EPT
Witchcraft Mini Mafia II - Page 37
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On November 06 2013 07:06 Cephiro wrote: .... Yeah. Call me stupid for not stubbornly going against the majority. Well, at least I showed fellow town I'm ready to co-operate even if I don't completely agree on something. Not sure if that's a good or a bad thing to be honest. Also I'm gonna go sleep right now to get my rhythm fixed, I'm tired. I'll respond all the "lolcephhammer" -accusations that will surely come in the morning. Yeah, you wanted no-lynch, I don't think thats preferable to mislynching. The possibilty of an extra blue isn't worth 1 town KP imo. You tried to derail the thread at a critical time by suggesting we no lynch, which is exactly the worst thing that could have happened, then you disappear until it's time to consolidate and you play it off as "oh, if you guys WANT me to, I GUESS I'll vote gumshoe if I HAVE to." As soon as I saw that you were voting for gumshoe I immediately thought he wasn't that likely to flip scum. Did you really want a no-lynch? Why didn't you let it happen? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On November 06 2013 07:06 Cephiro wrote: .... Yeah. Call me stupid for not stubbornly going against the majority. Well, at least I showed fellow town I'm ready to co-operate even if I don't completely agree on something. Not sure if that's a good or a bad thing to be honest. Also I'm gonna go sleep right now to get my rhythm fixed, I'm tired. I'll respond all the "lolcephhammer" -accusations that will surely come in the morning. There is nothing wrong with you hammering and i don't know why you feel the need to be so defencive about it.. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
I'm gonna be spending some time looking at Syl because I'm intrigued by what hzflank said about how while syl was devoting lots of time to calling out ceph, "Syl never played as if he thought that Ceph was scum, therefore what Syl wrote about Ceph was fake." | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
Why now? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
Why are you focused on the fact that I'm bringing it up now instead of what it means about syl? You could at least comment on it rather than completely disregarding the point by trying to discredit me. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On November 06 2013 08:06 thrawn2112 wrote: Hm? You didn't answer my question. What was the motivation behing your original post? And I still want to hear your opinion on what I brought up, idc that Ceph and sylencia already talked about it because none of them are named raynpelikoneet. I am focused on the fact that you bring it up now for two reasons (which i think i told already - i think that's what you are asking - if not, please clarify): (1) When the issue could have been important you did not bring it up. Instead you voted for the guy who did infact bring it up in the first place. That's odd imo. (2) I do not think what hz brought up means anything, because i felt like syl - ceph cleared the issue up to some extent in thread, and havn't talked since. It's a null tell for Sylencia. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On November 06 2013 07:06 Cephiro wrote: .... Yeah. Call me stupid for not stubbornly going against the majority. Well, at least I showed fellow town I'm ready to co-operate even if I don't completely agree on something. Not sure if that's a good or a bad thing to be honest. Also I'm gonna go sleep right now to get my rhythm fixed, I'm tired. I'll respond all the "lolcephhammer" -accusations that will surely come in the morning. dislike dislike dislike dislike dislike dislike dislike dislike dislike dislike dislike dislike | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On November 06 2013 08:10 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am focused on the fact that you bring it up now for two reasons (which i think i told already - i think that's what you are asking - if not, please clarify): (1) When the issue could have been important you did not bring it up. Instead you voted for the guy who did infact bring it up in the first place. That's odd imo. (2) I do not think what hz brought up means anything, because i felt like syl - ceph cleared the issue up to some extent in thread, and havn't talked since. It's a null tell for Sylencia. 1) I did not say so at the time but part of what initially made me hesitant about hzflank WAS what he said about Sylencia. Had he not said anything and not given a coherent argument I might have still lynched him. Also, expecting me to have already examined a 20 hr old post is weird. Do you expect me to follow up and do research into every single post and make an issue over everything that happens? No, I don't think that's rational which is sorta making me suspect that you're trying to deflect what I'm bringing up by discrediting how I brought it up. 2) I don't remember what you're referring to but I don't know how much it even matters. If Syl is scum and Ceph is town, Syl and Ceph reaching any kind of truce doesn't really influence what I think about Syl's earlier actions. Also, I just read Syl's filter and don't see anything that clears up the specific issue of "Why is syl discrediting Ceph while not acting as if he thinks Ceph is mafia." If you can show me that then I *might* be able to accept your null read but as it is you're being pretty dodgy about this. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On November 06 2013 08:23 thrawn2112 wrote: hey OO since you weren't here for lynch I'd like you to give us a rundown on how you think the lynch went down and what if any scum influence you think there might have been that caused it Ya, just doing my vote count thing at the moment. I'll hit that up next. Also @Sn0: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/T5IhQuq.jpg) | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On November 06 2013 08:19 thrawn2112 wrote: 1) I did not say so at the time but part of what initially made me hesitant about hzflank WAS what he said about Sylencia. Had he not said anything and not given a coherent argument I might have still lynched him. Also, expecting me to have already examined a 20 hr old post is weird. Do you expect me to follow up and do research into every single post and make an issue over everything that happens? No, I don't think that's rational which is sorta making me suspect that you're trying to deflect what I'm bringing up by discrediting how I brought it up. 2) I don't remember what you're referring to but I don't know how much it even matters. If Syl is scum and Ceph is town, Syl and Ceph reaching any kind of truce doesn't really influence what I think about Syl's earlier actions. Also, I just read Syl's filter and don't see anything that clears up the specific issue of "Why is syl discrediting Ceph while not acting as if he thinks Ceph is mafia." If you can show me that then I *might* be able to accept your null read but as it is you're being pretty dodgy about this. (1) No, i expect you to follow up and do research on every post you think is important, which you clearly do, as you stated so. My issue is that the post has been in thread for 20 hours and if you feel like Sylencia has not explained himself why didn't you bring it up earlier? If that in fact is important don't you think that could have been information that could lead us into lynching scum? (2) You were tunnelling him for the majority of the time, and gave Van a scum read through association from your points about WoS. You've given points about other players, I agree, I just thought at the time you were way too focused on WoS, since that filter dive post looks like you were being overly nitpicky over everything he's done. It's not a bad thing to nitpick, there's just a point though where I think you were reaching for points which didn't necessarily imply anything but you put it in a context where it tries to make him look scummy (The first point I found was where you said he was pointing out his own mistakes, which isn't really that implicating) I never said that you should ramble about how unsure you are about a player, but if you'regoing to vote for someone, why not just state why in the first place rather than make people question you? At least it becomes clear from the start where you are coming from. I can see that you answered when asked and you gave your reasoning fairly soon after, I just think it would've had the same effect with less questions about motive if you did it from the start. From what i read here is "i might be wrong in what i said", no? | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On November 04 2013 11:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: Looking the playerlist you are the guy i can work with the best. I can't read OO for shit. I hope Cephiro does not do dumb stuff like he did in Hogwarts. Lurk Sylencia = lynch, otherwise idk Sn0dude played really well in Hogwarts, i except that from him here aswell. gumshoe .... thrawn i misread on Desert until he actually started making sense, hope he does that too here Umasi was good in some game as town i think? Says nothing = lynch Onegu is tricky, damn he was tricky in Hogwarts. A guy to read closely. ET is town or scum at last N1, based purely on Hogwarts. hzflank i can read. Vanesco noob, no idea. contribute or die. and yeah, that's it. Is sn0 meeting your expectations? | ||
| ||
