EPTjulyzerg would be proud - Page 5
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Gokey
United States2722 Posts
| ||
|
d4d
Switzerland1066 Posts
On August 16 2007 11:04 EpiK wrote: The movie is horrible. Unless you're a fan of extremely cheesy romances that involve 15-year-olds. And they mention starcraft in like 3 small parts; the movie isn't really focused on that. But the movie's uploaded on crunchyroll if you really want to see it http://www.crunchyroll.com/showmedia?id=24336 Thank you for that EpiK... Remember, I am swiss, I like cheese. | ||
|
HaXxorIzed
Australia8434 Posts
| ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
On August 16 2007 19:40 Total-War wrote: Maybe it was a set-up rep, to show what he could do with his mutas? lol what the zerg player went in with lings trying to finish the game off, neglecting saving minerals for mutalisk. the only thing he could afford to build was scourge. The zerg killed off his spire as well, so all he had to do was neutralize the mutalisk then win it with his superior economy/hatch count. he didnt take into account that his opponent would deal with all the scourge thrown at him with near perfect control. in hindsight its easy to say he should have gotten mutalisk instead of scourge, but you need to think from the players perspective | ||
|
Purind
Canada3562 Posts
On August 16 2007 03:30 OneOther wrote: If I were him, I would have left after my spire got killed the 3rd and also a pool while Terran had a fully running natural. It was like..even more amazing than the ZvZ. Just my opinion ;o Well, while it was cool that he came back from losing his spire TWICE and his pool, think about how the ZvZ went. He went pool first vs. hatch, his lings did nothing, he lost his hatch and he lost his spire. Winning with just the 3 mutas that you built 3 seconds before the spire went down is pretty impressive as well | ||
|
lastshadow
United States1372 Posts
I am still questioning why the opposing zerg did not opt for mutalisks when in fact he KNEW the spire was down, and he KNEW that crazy-hydra was in no condition to sac drones for evo-spores / sunks. Makes no sense. | ||
|
L!MP
Australia2067 Posts
| ||
|
Ilikestarcraft
Korea (South)17719 Posts
On August 16 2007 22:09 Purind wrote: Well, while it was cool that he came back from losing his spire TWICE and his pool, think about how the ZvZ went. He went pool first vs. hatch, his lings did nothing, he lost his hatch and he lost his spire. Winning with just the 3 mutas that you built 3 seconds before the spire went down is pretty impressive as well I think somuchbetter pretty much explained it in a few posts above | ||
|
oHInsane
France727 Posts
| ||
|
Sudyn
United States744 Posts
I wish I could do that. | ||
|
EpiK
Korea (South)5757 Posts
On August 16 2007 19:28 Cascade wrote: Really crazy micro no doubt. A friend of mine did more or less the same thing.  But to our friends defence I must say that the terrans muta defence maybe was not top level. (no, you should NOT attack 7 mutas with 6 rines!) And I don't really understand why he went scourges instead of mutas... He had just killed his spire, and he had a sunken in his mineralline, then killing him with mutas seems to me like a better option than scourging his mutas and killing him with lings? Can anyone explain why he kept scourging?He probably got over-confident and thought the game was his. Plus, I don't think he had enough money for mutas. | ||
|
nOob
Spain120 Posts
MUTA IMB4 l337 ZOMG | ||
|
Try
United States1293 Posts
| ||
|
BalloonFight
United States2007 Posts
Sick reps, thanks. | ||
| ||
