|
On November 08 2012 20:40 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 08:19 Acrofales wrote: Yo Kush, what do you think of the newly claimed roles?
I have a sneaking suspicion it's Innocent Wabbit. It just feels more bugsy.
Yo risk, are you scum?
Show me evidence to why you think Innocent Wabbit being red seems bugsy. for now, ##Vote: Drazek Just the general impression I get of Bugs' sense of humor after multiple games and conversations. Bugs likes a good troll. Making Innocent Wabbit a scum role is trolly.
I see you dodged the question, though...
|
On November 08 2012 21:08 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 20:40 risk.nuke wrote:On November 08 2012 08:19 Acrofales wrote: Yo Kush, what do you think of the newly claimed roles?
I have a sneaking suspicion it's Innocent Wabbit. It just feels more bugsy.
Yo risk, are you scum?
Show me evidence to why you think Innocent Wabbit being red seems bugsy. for now, ##Vote: Drazek Just the general impression I get of Bugs' sense of humor after multiple games and conversations. Bugs likes a good troll. Making Innocent Wabbit a scum role is trolly. I see you dodged the question, though... Why would you suspect someone to answer that dumb question?
|
edwop why wwould you expect someone to answer that dumb question?
|
Kush, you're an idiot. Unless you're running intereference for your scumbuddy.
Do you have a town read on risk.nuke? I don't. If you don't, then why would you not just wait to hear the answer? Now go away, you've done enough damage in this game and I want to hear from risk, not you.
|
I don't have a town read on risk.. but I don't see the purpose of asking retarded questions like "are you scum?"
anyway this is the last I'll say about it.
|
On November 08 2012 21:08 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 20:40 risk.nuke wrote:On November 08 2012 08:19 Acrofales wrote: Yo Kush, what do you think of the newly claimed roles?
I have a sneaking suspicion it's Innocent Wabbit. It just feels more bugsy.
Yo risk, are you scum?
Show me evidence to why you think Innocent Wabbit being red seems bugsy. for now, ##Vote: Drazek Just the general impression I get of Bugs' sense of humor after multiple games and conversations. Bugs likes a good troll. Making Innocent Wabbit a scum role is trolly. I see you dodged the question, though... I'm not scum. You on the other hand probably are.
|
On November 08 2012 21:33 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 21:08 Acrofales wrote:On November 08 2012 20:40 risk.nuke wrote:On November 08 2012 08:19 Acrofales wrote: Yo Kush, what do you think of the newly claimed roles?
I have a sneaking suspicion it's Innocent Wabbit. It just feels more bugsy.
Yo risk, are you scum?
Show me evidence to why you think Innocent Wabbit being red seems bugsy. for now, ##Vote: Drazek Just the general impression I get of Bugs' sense of humor after multiple games and conversations. Bugs likes a good troll. Making Innocent Wabbit a scum role is trolly. I see you dodged the question, though... I'm not scum. You on the other hand probably are. SK, not mafia.
|
On November 08 2012 21:36 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 21:33 risk.nuke wrote:On November 08 2012 21:08 Acrofales wrote:On November 08 2012 20:40 risk.nuke wrote:On November 08 2012 08:19 Acrofales wrote: Yo Kush, what do you think of the newly claimed roles?
I have a sneaking suspicion it's Innocent Wabbit. It just feels more bugsy.
Yo risk, are you scum?
Show me evidence to why you think Innocent Wabbit being red seems bugsy. for now, ##Vote: Drazek Just the general impression I get of Bugs' sense of humor after multiple games and conversations. Bugs likes a good troll. Making Innocent Wabbit a scum role is trolly. I see you dodged the question, though... I'm not scum. You on the other hand probably are. SK, not mafia. Actually fuck everything, I don't see you as scum or SK but how can you be such a retard.
|
Ok. Now Kush, I will tell you what I got from this.
I have a fairly decent scumread on risk by now, meaning I thought the chance of any claim by him would be a fake claim, so I made up some stuff about Innocent Wabbit. Could it be true? Yes, but I have no clue what goes on in WBG's head, nor is there any point to try to figure it out that way. What I wanted and DID was to pressure risk on his claim.
Rather than just giving me his normal aggression off the bat, he got a bit hesitant. No big tell, so I pressured a bit more... and I get an OMGUS in response.
It's not much, but the little bits are piling up. Combine that with DP looking increasingly townie and my not being able to make sense of an SK or scum Kush yet, makes me more and more certain risk is scum. His play is increasingly off his town meta, his vote on hopeless was lacadaisical at best. I am still waiting for some things for it all to make sense (particularly the flip), but I am quite confident I have the scumteam figured out in Drazak and Risk.
|
Damn, he went and continued his train of thought. Now I'm not sure what to make of it anymore.
|
You're the one pushing for no-lynches and accusing people of scum for made up reasons. And you're having problem with what to think about me...
|
Risk. Do you still think prom is scum?
|
On November 08 2012 21:51 risk.nuke wrote: You're the one pushing for no-lynches and accusing people of scum for made up reasons. And you're having problem with what to think about me... Some people posted their reads rather openly this game... others just shut the hell up and never said anything in the last 72 hours or so except for a rather cryptic list.
Now I am used to you not being very talkative when playing, but I am used to you caring. I know it's old, but here is you in GoT mafia:
+ Show Spoiler [risk.nuke caring] +On March 25 2012 07:30 risk.nuke wrote: Okey Risen, I'm going to tell you this once and slowly, Layabout posted legit reasoning for his vote. You are the one who is dragged behind a horse. On March 25 2012 07:44 risk.nuke wrote: Btw townies, do you know how sad it is that the most pro-town person besides myself is the third party. Townies do you understand waht that means? Can you fathom how lousy you're playing. I wish the mafia would kill me tonight you so I don't have to play with you useless lurkers, morons and dumb-posters anymore. On March 30 2012 00:05 risk.nuke wrote: Chaoser you have hardly discussed anything exept the two players risen and acro. Your filter is useless because I look at it and I don't have clue where you stand and you don't seem to have any intention of changing that. You're supposed to be one of the better players in this game but you have so few opinions, you don't post or bring up stuff yourself but just lurk unless directly asked something. I don't like this casual lurking without opinions because thats how you played in hammermafia.
What do you think of Alderan and Greymist. Who are your scumreads? On April 01 2012 02:40 risk.nuke wrote:I'm exhausted. 8 hour examas does that. So basicly the Zealous lynch is bad, 1. Zealous is one of the few more active people. 2. He's done some few bad stuff but he's also done some good stuff which is completely ignored which I just find curious. The rest of the people. + Show Spoiler +gumshoe Jitsu Alderan chaoser Lyter Xatalos GreYMisT sinensis evantrees Looking at them right now there are two people I don't want to lynch. Meet Jitsu and Zealous. People I want to lynch more. You know how I feel about GreYMisT and he's looking bad from the layabout lynch vote-count. He was pushing risen but slow to vote him and it continues like that. I believe in odds and not badluck. But mostly I have gotten the feeling during the entire game that he's playing the game like he scum would play it. From when I know he's watching but doesn't post to how he chooses to post. I get scumchills and I'm probably right because I'm fairly smart. Alderan: I can't remember perfectly and i'm to lazy to go look though his filter. But there were scummy stuff in there, got a bunch of (-) from when I looked over it yesterday so it's there. Also, alot of flipped townies showed suspicion against him and what dead townies think counts alot. I think these two have the highest percentage to flip red. People I want to lynch. Chaoser: This guy isn't this bad. So either he's scum or he gives 0 shit about the game. And last time he did this he was scum. (Hammer mafia if you want to check) gumshoe: This guy is not forgotten. People I want to lynch less. Lyter Xatalos sinensis evantreesYou might be wondering why I have labeled you as People I want to lynch "less". I'll tell you why. It's because you don't post. You have posted scummy things, or you've been unlucky and been on the wrong side with your opinions. It's all lead you to the same place. The place where you're suspicious. In a normal game when a person gets under suspicion they have to post to try and clear themselves. It is the pro-town way if you're a townie under suspicion. But it's also to be understood that in most mafia games everyone look town, so there isn't more then one or two people at a time. The threat of they beeing lynched is very real. This is the first game I play where instead of primarily trying to find the scum I'm trying to determine who's the safest bet for scum because logicly you can't all be scum. A problem for me here is none of you feel the threat or pressure of beeing lynched so you don't give a shit about trying to clear yourselves. If you don't say anything and if you don't have any opinions you push for I can't read you. In any other game you would had been dead by now. Any other game Day 4 and you looked like you do here you would be regarded as confirmed-scum.
Here is a case you made quite a bit into the game in LC mafia: + Show Spoiler [LC Mafia] +On October 09 2012 23:32 risk.nuke wrote:I was checking into the day-1 lynch. Z-Bozon. clicky. Scroll up and you'll see the votes. It's tied at 7-7 with an hour to the deadline. What does Z-boz do. He unvotes and votes for Coag who as no votes and practicly no chance of beeing lynched. Making the lynch standings 7 on shady and 6 on node. Cares enough to go back over the voting thread and post his findings in detail.
There is nothing REMOTELY similar in your play this game. Lets see, we have this:
On November 02 2012 00:14 risk.nuke wrote: You should had given it more time, so you know next time. You could had safely dropped this 12 hours before the deadline and Muso's lynch would had been ensured. Regardless. ##unvote ##vote Muso
Does not care about whether Muso is guilty or not. Just about getting Muso lynched.
On November 04 2012 00:03 risk.nuke wrote:How are you supposed to get a read on me? It should make it blatantly obvious where I stand when I give you straight forward opinions. Meta: Go ahead! As far as I know you have exactly 1 scum game, which was funky weird. Not much meta to go on, buddy. And, your meta is off, compared to GoT mafia, when I got my first, and most memorable, look at you (since then we've been in some themed games together, but this is the first normal in a long time).
Anyway, the main point is that you have "opinions". You say things like
On November 02 2012 01:59 risk.nuke wrote: nice 180 prplhz. and then we are supposed to see this as:
On November 04 2012 00:26 risk.nuke wrote: Hillarious how you can bring up a post of me pressuring people, dismiss it as scummy and then accuse me of never pressuring people. Two wrongs with one stone. Additionally I was pressuring prplhz hard just before he quit.
Then I was leading on the Muso lynch arguing for it because it was the only thing to do. What the hell more do you expect from me? Want me to talk about the weather.
I'm sorry, but I see "nice 180" as a feeler comment that says you caught him on a strange decision. That's not pressure, in fact, it's not even worth a response (and prp didn't give you one).
When you pressure people, you do it like this: + Show Spoiler [risk.nuke pressuring greymist in GoT m…] +On March 22 2012 21:42 risk.nuke wrote:Welcome gentlemen to tonights episode of Who Needs To Get Hit In The Face With a Broadsword. My name is nuke and I will be your host for the evening. Untitled Reporter: Before we get to that, the day started of with a bunch of stupid stuff. Can you tell us a bit of what that was nuke?
nuke: Yes naturally, so yes the day started of with wherebugsgo instantly deciding to do some initial trolling. My cameraman Mr.Wiggles caught some of the first responses. + Show Spoiler [Xatalos] +But isn't he third party? DAFUQ ![[image loading]](http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyrw9lw9A51qe2tt8.gif) + Show Spoiler [evantrees] +The city was in chaos for a brief moment untill Acrofales rolled in and said. + Show Spoiler +Acrofales wrote: I'mma specculate on littlefingers wincondition. ![[image loading]](http://prohardver.hu/dl/upc/2011-07/131762_meme-lol.png) The quality play continues with GreYMisT wanting to lynch modconfirmed unlynchable third party. Which brings us to one of our main-candidates for the evening. Ladies and Gentlemen I present to you. ReDMisT. Show nested quote +On March 22 2012 01:20 GreYMisT wrote: Guys I say we lynch Wherebugsgo, just to be certain.
Sand/Syllo can you guys sign you posts? It makes it a lot easier for the rest of us to keep track of who thinks what.
Xatalos, I'm interested on what you think about Wherebugsgo/littlefinger. How do you think we should go about interacting with him now that we know he is 3rd party?
Also i would like to assure everyone that even though I am hosting Aperture Mafia, the science will not keep me from being active here. After reciving a pressurevote at the start of the game GreYMist emerges. He doesn't say anything about the vote made against him which I don't actually hold against him too much, altough a "Go bugger yourself nuke" in response to my vote would had been nice. However he doesn't say anything else either to generate lynch-discussion. Instead he tries to lead the conversation onto third-party discussion. If you look through his filter here. GreYMist Filter. His continued posts are pretty worthless. He makes a few points like informing how a Mayor system works, shoots down a role-claim. Denying freepasses and punching Mattchews poor logic in the face. Whilst these are alright posts and by that I mean not straight out useless or fluff they aren't doing much to help town either. They are just the kind of replies someone was going to post and GreYMisT posted first. So in terms of "helpfull discussion" aka "lynch discussion" GreY still sits on a pretty solid nothing. Show nested quote +On March 22 2012 03:44 GreYMisT wrote: If it wasnt already apparent that the "Guys we should lynch wherebugsgo, just to be sure" was a joke, me saying later that it was should have made it quite clear.
But enough of that, At the moment I would much prefer lynching Gumshoe over anyone else at this point. Notice how he jumps on the easiest lynch he can find, and then later he turns into more of a "sympathetic townie" where he give Acro a way out of the lynch (ie. claiming). in this way a Scum Gumshoe would win both ways. He either gets a townie lynched, or gets his role. First. No, I did not see any sarcasm in your lets lynch littlefinger post. This is what you wrote. Show nested quote +On March 22 2012 01:20 GreYMisT wrote: Guys I say we lynch Wherebugsgo, just to be certain. Tell me where is the sarcasm or how this clearly is a joke because I don't see it. Especially since the majority about that post is concerning what to do with littlefinger. GreYMisT dismiss it as sarcasm and a joke after the post BUT it wasn't sarcasm nor a joke. And that makes GreYMisT a L-I-A-R. Which is Scum in latin. I absolutely love the second part of this post If gumshoe is scum for jumping on the easiest lynch he can find, does the same go for you jumping on gumshoe? Show nested quote +On March 22 2012 03:44 GreYMisT wrote: But enough of that, At the moment I would much prefer lynching Gumshoe over anyone else at this point. Notice how he jumps on the easiest lynch he can find, and then later he turns into more of a "sympathetic townie" where he give Acro a way out of the lynch (ie. claiming). in this way a Scum Gumshoe would win both ways. He either gets a townie lynched, or gets his role. My other candidate right now was gumshoe but the case on him has already been stated and I don't feel like beeing overly repetetive. Winner: ReDMisT! Close but keeps his head: gumshoe! That's all for now, stay tuned! + Show Spoiler [risk.nuke pressuring BC and Mattchew i…] +On October 02 2012 07:07 risk.nuke wrote: BC talk to me scumshit. You show up late with a forced post in which you wildly misinterpret what I said, trying to twist find loopholes in my words too frame shit on me and. Additionally you state out of the blue you want to lynch 3 new targets with half of europe asleep untill the daypost. What are you trying to accomplish and how are you trying to make that happen? On October 10 2012 22:15 risk.nuke wrote: No Mattchew. that ship have sailed. As I said with coag, I'm done cutting you slack. You've had plenty of opportunity's to contribute but you're proving over again you don't have any ambition to see town suceed. All you do is lurk untill called out. You didn't even appear when day 4 started or as much as commented on ViceraEyes claim. Why should I think that your anything but demotivated because you're loosing and can't find strength to give this game anything. Risk.nuke has enough experience to know what actual pressure looks like. What he did to prplhz was clearly not that.
Then we have this:
On November 04 2012 22:22 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2012 22:12 Promethelax wrote:On November 04 2012 22:09 risk.nuke wrote:On November 04 2012 22:03 drazak wrote: so... we've got an sk for sure? No way that was a vig shot or something?
Hey kush, why did you bluehunt so hard, I'm not cool with that. We could have a vig, Zealos looks like a vig shot but it's unlikely since we already have two flipped blues. On November 04 2012 21:54 Promethelax wrote: Oh, Risk, do you really think that prp is that weak a scum player? Is he the sort of guy you see running away from pressure? That seems blatantly false, he is a good player and I don't see him doing that. If you don;t have some way to prove that he is a 'weak player' I will be moving you towards the scum side of the bracket for twisting information in an attempt to lynch me. Scum does this so often it's bizarre. When I first started playing I thought replacements likely took over bored townies. The truth is the bored townies and even busy townies most often just lurk. Mafia who feel the pressure is to much or for another reason feel they aren't doing well feel they are letting their failing their team so they replace out. weird. Never seen the connection. Mt first newbie two guys replaced out and both were townie, LC we had a 1-1 replacement. I have not seen this pattern. Please post the reads you said you wouldn't post at night. Is your shoddy case on me all you've got? Nothing shoddy about my case. Naming it won't make it so. Convince me why it would be a good idea to tell the town my town or lesser scum reads and I will. I see nowhere in risk's filter where he has a problem giving out scum reads on multiple people. Needlessly secretive is not something I associate with risk. Bluff, frank and aggressive are his playstyle, not this kinda wishy washy stuff.
On November 06 2012 06:42 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2012 06:31 Promethelax wrote:On November 06 2012 06:27 risk.nuke wrote:On November 06 2012 06:10 Promethelax wrote:On November 06 2012 06:08 risk.nuke wrote:On November 06 2012 06:05 Promethelax wrote:On November 06 2012 06:03 risk.nuke wrote:On November 06 2012 06:00 Acrofales wrote:On November 06 2012 05:56 risk.nuke wrote:On November 06 2012 05:54 Acrofales wrote: [quote] Yes. And the improbability of a vig shooting Zealos. Why, did you think zealos was town? I didn't have a scumread on him. That is actually a giant towntell on Zealos, as I mentioned in my nightpost. I needed more to get him out of null, but was hardly surprised by him flipping town (although I was surprised by him being killed. All he had in his filter was a wish for Prome and Kush to die). If thats your read on zealos why don't you think it was a mafia kp? He said that he does think it was Mafia KP. He thought that Matt was the SK. Okey, must have missed that. Thanks and Apologies. @acro: scum = mafia. What are your thoughts on today's lynch? Where will your vote be and why? Any of the list of candidates I provided earlier > No-Lynch. But with the lack of pressence in the thread right now we're not looking like we can lynch anyone. We're 4 here right now. You (risk) Me (prome) Thrawn Acro DP Kush Draz that is enough to lynch. Don't give up now. oh thrawn and kush is here and mkfuba just dropped in. Now I'm just undecided who I want to kill. I face the problem of having warmed up to you so now I'm in a gut vs logic debate. Considering killing DP or mkfuba or drazek. The two later just showed up suspiciously. And here is a great reason why NOT giving reads is such a great idea if you're mafia. When your preferred kill goes south you can just switch to pretty much anybody else without ever being accused of inconsistency.
On November 08 2012 03:38 risk.nuke wrote:Prom you're way pushing my "I'm warming up to you" alot. Who is the last two mafia and who is the SK. (I don't buy into theories involving additional blues, we already have an army of them) Remaining players:Myself thrawn2112 Promethalax DarthPunk Acrofales mkfuba07 drazak kushm4sta Release People have been requestiong them so are are my overall thoughts: Town: thrawn2112, kushm4sta. + Show Spoiler +I belive thrawns claim and while kushm4sta is a terrible player he's done nothing to warrant doubting a greencheck. Likely Mafia: Drazek, Promethalax, DarthPunk and mkfuba.Maybe Mafia: Release.Likely SK: Darthpunk, Acrofales.Maybe SK: Promethelax. Look! I used a random generator to decide who to put where! Or didn't you? When asked to explain, you never even mentioned it again. Ever. Instead you got caught up in the mass claim game.
Now there were some early signs that risk was being his townie self, but these have evaporated as the game went on. Combine that with other people looking townier as the game continues and we have ourself a very Innocent Wabbit
|
Nice case. I'm going to bed. If drazak isn't lynched by some miracle I will lose it. He fucking left the thread. Ok. He claimed scum. There is no reason not to vote for him. If he is town I will be extremely upset at him for playing town this way.
K. Night.
|
On November 08 2012 02:02 drazak wrote: I'm, working on a case for risk being scum, I'll post more about it in a few hours when I'm not so busy
This was Draz's last post and it was 22 hours ago. Anyone not voting Draz is an idiot at this point. This is a huge scum tell on top of a hugely scummy player.
Draz, if by some impossibility you are town I will hate you forever if you let yourself get lynched without doing a damn thing about it before you die.
@Kush
On November 08 2012 20:41 kushm4sta wrote: @release where did wbg say the game cant be broken with flavor?
On November 02 2012 01:15 wherebugsgo wrote: You may claim your role and character name, but I will be modkilling for flavor text (although the game should not be breakable with flavor, it's rule 11). Let this be your last and only warning.
A thought on Draz: this kid hasn't voted today. That means that he will be modkilled if he does not come back into the thread in the next ~6 hours. I for one would be okay with using his mod kill to our advantage and lynching someone else as long as we can confirm that there will be enough people here at the end of day to switch back onto Draz at lynch. I will be here on and off for another 5.5 hours but will not be here for lynch so this is a plan that would rely on other players. What do you all think?
|
I don't know what you want me to do Prom. I'm working the case for risk right now, I fell asleep last night because I was too tired after my day's activities. I've been honest with everyone, I don't know what else you'd want me to do.
|
greek chorus: the evil Draz has been away a long time and now no one doubts the evil which lurks within his red heart
Draz: lol no, I'm here guys I just dunno wats happening. k?
|
On November 09 2012 00:58 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 02:02 drazak wrote: I'm, working on a case for risk being scum, I'll post more about it in a few hours when I'm not so busy This was Draz's last post and it was 22 hours ago. Anyone not voting Draz is an idiot at this point. This is a huge scum tell on top of a hugely scummy player. Draz, if by some impossibility you are town I will hate you forever if you let yourself get lynched without doing a damn thing about it before you die. @Kush Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 20:41 kushm4sta wrote: @release where did wbg say the game cant be broken with flavor? Show nested quote +On November 02 2012 01:15 wherebugsgo wrote: You may claim your role and character name, but I will be modkilling for flavor text (although the game should not be breakable with flavor, it's rule 11). Let this be your last and only warning. A thought on Draz: this kid hasn't voted today. That means that he will be modkilled if he does not come back into the thread in the next ~6 hours. I for one would be okay with using his mod kill to our advantage and lynching someone else as long as we can confirm that there will be enough people here at the end of day to switch back onto Draz at lynch. I will be here on and off for another 5.5 hours but will not be here for lynch so this is a plan that would rely on other players. What do you all think?
Can't sleep. This is terrible prom. What are you thinking? Just lynch the guaranteed scum plz oh plz lynch him. This plan scares me.
|
EBWOP: sorry, that was just shitting on you and not actually helpful to anyone.
What you can do is: Provide the case you promised 22 hours ago. Make the case on anyone else you think is scum. Be active. Make sure you post all of your reads and the reasons for them. Give us any and all information you have or think you have. Your blue reads. Your red reads. Your green reads and your black reads. Everything.
|
On November 09 2012 01:14 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On November 09 2012 00:58 Promethelax wrote:On November 08 2012 02:02 drazak wrote: I'm, working on a case for risk being scum, I'll post more about it in a few hours when I'm not so busy This was Draz's last post and it was 22 hours ago. Anyone not voting Draz is an idiot at this point. This is a huge scum tell on top of a hugely scummy player. Draz, if by some impossibility you are town I will hate you forever if you let yourself get lynched without doing a damn thing about it before you die. @Kush On November 08 2012 20:41 kushm4sta wrote: @release where did wbg say the game cant be broken with flavor? On November 02 2012 01:15 wherebugsgo wrote: You may claim your role and character name, but I will be modkilling for flavor text (although the game should not be breakable with flavor, it's rule 11). Let this be your last and only warning. A thought on Draz: this kid hasn't voted today. That means that he will be modkilled if he does not come back into the thread in the next ~6 hours. I for one would be okay with using his mod kill to our advantage and lynching someone else as long as we can confirm that there will be enough people here at the end of day to switch back onto Draz at lynch. I will be here on and off for another 5.5 hours but will not be here for lynch so this is a plan that would rely on other players. What do you all think? Can't sleep. This is terrible prom. What are you thinking? Just lynch the guaranteed scum plz oh plz lynch him. This plan scares me.
If he was going to get modkilled (he isn't anymore, plan gone) it would be nice if we could let him die on his own and lynch the next scummiest guy as long as we could make sure that if he showed up to make sure he didn't get modkilled we could still lynch him. I like it but it doesn't matter anymore.
|
|
|
|