EPT6 possible balance changes - David Kim - Page 11
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
MostGroce
United States104 Posts
| ||
|
rd
United States2586 Posts
On September 24 2013 04:16 Everlong wrote: If you want to hear, how bad those changes are for Terran, just tune in Avilo's stream right now. Noone would do this better for you.. :D They could make siege tanks fly and Avilo would find a problem with it. | ||
|
NotSorry
United States6722 Posts
| ||
|
raga4ka
Bulgaria5676 Posts
| ||
|
shid0x
Korea (South)5014 Posts
well we don't. -Blizzard 2013. | ||
|
Lorch
Germany3666 Posts
| ||
|
sotaporo
Finland195 Posts
http://www.myinstants.com/instant/noooo/ | ||
|
nichan
United States158 Posts
Oracles just get rid of the unit guive phoenix ground attack and the other oracles power revelation and the other one that tags the units don't know the name as of now. | ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8366 Posts
| ||
|
Foxxan
Sweden3427 Posts
Cheese units, or whatnot. Why focus on these two units? Go heavier, look at the sentrie or colossous or something. I love the wm change atleast, for tvz. The siegetank change i dont understand it, but i still wanna see some tanks in tvz now. Diversity, sure why not. I hope this siegetank is from heaven and just blocks roaches all together. The roach is such a boring unit(?). Numbers or gtfo | ||
ZeromuS
Canada13378 Posts
On September 24 2013 04:25 shid0x wrote: Heya little man you like macro ? well we don't. -Blizzard 2013. I think we got too much macro going on right now and we need some good pressure strats outside of Protoss 2 base all ins vs Zerg. We also need to see protoss do something other than sitting in base and building a super army | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On September 24 2013 04:25 shid0x wrote: Heya little man you like macro ? well we don't. -Blizzard 2013. We got that macro thing down. We need to get back to harassing and earning those expansions. | ||
|
SupLilSon
Malaysia4123 Posts
On September 24 2013 04:13 Bagi wrote: They probably haven't talked to those 2 because one of them is notoriously BM and the other hasn't been relevant in years. Its possible that Blizzard has NDAs in place with these players they choose to have balance discussions with. It's also possible that Blizzard doesn't talk to progamers at all, which is much more likely considering the shot-in-the-dark nature of their changes. If Blizzard actually talked to any pros the WoL Infestor Era would have been over in no time, even Zergs were saying it was ridiculous. And Morrow didn't just imply he hadn;t been contacted, I'm pretty sure he said he hadnt heard of any top EU pro being talked to. I don't want to put words in his mouth, but I definitely remember him posting on TL about the subject. | ||
|
shid0x
Korea (South)5014 Posts
On September 24 2013 04:29 Plansix wrote: We got that macro thing down. We need to get back to harassing and earning those expansions. Oh yeah and proxy oracle and DT and cocaine are gonna fix that ? No,its just gonna be more cheese opportunities. At least the zerg change asks you to use you brain for a bit. | ||
|
freetgy
1720 Posts
i suggest, that DTs should get a speed upgrade when charge is researched similar to the passiv speed bonus Zealots get when it is researched. | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
| ||
|
Everlong
Czech Republic1973 Posts
| ||
|
Paljas
Germany6926 Posts
the ideal situation would be that WM+Bio and Tank+Bio is map dependent and that one can transition into the other. also, making roach/hydra more viable in this matchup would be cool too | ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7028 Posts
On September 24 2013 04:31 SupLilSon wrote: It's also possible that Blizzard doesn't talk to progamers at all, which is much more likely considering the shot-in-the-dark nature of their changes. If Blizzard actually talked to any pros the WoL Infestor Era would have been over in no time, even Zergs were saying it was ridiculous. And Morrow didn't just imply he hadn;t been contacted, I'm pretty sure he said he hadnt heard of any top EU pro being talked to. I don't want to put words in his mouth, but I definitely remember him posting on TL about the subject. Chances are David Kim only talks to Koreans. Why would he talk to foreigners? | ||
|
RaZorwire
Sweden718 Posts
Lowering the splash radius from 1.75 to 1.1 would result in the splash area decresing from ~9.62 to ~3.80, meaning the area would only be less than 40% of what it was before the nerf. | ||
| ||
