| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
hiro protagonist
1294 Posts
On July 16 2010 12:02 BrownBear wrote: The Banlings are out in force, and it is glorious. So much cleaning house going on right now. I really wanna see boes' first ban though  ya, inControl is on fire! and so is harem. I thought there would be some kind of warming up period; you know, a warning here and a closed thread there. instead they going right at it. | ||
zatic
Zurich15366 Posts
On July 16 2010 10:08 DivinO wrote: Can I ask the mods who they consider the "worst poster" who they've already banned? lilpwnyIII and his 10 alt accounts. Def. the worst poster I have ever seen around here. Example: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=&t=c&f=-1&u=ziziyo2&gb=date | ||
|
rredtooth
5464 Posts
On July 16 2010 20:03 zatic wrote: what an angry individual.lilpwnyIII and his 10 alt accounts. Def. the worst poster I have ever seen around here. Example: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=&t=c&f=-1&u=ziziyo2&gb=date | ||
|
Half
United States2554 Posts
| ||
|
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
On July 17 2010 03:02 p2p4t wrote: Anyone relates with Tl.Net is a bastard and always will be. User was banned for this post. User was banned for this post. User was banned for this post. It's mods creating little moments like this that make my day. | ||
|
Apex
United States7227 Posts
On July 17 2010 11:13 BrownBear wrote: It's mods creating little moments like this that make my day. Woah is that a TRIPLE BAN!? O_O | ||
Hyde
Australia14568 Posts
On July 15 2010 10:49 MythicalMage wrote: Because Americans are stupid. Having keys that corrspond to the name of the action is a tad more intuitive. you can always change it, so it's a non-issue. User was warned for this post User was temp banned for this post. User was victim of a double driveby. Whilst not a triple ban, it's still funny, tag teamed. I cracked up when I read the third red line. | ||
|
Odinsphere
United States57 Posts
On July 17 2010 11:32 Hyde wrote: Whilst not a triple ban, it's still funny, tag teamed. I cracked up when I read the third red line. We need the sound clip from "OH BABY A TRIPLE!" for things like this... | ||
|
vengee
Canada52 Posts
| ||
|
MamiyaOtaru
United States1687 Posts
| ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
101TFP was just banned by EvilTeletubby. That account was created on 2010-05-04 23:23:15 and had 166 posts. Reason: Your attitude is not conducive to this website. Since you seem to have such a problem with the way we run this site, let me help you out a little bit. I possibly have forgone the right to question any bans due to being warned and banned in the past for poor posting, or simply that users on here don't have that right irrespective, but I really can't understand the logic behind this ban. + Show Spoiler + Here's his ban post http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=136013¤tpage=11#214 Everything about it irritates me, the vagueness of "your attitude is not conducive" the fact that his small irritation with the new implemented rules on one forum somehow equates to "such a problem with the way we run this site". Also that he seemed to make - I have no knowledge whatsoever about Google Ad Sense - a valid criticism, even supplementing it with a not greatly funny but relevant joke, but instead of addressing what he said and showing the decision to be justified he is just simply banned for having the audacity to question something that doesn't appear to make sense to him, or at least hasn't been outlined clearly. Spoilers are probably more fitting, didn't expect to go on so. | ||
|
Mikami_
Estonia274 Posts
On July 17 2010 21:10 XeliN wrote: I possibly have forgone the right to question any bans due to being warned and banned in the past for poor posting, or simply that users on here don't have that right irrespective, but I really can't understand the logic behind this ban. + Show Spoiler + Here's his ban post http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=136013¤tpage=11#214 Everything about it irritates me, the vagueness of "your attitude is not conducive" the fact that his small irritation with the new implemented rules on one forum somehow equates to "such a problem with the way we run this site". Also that he seemed to make - I have no knowledge whatsoever about Google Ad Sense - a valid criticism, even supplementing it with a not greatly funny but relevant joke, but instead of addressing what he said and showing the decision to be justified he is just simply banned for having the audacity to question something that doesn't appear to make sense to him, or at least hasn't been outlined clearly. Spoilers are probably more fitting, didn't expect to go on so. Nuke for his post on funny pictures thread surprised me too  | ||
|
KinosJourney2
Sweden1811 Posts
On July 16 2010 10:29 flamewheel wrote: ^tdot? I highly doubt tdot was the worst poster, he did put effort into his posts but what he actually wrote about is what got him banned | ||
|
Jacobs Ladder
United States1705 Posts
On July 17 2010 21:15 Mikami_ wrote: Nuke for his post on funny pictures thread surprised me too I'm fairly new here but I love this about TL. The mods here have no tolerance for tired, boring, memes. They regularly warn people for it (I've seen it at least 4 times in my short time here) and I don't have an issue with them thinning the herd. Again, I'm new, so ignore me :D. | ||
|
VorcePA
United States1102 Posts
On another note: it boggles my mind how stupid people can be. I have a few social problems IRL that translate in to forum socializing issues, and I've had more than one of my threads locked, and I still haven't gotten so much as a warning. The fuck are these people thinking say the shit that they do? | ||
|
Odinsphere
United States57 Posts
[QUOTE]On July 17 2010 21:10 XeliN wrote: [quote] 101TFP was just banned by EvilTeletubby. That account was created on 2010-05-04 23:23:15 and had 166 posts. Reason: Your attitude is not conducive to this website. Since you seem to have such a problem with the way we run this site, let me help you out a little bit. [/quote] I possibly have forgone the right to question any bans due to being warned and banned in the past for poor posting, or simply that users on here don't have that right irrespective, but I really can't understand the logic behind this ban. + Show Spoiler + Here's his ban post http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=136013¤tpage=11#214 Everything about it irritates me, the vagueness of "your attitude is not conducive" the fact that his small irritation with the new implemented rules on one forum somehow equates to "such a problem with the way we run this site". Also that he seemed to make - I have no knowledge whatsoever about Google Ad Sense - a valid criticism, even supplementing it with a not greatly funny but relevant joke, but instead of addressing what he said and showing the decision to be justified he is just simply banned for having the audacity to question something that doesn't appear to make sense to him, or at least hasn't been outlined clearly. Spoilers are probably more fitting, didn't expect to go on so.[/QUOTE] I'm quite surprised you haven't been banned. I got irritated over my first perma ban(I got unbanned by a friend) because the banning/temp banning/ warning is very inconsistent. I came here to discuss it and squashed my entire issue but within minutes of leaving I was perma banned AGAIN. They say they give warnings out to people who post often but I've seen several people who only had like 5 or less posts get a warning for posting stuff far more horrendous than I had. It just depends on the moderator. Like someone told me, they could of dropped their lunch on themselves, got pissed, and clicked a button. Now just so everyone knows my issue is SQUASHED and I am referring to how I felt in the PAST. | ||
|
TheAntZ
Israel6248 Posts
edit: I just did a search to find my ban, and apparently intrigue is a girl? http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=77015#15 I'm always so late on the uptake... | ||
|
Hyde
Australia14568 Posts
On July 18 2010 01:45 TheAntZ wrote: I was never warned. Just straight up temped for being a huge dick to shine in a LR thread, and for some other reason that I dont remember...but I remember intrigue banned me the 2nd time and he was really nice about it. I didnt think I could feel nice about a ban edit: I just did a search to find my ban, and apparently intrigue is a girl? http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=77015#15 I'm always so late on the uptake... lol, Intrigue isn't a girl, check out this thread and watch the Kennigit interview. You'll see Intrigue after the first 30 seconds. | ||
|
TheAntZ
Israel6248 Posts
On July 18 2010 03:07 Hyde wrote: lol, Intrigue isn't a girl, check out this thread and watch the Kennigit interview. You'll see Intrigue after the first 30 seconds. Further evidence that Im slow on the uptake. Thanks for the link, hadnt seen it yet | ||
|
Musoeun
United States4324 Posts
How'd the same dude manage to get banned twice? I assume Puosu unbanned him in order to double-ban him just because because, but what did he do to deserve that level of vitriol? Anyway, moment of amusement for me for the day. EDIT: Make that three times, apparently boesthius started it. | ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Clem vs Lambo
Scarlett vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
IPSL
Dragon vs Hawk
RSL Revival
Classic vs Trap
herO vs SHIN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
