http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/zatic/unspoiler_alluser.js
Spoiled Strategy Forum Guides - Page 6
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy |
zatic
Zurich15306 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/zatic/unspoiler_alluser.js | ||
CecilSunkure
United States2829 Posts
On August 05 2011 18:14 zatic wrote: Problem solved http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/zatic/unspoiler_alluser.js So... How do you use this? Also to anyone that has been adding spoiler to their OP, I've been simply not reading your posts because it's annoying | ||
~Maverick~
United States234 Posts
| ||
galtdunn
United States977 Posts
I + Show Spoiler + don't + Show Spoiler + see + Show Spoiler + what + Show Spoiler + the + Show Spoiler + problem + Show Spoiler + is Oh, and I actually like spoilered guides, seeing as how Zatic is apparently taking a vote (make a poll dummy) | ||
Squigly
United Kingdom629 Posts
On August 02 2011 18:46 SeaSwift wrote: Congratulations for successfully stereotyping every single person who doesn't like to read walls of text. It is a widely accepted fact that people dislike big walls of plain text. No 12 year olds, retards or dropouts involved. Ask professional presenters or authors. The spoiler tags act as a contents page so you can find what you are looking for quickly. The complaints in this thread seem to come from the stance that you have to click too much to read it. Firstly, as somebody else pointed out this is ironic coming from a Starcraft player. Secondly, those clicks are so quick that it seems narrow-minded to bitch about that. It is just such a tiny problem. What does using spoiler tags have to do with "long well written guides"? If the OP uses Spoiler tags for a strategy that is in total about 4 lines long, yes that is stupid. But for the ideal guide Spoiler tags are useful. Your problem is your shitty phone browser if it has to reload the page. Not people using Spoiler tags. Also, to people complaining about reloading the page, maybe you should get off the internet and read a damn book while you wait. Seriously, learn how to have an attention span of over 30 seconds. You hypocrite. No, because as someone else pointed out, guide =/= news. Your news is colourful, bordered etc and the text is elegantly written with tons of little pictures. Strategy guides are not bordered, have little colour and are dry and clinically written by their very nature, with the only pictures being units involved and screenshots of how the strategy works. I dont appreciate being completely falsely quoted. Please refrain from this in the future. | ||
Turo
Canada333 Posts
| ||
Prometheas
Canada8 Posts
| ||
whistle
United States141 Posts
On August 11 2011 03:37 CecilSunkure wrote: So... How do you use this? Also to anyone that has been adding spoiler to their OP, I've been simply not reading your posts because it's annoying Open notepad and create a new file somewhere easily accessed called tlscript.user.js. Copy and paste the contents of zatic's script into that file. If you're using FF, get the Greasemonkey extension. Drag the file you created into FF, and Greasemonkey should ask you if you want to install. If you're using Chrome, you can just drag the file into Chrome without getting another extension first. You don't need to keep the file around after installing. | ||
Demonace34
United States2493 Posts
Compare CecilSunkure's guide on improving to all the other Guides with spoiler tags. If the posts were setup like the liquipedia pages for builds they wouldn't need a ton of spoilers. I think there is a way to get more readability without having to click 10+ times per guide, but my brain is blank at the moment. I'll try to think hard and come back. | ||
Flix
Belgium114 Posts
On August 11 2011 08:37 Prometheas wrote: zatic im with you!!! as a mobile developer this is a travesty! think of all the mobile users... Works fine on my Blackberry and those are well known for being crap at browsing, really crap! I don't bother posting from the BB but reading the forums and opening spoilers works great. | ||
zatic
Zurich15306 Posts
Table Of Contents: Introduction Tactics Battles References Introduction Crossing the T or Capping the T is a classic naval warfare tactic attempted from the late 19th to mid 20th century, in which a line of warships crossed in front of a line of enemy ships, allowing the crossing line to bring all their guns to bear while receiving fire from only the forward guns of the enemy. It became possible to bring all of a ship's main guns to bear only in the late 19th and the early 20th centuries with the advent of steam-powered battleships with rotating gun turrets, which were able to move faster and turn quicker than sailing ships, which had fixed guns facing sideways. The tactic became largely obsolete with the introduction of missiles and aircraft as long-range strikes are not dependent on the direction the ships are facing. Tactics When going into battle, ships would assume a battle line formation called "line astern", in which one vessel followed another in one or more parallel lines. This allowed each ship to fire over wide arcs without lofting salvoes above friendly vessels. Each ship in the line generally engaged its opposite number in the enemy battle line. Steaming with the enemy off to the side (by crossing the T) enabled a ship to launch salvoes at the same target with both the forward and rear turrets, maximizing the chances for a hit. It also made ranging error less critical for the ship doing the crossing, while simultaneously more critical for the ship being crossed. In military terms, this is known as enfilade fire. The tactic, designed for heavily armed and armored battleships, was used with varying degrees of success with more lightly armed and armored cruisers and heavy cruisers. Advances in gun manufacture and fire-control systems allowed engagements at increasingly long range, from approximately 6,000 yards (5500 m) at the Battle of Tsushima in 1905 to 20,000 yards (18 000 m) at the Battle of Jutland in 1916. The introduction of brown powder, which burned less rapidly than black powder, allowed longer barrels, which allowed greater accuracy; and because it expanded less sharply than black powder, it put less strain on the insides of the barrel, allowing guns to last longer and to be manufactured to tighter tolerances. The addition of radar allowed World War II ships to fire further, more accurately, and at night. Battles Notable battles in which warships crossed the T include:
References Mahan, Alfred Thayer (1906). Reflections, Historic and Other, Suggested By The Battle Of The Japan Sea. By Captain A. T. Mahan, US Navy. US Naval Institute Proceedings magazine, (Article) June 1906, Volume XXXVI, No. 2, Heritage Collection. Morison, Adm. Samuel Eliot. History of Naval Operations in World War II. Larrabee, Eric. Commander-in-Chief: Franklin D. Roosevelt, His Lieutenants and Their War. | ||
DuncanIdaho
United States465 Posts
On August 11 2011 21:49 zatic wrote: + Show Spoiler + I still maintain that the best way to structure longer guides is headlines, paragraphs, and a table of contents, like it's done pretty much everywhere else in the world except the TL strategy forum: Table Of Contents: Introduction Tactics Battles References Introduction Crossing the T or Capping the T is a classic naval warfare tactic attempted from the late 19th to mid 20th century, in which a line of warships crossed in front of a line of enemy ships, allowing the crossing line to bring all their guns to bear while receiving fire from only the forward guns of the enemy. It became possible to bring all of a ship's main guns to bear only in the late 19th and the early 20th centuries with the advent of steam-powered battleships with rotating gun turrets, which were able to move faster and turn quicker than sailing ships, which had fixed guns facing sideways. The tactic became largely obsolete with the introduction of missiles and aircraft as long-range strikes are not dependent on the direction the ships are facing. Tactics When going into battle, ships would assume a battle line formation called "line astern", in which one vessel followed another in one or more parallel lines. This allowed each ship to fire over wide arcs without lofting salvoes above friendly vessels. Each ship in the line generally engaged its opposite number in the enemy battle line. Steaming with the enemy off to the side (by crossing the T) enabled a ship to launch salvoes at the same target with both the forward and rear turrets, maximizing the chances for a hit. It also made ranging error less critical for the ship doing the crossing, while simultaneously more critical for the ship being crossed. In military terms, this is known as enfilade fire. The tactic, designed for heavily armed and armored battleships, was used with varying degrees of success with more lightly armed and armored cruisers and heavy cruisers. Advances in gun manufacture and fire-control systems allowed engagements at increasingly long range, from approximately 6,000 yards (5500 m) at the Battle of Tsushima in 1905 to 20,000 yards (18 000 m) at the Battle of Jutland in 1916. The introduction of brown powder, which burned less rapidly than black powder, allowed longer barrels, which allowed greater accuracy; and because it expanded less sharply than black powder, it put less strain on the insides of the barrel, allowing guns to last longer and to be manufactured to tighter tolerances. The addition of radar allowed World War II ships to fire further, more accurately, and at night. Battles Notable battles in which warships crossed the T include:
References Mahan, Alfred Thayer (1906). Reflections, Historic and Other, Suggested By The Battle Of The Japan Sea. By Captain A. T. Mahan, US Navy. US Naval Institute Proceedings magazine, (Article) June 1906, Volume XXXVI, No. 2, Heritage Collection. Morison, Adm. Samuel Eliot. History of Naval Operations in World War II. Larrabee, Eric. Commander-in-Chief: Franklin D. Roosevelt, His Lieutenants and Their War. Wow dude, I just added the quote version of this comment to my favorites, such that i can steal the code, because I've been wondering how to do anchors for some time now, and I admit, this is way better than spoilers. Thank you so much! | ||
DuncanIdaho
United States465 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=253647 <3 ~DuncanIdaho | ||
| ||