|
I revoted because I forgot I already voted for you lol.. why would you even ask that question release? Is it scummy to revote or something?
@thrawn why am I voting for release?
Well his behavior is scummy. I don't like how SURE he is that I'm scum. He says I'm stopping town from finding scum...That is a scummy exaggeration to suite his purpose. I'm not stopping anyone from doing anything.
Also he was rb and no one died.
|
Normally? No. But when your post is directly under the vote count and it clearly wasn't ninja'd, yes.
Sure it is exaggeration but give me a decent reason for your flavor theory other blue-hunting.
|
On a day on which no one dies, occam's razor says that those who have kill roles will not claim to be RBed. It would lead to that line of reasoning ,"no one dead, this guy RBed, this guy has killing role"
|
And I claimed before anyone claimed to rb me
|
On November 08 2012 13:10 Release wrote: On a day on which no one dies, occam's razor says that those who have kill roles will not claim to be RBed. It would lead to that line of reasoning ,"no one dead, this guy RBed, this guy has killing role"
Not if you were scum (not SK) and were roleblocked. You would know that you were roleblocked by town and that the person who RB'd you would claim it if you didn't.
Acro: the pm detail was not frivolous. He claimed late. If someone is going to claim rb late they need a reason. If kush is mafia and they rb'd one of release/me claiming to have been rb'd is only a benefit to them since, in that case, they would not be holding the rb. Thoughts?
|
I'm back. My vote was up in the air in the beginning, because I was pondering over possibly voting kush. I'll stick with draz for now, since now that I've got confirmation bias out of my system, I can't confirm my theory until one of them flips.
##Vote drazak
@Release: I think it's likely that someone with a kp who was roleblocked would be more inclined to report it, because then there's a roleblocker out there who knows you haven't told the truth.
But on that note, the fact that you appear to have not thought of that makes me think you're town.
Edit: saw I was ninja'd. Wanted to comment anyway.
|
On November 08 2012 13:26 mkfuba07 wrote: I'm back. My vote was up in the air in the beginning, because I was pondering over possibly voting kush. I'll stick with draz for now, since now that I've got confirmation bias out of my system, I can't confirm my theory until one of them flips.
##Vote drazak
@Release: I think it's likely that someone with a kp who was roleblocked would be more inclined to report it, because then there's a roleblocker out there who knows you haven't told the truth.
But on that note, the fact that you appear to have not thought of that makes me think you're town.
Edit: saw I was ninja'd. Wanted to comment anyway.
You don't read that as disingenuous? Kid has been paranoid as fuck so far. His post reads to me like someone saying "look what I just did, no scum would do that, see" it is one of the things release has been finding scummy in acro, and I wonder if he might be hyper aware of it because it is a scum tell of his own.
|
and the wifom begins... How about, it's a failure to comprehend logic that neither scum nor town nor sk would make because of their alignment? It does not show alignment. Only that i was smoking when i wrote that.
The truth is, you and acro are the two who claim "I'm town" more than anyone else in this thread.
|
I considered it, but I feel that scum wouldn't even consider saying what he did. As scum, I feel it would be my first reaction: "Can I just not claim? No, I have to claim, or someone will know I'm lying." As such, I would never consider it proof of innocence. I feel that he's wrong, and scum would never think to fake being wrong in that way. Does that make sense?
|
nope, that would be kush. Acro and I are unquestionably next, though we've backed it up with our play and you'll find that for me at least it isn't indicative as it is something I do as both town and scum.
|
EBWOP: Clarification - As such, I would never consider *what he said* to be proof of innocence, from his own scum perspecctive.
|
the above was @release
Fubs: I disagree with you on the mindset necessary for the comment but it doesn't really matter at the moment. I can see why you would read it as you did.
|
well,This probably isn't going to lead us anywhere.
___________________________________________________
More interestingly, Draz has still not delivered. Maybe kush went to sleep, but i'd like to see a legitimate reason for the flavor theory. + Show Spoiler +I don't want to hear more flavor hint hint hint + Show Spoiler +I want to hear why from the very start you even chose ot pursue it after wbg said game cannot be broken with it.
|
And on that note, Peace out.
|
So drazak has been conspicuously absent. Seems like he has given up and doesn't want to give anything away. I am concerned that we don't have all votes on drazak yet.
Seriously vote drazak. He is 100% scum. if he flips green I will eat my trousers.
|
On November 08 2012 08:19 Acrofales wrote: Yo Kush, what do you think of the newly claimed roles?
I have a sneaking suspicion it's Innocent Wabbit. It just feels more bugsy.
Yo risk, are you scum?
Show me evidence to why you think Innocent Wabbit being red seems bugsy. for now, ##Vote: Drazek
|
@release where did wbg say the game cant be broken with flavor?
|
i guess nice bus dp
##unvote ##vote drazek
|
On November 08 2012 20:43 kushm4sta wrote: i guess nice bus dp
##unvote ##vote drazek
If I am bussing drazak I must have gone backwards in time to day one and told my past self to bus him. Seriously kush. I used to think you were a troll but now I realise you are just bad at this game.
|
On November 08 2012 12:37 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 11:15 DarthPunk wrote:On November 08 2012 11:11 Acrofales wrote: Did some thinking about kush claiming rb'd. I think scum rb'd him, thinking he is the SK.
That's making me think he's town. I disagree. Ok, convince me. Make a case on Kush that explains some of the following. Kush is an extremely unlikely SK. I tried making a case for him and couldn't. The problem is that voting behaviour. It's not something an SK would do. SKs don't pull stupid voting shenanigans, because they don't give a crap about the lynch, as long as it's not their head on the line. Do you feel lime that was all an elaborate act? To what purpose? Is kush even the kind of player who can pull that off? Imho you have to be Ace to even come up with that kinda stuff, let alone pull it off convincingly. And then, what's it all for? Kush is also unlikely scum. We already had the green check. We now have a roleblock claim. As far as I can see, the only way of this happening is if scum deliberately didn't roleblock (or roleblocked Prom) and took advantage of the missing block to claim RB'd themselves. Two problems here: The first is that the claim doeqsn't feel like a lie. It has frivolous details like the "I got a PM". That is too much effort for a lie: It describes a process. People lieing don't imagine the full scenario, just the relevant stuff, which would be "I was RB'd", without the extras. The second is that Kush already has the green check AND he claimed VT. Why have him claim RB'd, rather than his scumbuddy? This together makes him unlikely scum, but if we find a framer, I will reconsider this second part.
I'll address this when I claim.
|
|
|
|