[Stream] Ascend - Page 3
Forum Index > User Streams |
genius_man16
United States749 Posts
| ||
MyOwn!
Germany2 Posts
| ||
Lovin
Denmark812 Posts
On September 19 2011 07:24 MyOwn! wrote: this shit lags so hard..... better you didn't stream everythink fu It's not actually his fault, but JustinTV's.. That said some owned TV alternative would be great in case something like this happens. | ||
TwoMagTrav
United States195 Posts
My stream is at twitch.tv/BioDieselTV there are some VODs on there, quality is pretty good but yours is a lot smoother. Any tips on settings? Keep up the good work! | ||
Ascend
United States120 Posts
On March 10 2012 22:49 BioDiesel wrote: I love the stream man, I watch the top 200 every friday. Any chance I could get your xsplit settings? My stream is at twitch.tv/BioDieselTV there are some VODs on there, quality is pretty good but yours is a lot smoother. Any tips on settings? Keep up the good work! 720p@30fps Settings: Preset: faster Quality: 5 VBV: 3500kbps Audio: 44.1KHz 16bit Stereo, AAC LC, 192kbps Interleave: Enabled 1080p@30fps Settings: Preset: faster Quality: 4 VBV: 4800kbps Audio: 44.1KHz 16bit Stereo, AAC LC, 192kbps Interleave: Enabled Capture Source: BMIS for console games, DXtory source (1920x1080 output) for PC games. All overlays are either static images, or XSplit plugins I built myself. These include: Scoreboard - Starboard (I made it, I should probably use it) Player Rankings at start of game, Voting results Scene Switching during Top 200 - R1CH's XSplit Scene Switcher Automatic overlay switching and hotkey presses before and after games, automatic scoreboard updating both at start and end of game: A custom app I built. Hope that's enough information ;D | ||
TwoMagTrav
United States195 Posts
| ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20263 Posts
On March 16 2012 15:38 Ascend wrote: 720p@30fps Settings: Preset: faster Quality: 5 VBV: 3500kbps Audio: 44.1KHz 16bit Stereo, AAC LC, 192kbps Interleave: Enabled 1080p@30fps Settings: Preset: faster Quality: 4 VBV: 4800kbps Audio: 44.1KHz 16bit Stereo, AAC LC, 192kbps Interleave: Enabled Capture Source: BMIS for console games, DXtory source (1920x1080 output) for PC games. All overlays are either static images, or XSplit plugins I built myself. These include: Scoreboard - Starboard (I made it, I should probably use it) Player Rankings at start of game, Voting results Scene Switching during Top 200 - R1CH's XSplit Scene Switcher Automatic overlay switching and hotkey presses before and after games, automatic scoreboard updating both at start and end of game: A custom app I built. Hope that's enough information ;D Is there any reason you are using Faster for both 1280x720 and 1920x1080? The second resolution is more than twice as hard on cpu to encode | ||
Ascend
United States120 Posts
On March 20 2012 01:45 Cyro wrote: Is there any reason you are using Faster for both 1280x720 and 1920x1080? The second resolution is more than twice as hard on cpu to encode It's more or less because 'I can'. Over the weekend though, when casting the Top 200 @ 1080p, I did switch to 'veryfast' instead, as I was having some CPU issues. The difference between the two, visually, is likely very little. Unless you have a heavily overclocked CPU in your favor, you likely want to stick with 'veryfast'. I know people using the hex-core i7's (3630 & 3690 i believe?) and they will use something along the lines of fast-medium. | ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20263 Posts
On March 20 2012 09:17 Ascend wrote: It's more or less because 'I can'. Over the weekend though, when casting the Top 200 @ 1080p, I did switch to 'veryfast' instead, as I was having some CPU issues. The difference between the two, visually, is likely very little. Unless you have a heavily overclocked CPU in your favor, you likely want to stick with 'veryfast'. I know people using the hex-core i7's (3630 & 3690 i believe?) and they will use something along the lines of fast-medium. Ive been encoding 960x540@30fps using "slower" on an i7 950 for sc2 without dropping any frames in VOD's which is 5 presets below "veryfast" and it makes a massive difference at lower bitrates, i think there is definatly more room for pushing below faster if you have a 2600k @5ghz or something for 1280x720@30fps I think a 3930k could probably go for 720p30@medium with 2 cores dedicated to sc2 pretty easily | ||
Ascend
United States120 Posts
On March 20 2012 13:24 Cyro wrote: Ive been encoding 960x540@30fps using "slower" on an i7 950 for sc2 without dropping any frames in VOD's which is 5 presets below "veryfast" and it makes a massive difference at lower bitrates, i think there is definatly more room for pushing below faster if you have a 2600k @5ghz or something for 1280x720@30fps I think a 3930k could probably go for 720p30@medium with 2 cores dedicated to sc2 pretty easily Unfortunately, I'm currently using a Core i7-920 and have only got it stable up to 3.9GHz. I'm thinking of going either towards a 3930k or one of the new Ivy Bridge CPUs come May-June (when they're released). I could use native USB 3 ports on my motherboard + SATA3. | ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20263 Posts
On March 20 2012 15:30 Ascend wrote: Unfortunately, I'm currently using a Core i7-920 and have only got it stable up to 3.9GHz. I'm thinking of going either towards a 3930k or one of the new Ivy Bridge CPUs come May-June (when they're released). I could use native USB 3 ports on my motherboard + SATA3. I have that @3.72ghz, dont think its worth going ivy bridge from these CPU's as haswell will be a big upgrade in 1-1.5yrs anyway, the 6-cores will take a while longer to replace though. I dont know of anything that uses USB3 and the speed gain seen from SSD's is mostly from random access etc and not from sequential reading so sata 3 doesnt help all that much | ||
CatNzHat
United States1599 Posts
On March 20 2012 17:06 Cyro wrote: I have that @3.72ghz, dont think its worth going ivy bridge from these CPU's as haswell will be a big upgrade in 1-1.5yrs anyway, the 6-cores will take a while longer to replace though. I dont know of anything that uses USB3 and the speed gain seen from SSD's is mostly from random access etc and not from sequential reading so sata 3 doesnt help all that much I've got a 930 D0 @4.2Ghz, able to encode with slower 1280x720@24fps without any issues at all, I'm using dxtory to capture the game, haven't tried using screen region to see the performance difference. visually at low bitrate the difference is huge, at least for first person when I'm jumping the camera around constantly. | ||
Ascend
United States120 Posts
On March 20 2012 17:06 Cyro wrote: I have that @3.72ghz, dont think its worth going ivy bridge from these CPU's as haswell will be a big upgrade in 1-1.5yrs anyway, the 6-cores will take a while longer to replace though. I dont know of anything that uses USB3 and the speed gain seen from SSD's is mostly from random access etc and not from sequential reading so sata 3 doesnt help all that much I've used the Blackmagic Intensity Shuttle for about the last year for streaming Xbox 360 and PS3, it's USB3 only and my PCI drivers have been starting to give BSOD issues... | ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20263 Posts
On March 20 2012 19:03 CatNzHat wrote: I've got a 930 D0 @4.2Ghz, able to encode with slower 1280x720@24fps without any issues at all, I'm using dxtory to capture the game, haven't tried using screen region to see the performance difference. visually at low bitrate the difference is huge, at least for first person when I'm jumping the camera around constantly. Now try encoding that with 1.5/2 cores dedicated to running SC2 smoothly The whole screen region/dxtory thing is about ingame performance not encoding performance or stream quality | ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20263 Posts
On March 22 2012 12:23 Ascend wrote: I've used the Blackmagic Intensity Shuttle for about the last year for streaming Xbox 360 and PS3, it's USB3 only and my PCI drivers have been starting to give BSOD issues... ahh, i dont really know anything about how capture cards work, havnt looked into them as i had weirdly almost 0 performance hit from screen capture and i only have one PC worthy of encoding anything (no consoles etc) | ||
Lega-
Canada141 Posts
| ||
CatNzHat
United States1599 Posts
On March 22 2012 23:49 Cyro wrote: Now try encoding that with 1.5/2 cores dedicated to running SC2 smoothly The whole screen region/dxtory thing is about ingame performance not encoding performance or stream quality I get no lag in game when allowing the OS to control which threads run on which cores, i see no reason to change that. | ||
Ascend
United States120 Posts
On March 24 2012 13:26 KraVe wrote: No show tonight? Nope, no show. Conflicts with MLG, where Thundertoss is. You would have known if you followed on twitter: http://twitter.com/ascendsc2 </shamelessplug> | ||
Lega-
Canada141 Posts
| ||
nepeta
1872 Posts
| ||
| ||