|
Palmar , I love You . The Coagulation thing is just a funny joke . I am on my smartphone not even in the middle of trip . CreamyButter is my best Lynch candidate for today . Things like " I wont make enough posts " detailed scum strategy ( why the fuck we need that ?) and stuff I will look at and talk about when I get a pc to use are scummy. Coag needs to post something useful .
|
On July 18 2011 19:20 TheAwesomeAll wrote:gtrsr, claiming VT is extremely bad, so I trust that to be a lie. After i read Coags list, and generall spamness, but imo we already got a better target, PyoShow nested quote +On July 18 2011 13:14 Pyo wrote:On July 18 2011 10:25 Mr. Wiggles wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Ok, so let's get this started! First things first, let's lay out some things we want to achieve, and some guidelines. A pro-town atmosphereThis normally goes without saying, but it often bears repeating. If we want to catch scum, we need to have the proper environment for scum hunting and for communicating with each other. This means a couple things: - Promoting scum hunting.
- Not having pointless arguments
- Actively contributing
- All that jazz
Basically, we want to keep the thread as clean as possible, because chaos best serves mafia, not town. If you really don't know what to do, there's town guides. I'm not going to write one here, because I'm too lazy, and don't consider myself experienced enough to try. However, I am going to go through the three points above, as I think they are very important. We always want people to scum-hunt. There's never an excuse not to scum-hunt; everyone can do it. This provides us with many benefits. First, it's the primary method for actually finding scum. It also means that people have to give their actual thoughts, and have to come up with things beyond "I agree". This gives us information, and information is good. It lets us know what you're thinking, and it puts pressure on mafia to have to contribute. Also, forcing mafia to scum-hunt means that there's a good chance of catching them just based on their analysis, because it's hard to find people who are scummy, when you know they aren't scum. Next, we want to avoid bickering. This goes hand in hand with keeping the thread clean. This is different from actually debating with people, and you should be able to tell the difference between rationality, and NO U. If anyone is having a pointless argument, they will be asked to stop. It doesn't help town, only mafia. Lastly, we want people to contribute. There's a posting limit of 5 posts per day/night, but that doesn't give you permission to skirt that limit. It's easy for mafia to hide amongst lurkers, and beyond that, lurkers are nearly impossible to analyze. So, contribute. This doesn't mean make tons of pointless one-liners, it means providing actual thoughts, analysis, and content. You can do it, I believe in you. And if you don't, we can always just ask a vig to shoot you. We don't want people to lurk. CluesThere's clues in this game. However, all clue analysis MUST MUST MUST be backed up by post analysis. Before you post the clue analysis too. The reason for this, is that clues will most likely point to all kills. this means that some of the clues are going to point to vigs, some will point to third parties, and the others will point to mafia. Accidentally outing a vig because you solved the clues about them is bad. So, if you think someone's attached to a clue, go back and re-read their posts. If you think they look scummy, then post an analysis that contains the clue analysis. If you think they're town, just hold onto your analysis. Clue-analysis should always be used to supplement an actual behavioural analysis. It should never be the main point for calling someone scummy. In other words: Clues pointing towards a person does not equal scum. Third PartiesLooking at the third parties, here's what we want: -We want Joker to die. -We want Batman to kill Joker. -This means that Batman wins, and should hopefully be removed from the game, also removing Ra’as Al Ghul who can no longer achieve his victory condition. This is the optimal way the third party part of the game will go. We want Batman to kill Joker before Ra'as can kill Batman, so that we don't have to deal with Joker ourselves. So, if you think someone's acting like an SK, don't be afraid to point it out, as this should help Batman achieve his win-con, and let us get on with the rest of the game. If Joker is lynched, is Batman removed from the game? If Batman is removed from the game, is Ra'as removed from the game?Thoughts? Disagreements? Let's get this rolling. On July 18 2011 12:39 CreamyButter wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On July 18 2011 10:37 Curu wrote:
CreamyButter, a question for you if I may. Taking the setup into consideration, how would you propose to play as Mafia this game if you were indeed to receive such a role? Ummm. Well. First order of business is of course ensuring that all mafia members are actively contributing to the thread. For the newer players, I might consider giving them a talking point, or else assigning one mafia to make an inconsequential "slip" in the thread, so that the less experienced mafia members can analyze properly without feeling guilty and without actually slipping up. I would pick the newest players and make sure they know what they're doing, basically, and if not I would help them compose their posts before they post them. After all mafia members are actively posting, I would try to shift the demographic being targeted in the thread to something less dangerous, such as lynching all lurkers. Also, since there seems to be a zodiac/veteran list going up, I would make sure to elect a figurehead boss, so that the boss doesn't end up on the list. From there, use PMs to harass/poke people and figure out what roles they have/infiltrate their circles >.> Avoid hitting vets, figure out where the hatter's bombs are before killing them, hit medics, boring stuff etc. I would be actively PMing, to make sure the town doesn't get up to anything worthwhile. Possibly coordinate PMs with other mafia members. A priority is reaching out to the insane inmates, and integrating them into the mafia circle. With no rolechecker, though, I'm not sure how mafia would do this. I guess they would get the DT to check on someone who isn't in the known mafia circle, and if the DT claims that he's seeing red, then the guy being checked is probably insane because no 3rd party would set themselves as red. For this reason I might consider not killing DTs right away as long as he's being properly manipulated. Batman is useless because he can't claim and he can't reveal his findings, though. From what I can tell, it is in mafia's best interest to get the 3rd parties lynched. The 3rd parties might randomly kill a mafia member at night, and might eat up night hits, and it is impossible to cooperate with them since they can't claim. I guess I would just leave random hints everywhere that someone (someone who isn't mafia) is Batman and hope he dies. As a 3rd party player: It seems to be in Joker's best interest for the game to end as quickly as possible, so he would keep mafia alive at first, so that their KP is higher. Batman and Ra'as, on the other hand, want to keep the game running longer, so that they have time to hunt. As Batman I would default to rolechecking, and killing only when either confirmed or if one side seems like it's winning. As Ra'as I would target lurkers/useless seeming people until I get a read. There seems to be enough vigilante advice, so maybe it's time to stop with that. As for DT advice though, On July 18 2011 11:32 notasmurf wrote:
It's not who the veteran players are that we should be concerned about. It's who the new players are. These are the people that we should focus our DT check on, and take a closer look during scumhunting. By no means am I saying we should lynch new players instead of old ones. Obviously we need to lynch the best person possible. But what I'm saying is that they tend to get overlooked.
I agree that DTs should check the newer, more easy ignorable players, instead of the vets. Since as a DT you can only trust a red reading, there's no way to try and build a circle around yourself. It would also be much easier to get a newer, inactive, partially illiterate player lynched than an old one. So check people that you think yourself capable of actually getting lynched i guess. I have to study/class, will be back later today. I don't really know how to give/identify good analysis, but I'm fully open to being tested/asked stupid questions to see if I screw up, so feel free to send me PMs. I might be a "newb" but from my limited experience, pretty much every time someone comes out with one of these massive long policy spam posts, they've been scum. Just sayin' lets start with his worst post, he makes some terrible accusation, and then goes on to back of within 2 words. That is super scummy. Second of all all your accusation is even more terrible then my first sentence would show, long posts= scum? get out. Show nested quote +On July 18 2011 14:49 Pyo wrote:On July 18 2011 13:22 Mr. Wiggles wrote:On July 18 2011 13:14 Pyo wrote:On July 18 2011 10:25 Mr. Wiggles wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Ok, so let's get this started! First things first, let's lay out some things we want to achieve, and some guidelines. A pro-town atmosphereThis normally goes without saying, but it often bears repeating. If we want to catch scum, we need to have the proper environment for scum hunting and for communicating with each other. This means a couple things: - Promoting scum hunting.
- Not having pointless arguments
- Actively contributing
- All that jazz
Basically, we want to keep the thread as clean as possible, because chaos best serves mafia, not town. If you really don't know what to do, there's town guides. I'm not going to write one here, because I'm too lazy, and don't consider myself experienced enough to try. However, I am going to go through the three points above, as I think they are very important. We always want people to scum-hunt. There's never an excuse not to scum-hunt; everyone can do it. This provides us with many benefits. First, it's the primary method for actually finding scum. It also means that people have to give their actual thoughts, and have to come up with things beyond "I agree". This gives us information, and information is good. It lets us know what you're thinking, and it puts pressure on mafia to have to contribute. Also, forcing mafia to scum-hunt means that there's a good chance of catching them just based on their analysis, because it's hard to find people who are scummy, when you know they aren't scum. Next, we want to avoid bickering. This goes hand in hand with keeping the thread clean. This is different from actually debating with people, and you should be able to tell the difference between rationality, and NO U. If anyone is having a pointless argument, they will be asked to stop. It doesn't help town, only mafia. Lastly, we want people to contribute. There's a posting limit of 5 posts per day/night, but that doesn't give you permission to skirt that limit. It's easy for mafia to hide amongst lurkers, and beyond that, lurkers are nearly impossible to analyze. So, contribute. This doesn't mean make tons of pointless one-liners, it means providing actual thoughts, analysis, and content. You can do it, I believe in you. And if you don't, we can always just ask a vig to shoot you. We don't want people to lurk. CluesThere's clues in this game. However, all clue analysis MUST MUST MUST be backed up by post analysis. Before you post the clue analysis too. The reason for this, is that clues will most likely point to all kills. this means that some of the clues are going to point to vigs, some will point to third parties, and the others will point to mafia. Accidentally outing a vig because you solved the clues about them is bad. So, if you think someone's attached to a clue, go back and re-read their posts. If you think they look scummy, then post an analysis that contains the clue analysis. If you think they're town, just hold onto your analysis. Clue-analysis should always be used to supplement an actual behavioural analysis. It should never be the main point for calling someone scummy. In other words: Clues pointing towards a person does not equal scum. Third PartiesLooking at the third parties, here's what we want: -We want Joker to die. -We want Batman to kill Joker. -This means that Batman wins, and should hopefully be removed from the game, also removing Ra’as Al Ghul who can no longer achieve his victory condition. This is the optimal way the third party part of the game will go. We want Batman to kill Joker before Ra'as can kill Batman, so that we don't have to deal with Joker ourselves. So, if you think someone's acting like an SK, don't be afraid to point it out, as this should help Batman achieve his win-con, and let us get on with the rest of the game. If Joker is lynched, is Batman removed from the game? If Batman is removed from the game, is Ra'as removed from the game?Thoughts? Disagreements? Let's get this rolling. On July 18 2011 12:39 CreamyButter wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On July 18 2011 10:37 Curu wrote:
CreamyButter, a question for you if I may. Taking the setup into consideration, how would you propose to play as Mafia this game if you were indeed to receive such a role? Ummm. Well. First order of business is of course ensuring that all mafia members are actively contributing to the thread. For the newer players, I might consider giving them a talking point, or else assigning one mafia to make an inconsequential "slip" in the thread, so that the less experienced mafia members can analyze properly without feeling guilty and without actually slipping up. I would pick the newest players and make sure they know what they're doing, basically, and if not I would help them compose their posts before they post them. After all mafia members are actively posting, I would try to shift the demographic being targeted in the thread to something less dangerous, such as lynching all lurkers. Also, since there seems to be a zodiac/veteran list going up, I would make sure to elect a figurehead boss, so that the boss doesn't end up on the list. From there, use PMs to harass/poke people and figure out what roles they have/infiltrate their circles >.> Avoid hitting vets, figure out where the hatter's bombs are before killing them, hit medics, boring stuff etc. I would be actively PMing, to make sure the town doesn't get up to anything worthwhile. Possibly coordinate PMs with other mafia members. A priority is reaching out to the insane inmates, and integrating them into the mafia circle. With no rolechecker, though, I'm not sure how mafia would do this. I guess they would get the DT to check on someone who isn't in the known mafia circle, and if the DT claims that he's seeing red, then the guy being checked is probably insane because no 3rd party would set themselves as red. For this reason I might consider not killing DTs right away as long as he's being properly manipulated. Batman is useless because he can't claim and he can't reveal his findings, though. From what I can tell, it is in mafia's best interest to get the 3rd parties lynched. The 3rd parties might randomly kill a mafia member at night, and might eat up night hits, and it is impossible to cooperate with them since they can't claim. I guess I would just leave random hints everywhere that someone (someone who isn't mafia) is Batman and hope he dies. As a 3rd party player: It seems to be in Joker's best interest for the game to end as quickly as possible, so he would keep mafia alive at first, so that their KP is higher. Batman and Ra'as, on the other hand, want to keep the game running longer, so that they have time to hunt. As Batman I would default to rolechecking, and killing only when either confirmed or if one side seems like it's winning. As Ra'as I would target lurkers/useless seeming people until I get a read. There seems to be enough vigilante advice, so maybe it's time to stop with that. As for DT advice though, On July 18 2011 11:32 notasmurf wrote:
It's not who the veteran players are that we should be concerned about. It's who the new players are. These are the people that we should focus our DT check on, and take a closer look during scumhunting. By no means am I saying we should lynch new players instead of old ones. Obviously we need to lynch the best person possible. But what I'm saying is that they tend to get overlooked.
I agree that DTs should check the newer, more easy ignorable players, instead of the vets. Since as a DT you can only trust a red reading, there's no way to try and build a circle around yourself. It would also be much easier to get a newer, inactive, partially illiterate player lynched than an old one. So check people that you think yourself capable of actually getting lynched i guess. I have to study/class, will be back later today. I don't really know how to give/identify good analysis, but I'm fully open to being tested/asked stupid questions to see if I screw up, so feel free to send me PMs. I might be a "newb" but from my limited experience, pretty much every time someone comes out with one of these massive long policy spam posts, they've been scum. Just sayin' Meh, it's a null-tell again. Examples, GM in Real-Time Mafia, Kavdragon in Pick Your Power Insane. Both making long posts trying to direct town at the beginning, both town. Also, if you think my post is spam, please point out how. If you read it, I specifically say I'm not going to write a general how to play town guide, just give a little bit of general advice against what's made town lose in about three of the last four games I've played, and then talked about how to use clues properly and that killing Joker is a high priority for town. It's not even that massive either, haha. All you did in your post was herpa-derp the premise of the game. It's not meaningful in any way shape or form. I realize that people can meta-game that shit by always posting that crap at the beginning of their games so that whenever they are mafia it doesn't look so suspicious, but in general it's a really bad way to play if you really are town. So if long posts happen in any other game and theyre town, that doesnt mean anything since they were just setting up for this game? That line of reasoning is preeeeeeeeeeetty bad, since your postulate is that theyre scum, which is just lol. Also to people who talk about there newbie ness, your scum. If you are a newbie this will de evaluate your opinion, so it doesnt matter you post non constructive, vote on towns, bandwagon etc. Therefore proclaiming your newbieness is something only mafia will do. Even worse then all of this is that since your obviously scum by now, scum will bandwagon you. Now Palmar, do you REALLY believe hes scum? (you might ofcourse dont be scum, dont mention your newbie ness ever again though) major fos on Pyo fos on Coag and palmar and curu, the gtrsr bashing is worse then spam.
coagulation made a post wherein I was called a "newb" that was what I was referring to when I said "i might be a 'newb.'" I actually consider myself to be a fairly strong player.
Also I wasn't explicitly accusing wiggles or creamybutter of being scum. I was simply saying that people shouldn't be concluding pro-townness from those long policy posts. To be clear, my post was an effort to avoid this:
On July 18 2011 14:14 gtrsrs wrote: anyways. wiggles, i dig the pro-town-ness already. In my follow up posts, I was also trying to convey the point that super long posts are more likely to be glossed over than read, so if you actually have a point to make, make it simple and straightforward, otherwise you're just cluttering up the thread with a big wall-o-text.
|
despite the coagulation wagon being pretty stupid, he well deserves a shot in the face if he doesn't add anything meaningful to the discussion.
|
ok i'm totally here why are you people so interested in zodiac lists honestly they're SO bad let's not forget that it originated from BC when he was scum, ya?
|
So, interesting developement. Mig posts this:
On July 18 2011 11:23 Mig wrote: There are a ton of new players this game. So someone who has been around a long time should make a list of the veteran players, not necessarily to use as a discussion point but just purely as information. The mafia are pretty much guaranteed to have at least a couple vets on their team so they will all know who the experienced players are. There is no reason a list shouldn't be made just so the new town players won't be at a disadvantage information wise.
I will make one if no one who has been around longer does.
Also I will just say I don't care who notasmurf is and neither should anyone else. If you really want to bug him then send him pms about it. Don't spam the thread up discussing his identity.
Coagulation obliges. ROL doesn't read the thread and barges in with this:
On July 18 2011 16:05 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2011 12:33 Coagulation wrote: Heres the list of newbs and vets in the game. 1. snotboogie Newb 2. Deconduo Vet 3. Kurumi NEWB LOL 4. curu Newb 5. RebirthofLegend Vet 6. Amber[LighT] Vet 7. hiro protagonist Newb 8. nisani201 Newb 9. Pyo Newb 10.Drazerk Newb 11. supersoft Newb 12. Jackal58 LOL 13. Mr. Wiggles Vet 14. prplhz Newb 15. mig Newb 16. notasmurf Newb 17. kenpachi LOL 18. Syllogism Newb 19. Palmar Newb 20. Sevryn Newb 21. ghrur Vet 22. Varysthespider Newb 23. node Vet 24, coagulation Vet 25. kavdragon Vet 26. Lucidity Newb 27. ketomai Newb 28. creamybutter Newb 29. redff Vet 30. youngminii Vet 31. liquid`nazgul Newb 32. Shraft Newb 33. cjrninja Newb 34. visceraeyes Newb 35. theawesomeall Newb 36. eternalmisfit Newb 37. zona Vet 38. gtrsrs Newb 39. ribboo Newb 40. sinani206 Newb
This list was pointless and all it served to do was belittle and intimidate the newer players from posting. To that end, what is your agenda? The only objective this post served was to discourage newer players from posting which helps mafia force sheeping, which in a game this size is a considerable problem. To this end, I am voting for you. ##Vote Coagulation
I'd almost agree with him, except for the fact that this was being discussed already so was a legitimate thing to do. Also its Coag, what do you expect.
However the Bandwagon votes from Kurumi and supersoft are intriguing to me. It looks like they are after an easy day 1 lynch of a decent player. Big FOS on them
|
what is with you guys and saying "i'm going to say something scummy" or "i might slip up later and say scummy stuff" that's a giant scumtell in my eyes, honestly
voting creamybutter
|
On July 18 2011 20:46 youngminii wrote: what is with you guys and saying "i'm going to say something scummy" or "i might slip up later and say scummy stuff" that's a giant scumtell in my eyes, honestly
voting creamybutter
Only mafia have a reason to inherently feel guilty and apologetic from the start of the game.
|
deconduo why are you fosing RoL but not voting him? are you trying to hide your voting patterns? are you just faking pressure against a scum buddy?
if you're scumhunting there's absolutely no reason why you'd say "big fos on you" without a vote to back it up, unless you already had a vote somewhere else
suspicious suspicious
|
also this doesn't really pertain to this game anymore, more for future games i suppose
it's not wise to establish "okay everyone 3rd party is bad and we must lynch them asap in this order", i think everyone kind of knows that already but by saying that you're just scaring the 3rd party off and making them hide their role even more. if you hadn't said anything they might think it's logical or wise to come out and claim or softclaim/breadcrumb or even just slip up and show patterns that they have KP which will allow us to kill them
i'd go back and check who started that but no one in the game should have the motive to hide the 3rd party
|
Ok this is what happens: Mig asks for a list, knowing that giving lists is a way for mafia to blend in and that lists are generally a scum tell. Coag replies Coag gets fossed and bandwagoned mig dissapears... People that are accusing Coag are accusing the wrong guy i think.
|
I guess I'll start accusing people.
Kurumi: Every post of his so far has been junk--either a joke, spam, or just trolling. This immediately changes, however, as soon as the first opportunity pops up. As soon as Palmar warned Kurumi, and as soon as Palmar began launching full-scale accusations against me, Kurumi immediately bandwagoned with a tiny post saying that he agrees. Why was it necessary to even post, if he was in the middle of a trip? Why could he not form his own opinions on my scummy post, which was posted hours before Palmar accused me, and while he was still on a PC (or at least capable of making coherent posts): + Show Spoiler +Claiming Scout looks suspicious to me, I would ask Pyro to spycheck them.. Wait, if they're really Scouts we won't get anything.. and if they're disguised... We don't have such Pyros! MAGGOTS! Also, Snipers should get lynched before roleclaimers. Like, those Australlian Pit Dwellers can live entire month without food and water! Because Kurumi has basically been biding his time, waiting for the first shots to be fired, I nominate him.
Coag: I actually found that vet/newb pretty useful (assuming its accurate) so as long as he starts posting soon I have no real doubts.
Pyo: I agree with TAA that his argument that long posts are scummy is stupid (>.>), though I would still say that I prefer Kurumi. I believe that a situation where everyone is making long posts is much better than a situation where everyone is making tiny posts, for obvious reasons. Pyo has just been making silly arguments and then immediately backing off, which does not help town and would help scum. I give mild doubts.
|
On July 18 2011 20:56 TheAwesomeAll wrote: Ok this is what happens: Mig asks for a list, knowing that giving lists is a way for mafia to blend in and that lists are generally a scum tell. Coag replies Coag gets fossed and bandwagoned mig dissapears... People that are accusing Coag are accusing the wrong guy i think.
dude why are you randomly fosing everyone... mig had a post 3 hours ago, how is that disappearing?
|
On July 18 2011 19:52 Pyo wrote: Also I wasn't explicitly accusing wiggles or creamybutter of being scum. I was simply saying that people shouldn't be concluding pro-townness from those long policy posts.
Nice, making friends.
Who are you accusing?
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Time to actually go to work I guess.
Let's start with our always scum fellow Mr. Wiggles shall we?
Now we could say wiggles has a track record of being scum but the problem is his scum play has been pretty bland, In fact in RTM / WaW2 we was able to pick him out as scum just because of how little effort he puts in when being scum. Now when I read the thread this morning I was pretty much blown away by how much effort he was putting in, Its almost as if he did a 180 and is trying his best to not follow his scum meta by promoting a pro town atmosphere.
+ Show Spoiler +On July 18 2011 10:25 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Ok, so let's get this started! First things first, let's lay out some things we want to achieve, and some guidelines. A pro-town atmosphereThis normally goes without saying, but it often bears repeating. If we want to catch scum, we need to have the proper environment for scum hunting and for communicating with each other. This means a couple things: - Promoting scum hunting.
- Not having pointless arguments
- Actively contributing
- All that jazz
Basically, we want to keep the thread as clean as possible, because chaos best serves mafia, not town. If you really don't know what to do, there's town guides. I'm not going to write one here, because I'm too lazy, and don't consider myself experienced enough to try. However, I am going to go through the three points above, as I think they are very important. We always want people to scum-hunt. There's never an excuse not to scum-hunt; everyone can do it. This provides us with many benefits. First, it's the primary method for actually finding scum. It also means that people have to give their actual thoughts, and have to come up with things beyond "I agree". This gives us information, and information is good. It lets us know what you're thinking, and it puts pressure on mafia to have to contribute. Also, forcing mafia to scum-hunt means that there's a good chance of catching them just based on their analysis, because it's hard to find people who are scummy, when you know they aren't scum. Next, we want to avoid bickering. This goes hand in hand with keeping the thread clean. This is different from actually debating with people, and you should be able to tell the difference between rationality, and NO U. If anyone is having a pointless argument, they will be asked to stop. It doesn't help town, only mafia. Lastly, we want people to contribute. There's a posting limit of 5 posts per day/night, but that doesn't give you permission to skirt that limit. It's easy for mafia to hide amongst lurkers, and beyond that, lurkers are nearly impossible to analyze. So, contribute. This doesn't mean make tons of pointless one-liners, it means providing actual thoughts, analysis, and content. You can do it, I believe in you. And if you don't, we can always just ask a vig to shoot you. We don't want people to lurk. CluesThere's clues in this game. However, all clue analysis MUST MUST MUST be backed up by post analysis. Before you post the clue analysis too. The reason for this, is that clues will most likely point to all kills. this means that some of the clues are going to point to vigs, some will point to third parties, and the others will point to mafia. Accidentally outing a vig because you solved the clues about them is bad. So, if you think someone's attached to a clue, go back and re-read their posts. If you think they look scummy, then post an analysis that contains the clue analysis. If you think they're town, just hold onto your analysis. Clue-analysis should always be used to supplement an actual behavioural analysis. It should never be the main point for calling someone scummy. In other words: Clues pointing towards a person does not equal scum. Third PartiesLooking at the third parties, here's what we want: -We want Joker to die. -We want Batman to kill Joker. -This means that Batman wins, and should hopefully be removed from the game, also removing Ra’as Al Ghul who can no longer achieve his victory condition. This is the optimal way the third party part of the game will go. We want Batman to kill Joker before Ra'as can kill Batman, so that we don't have to deal with Joker ourselves. So, if you think someone's acting like an SK, don't be afraid to point it out, as this should help Batman achieve his win-con, and let us get on with the rest of the game. If Joker is lynched, is Batman removed from the game? If Batman is removed from the game, is Ra'as removed from the game?Thoughts? Disagreements? Let's get this rolling.
You will see a post like that at the start of every game, In fact it's pretty much one of the easiest ways to gain townie points as the post is pretty much common sense followed with some "weak" policies.
Notice how wiggles keeps mentioning the third parties? + Show Spoiler +On July 18 2011 10:58 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2011 10:37 deconduo wrote: I agree that Batman killing the Joker is the ideal situation. However I would regard all 3rd party, including Batman, as anti-town. They constitute 3 extra KP each night which results in a faster lylo and less DT checks and clues. If we catch one they should be lynched. None of this 'Keep me alive and I'll help town' crap.
Given the size of the game and the heavy activity requirement there will be a lot of reading to do. There will certainly be people attempting to just pass with the bare minimum of posts. These people should be scrutinised intensly, and lynched if any clues point towards them. Mhmm, if we catch them, we should lynch them. However, how can we catch them? The only ways I can see, are through just behavioural analysis, and also clue analysis. That's why I say, that if someone is acting like an SK, we might as well lynch them. However, SKs normally act like lurkers, or are scummy, from my experience. So, that means the batman should be shooting into lurkers and scummy people. On the flip-side though, Ra'al is going to be shooting into pro-town players, as Batman wants to try to look like a green, most likely. The priority is: joker>batman>ra'al Because killing up the chain, removes the players below. So, I guess you're right, that we should always kill third-parties, to remove their KP. However, the priority should be on the joker, as he will most likely appear scummiest, and also his death removes all third parties.
The constant talk of game mechanics makes it seem like he is pro town when he is pretty much posting fluff at this point he just seems to want to enter lylo later when he has established himself as a town player.
Shall we go into his other posts about game mechanics? + Show Spoiler ++ Show Spoiler +On July 18 2011 11:01 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2011 10:57 redFF wrote: If you clue analyse backing it up with some other form of analysis or evidence can help, but isn't necessary. If you see a clue don't be afraid to point it out.
Unless its like, x is a detective, then don't point it out lol. On the whole I think relying on clue analysis is pretty terrible though so i won't be basing any of my voting around some vague clue which could be pointing to 10 different people. Clue analysis can be strong, and also, newer players are sometimes easily swayed by it, because it seems like an "objective" form of scum-hunting. I'm saying, before pointing out any clues, look at the person who was killed, and the posting history of the player you think the clue is pointing to. For example, if they killed a mafia, and look super pro-town, what would be the possible benefits of pointing it out? However, if someone killed town, and look scummy, then make an actual analysis and then attach the perceived clue to it. No one should be lynched only on clues, and clues shouldn't just be looked at in a vacuum. + Show Spoiler +On July 18 2011 11:06 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2011 11:02 CreamyButter wrote:Maybe it's because I only have 35 posts, but 5 posts a day seems like a hell of a lot, and I'm predicting a ton of spam/filler posts just to hit the minimum (I'm kind of freaking out about getting modkilled if I forget one evening lol). Maybe we should tag our posts like /analysis or /filler? Since I feel like if people are all forced to make 5 posts a day, there might be a lot of red herrings from tired townies who just want the day to end, and this way we can sort of manually adjust the posting minimum to like 3 "real" posts a day. Or 8 or whatever. @Curu Give me a sec to think about it. From what I understand the mafia just sort of chill, analyze/snipe blues, give confusing/chaos-inspiring analysis, and attempt to plant themselves into town circles. Not sure if there are any strategies that would be particular to this game yet, but will totally get back to you on that. Also I'm sure this is unintentional, but just to make sure, There's a posting limit of 5 posts per day/night, but that doesn't give you permission to skirt that limit. It's a minimum, not a limit, right? Yeah, it's a minimum, I just used the word limit for some reason =/ If you are being active and playing the game, you shouldn't really have any problem making the 5 post minimum. For example, you already made 2 decent posts, and still have almost 70 hours to make the other three to avoid mod-kill. Also, filler should mostly be avoided if possible, as there are always other things to post besides useless stuff. For example, you can comment on other people's analysis, on the voting patterns or bandwagons that are going to appear, on how people are acting or trying to manipulate town, etc. There's lots to talk about. :p + Show Spoiler +On July 18 2011 11:06 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2011 11:03 deconduo wrote:On July 18 2011 11:00 redFF wrote: And regarding blacks I feel it is best to ignore them. Usually I don't really like lynching blacks, but since they all have 1kp a night and will be shooting into town I say if we find them we should be lynching them.
Im going to be treating all the black roles as serial killers. I disagree about ignoring them. Effort should definitely be made in finding and lynching them, especially the Joker and/or Batman. Agreed. Together the third party hold the same amount of KP as the entire mafia, and based on probability, are more like to kill town than mafia too. + Show Spoiler +On July 18 2011 11:49 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2011 11:41 Curu wrote: Just a lovely note to our lovely DTs out there:
Never check a man who is a very likely lynch. If you find a guilty, well he's getting killed anyways. If you find an innocent, then you shouldn't be outing yourself to save him anyways unless there are very few players left in the game. The Godfather/third parties also give innocent checks.
To our lovely Vigilantes:
Likewise, if someone is declared a policy lynch or something of that nature, it is far better to have our Vigilantes shoot them instead. The lynch process gives us no information when reds can easily bandwagon lynch someone. Remember that the lynch is a process for finding information and connections as well, not just a simple kill. Also, to add on to advice for DTs, especially as there are a lot of newer players present, always try to form a case around a player based on analysis if you get a guilty check. Do not just claim. Claiming early is never a good thing, as a 1-1 trade with mafia benefits them more than town. + Show Spoiler +On July 18 2011 11:57 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2011 11:51 Zona wrote: ^ Well, a "1-1 trade" benefits town a TON more than the mafia, if the town is vanilla. But a DT trade for a mafia is a poor one. Oops, I might have screwed up the logic, haha. Been playing scum for too long. O.o Green for mafia is an awesome trade, as we outnumber the mafia. 1-1 with a DT isn't great early on, especially depending on who the scum is. For example, if you checked random lurker A and they returned red, try to get them shot or lynched, don't claim. Trading a DT for a red lurker isn't a very good trade, when we can get additional use out of the DT. Use your discretion, but I think making a push for a lynch based on analysis should be the first step taken, before any kind of claim.
So essentially most of his posts are either about, The third parties or how to deal with clues.
He has actually done little scum hunting which is a typical trait of his scum play.
In my opinion Wiggles is trying very hard to not look like his regular scum meta by "Appearing" to put in effort but with the little scum hunting / FoSing from him he seems to have just concentrated on the mechanics side of the game (Basically fluff) and promote his "Town atmosphere" the best way he can.
FoS on Wiggles
##Vote: Mr. Wiggles
|
On July 18 2011 21:12 Pyo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2011 20:56 TheAwesomeAll wrote: Ok this is what happens: Mig asks for a list, knowing that giving lists is a way for mafia to blend in and that lists are generally a scum tell. Coag replies Coag gets fossed and bandwagoned mig dissapears... People that are accusing Coag are accusing the wrong guy i think. dude why are you randomly fosing everyone... mig had a post 3 hours ago, how is that disappearing? again, making friends.
|
On July 18 2011 21:08 CreamyButter wrote: I guess I'll start accusing people.
Thanks for complying with my request, and specifically stating you're doing this to look less scummy. You are now cleared of any suspicion.
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On July 18 2011 21:08 CreamyButter wrote: Pyo: I agree with TAA that his argument that long posts are scummy is stupid (>.>), though I would still say that I prefer Kurumi. I believe that a situation where everyone is making long posts is much better than a situation where everyone is making tiny posts, for obvious reasons. Pyo has just been making silly arguments and then immediately backing off, which does not help town and would help scum. I give mild doubts.
obvious eh? perhaps you can enlighten the blind?
I'm not advocating making tiny posts, i'm saying that long rambly post are bad. you're being really defensive...
|
We Lynch scummy people , not trolls duh. Also the game started at 4 am and I woke up at 10 past 9 am just to leave home and start the trip at ten to 10am. Really , give me a hour or two .
|
On July 18 2011 21:12 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2011 19:52 Pyo wrote: Also I wasn't explicitly accusing wiggles or creamybutter of being scum. I was simply saying that people shouldn't be concluding pro-townness from those long policy posts.
Nice, making friends. Who are you accusing?
no one, yet. the game is less than 24 hours in on day 1. i simply would like people to keep their posts simple and to the point. the pulitzer committee doesn't read these forums.
|
On July 18 2011 20:56 TheAwesomeAll wrote: Ok this is what happens: Mig asks for a list, knowing that giving lists is a way for mafia to blend in and that lists are generally a scum tell. Coag replies Coag gets fossed and bandwagoned mig dissapears... People that are accusing Coag are accusing the wrong guy i think.
The thing is that mig only asked for a list of the veteran players. Somehow coag felt the need to comment on everybody. Smells like he's trying to look like he is contributing without actually doing anything. I'm keeping my vote on him until he shows up and starts contributing. At the moment it seems like he's trying to fill the post-quota with useless one-liners.
|
|
|
|