EPTSam would like you all to know that if you have questions, comments, or concerns you can email them there?
The Automated Ban List - Page 2182
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
packrat386
United States5077 Posts
Sam would like you all to know that if you have questions, comments, or concerns you can email them there? | ||
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
| ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
On January 26 2014 05:15 Darkhoarse wrote: An SC2 is dead thread has opened up (mostly whining about how protoss is so good vs terran.) It'll probably be closed soon but if not prepare yourselves. nothing good in that thread but this gem was in the Code A concludes thread. although not much epic other than complaining about blink all ins. On January 26 2014 07:03 JIJI_ wrote: a BIG part of it is so many maps where blink can be abused......1st step is add in some dam maps on ladder that aren't so strong 4 blink 2 base blink is BS and every1 knows it oracle is a JOKE almost impossible to lose this unit now with its acceleration and speed those 2 things puts toss so far ahead in the early game (even the fact that they exist u have to take them into consideration for your build or u auto-lose) innovation (1 of my favorite players) losing 2 blink twice is a DISGRACE User was warned for this post User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On January 26 2014 02:57 32 wrote: I'll always hold dear his debt talk/impoverishment talk. We disagreed on 10,000 subjects but agreed on that.It's all about the snowflakes, isn't it? Every day, someone on the internet expresses their disgust at people who think they are special. The only acceptable mindset is to believe you are the same organic decaying matter as everything else. As it turns out, I am five days late. I had decided I had questions for him, if he had the time to answer. I don't think he's more qualified than other people I know of to answer my questions, but he had a certainty in his arguments I know I could examine effectively. Could you not have waited another 5 or so days :/ Vicious attacks when he was raging though. TLWINDRUNNER was just banned by JBright. Not quite at this level though. Can't windrun to safety, either.That account was created on 2013-11-28 21:07:25 and had 27 posts. Reason: Insulting people with something kinda crazy. | ||
|
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
On January 26 2014 09:30 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote: nothing good in that thread but this gem was in the Code A concludes thread The double mod action going on is great | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
On January 26 2014 09:30 Darkhoarse wrote: The double mod action going on is great I didn't even notice it when I first saw it. possible a mod warned him. then someone looked at his posting history and decided it was worth a temp.or it could have been the same guy ding both. nvm on that part found this gem from earlier On January 25 2014 10:03 JIJI_ wrote: plz gom put innovation in code s!! its a dam DISGRACE he is in code b blizz should b ashamed of themselves this from a while back but its not really too much of a problem just general complaining On October 01 2013 13:32 JIJI_ wrote: The funny part is this strat became so strong and so viable due to over-patching. But ya agree that basically the second anyone does something different that appears at first glance like a good build or a strong build......it just gets nerfed into the dirt and into extinction. Because of this, the game is barely even a "strategy" game anymore but more just muscle memory training and coin-flips. | ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34494 Posts
| ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On January 26 2014 09:34 Firebolt145 wrote: I saw it and marked him down for a ban, but as a trial banling my bans need to be approved by a senior moderator first. During that time Zealously warned him because he's a nice guy. Then my ban got approved. why is it banling? I can understand the ban part lol but the ling? | ||
motbob
United States12546 Posts
On January 26 2014 12:36 BigFan wrote: why is it banling? I can understand the ban part lol but the ling? I know, if you revisit this question, that you can figure it out. | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
|
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
On January 26 2014 09:34 Firebolt145 wrote: I saw it and marked him down for a ban, but as a trial banling my bans need to be approved by a senior moderator first. During that time Zealously warned him because he's a nice guy. Then my ban got approved. You and Zealously already making great banlings  | ||
|
koreasilver
9109 Posts
| ||
|
32
United States163 Posts
On January 26 2014 04:02 packrat386 wrote: samzdat68@gmail.com Sam would like you all to know that if you have questions, comments, or concerns you can email them there? Thanks, for helpfulness. | ||
|
MoltkeWarding
5195 Posts
I'll always hold dear his debt talk/impoverishment talk. We disagreed on 10,000 subjects but agreed on that. Vicious attacks when he was raging though. If this is true, it is not because his vehemence was especially vicious. Vehemence alone does not make enemies; he simply had a perverse talent with rhetorically dancing around those he challenged, and making them look stupid with his flippancy. Such behaviour is no alien to tl.net; if he was better at this than most people, it was only a matter of degree, and not of essence. TL.net is a demonstration of how when a small community becomes a larger one, most people under such circumstances will commence with the habits of tactical speaking, wherein they will only voice their opinions when they are reasonably sure that those opinions will receive substantial support or consensus. In time, tactical speaking encourages tactical thinking, and people begin to instinctively adopt those opinions which happen to be successful, rather than genuine. Samidzat was a maverick poster, not because of the originality of his ideas or his failure to meet the ethical standards of the town square, but because he incarnated that rare willingness to challenge, annoy and embarrass the nomenklatura as a party of one. That after all, is the meaning of the word samidzat. | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18832 Posts
| ||
|
packrat386
United States5077 Posts
| ||
|
Crushinator
Netherlands2138 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On January 27 2014 03:53 Crushinator wrote: I for one think samzdat can go fuck himself. That was all he did here anyway, public masturbation. Calm. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18832 Posts
| ||
| ||
