MLG Orlando Blue Day 2 Live Report Thread - Page 30
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Oreo7
United States1647 Posts
| ||
n00b3rt
Bulgaria890 Posts
On October 16 2011 07:25 Jakkerr wrote: I'm not gonna cry because I know what will happen. But come on blizzard is this really the game we wanna play? If Sase had gone dt-s, and Puma didn't have orbitals and turrets for some reason, would that be imbalanced too ? :D | ||
Antha
Germany42 Posts
| ||
LtLolburger
New Zealand365 Posts
| ||
Krimineel
France21 Posts
On October 16 2011 07:25 Cyro wrote: Id love to see you beating Puma in PvT at MLG, are you volunteering? Lol comments like this are so bullshit.. Even if 1-1-1 is OP Sase completly failed any build.. it wasn't even close, make no obs when cloak banshee is in base? Can't blame 1-1-1 for that moron | ||
pallidiog
37 Posts
| ||
Mohdoo
United States15286 Posts
| ||
ragnorr
Denmark6097 Posts
On October 16 2011 07:26 dae wrote: 1-1-1 is just such a silly build. Try to blind counter the no cloak version and just auto lose to cloak version :-(. Puma does cloak banshee build all the time he does 1-1-1, it shouldnt be a suprice to sase to have detection ready | ||
BuddhaMonk
781 Posts
On October 16 2011 07:26 n00b3rt wrote: If Sase had gone dt-s, and Puma didn't have orbitals and turrets for some reason, would that be imbalanced too ? :D What Terran doesn't get an orbital? Stop being silly. | ||
awu25
United States2003 Posts
| ||
staples2
United States216 Posts
| ||
ProxyKnoxy
United Kingdom2576 Posts
On October 16 2011 07:25 Erasme wrote: He could have not used it. And I'm hating both. I'm pretty sure the 1/1/1 reached popularity shortly after the NASL finals. It wasn't used much before then and it was generally unknown... He used it twice to MC at IEM | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On October 16 2011 07:26 n00b3rt wrote: If Sase had gone dt-s, and Puma didn't have orbitals and turrets for some reason, would that be imbalanced too ? :D the difference is that there´s almost no way to know whether it´s the cloak version or not... | ||
HwangjaeTerran
Finland5967 Posts
On October 16 2011 07:26 Oreo7 wrote: terrible series, I don't think Puma is actually that good tvp, he just 1/1/1s. Terrible. 1/1/1 is good TvP. Probably the highest winrate one base play there is.(all-in if you like) | ||
aZealot
New Zealand5447 Posts
Terrible games. I wish I hadn't watched that. WP, Puma. | ||
Asha
United Kingdom38136 Posts
On October 16 2011 07:27 awu25 wrote: So Sase loses 21 probes to a cloaked banshee and everyone hates Puma for it? Everyone hates Puma for doing a 1/1/1 all in twice in a row, especially given he (ab)uses it almost constantly in series vs Protoss. It's just not a spectator friendly build =p | ||
ReachTheSky
United States3294 Posts
I'm hoping that SaSe just didn't want to reveal his all smash vs 1-1-1 until the champ bracket | ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20263 Posts
On October 16 2011 07:26 dae wrote: 1-1-1 is just such a silly build. Try to blind counter the no cloak version and just auto lose to cloak version :-(. The 20 second warpgate nerf removed heavy warpgate attacks from the counter list of 5 minute starport, as it stands, with a bunker at the ramp and those marines, it is literally impossible to kill a good terran, warp prism all ins etc are all 1 base and if you stay 1 base he can throw up a second bunker and just salvage it when you expand, so ive never actuly seen anyone killed since 1.3.6 by rushing starport with marines and a bunker + scv's | ||
Scufo
United States136 Posts
| ||
branflakes14
2082 Posts
On October 16 2011 07:26 Krimineel wrote: Lol comments like this are so bullshit.. Even if 1-1-1 is OP Sase completly failed any build.. it wasn't even close, make no obs when cloak banshee is in base? Can't blame 1-1-1 for that moron Whether or not a Terran gets cloak is a coin flip. Puma didn't get it in the first game but did in the 2nd. Sase had no way of knowing in either game, and getting an Observer is a surprisingly big investment in a tight situation like that. This all comes back to that whole scouting a Terran issue. | ||
| ||