|
On October 16 2012 20:27 sitromit wrote:
Jesus, when will this Zerg balance whine stop?
They whined about the Infestor until it got nerfed, then it stopped for a while and the Muta whine began, until Protoss got a hard hard Muta counter which they didn't even need. Now they beat Mutas without ever using the upgrade or making Phoenixes, and the complaints have stopped, and they're back onto nerfing the Infestor some more. It never ends....
terrans and protosses want the game to go back to 60% winrates era, like open seasons.
User was warned for this post
|
On October 16 2012 20:27 MateShade wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2012 20:24 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:23 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:22 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:21 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:20 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:18 Heavenlee wrote:On October 16 2012 20:16 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:16 Heavenlee wrote:On October 16 2012 20:15 ImNightmare wrote:
[quote]
And a mid game buff? What would you suggest? Why would raising supply for broodlords require a mid-game buff? Lol...colossi are 6, and I'd much rather have a broodlord over a colossus. Because a late game nerfs needs a mid game buff. How many times must we say that? Zerg wins in z v p comes mostly from late game. Fuck our late game and we need a better mid game. And please, everyone would agree colossus is so much better then a broodlord. you mean, how many times must you say it without making any sense? Why would there be a mid-game buff for a SUPPLY CHANGE for a unit so that you can have less of it, since it's clearly a problem? That has no effect on anything instead of making the overpowered late-game more manageable. 5 supply means less broodlords. Less broodlords means less of a army. You seem to think supply is a small problem but zerg is the swarm race. We aren't like toss with big supplies but equally big fire power. We are weak unless we have the numbers. You don't make sense because you think zerg is op, I think z v p needs a redesign for both races to have options in every stage of the game. big difference. Less brood lords means more balance :D I am sorry but I am really not interested in discussing with a player who thinks his losses comes from imbalance instead of admitting he just suck. Good day to you sir. I play random, and Zerg is freaking easy, maybe you shouldn't assume things And I play terran and toss and they are both a move. Troll. Did you just say Terran was amove L O L
Caught you mr terran who says he play random. You guys are so predictable with the "I play random but x race is easy." stuff
User was warned for this post
|
|
|
On October 16 2012 20:26 ImNightmare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2012 20:25 HaXXspetten wrote:On October 16 2012 20:23 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:22 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:21 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:20 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:18 Heavenlee wrote:On October 16 2012 20:16 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:16 Heavenlee wrote:On October 16 2012 20:15 ImNightmare wrote:
[quote]
And a mid game buff? What would you suggest? Why would raising supply for broodlords require a mid-game buff? Lol...colossi are 6, and I'd much rather have a broodlord over a colossus. Because a late game nerfs needs a mid game buff. How many times must we say that? Zerg wins in z v p comes mostly from late game. Fuck our late game and we need a better mid game. And please, everyone would agree colossus is so much better then a broodlord. you mean, how many times must you say it without making any sense? Why would there be a mid-game buff for a SUPPLY CHANGE for a unit so that you can have less of it, since it's clearly a problem? That has no effect on anything instead of making the overpowered late-game more manageable. 5 supply means less broodlords. Less broodlords means less of a army. You seem to think supply is a small problem but zerg is the swarm race. We aren't like toss with big supplies but equally big fire power. We are weak unless we have the numbers. You don't make sense because you think zerg is op, I think z v p needs a redesign for both races to have options in every stage of the game. big difference. Less brood lords means more balance :D I am sorry but I am really not interested in discussing with a player who thinks his losses comes from imbalance instead of admitting he just suck. Good day to you sir. I play random, and Zerg is freaking easy, maybe you shouldn't assume things I play toss and I do better in ZvP than PvZ at the same mmr :s look I don't like to say this and that is imbalanced, but there's no reason to be delusional Sorry hax but I have been here long enough to know that you always say zerg is op even when we have fuck up win rates like now. You need to stop being delusional and just accept you can't play.
"I have been here long enough"
join date: May 2012
LOL
|
Sorry if it's already answered, but what's with MC's "Do not forget July 19th" sign?
|
On October 16 2012 20:27 sitromit wrote:
Jesus, when will this Zerg balance whine stop?
They whined about the Infestor until it got nerfed, then it stopped for a while and the Muta whine began, until Protoss got a hard hard Muta counter which they didn't even need. Now they beat Mutas without ever using the upgrade or making Phoenixes, and the complaints have stopped, and they're back onto nerfing the Infestor some more. It never ends....
My guess it will stop around HOTS
|
ITT: Plat leaguers discuss balance.
Please visit the battle.net forums to discuss your worthless opinions.
PvZ is entirely fucked up because of design, balance be damned.
|
On October 16 2012 20:27 X3GoldDot wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2012 20:25 TommyP wrote:On October 16 2012 20:24 X3GoldDot wrote:
if zergs were really as op as ppl would think, why is this season's GSL the most balanced of all?? Dont let the terrans get to you my friend. i literally hate basically non pro level terran players atm, they are the sole reason of bad LR threads.
zerg qq was so much worse than this.
|
also MC is losing mainly because MC is playing more shitty than expected, while drg is pretty meh still MC is slightly more fucked atm
|
On October 16 2012 20:28 ImNightmare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2012 20:27 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:24 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:23 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:22 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:21 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:20 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:18 Heavenlee wrote:On October 16 2012 20:16 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:16 Heavenlee wrote:
[quote]
Why would raising supply for broodlords require a mid-game buff? Lol...colossi are 6, and I'd much rather have a broodlord over a colossus. Because a late game nerfs needs a mid game buff. How many times must we say that? Zerg wins in z v p comes mostly from late game. Fuck our late game and we need a better mid game. And please, everyone would agree colossus is so much better then a broodlord. you mean, how many times must you say it without making any sense? Why would there be a mid-game buff for a SUPPLY CHANGE for a unit so that you can have less of it, since it's clearly a problem? That has no effect on anything instead of making the overpowered late-game more manageable. 5 supply means less broodlords. Less broodlords means less of a army. You seem to think supply is a small problem but zerg is the swarm race. We aren't like toss with big supplies but equally big fire power. We are weak unless we have the numbers. You don't make sense because you think zerg is op, I think z v p needs a redesign for both races to have options in every stage of the game. big difference. Less brood lords means more balance :D I am sorry but I am really not interested in discussing with a player who thinks his losses comes from imbalance instead of admitting he just suck. Good day to you sir. I play random, and Zerg is freaking easy, maybe you shouldn't assume things And I play terran and toss and they are both a move. Troll. Did you just say Terran was amove L O L Caught you mr terran who says he play random. You guys are so predictable with the "I play random but x race is easy." stuff
you should stop, this thread is becoming terrible.
|
On October 16 2012 20:27 X3GoldDot wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2012 20:25 TommyP wrote:On October 16 2012 20:24 X3GoldDot wrote:
if zergs were really as op as ppl would think, why is this season's GSL the most balanced of all?? Dont let the terrans get to you my friend. i literally hate basically non pro level terran players atm, they are the sole reason of bad LR threads.
Hey, screw you D: I never harmed anyone
|
|
|
On October 16 2012 20:28 Laurens wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2012 20:26 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:25 HaXXspetten wrote:On October 16 2012 20:23 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:22 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:21 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:20 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:18 Heavenlee wrote:On October 16 2012 20:16 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:16 Heavenlee wrote:
[quote]
Why would raising supply for broodlords require a mid-game buff? Lol...colossi are 6, and I'd much rather have a broodlord over a colossus. Because a late game nerfs needs a mid game buff. How many times must we say that? Zerg wins in z v p comes mostly from late game. Fuck our late game and we need a better mid game. And please, everyone would agree colossus is so much better then a broodlord. you mean, how many times must you say it without making any sense? Why would there be a mid-game buff for a SUPPLY CHANGE for a unit so that you can have less of it, since it's clearly a problem? That has no effect on anything instead of making the overpowered late-game more manageable. 5 supply means less broodlords. Less broodlords means less of a army. You seem to think supply is a small problem but zerg is the swarm race. We aren't like toss with big supplies but equally big fire power. We are weak unless we have the numbers. You don't make sense because you think zerg is op, I think z v p needs a redesign for both races to have options in every stage of the game. big difference. Less brood lords means more balance :D I am sorry but I am really not interested in discussing with a player who thinks his losses comes from imbalance instead of admitting he just suck. Good day to you sir. I play random, and Zerg is freaking easy, maybe you shouldn't assume things I play toss and I do better in ZvP than PvZ at the same mmr :s look I don't like to say this and that is imbalanced, but there's no reason to be delusional Sorry hax but I have been here long enough to know that you always say zerg is op even when we have fuck up win rates like now. You need to stop being delusional and just accept you can't play. "I have been here long enough" join date: May 2012 LOL
lol? 5 months and he has been whining zerg is op in every thread. Is that not long enough? fool.
|
DRG playing so careful building units way before he needs him to make MC take a third and force him into the late game.
|
On October 16 2012 20:28 ImNightmare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2012 20:27 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:24 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:23 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:22 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:21 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:20 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:18 Heavenlee wrote:On October 16 2012 20:16 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:16 Heavenlee wrote:
[quote]
Why would raising supply for broodlords require a mid-game buff? Lol...colossi are 6, and I'd much rather have a broodlord over a colossus. Because a late game nerfs needs a mid game buff. How many times must we say that? Zerg wins in z v p comes mostly from late game. Fuck our late game and we need a better mid game. And please, everyone would agree colossus is so much better then a broodlord. you mean, how many times must you say it without making any sense? Why would there be a mid-game buff for a SUPPLY CHANGE for a unit so that you can have less of it, since it's clearly a problem? That has no effect on anything instead of making the overpowered late-game more manageable. 5 supply means less broodlords. Less broodlords means less of a army. You seem to think supply is a small problem but zerg is the swarm race. We aren't like toss with big supplies but equally big fire power. We are weak unless we have the numbers. You don't make sense because you think zerg is op, I think z v p needs a redesign for both races to have options in every stage of the game. big difference. Less brood lords means more balance :D I am sorry but I am really not interested in discussing with a player who thinks his losses comes from imbalance instead of admitting he just suck. Good day to you sir. I play random, and Zerg is freaking easy, maybe you shouldn't assume things And I play terran and toss and they are both a move. Troll. Did you just say Terran was amove L O L Caught you mr terran who says he play random. You guys are so predictable with the "I play random but x race is easy." stuff
Lol okay, Terran player complaining about Pvz. Seems legit
|
omg MC can u just turn on Parting 2base mode every game pls?
|
On October 16 2012 20:29 sc14s wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2012 20:27 X3GoldDot wrote:On October 16 2012 20:25 TommyP wrote:On October 16 2012 20:24 X3GoldDot wrote:
if zergs were really as op as ppl would think, why is this season's GSL the most balanced of all?? Dont let the terrans get to you my friend. i literally hate basically non pro level terran players atm, they are the sole reason of bad LR threads. zerg qq was so much worse than this.
it was worse, but there shouldnt be qq in the first place, especially in this period of games, with GSL having basically the best balance of player races every round.
|
Open both, minimise english, mute korean?
|
On October 16 2012 20:29 MateShade wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2012 20:28 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:27 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:24 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:23 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:22 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:21 MateShade wrote:On October 16 2012 20:20 ImNightmare wrote:On October 16 2012 20:18 Heavenlee wrote:On October 16 2012 20:16 ImNightmare wrote:
[quote]
Because a late game nerfs needs a mid game buff. How many times must we say that? Zerg wins in z v p comes mostly from late game. Fuck our late game and we need a better mid game. And please, everyone would agree colossus is so much better then a broodlord. you mean, how many times must you say it without making any sense? Why would there be a mid-game buff for a SUPPLY CHANGE for a unit so that you can have less of it, since it's clearly a problem? That has no effect on anything instead of making the overpowered late-game more manageable. 5 supply means less broodlords. Less broodlords means less of a army. You seem to think supply is a small problem but zerg is the swarm race. We aren't like toss with big supplies but equally big fire power. We are weak unless we have the numbers. You don't make sense because you think zerg is op, I think z v p needs a redesign for both races to have options in every stage of the game. big difference. Less brood lords means more balance :D I am sorry but I am really not interested in discussing with a player who thinks his losses comes from imbalance instead of admitting he just suck. Good day to you sir. I play random, and Zerg is freaking easy, maybe you shouldn't assume things And I play terran and toss and they are both a move. Troll. Did you just say Terran was amove L O L Caught you mr terran who says he play random. You guys are so predictable with the "I play random but x race is easy." stuff Lol okay, Terran player complaining about Pvz. Seems legit
Its the enemy of my enemy is my friend syndrome. You play better against toss then zerg hence you complain about zerg.
Anyway I received a warning so I am going to stop now. Have a nice day.
|
It's not that people are complaining that Protoss are losing.
It's the way Protoss are losing that is prompting complaints.
Boring, drawn-out games with no style and little variation in late-game armies.
That's way I think Broodlord/infestor is currently unfair against Protoss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
