• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:58
CET 22:58
KST 06:58
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !10Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
The Grack before Christmas Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Micro Lags When Playing SC2? When will we find out if there are more tournament
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recommended FPV games (post-KeSPA) BW General Discussion FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB QuarterFinals - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI How Does UI/UX Design Influence User Trust? Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1166 users

CIA admits it misled Congress...

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-07-09 05:47:37
July 09 2009 05:46 GMT
#1
Bombshell? Probably not, but it will be interesting if the media keeps pressing if anything else will surface. This centers around Pelosi saying the CIA gave her faulty information regarding Waterboarding and if it had performed the technique on suspected terrorists. Which would be regarded as torture under International, and U.S. laws.

July 8 (Bloomberg) -- Six Democrats on the U.S. House Intelligence Committee said the head of the CIA admitted the agency misled Congress since 2001 about “significant actions.”


The lawmakers’ letter said Panetta’s recent testimony disclosed concealment by the CIA that is “similar to other deceptions of which we are aware from other recent periods.” The intelligence committee regularly receives private briefings from U.S. officials.


Full Article

+ Show Spoiler +



July 8 (Bloomberg) -- Six Democrats on the U.S. House Intelligence Committee said the head of the CIA admitted the agency misled Congress since 2001 about “significant actions.”

In a letter to CIA Director Leon Panetta, the six members said he had “recently” testified that “top CIA officials have concealed significant actions from all members of Congress” and “misled members” from 2001 until this week.

The letter, released today, didn’t describe what CIA actions were at issue. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Republicans have been feuding over her claim that the CIA misled Congress in 2002 about harsh interrogations of suspected terrorists.

The letter called on Panetta to “publicly correct” his May 15 statement that “it is not our policy or practice to mislead Congress.”

Separately, the House committee’s chairman, Democrat Silvestre Reyes of Texas, said in a statement tonight that “in rare instances’’ CIA officers “have not adhered to the high standards’’ that the agency sets for “truthfulness in reporting’’ to Congress.

Praise for Panetta

Reyes, who wasn’t among the six lawmakers who signed the letter to Panetta, praised the CIA chief’s “recent efforts to bring issues to the committee’s attention’’ that “had not been previously conveyed’’ to it.

Reyes was blunter in a July 7 letter to the panel’s top Republican, saying that the CIA had lied to the committee at least once.

Information Panetta gave the panel June 24 “brought to light significant information on the inadequacy of reporting to the committee,’’ Reyes wrote to Representative Pete Hoekstra of Michigan.

The information provided by Panetta “led me to conclude that this committee has been misled, has not been provided full and complete notification and (in at least once case) was affirmatively lied to,’’ Reyes said in a letter, first reported by Congressional Quarterly.

The disclosures came on the eve of a scheduled House debate on an intelligence spending measure. It would expand the number of lawmakers who must be notified of covert intelligence operations from eight congressional leaders to more than 35 members of House and Senate intelligence panels.

Pelosi’s Charge

In May, Pelosi charged that when she was a member of the House intelligence panel, the spy agency gave her misleading and inaccurate information whether it had waterboarded suspected terrorists. The CIA has acknowledged that it used the interrogation technique on three detainees suspected of being al-Qaeda operatives to simulate the sensation of drowning.

House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio has challenged Pelosi to either produce evidence to support her claim or retract her assertion that the CIA “misrepresented every step of the way” its use of harsh interrogation techniques on suspected terrorists.

The lawmakers’ letter said Panetta’s recent testimony disclosed concealment by the CIA that is “similar to other deceptions of which we are aware from other recent periods.” The intelligence committee regularly receives private briefings from U.S. officials.

CIA spokesman George Little said in a statement that Panetta “stands by his May 15 statement” because “it is not the policy or practice of the CIA to mislead Congress” and that “Director Panetta’s actions back that up.”

The agency went to the panel with the new information, the agency’s statement said.

“As the letter from these six representatives notes, it was the CIA that took the initiative to notify the oversight committees,” Little said.

The letter was signed by Democrats Anna Eshoo of California, John Tierney of Massachusetts, Rush Holt of New Jersey, Mike Thompson of California, Alcee Hastings of Florida and Jan Schakowsky of Illinois.

To contact the reporter on this story: James Rowley in Washington at jarowley@bloomberg.net .


Source, Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
sith
Profile Blog Joined July 2005
United States2474 Posts
July 09 2009 05:50 GMT
#2
Seems obvious now, but it's good they came clean.

This whole waterboarding issue needs to wrap up though, we either need to punish the people who knew about it/ordered it, not punish them, or move on. Why does it take so long to investigate and decide what happened and what to do?
Husky
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3362 Posts
July 09 2009 05:54 GMT
#3
oh god.

inc massive political debate.

Thanks for the headsup *puts on armor* this could get interesting.
Commentaries: youtube.com/HuskyStarcraft
daz
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Canada643 Posts
July 09 2009 05:58 GMT
#4
so wait whats the problem with waterboarding? am i missing something here because from what i read its harmless
Some eat to remember, some smash to forget. 2009msl.com
ghrur
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3786 Posts
July 09 2009 06:00 GMT
#5
On July 09 2009 14:58 daz wrote:
so wait whats the problem with waterboarding? am i missing something here because from what i read its harmless


Lol, you read wrong.
It can't exactly be harmless if it counts as torture.
And......... there's the problem with it, it's torture.
darkness overpowering
decafchicken
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
United States20090 Posts
July 09 2009 06:00 GMT
#6
On July 09 2009 14:58 daz wrote:
so wait whats the problem with waterboarding? am i missing something here because from what i read its harmless


It's harmless if you dont mind people making you feel like you're going to drown in order to extract information from you that you may or may not have after being detained without question.
how reasonable is it to eat off wood instead of your tummy?
daz
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Canada643 Posts
July 09 2009 06:16 GMT
#7
but it doesnt do any actual physical damage amirite? thats really what i meant. tbh if it isnt doing any actual physical harm i really dont see the problem. I mean like what are the alternatives to waterboarding? Like if you capture some terrorist and you need to extract information from him, what are your options? 1. real torture 2. waterboarding 3. asking politely.

I think waterboarding is a clear winner there
Some eat to remember, some smash to forget. 2009msl.com
Clasic
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Bosnia-Herzegovina1437 Posts
July 09 2009 06:17 GMT
#8
On July 09 2009 15:16 daz wrote:
but it doesnt do any actual physical damage amirite? thats really what i meant. tbh if it isnt doing any actual physical harm i really dont see the problem. I mean like what are the alternatives to waterboarding? Like if you capture some terrorist and you need to extract information from him, what are your options? 1. real torture 2. waterboarding 3. asking politely.

I think waterboarding is a clear winner there


Drowning people isn't torture?
No no no no its not mine!
eXigent.
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
Canada2419 Posts
July 09 2009 06:17 GMT
#9
On July 09 2009 14:58 daz wrote:
so wait whats the problem with waterboarding? am i missing something here because from what i read its harmless


you should watch a few youtube videos of people volunteering to be waterboarded. None of them last more than 15seconds before panicing and demanding to stop. Seems like torture to me.
Railz
Profile Joined July 2008
United States1449 Posts
July 09 2009 06:18 GMT
#10
On July 09 2009 15:16 daz wrote:
but it doesnt do any actual physical damage amirite? thats really what i meant. tbh if it isnt doing any actual physical harm i really dont see the problem. I mean like what are the alternatives to waterboarding? Like if you capture some terrorist and you need to extract information from him, what are your options? 1. real torture 2. waterboarding 3. asking politely.

I think waterboarding is a clear winner there


It could do damage. They admitted to having a doctor present at every situation. Any form of interrogation where a doctor is present means that there is physical harm capabilities. You can literally choke to death if done for an extended period of time (read: still less then a minute)
Did the whole world just get a lot smaller and go whooosh?_-` Number 0ne By.Fantasy Fanatic!
Clasic
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Bosnia-Herzegovina1437 Posts
July 09 2009 06:19 GMT
#11
Because you actually are drowning them...
Yes their is a small amount of physical damage done and A LOT of mental damage..
not sure if I said that right.. im high.
also I can tell your a republican just to point that out.. amirite?
No no no no its not mine!
Not_Computer
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
Canada2277 Posts
July 09 2009 06:24 GMT
#12
On July 09 2009 15:16 daz wrote:
but it doesnt do any actual physical damage amirite? thats really what i meant. tbh if it isnt doing any actual physical harm i really dont see the problem. I mean like what are the alternatives to waterboarding? Like if you capture some terrorist and you need to extract information from him, what are your options? 1. real torture 2. waterboarding 3. asking politely.

I think waterboarding is a clear winner there


http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=93858

-----
here's a (bad) example which I'm randomly trying to think of:
waterboarding -> drowning
as
tasing -> electrocuting

sure it "might not" kill you, but I wouldn't want to be tased or waterboarded repeatedly regardless. You'd probably be begging for death after that.
"Jaedong hyung better be ready. I'm going to order the most expensive dinner in Korea."
Day[9]
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
United States7366 Posts
July 09 2009 06:34 GMT
#13
On July 09 2009 15:16 daz wrote:
but it doesnt do any actual physical damage amirite? thats really what i meant. tbh if it isnt doing any actual physical harm i really dont see the problem. I mean like what are the alternatives to waterboarding? Like if you capture some terrorist and you need to extract information from him, what are your options? 1. real torture 2. waterboarding 3. asking politely.

I think waterboarding is a clear winner there


there are actually a bunch of youtube videos of people subjecting themselves to waterboarding (such as Christopher Hitchens). it's absolutely horrific.

if you don't want to go watch youtube videos, here's a good way to think of it: imagine if someone injected you with some serum that causes your nervous system to misreact and you literally felt like you were on fire. You'd writhe in agony and try to find some way to put it out, but nothing would work, the pain would continue until the serum ran out. again, even though there's no "physical damage" being causes by the "fire serum" i just described, its inflicting significant pain on the victim.

in fact, things like the imaginary "fire serum" and waterboarding are actually MUCH worse than torture that inflicts "actual physical damage" because the torturers can continue the procedure indefinitely without any worry of you dying. i can't imagine how awful it must be knowing that you'd be subjected to long periods of waterboarding DAILY until you gave some piece of information.

imagine if you were innocent and didn't actually know anything! eesh! :[
Whenever I encounter some little hitch, or some of my orbs get out of orbit, nothing pleases me so much as to make the crooked straight and crush down uneven places. www.day9.tv
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
July 09 2009 06:41 GMT
#14
I don't even see why the fuck all this "torture" qualification shit matters

we should be treating all prisoners HUMANELY

now there may be certain exceptions where getting information is clearly going to save lives and we know the information is there, but these were not the cases in which waterboarding was being used
daz
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Canada643 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-07-09 06:45:57
July 09 2009 06:43 GMT
#15
seems that waterboarding is a lot worse then i thought, so i can see why people have a problem with it. I guess to me it depends on the situation, honestly, if we take a situation like the 'war on terrorism' where there is so much covert activity, and a country like the states has to protect its own citizens and interests, i fully expect them to use torture and i honestly cant even imagine any other scenario regardless of whether its right or wrong.

Take this situation for example, lets imagine the CIA in pakistan captures some high level al-qeida (no idea how to spell this) dude. Now this dude is obviously going to have a lot of information about what his group is doing, information about future planned terrorist attacks, and the CIA having this information would be able to prevent attacks and save lives of their citizens, as well as potentially capture other enemies. Now in this situation i dont even think its a question of what to do, in fact i would say they are OBLIGATED to do whatever is necessary to gain this information as this is their main purpose. I've never understood what is that people get all up in arms about, this is how intelligence works, every country does this, every group, faction, you name it, its pretty much unavoidable. Its not even realistic or reasonable to expect otherwise.

Now that being said, the obvious problem is if you give any groups the right to torture, especially groups who are obligated to hide information from the public, how do you then guarantee that torture is only being used in the "right" circumstances? Of course there is no way to guarantee it, but at the same time you cant blanket ban it and say "even if this person holds information that would have a huge impact on the interests of our country, we will not cause him any pain or anguish because that would be wrong." This would be an insane way to conduct affairs.

I could write another few pages elaborating on this but its already a wall of text so ill just leave it there, and if anything doesnt make sense ill clarify upon request


edit: Lol no im not a republican in fact i hate republican. In fact i hate most political ideological groups because most of them are bullshit. I dont fully agree with every policy of any party i have yet to encounter, but if i had to say something i would say i lean much more towards liberalism on most issues
Some eat to remember, some smash to forget. 2009msl.com
Husky
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3362 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-07-09 06:45:42
July 09 2009 06:44 GMT
#16
On July 09 2009 15:16 daz wrote:
but it doesnt do any actual physical damage amirite? thats really what i meant. tbh if it isnt doing any actual physical harm i really dont see the problem. I mean like what are the alternatives to waterboarding? Like if you capture some terrorist and you need to extract information from him, what are your options? 1. real torture 2. waterboarding 3. asking politely.

I think waterboarding is a clear winner there


Watch the countless videos about this. One of the more effective ways of interrogating our enemies is to be nice to them. A majority of them were raised and lead to believe that America (and her allies) are cruel, terrible people. You might be surprised the kind of information you get once they realize this simply isnt true.

Sure, some of them are batshit insane and there is nothign you can do about it. But do some research, you might be surprised.

edit: Yes i said 'you might be surprised' twice.
Commentaries: youtube.com/HuskyStarcraft
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-07-09 06:50:12
July 09 2009 06:47 GMT
#17
daz a problem is there is/was no clear basis for deciding who should be "interrogated"

oh, u clearly don't. so nm that


so anyways I still don't think torture is the right way to extract information.

hell, I think bribing them and letting them go is a preferrable method. if they don't respond to that they probably aren't going to respond to torture either.
daz
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Canada643 Posts
July 09 2009 06:48 GMT
#18
On July 09 2009 15:44 HuskyTheHusky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 09 2009 15:16 daz wrote:
but it doesnt do any actual physical damage amirite? thats really what i meant. tbh if it isnt doing any actual physical harm i really dont see the problem. I mean like what are the alternatives to waterboarding? Like if you capture some terrorist and you need to extract information from him, what are your options? 1. real torture 2. waterboarding 3. asking politely.

I think waterboarding is a clear winner there


Watch the countless videos about this. One of the more effective ways of interrogating our enemies is to be nice to them. A majority of them were raised and lead to believe that America (and her allies) are cruel, terrible people. You might be surprised the kind of information you get once they realize this simply isnt true.

Sure, some of them are batshit insane and there is nothign you can do about it. But do some research, you might be surprised.

edit: Yes i said 'you might be surprised' twice.


it wouldnt surprise me at all that most of these people have been brainwashed to believing ridiculous things, especially in the case of islamic terrorists since they are a religious group and religion is practically impossible without brainwashing, but i would be INCREDIBLY surprised if you could actually get any of these people to "realize" that the beliefs they've held strongly enough to kill people over for their entire lives aren't true.
Some eat to remember, some smash to forget. 2009msl.com
daz
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Canada643 Posts
July 09 2009 06:52 GMT
#19
On July 09 2009 15:47 travis wrote:
daz a problem is there is/was no clear basis for deciding who should be "interrogated"

oh, u clearly don't. so nm that


so anyways I still don't think torture is the right way to extract information.

hell, I think bribing them and letting them go is a preferrable method. if they don't respond to that they probably aren't going to respond to torture either.



i dont get the first part of this post but as for the part about bribing them that actually sounds reasonable and is probably correct but if i was some CIA dude i wouldnt be willing to risk 'national security' on it
Some eat to remember, some smash to forget. 2009msl.com
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
July 09 2009 06:55 GMT
#20
yeah the first part was part of a larger post, but i realized i missed part of yours and i edited most of it out
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 19h 2m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech170
DisKSc2 59
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 544
Dewaltoss 141
Mini 124
firebathero 92
Hyun 77
910 28
soO 8
HiyA 6
Dota 2
BananaSlamJamma460
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
byalli967
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu527
Other Games
Grubby5843
tarik_tv1485
Beastyqt711
RotterdaM254
ArmadaUGS230
Mew2King101
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick655
BasetradeTV235
StarCraft 2
angryscii 48
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• HappyZerGling74
Other Games
• imaqtpie3283
Upcoming Events
Big Brain Bouts
19h 2m
Elazer vs Nicoract
Reynor vs Scarlett
Replay Cast
1d 2h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.