Hogwarts Mafia - Page 22
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
| ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:15 I-be-Pro wrote: It's how I play d1. I make a big deal out of very minor things to make people talk about things happening in the thread instead of talking about politics/house-quests or whatever else. The intention is to get some reactions from people and have a quick start into d1. Some people have to start the discussion somehow and I usually take that as my job on d1. Means I'm usually a big meanie on d1 and I'm often times stating things that look like nothing to people and they're hardly anything else to me most of the time as well. But I find that a lot better than having a discussion the first 24 hours about some weird plan of someone because people have to commit somewhat the way I'm doing things. I might add it is currently working but now I'm really sleeping So your plan for catching scum is "post things that aren't important, because then people will talk about unimportant things and that will give me reads" | ||
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:16 Skanjab1s wrote: So your plan for catching scum is "post things that aren't important, because then people will talk about unimportant things and that will give me reads" Why don't you 1-up him by posting important things? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:14 Grackaroni wrote: Ok, you don't like that I'm willing to let others control the power instead of myself. But why focus on it? A scum player should also be interested in trying to make the power based on his decisions. There is little to go on and this is something that struck me as odd. Just like everyone else has been doing. Yes, they would. However, why would you be concerened how other people perceive what you're doing? You know you're town, you take control, you win the game. Who cares what scum are interested in doing? | ||
raynpelikonoshi
Cayman Islands1087 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:16 Sn0_Man wrote: Theres a certain amount of scum motivation to not trying the pickup line challenge simply because you feel like another house could be influenced more easily by scum. Since a scum player would know which house had the most scummers in it (and/or the least strong town) What is the scum motivation by saying it in the QT that you won't participate? He can always hide that fact. imo saying you won't participate is null and probably a ploy to get reactions or something. Let's see how he follows up. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:15 Hopeless1der wrote: Maybe you misunderstood my question. Someone in the game thread specifically indicated he wanted qt convos to be related in this thread. I was asking if you knew who that was. Oh yeah, I misunderstood you then. Thought you were just trying to see who we were discussing in our QT or something. | ||
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:17 Holyflare wrote: There is little to go on and this is something that struck me as odd. Just like everyone else has been doing. Yes, they would. However, why would you be concerened how other people perceive what you're doing? You know you're town, you take control, you win the game. Who cares what scum are interested in doing? I'm not. I want to know why you think what I have done is more likely to come from a scum player than a town player. Pretty simple question. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:17 Sn0_Man wrote: Why don't you 1-up him by posting important things? Oh, I am. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
1-up'd. | ||
Zaragon
Sweden235 Posts
On October 17 2013 07:32 Skanjab1s wrote: (1) Not new. Odd in what way? (2) Your scumread on raynoshi is just because you don't know who is posting? Thats hardly a reason to think someone scum, especially since they have already stated earlier before the game started that rayn will put his name at the end of his posts. You respond to posts as if we should know your meta better when we don't; I didn't take that for a sign of a veteran smurfing and it still doesn't make much sense to me. I'm not getting any kind of personality read on you, so I can only place you by pattern and post motivation right now. On rayn/koshi; I said I could have missed them setting up details in the pregame, I didn't follow the pregame much. Nullifies that part of the read, which should be quite obvious since I phrased myself clearly. Bedtime for me. Guess I'll be reading some more Harry Potter for pickup line inspiration. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:18 raynpelikonoshi wrote: What is the scum motivation by saying it in the QT that you won't participate? He can always hide that fact. imo saying you won't participate is null and probably a ploy to get reactions or something. Let's see how he follows up. I can see that. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:18 Grackaroni wrote: I'm not. I want to know why you think what I have done is more likely to come from a scum player than a town player. Pretty simple question. So many hypotheticals that it's hard to believe you are actually asking me this question: 1) You might be the only one in the house and so most probably can't sway it in your favour, let other houses with more scum win and increase your chance. 2) It's a flavour thing and you don't need items to find out who scum are because you know who is scum and who is town. etc etc. How was that hard to understand? | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Grackaroni
United States9832 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:23 Holyflare wrote: So many hypotheticals that it's hard to believe you are actually asking me this question: 1) You might be the only one in the house and so most probably can't sway it in your favour, let other houses with more scum win and increase your chance. 2) It's a flavour thing and you don't need items to find out who scum are because you know who is scum and who is town. etc etc. How was that hard to understand? If you are going to spend all of your time posting about me saying that then I should know why you think it makes me more likely to be scum than town. It's not a ridiculous question to ask lol. I should would be wanting the items regardless if I know who scum are in order to push the items away from my scumbuddies or get credit for pushing it on to them. You don't have very good reasoning for thinking I am scum. The reason I actually don't care too much is that I trust some other people to make better decisions than myself so I'm fine with others having the abilities. | ||
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:22 Hopeless1der wrote: Skanj, humor me at least...who was I referring to? supersoft | ||
Mocsta
Australia9387 Posts
Firstly, I'm not sure why Supersoft/Toad want to release the house member distribution so eagerly? Could either of you please divulge some reasoning behind this play I know neither of them played GoT; but IIRC, the end-game discussion resulted in agreement between players/hosts that it was in towns best interest NOT to give out the house information. Though the setups are not identical, there are enough commonalities for me to conclude that the reasons in that game, pertain in this game. i.e. mafia are randomly distributed; and there is potential there is at least one house they have not corrupted. Why give this information to them for free --> especially when we don't know what type of roles they have etc. Secondly, Raynkonoshi, can you please confirm that because no posts have been signed by Rayn; you are responsible for every post made by your hydra so far? Thirdly, I have no opinion on the skanjab stuff so far. I'm acknowledging it occured because obvious thats the biggest matter going on in the thread so far; but I need to re-read it all again before stating an opinion. Lastly, I'm not sure if this is right play to do in a themed closed game. But in a normal I believe you are meant to do this. I am a self-aware miller. After my doctor fake-claims as town last game, I can understand those that refuse to believe this. So if this ends up in my lynch, so be it. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On October 17 2013 08:16 Skanjab1s wrote: So your plan for catching scum is "post things that aren't important, because then people will talk about unimportant things and that will give me reads" What do you think of him OMGUSing this. His defenses have been kind of shitty IMO and then when someone says they want to generate discussion he is surprised by it? Any discussion that isn't the normal policy lynch crap is good discussion. Look at what we've got already, people soft defending, people criticising and people discussing. Why is he attacking for this? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
and dont we always have to lynch the self aware miller or is that some other weird role? | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
| ||