off at the world. Yesterday I lost a day of pay because I couldn't get to work because the work truck had issues. (I agreed beforehand that for use of the company truck <personal use> I would not be paid if downtime prevented me from working) and then trying to get a little mafia fix my phone vomited all over the thread. Today, I just got approval for full repairs and new tires and I'm on my laptop. Life is good. Everyone is town XD | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On February 05 2014 01:43 Balla24 wrote: Such conclusions. Really happy they didn't color my analysis there otherwise I would have been a huge sheep! Sorry dude. Looks more like you did the opposite. You asked an open-ended question because you didn't really see anything yourself, and then you said exactly what the people you asked said. On February 05 2014 01:46 Oatsmaster wrote: Or we came to the same conclusion independantly which says something about LM's alignment. HAH. Do you think Im scum? Oatsmaster this quote coming from what Balla said makes no sense to me. Do you realize that the bolded part was him talking to you? He never said anything about LM in that post. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17321 Posts
On February 05 2014 02:15 jaybrundage wrote: I understood them in the sense that you think im scummy and don't like some of my posts. However why you thought they were scummy is a mystery to me. I would love to hear your thinking. I still adhere to the fact that if you can't see someone's username and see who is posting what. That your reads are going to be terrible. I hope you can read the game knowing who is posting what. Correct. This was part of why I was so pissed. TL was glitching out with & stuff like that which drove me mad | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17321 Posts
On February 04 2014 22:38 Koshi wrote: Why... It helped the game forward. Koshi We know the way of extractor trick mini We know you be doing the same tactics I used to further scum victory <3 Kush | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
His "case" against Koshi is bad, and yet he continues to push it. He's also not consistent with his views: On February 04 2014 15:32 Oatsmaster wrote: suki nullish, dunno why she is attacking you though, bad reasons but not inherently scummy. Cakeman also null. Same with johnny. i mean, nobody is really pushing shit and its hard to figure out if they are posting for the sake of it or posting to find scum. Literally throughout the whole 7-8 pages there is no concerted effort to push someone by anyone. Koshi scum for suggesting a really bad policy about post counts and nothing else. It feels like bait for scum to jump on but there is no followup. On February 05 2014 00:49 Balla24 wrote: Can you explain a bit more? 1. How does Koshi posting something "bad" make it bait for scum to jump on? Basically: what will scum do with it? 2. Did anybody jump on it? 3. Was this your first thought when you read it? On February 05 2014 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote: 1. Scum will go and shit on Koshi for it because its bad and scummy. 2. yeah suki and some other dudes. 3. My first thought was why is koshi proposing such a useless policy. mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post. This is almost a scum claim right here. Oats is doing the exact thing that he says scum would do, and yet he's calling other people out for it. Who is Oats willing to lynch today? On February 05 2014 01:39 Oatsmaster wrote: Yeah Im not telling you my conclusions because I want to hear what you think without my conclusions coloring your analysis. I really null on cake, what he posts when he comes back is really important and will probably decided my read. Hopeless is a useless piece of shit that we should lynch. (... On a side note, I don't approve of the personal attack calling Hopeless a 'useless piece of shit'.) Anyways. He suddenly thinks Hopeless is super scummy, without any reasoning. This is after LoneMeow has stated suspicions on Hopeless so it feels like a bandwagon. Hopeless was one of the people who didn't shit on Koshi's policy, and said that the policy makes him feel motivated. So this big scum tell that Oats has been pushing the entire game doesn't apply to his choice of lynches? He reads cake as null and yet it's cake and hopeless who he wants to discuss. Why not me, who you said was scummy for 'jumping on Koshi's policy' or those 'other dudes' that you so specifically called out? Why is LoneMeow town even though he was the most vocal about probably not meeting Koshi's 40 post policy? Hm. Also this exchange just leaves a bad taste in my mouth: On February 04 2014 12:10 Oatsmaster wrote: Hi guys, [jay] probably town Also, why does Oats avoid Balla's question here? He's not being transparent, and if he thinks Balla is town then why throw the question back at him? On February 05 2014 01:55 Oatsmaster wrote: I thought you disapproved of the asking questions before giving your own answers? In summary, Oats is calling people scummy for something that he himself is actively doing. His reads on people seem random, rather than thought out. There's no logical progression on why he thinks Hopeless is super scummy and worth lynching (it feels like bandwagoning to try to push an easy lurker lynch). There's no explanation on why LoneMeow is town to him despite the dissonance with his 'Koshi policy' case. When asked to explain himself he's extremely reluctant. He tries to deflect attention from himself. This all reads as scum to me. ##vote Oatsmaster | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17321 Posts
Koshi is scummy at first because of his crazy entry to the thread. He is further scummy because he abandons the policy as some sort of joke as soon as he gets fire for it. Oats is Oats, have you been in many games with him? I don't try to read him yet Balla24 finally so town ist awesome. Jaybrundage not near as scummy as I thought he was last night. But I am devolving into list posting stuff you all either already know or won't care about. I hope we aren't around looking for some sort of scum tell. I was and I was getting all pissy because I was finding them everywhere. What we need to do is find the unknown, by conventional or unconventional means. Vote: LoneMeow jaybrundage why are you scummy? I don't care if you know your alignment is town, why are you scummy? What have you done in this game that is scummy? I want you to look over stuff in your own filter and point it out. if you feel like it, answer the same question Sidesprang. Or not. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
I like your case seems well thought out and pretty straight forward logic. The first big case of the thread :D | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 04 2014 15:32 Oatsmaster wrote: Koshi scum for suggesting a really bad policy about post counts and nothing else. It feels like bait for scum to jump on but there is no followup. I was asking him about this because it's a super weird thing to think about as town. I didn't think that, if others did let me know. The JB town read as your first post was pretty random. Random town reads is generally scummy as they are easier to give than scum reads. Sure he semi-explained it, but "pushing the thread forward" isn't exactly the best reason to townread someone and try to stifle discussion with that. Then this cakeman/hopeless question business. It was revealed that Oats thought/thinks LM and I are town. It was also revealed that he didn't really see anything in either of the two that was interesting. Super empty fake participation question in that case. ##vote Oatsmaster | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17321 Posts
you all crappin on my styles ##unvote ##Vote: Oatsmaster His flip may provide sufficient information in and of itself. If he is town, we take his posting to this point more seriously. Otherwise, oh happy day! He is not particularly townie so there should be no problem with this. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
 | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17321 Posts
On February 05 2014 02:35 jaybrundage wrote: SUKI GONNA RUSTLE SOME JIMMIES I like your case seems well thought out and pretty straight forward logic. The first big case of the thread :D Worth voting on? Sorry for the pissitude. As I read your filter I find that though you have scum tells it is not particularly because it works for you being scum. We will see if it was premature. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17321 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 05 2014 02:38 Alakaslam wrote: pffft. you all crappin on my styles ##unvote ##Vote: Oatsmaster His flip may provide sufficient information in and of itself. If he is town, we take his posting to this point more seriously. Otherwise, oh happy day! He is not particularly townie so there should be no problem with this. ??? Do you think this is IML or something? This vote is shit. You just said you don't try to read Oatsmaster yet now you are voting him literally minutes after you said that. For INFORMATION of all things. What happened to your vote on LoneMeow? You didn't justify that at all yet and now you are dropping it? Doesn't make sense. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17321 Posts
On February 05 2014 02:43 Balla24 wrote: ??? Do you think this is IML or something? This vote is shit. You just said you don't try to read Oatsmaster yet now you are voting him literally minutes after you said that. For INFORMATION of all things. What happened to your vote on LoneMeow? You didn't justify that at all yet and now you are dropping it? Doesn't make sense. Don't worry so much. All will be clear in due time. Clarify "IML" | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17321 Posts
No, if I did would I be voting so randomly? Maybe you thought it was for a moment XD | ||
| ||
