Bastard Mafia - Page 28
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 13 2012 17:34 johnnywup wrote: I don't understand what you mean. It came with a different role PM that you could claim? A fake win-con, not the whole pm. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
##Vote: Cyber_Cheese Okay certain someone is VE. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 13 2012 18:47 Bluelightz wrote: Fuck this, with my case im guessing im going to vote C_C. ##Vote: Cyber_Cheese Okay certain someone is VE. Sheep. Make the case anyway, kgo. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Let's look at this stuff first, He spends 2 post's on some useless stuff why Layabout was targeting me for joking + Show Spoiler + On April 10 2012 06:38 VisceraEyes wrote: layabout, do you dislike Bluelightz? Do you think Bluelightz is in the scumteam that you're speculating doesn't exist? Why would you want me to shoot Bluelightz? On April 10 2012 06:47 VisceraEyes wrote: I can't condone killing people for 'lols' after how I raged in the obsQT for Aperture. It's not fun for the lolee. Next, he want's to lynch layabout JUST for the joking on me...... On April 10 2012 07:28 VisceraEyes wrote: I think we should lynch layabout. I mean...layabout. Am I doing it right? I can't see the logic in this, VE's playing has however been entirely playful, he never bothers to make cases on people, he makes one liners etc. And look, here he tries to avoid potential suspicion if LB flipped town, so he voted C_C On April 11 2012 20:49 VisceraEyes wrote: Yeah, I'm good with a Cyber_Cheese lynch. Playing the newbie card is one thing, but not as a sole basis for a lynch. I think Macheji responded fine to C_C's accusation, and the fact that C_C is still pushing it is coming off as scummy to me. ##Vote: Cyber_Cheese Night 1 Results: Okay where I said I needed the night's results was to see logic: I die --> CC = SK I didnt --> CC = Survivor or Town VE didn't die --> Survior, scum, or SK. Im taking the benefit of the doubt and believing this logic on VE. Last part, if you look at his town meta, VE was actively pushing discussion, making cases, etc. Here he just's jokes around like not caring if LB was town or not. This is why I want VE lynched. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
##Vote: Viscera Eyes | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 13 2012 21:45 Drazerk wrote: The layabout lynch was good for town now we know the set up. Judging by the amount of conversation that day, It left a lot to be desired. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Especially given that you have a Secret Message. | ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
and who cares about secret messages no one will take them seriously | ||
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On April 13 2012 21:53 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Now, the question is, why does a DT claim after a bodyguard flips, to reveal a survivor? Especially given that you have a Secret Message. You do realize you asked Drazerk that right? Nothing he does makes sense | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Is that what you want? Do you want C_C to kill us all while we sleep? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
My theory is that we're ALL survivors considering the end-game mechanic, except for scum or SK's or whatever that have their very own win-con. And in case you're like ":O", yes, I did just claim Survivor. The fact that you guys are allowing scum to get people to "vote for claimed Survivors" indicates to me that no one is thinking about the higher implications of the game. Jackal, back me up here, is this what you're seeing too? | ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
| ||
| ||