|
On November 11 2011 11:08 archonOOid wrote: if you loose first 2 games in the final why must you win the next four? Where is the winner bracket advantage? Extended series... naniwa needs to win two series, white-ra only has to win one its only extended if they've met before dont pay attention to this, i was wrong
|
On November 11 2011 11:11 Samahoj wrote:Show nested quote +On November 11 2011 11:08 archonOOid wrote: if you loose first 2 games in the final why must you win the next four? Where is the winner bracket advantage? Extended series... naniwa needs to win two series, white-ra only has to win one its only extended if they've met before
Thats not what JP said though, and score says 2-0 indicating that it's a extended series instead of a second Bo3. I've always thougth it was 2xBo3 in the finals, but apparently not.
|
|
Is this extended series, or two bo3s?
|
Does anyone know the bracket for the final 4?
Is it forienger vs korean?
|
Oh, I see.. Naniwa actually started 2-0 up despite coming from the losers bracket. So this is straight up extended series.
|
HAHAHA artosis just found out about stalker heads LOLOL
|
whtas going on with artosis, why is that shocking him?
|
LOL. I had the same reaction months ago!
|
In the base trade, why didn't Naniwa build a forge and then cannon instead of the cyber core?
|
On November 11 2011 11:30 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: In the base trade, why didn't Naniwa build a forge and then cannon instead of the cyber core?
He only had 115 minerals left after the core, same value as a forge.
|
Canada1637 Posts
On November 11 2011 11:30 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: In the base trade, why didn't Naniwa build a forge and then cannon instead of the cyber core? Don't think he had 300 minerals in total.
|
Hm, really like this transition's music :D
|
Naniwa didn't have 300 minerals so he could only have built the forge, not a cannon as well.
|
United Kingdom16710 Posts
|
anyone else think that going for DT's AND an expansion was just a little too... overeager?
|
On November 11 2011 10:45 Telcontar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 11 2011 10:40 tuho12345 wrote:On November 11 2011 10:30 Telcontar wrote: I guess 4 gate wasn't really the problem. Protoss will still find ways to kill you on 1 base. Who cares, that game was awesome as hell. You want tanks vs tanks for 50 mins or quick and tense game? I want all strats to be viable, like TvT is right now. PvP is still way too 1-basey. I think that's just how Protoss is supposed to be. For example, Zerg has the capability to expand quickly, and loosely speaking, an n + 1 base Zerg is about as strong as a n base Protoss or Terran. This translates into having weak low base strategies. Terran doesn't expand as quickly as Zerg but generally expands faster than Protoss. In TvZ, I think it's fair to accept that a lower base Terran is as strong as a slightly more base Zerg (maybe one more base, not necessarily fully saturated). I don't know PvT as well but save the 1-1-1 all in, Terran seems to need the extra bases for the army to keep up with the Protoss army. Protoss is a race that's slow to expand. But it must compete somehow, right? They're just stronger off less bases.
These differences might be bases on mobility and the way each race constructs their town hall (300 mins for Zerg, 400 for Terran but it can float, 400 for Protoss but must be built at site.)
Thus, I'm okay with Protoss being strong off one base/fewer bases. Though it's annoying on small maps.
|
Really well played from Nani. Nice to see.
|
NaNi takes it all (((((((: .
|
United Kingdom16710 Posts
So NesTea takes the Blizzcon spot? YEAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|