1) blazing makes a shitload of effort to look at iamp's meta, having played with iamp before
2) blazing makes no effort to look at iamp's meta, despite having played with iamp's meta before
i'm liking the difference between 1 and 2 right now
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
1) blazing makes a shitload of effort to look at iamp's meta, having played with iamp before 2) blazing makes no effort to look at iamp's meta, despite having played with iamp's meta before i'm liking the difference between 1 and 2 right now | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
##vote: blazinghand | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:33 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:30 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 08:29 iamperfection wrote: so you dont remember this? On November 21 2012 08:08 Blazinghand wrote: So I'm dropping a made meta read on Iamp for his scum play in GSL Mini III and his town play in Liquid City. Iamperfections' meta as scum is lurking and big gaps between small posts, besides defending himself. As Town he tends to flood with smaller posts but he's always in the thread and interacting with people. Bearing in mind GSL Mini III is an unusually extreme version of Iamperf's meta, it's still indicative-- in fact, Hapa catches him as scum that game based on meta with extreme ease (link). In this game Iamperfection is doing his typical "bury them in a mountain of posts!" style town play. He has periods of 2-3 hours where he'll post like 10 times, then he'll go away for ~8 hours then come back and do the same. This is how he plays as town. n terms of associative tells, he interacts with Hapa in a natural way that doesn't seem like they're scum together. I also like this read he makes on kickstart early on (link) that as scum he wouldn't want to. His suspicions of Hapa (link) tie in well with his willingness to last-minute votehop (link). Although he does defend crossfire here (link) I view that as more a point in his favor than against him, as Crossfire was a liability for the scumteam and was inevitably gonna be lynched. In particular his interaction with marv here (link) and his attempts to get crossfire to play the damn game here (link) and here (link) make it seem like he really genuinely think crossfire is town. Basically I don't see scum making a post like this: (link) or like this: (link). This is all consistent with a legitimate town-read on cross, which, given the scenario, is a bad move as scum. Cross WAS going to flip eventually and bussing him was optimal scum play. I'm liking this a lot. Just sayin' having read that, I now remember it! It didn't come to mind previously though. "I'm fox!" lolololololol | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:35 marvellosity wrote: i'm voting for blazing. his stutters case is totally underwhelming. ##vote: blazinghand Which point don't you like in the stutters case? | ||
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:34 marvellosity wrote: Like, seriously. We have 2 scenarios: 1) blazing makes a shitload of effort to look at iamp's meta, having played with iamp before 2) blazing makes no effort to look at iamp's meta, despite having played with iamp's meta before i'm liking the difference between 1 and 2 right now dude I legit forgot, and fwiw I just voted him because he was being a douchebag. Given that you literally just went through this same thing like minutes ago I don't see how you're not aware of this. Once you brought up his meta, i did unvote him you know | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:37 iamperfection wrote: blazinghand does have a point about jar jar he looks kind of tera bad agreed, the biggest issue is that blazing is voting stutters, and not jarjar. do you see what i'm saying? | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:37 marvellosity wrote: blazing, i kinda feel ok about a Jarjar vote instead. how does that feel? if a stutters lynch isn't happening, jarjar is acceptable. that being said, I'd much prefer stutters. What do you think of his post about VA? Isn't that like a pretty scum-motivated move? | ||
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:37 marvellosity wrote: blazing, i kinda feel ok about a Jarjar vote instead. how does that feel? On May 18 2013 08:37 iamperfection wrote: blazinghand does have a point about jar jar he looks kind of tera bad I feel very good about a town marv now this has happened before. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
i've seen you in recent games say "if you can't support this case with meta, your case sucks". can you? | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:39 marvellosity wrote: Let's put it this way Blazing. Stutters is always a useless pile of shit. literally always. i've seen you in recent games say "if you can't support this case with meta, your case sucks". can you? if he's a kushm4sta, then my case on him isn't valid. I'll go dive some meta then. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:39 iamperfection wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:37 marvellosity wrote: blazing, i kinda feel ok about a Jarjar vote instead. how does that feel? Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:37 iamperfection wrote: blazinghand does have a point about jar jar he looks kind of tera bad I feel very good about a town marv now this has happened before. and i feel very good about you saying this. can we have sex now? | ||
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:40 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:39 iamperfection wrote: On May 18 2013 08:37 marvellosity wrote: blazing, i kinda feel ok about a Jarjar vote instead. how does that feel? On May 18 2013 08:37 iamperfection wrote: blazinghand does have a point about jar jar he looks kind of tera bad I feel very good about a town marv now this has happened before. and i feel very good about you saying this. can we have sex now? i dont want to risk our friendship | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:40 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:39 marvellosity wrote: Let's put it this way Blazing. Stutters is always a useless pile of shit. literally always. i've seen you in recent games say "if you can't support this case with meta, your case sucks". can you? if he's a kushm4sta, then my case on him isn't valid. I'll go dive some meta then. I don't like this, Blazing. i'm not going to shout at you, because I don't feel it's... productive. I know you're "up" on the TL scene to know enough that Stutters is generally an extremely lurky mofo. he has played 10 town games or so and always been lurky/useless in all of them. I don't like how much you generally like meta and how little you're willing to look into Stutters' meta. Do you understand my concerns? | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:42 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:40 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 08:39 marvellosity wrote: Let's put it this way Blazing. Stutters is always a useless pile of shit. literally always. i've seen you in recent games say "if you can't support this case with meta, your case sucks". can you? if he's a kushm4sta, then my case on him isn't valid. I'll go dive some meta then. I don't like this, Blazing. i'm not going to shout at you, because I don't feel it's... productive. I know you're "up" on the TL scene to know enough that Stutters is generally an extremely lurky mofo. he has played 10 town games or so and always been lurky/useless in all of them. I don't like how much you generally like meta and how little you're willing to look into Stutters' meta. Do you understand my concerns? no given that I just said I'll look into his meta what is it with people just expecting me to pull meta cases out of my ass constantly | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
and by "constantly" i mean "today" | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
:/ | ||
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:43 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 08:42 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 08:40 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 08:39 marvellosity wrote: Let's put it this way Blazing. Stutters is always a useless pile of shit. literally always. i've seen you in recent games say "if you can't support this case with meta, your case sucks". can you? if he's a kushm4sta, then my case on him isn't valid. I'll go dive some meta then. I don't like this, Blazing. i'm not going to shout at you, because I don't feel it's... productive. I know you're "up" on the TL scene to know enough that Stutters is generally an extremely lurky mofo. he has played 10 town games or so and always been lurky/useless in all of them. I don't like how much you generally like meta and how little you're willing to look into Stutters' meta. Do you understand my concerns? no given that I just said I'll look into his meta what is it with people just expecting me to pull meta cases out of my ass constantly well it gives an impression that you half assing your cases which i would think would be more likely from a scum bh. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney 35616 Dota 2Sea 3573 Jaedong 1105 actioN 1091 Larva 731 BeSt 495 Pusan 288 Light 237 Snow 156 ToSsGirL 64 [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • AfreecaTV YouTube StarCraft: Brood War• intothetv • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel • sooper7s |
Replay Cast
StarCraft2.fi
StarCraft2.fi
The PondCast
StarCraft2.fi
OlimoLeague
|
|