|
On February 05 2014 02:45 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 02:43 Balla24 wrote:On February 05 2014 02:38 Alakaslam wrote: pffft.
you all crappin on my styles
##unvote ##Vote: Oatsmaster
His flip may provide sufficient information in and of itself. If he is town, we take his posting to this point more seriously. Otherwise, oh happy day!
He is not particularly townie so there should be no problem with this. ??? Do you think this is IML or something? This vote is shit. You just said you don't try to read Oatsmaster yet now you are voting him literally minutes after you said that. For INFORMATION of all things. What happened to your vote on LoneMeow? You didn't justify that at all yet and now you are dropping it? Doesn't make sense. Don't worry so much. All will be clear in due time. Clarify "IML"
Instant Majority Lynch (IML)
No, not all will be clear in due time. Explain yourself.
|
Something tells me you are all on slow connections. I seem to move really fast comparatively.
|
On February 05 2014 02:46 Balla24 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 02:45 Alakaslam wrote:On February 05 2014 02:43 Balla24 wrote:On February 05 2014 02:38 Alakaslam wrote: pffft.
you all crappin on my styles
##unvote ##Vote: Oatsmaster
His flip may provide sufficient information in and of itself. If he is town, we take his posting to this point more seriously. Otherwise, oh happy day!
He is not particularly townie so there should be no problem with this. ??? Do you think this is IML or something? This vote is shit. You just said you don't try to read Oatsmaster yet now you are voting him literally minutes after you said that. For INFORMATION of all things. What happened to your vote on LoneMeow? You didn't justify that at all yet and now you are dropping it? Doesn't make sense. Don't worry so much. All will be clear in due time. Clarify "IML" Instant Majority Lynch (IML) No, not all will be clear in due time. Explain yourself. I plan to. I want some more people to catch up. We appear to have the two fastest connections of the currently active folks.
|
On February 05 2014 02:38 Alakaslam wrote: pffft.
you all crappin on my styles
##unvote ##Vote: Oatsmaster
His flip may provide sufficient information in and of itself. If he is town, we take his posting to this point more seriously. Otherwise, oh happy day!
He is not particularly townie so there should be no problem with this. So looking at my posting the thing that you might perceive as "scummy" Is that I am not posting my own opinion as much as prodding other's for information. And that is intentional I want to see more posting from lurkers that is my number 1 concern at the moment. I want to be able to separate the town lurkers to the scum lurkers.
My other question is why did you vote Lonemeow but then vote Oatsmaster when suki and Balla made cases and votes against him. What was your initial intention to vote lone meow in the first place?
Why switch over to Oats just cause thread sentiment is going in that direction.
|
Come on now.
What have I done everyone?
|
On February 05 2014 02:48 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 02:38 Alakaslam wrote: pffft.
you all crappin on my styles
##unvote ##Vote: Oatsmaster
His flip may provide sufficient information in and of itself. If he is town, we take his posting to this point more seriously. Otherwise, oh happy day!
He is not particularly townie so there should be no problem with this. So looking at my posting the thing that you might perceive as "scummy" Is that I am not posting my own opinion as much as prodding other's for information. And that is intentional I want to see more posting from lurkers that is my number 1 concern at the moment. I want to be able to separate the town lurkers to the scum lurkers. My other question is why did you vote Lonemeow but then vote Oatsmaster when suki and Balla made cases and votes against him. What was your initial intention to vote lone meow in the first place? Why switch over to Oats just cause thread sentiment is going in that direction. This is what I was looking for.
Jay who cares what you said or what I was saying to you? Yet you don't just immediately attack me for tomfoolery, you first defend your own stuff that I called you out for. You use 3 lines doing that, and two lines asking why I did what I did, and then one line painting it as a common scum tell.
Balla on the other hand?
On February 05 2014 02:43 Balla24 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 02:38 Alakaslam wrote: pffft.
you all crappin on my styles
##unvote ##Vote: Oatsmaster
His flip may provide sufficient information in and of itself. If he is town, we take his posting to this point more seriously. Otherwise, oh happy day!
He is not particularly townie so there should be no problem with this. ??? Do you think this is IML or something? This vote is shit. You just said you don't try to read Oatsmaster yet now you are voting him literally minutes after you said that. For INFORMATION of all things. What happened to your vote on LoneMeow? You didn't justify that at all yet and now you are dropping it? Doesn't make sense.
What is different between these two reactions?
FoS Jaybrundage.
But I really didn't expect you to be the one to trip it. Now I feel like an idiot, I recanted my bad day feelings and now they're back XD
|
Here's an idea alakaslam how about you answer my questions. I really don't care about your FoS your actions are the scummiest thing going on in the thread atm.
|
So you all now see why?
This was a ploy. We are seeking uncommon knowledge. How do people react to things? Do they react quickly and emotionally, or with a delay and with a clear purpose in mind?
Well, Balla was quick and a litte emotional. jaybrundage took a bit and was clear and precise, but with questionable motive.
## unvote by the way.
Anyone have a good reason why jaybrundage is town?
|
On February 05 2014 02:54 jaybrundage wrote: Here's an idea alakaslam how about you answer my questions. I really don't care about your FoS your actions are the scummiest thing going on in the thread atm. What page are they on? I have caught up so I must have missed them.
I disregarded anything related to my phone crap prior to now, if you or anyone want those flaming piles of dog feces explained I am here for a bit.
|
Jay's been pretty consistent lol . I don't see this slip that you're talking about.
Jay has been contributing to the thread and pressuring people so I'm not interested in him.
|
And the scumminess is intentional. It garners a reaction but you tripped it lightning speed.
|
How has he been going about it though suki? That is more common knowledge. It is so easy to pressure people as scum. Heck Kushm4sta and I pushed EACH OTHER as scum in Extractor trick, and my ENTIRE TEAM bussed me hard in Aperture 2p2 and I still survived until day 3
It isn't so easy to get someone lynched. And I have a thousand times easier time making myself look townie as scum.
|
And I don't believe in scumslips. It's not a slip per say, it is a mindset coming through.
|
Also I just got word to move out, so I am going to work. Means I will be in and out as I am switching to phone. I have charge so that won't be an issue like before, but I will react slower.
|
On February 05 2014 02:56 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 02:54 jaybrundage wrote: Here's an idea alakaslam how about you answer my questions. I really don't care about your FoS your actions are the scummiest thing going on in the thread atm. What page are they on? I have caught up so I must have missed them. I disregarded anything related to my phone crap prior to now, if you or anyone want those flaming piles of dog feces explained I am here for a bit. There in the post you quoted. I was writing my response to your question and then I saw your terrible vote switch and I added that to my post seems pretty self explanatory.
|
I like Jay's attitude so far and I don't find any inconsistencies in his play. It could be good town play or strong scum play, but if it's strong scum play then he will slip up later on. My gut tells me he's town for now.
There are other people that I'm looking at other than Oats but I'd rather wait for activity from more people before I do more detailed analysis.
|
I saw this. It was a trap bull a mile away. Its reallly dumb. You still haven't answered my question of why you initially voted lonemeow
|
|
On February 05 2014 03:02 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 02:56 Alakaslam wrote:On February 05 2014 02:54 jaybrundage wrote: Here's an idea alakaslam how about you answer my questions. I really don't care about your FoS your actions are the scummiest thing going on in the thread atm. What page are they on? I have caught up so I must have missed them. I disregarded anything related to my phone crap prior to now, if you or anyone want those flaming piles of dog feces explained I am here for a bit. There in the post you quoted. I was writing my response to your question and then I saw your terrible vote switch and I added that to my post seems pretty self explanatory.
On February 05 2014 03:19 jaybrundage wrote: I saw this. It was a trap bull a mile away. Its reallly dumb. You still haven't answered my question of why you initially voted lonemeow
On February 05 2014 03:19 jaybrundage wrote: I saw this. It was a trap bull a mile away. Its reallly dumb. You still haven't answered my question of why you initially voted lonemeow
And you still need answers? I am looking for reactions! And here you are asking questions you know the answer to, then getting upset when I don't bother because I know you know.
Come now.
|
I don't have that much of a problem with oats right now. I get his case on Koshi, I also thought fairly early on that Koshi posted a random policy to generate discussion, and that the policy was easy to disagree with because that's how you get discussion past unanimous agreement.
Koshi did post some analysis on people's reactions though, not sure why oats kept going on him for not making use of the discussion he generated. + Show Spoiler +On February 04 2014 23:37 Koshi wrote: That's not how it works, it's not because what people say is not interesting at that moment that if won't be interesting at all anymore.
1) LM said he was not going to vote for something just based on filter size but on filter content. This shows future commitment to the game. This is a town answer. But in 24 hours we can also use this to pressure him to give reads, or at least his town answer looks bad when he doesn't follow up. But I trust he will.
2) Balla same story. Instantly said yay let's do this and was worried about other people low content spam and not himself. Good + follow up ensured.
3) Jonny was angry and is still angry. There is no reason for that at all and I put him scummy. I also read his post better and found previously quoted post that does not make sense at all. ↨ 4) Hopeless said something and then fucked off. This is scummy and it is not my fault that he did this. If we lynch somebody we lynch Hopeless.
5) Suki her post was actually a wtf moment. The underlined part of previous sentence was my confusion.
I think the rest of the people made similar comments but that's what my post generated. But nothing on it's own was scummy.
Also I wasn't in let's solve this game right now mode yesterday right before bed.
Then again, Koshi also declared that he was pretty much gonna do nothing for a while and let us talk, which kinda annoys me. I'd like him talking with us.
So basically, I don't mind oats's aggression towards Koshi. I personally just want Koshi to stop that lurking thing. Oats having a townread on LM doesn't make sense to me, but the fact that he's been here and giving opinions (with justifications sometimes) makes him look a bit better than people who are just gone.
Like sidesprang. Or hopeless. Where are they?
Oh yeah, to anyone wondering about my post on LM, that was in response to suki asking me what I thought about him. And LM's posts since then make him look rather worse among lurky people,
|
|
|
|