• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:33
CET 18:33
KST 02:33
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy7ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool48Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win42026 KungFu Cup Announcement6BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled12
StarCraft 2
General
Potential Updates Coming to the SC2 CN Server Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open RSL Season 4 announced for March-April
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat Mutation # 516 Specter of Death
Brood War
General
RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site Gypsy to Korea KK Platform will provide 1 million CNY ASL21 General Discussion mca64Launcher - New Version with StarCraft: Remast
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2026 Changsha Offline Cup [ASL21] Ro24 Group B [ASL21] Ro24 Group A
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Darkest Dungeon General RTS Discussion Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Cricket [SPORT] Formula 1 Discussion Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1549 users

How to keep new people in Blizzard RTS games?

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 Next All
yuisaka
Profile Joined July 2011
Australia76 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-10-23 04:23:08
October 22 2020 22:49 GMT
#1
Main point is blizzard RTS is too hardcore for the people never played the game my thought is more auto function less click more time to think of how to play instead of to play at lower league.
Eg:At bronze league you can have auto production/auto mining/autocast/build reminder/scouting reminder etc let new people focus on how to not just to play the game.
Each higher league the auto function will be less so can let players to focus on the thing they have to do at lower league plus the parts that not auto anymore.
In the end at GM level everything will be the normal RTS should be just like starcraft/starcraft2.
2000
Jealous
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
10302 Posts
October 22 2020 23:13 GMT
#2
This is a REAL TIME strategy game.
"The right to vote is only the oar of the slaveship, I wanna be free." -- бум бум сучка!
yuisaka
Profile Joined July 2011
Australia76 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-10-22 23:40:31
October 22 2020 23:20 GMT
#3
On October 23 2020 08:13 Jealous wrote:
This is a REAL TIME strategy game.


It is real time strategy game you can still do so many things even most things are auto(eg:multi drops) and when league gets higher and higher the auto functions will be fewer and fewer.

Also now the game starcraft2 bronze players can only do so few things they focus some things to do but will forget some things my idea is let them to remeber to do these things they forget( auto for them at lower league).
2000
IMSupervisor
Profile Joined June 2016
Australia138 Posts
October 22 2020 23:42 GMT
#4
The problem with automating the game for lower level players only is that at the point where they level up and it no longer does it for them, they are likely to end up playing worse and de-ranking while they get used to the new system. This isn't going to be motivating for casual players. The automation would have to be for everyone, and the only way that would work is if the automated system isn't efficient. It would require that manual control is harder but superior and allows players to learn it when they are ready to.
Chris_Havoc
Profile Joined August 2016
United States600 Posts
October 22 2020 23:49 GMT
#5
You mean like a part-time strategy game? Doing that way would mean effectively a different game at each league.
Owner of the SC2 Esports Anthology channel on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/SC2EsportsAnthology
CharAznable2
Profile Joined July 2015
26 Posts
October 23 2020 00:32 GMT
#6
I think tutorial mode in cooperation with the community can help. If you had in game video of an instructor like day9 in the early days of starcraft 2, you would feel motivated to play. Lots of people continued playing RTS because there was support for the strategies, funday mondays and funny stuff.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26462 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-10-23 00:45:40
October 23 2020 00:35 GMT
#7
I think a compromise is to automate things, but make automation worse than doing it manually.

So say auto-production but your stuff costs a little more, or takes a little longer or something, have a cooldown between cycles if you’re set to auto.

This way you’ll just organically swap over when you get the grasp and want to step up a level, but it’s kind of up to you when you make the transition or not.

You have less of the different games in different leagues that way. You could end up with players who are terrible at macro but are really good at micro or general strategy still being able to play up to a level too.

I think at higher levels you want players to be just good all-round obviously, macro is an important part of the game, or any potential future competitive RTS imo
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
yuisaka
Profile Joined July 2011
Australia76 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-10-23 00:38:48
October 23 2020 00:37 GMT
#8
On October 23 2020 08:42 IMSupervisor wrote:
The problem with automating the game for lower level players only is that at the point where they level up and it no longer does it for them, they are likely to end up playing worse and de-ranking while they get used to the new system. This isn't going to be motivating for casual players. The automation would have to be for everyone, and the only way that would work is if the automated system isn't efficient. It would require that manual control is harder but superior and allows players to learn it when they are ready to.


Keep those people in game is better than they quit the game,if is real hardcore RTS players surely they will want to improve themselves like me I only play 1 on 1 on ladder and I played almost 20 years of starcraft,which said only casual players will stay in the comfort zone(And as they play more they will be better anyway/or if them make friends in game some friendly matches will let them want to improve skills as well), starcraft2 sold millions of copies but not much people still play the game because most people cant handle the pressure and frustration if there have a way to keep them must be easier the game,you have to keep the players first then they may or may not improve themselves
2000
yuisaka
Profile Joined July 2011
Australia76 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-10-23 00:43:12
October 23 2020 00:41 GMT
#9
On October 23 2020 09:35 WombaT wrote:
I think a compromise is to automate things, but make automation worse than doing it manually.

So say auto-production but your stuff costs a little more, or takes a little longer or something, have a cooldown between cycles if you’re set to auto.

This way you’ll just organically swap over when you get the grasp and want to step up a level, but it’s kind of up to you when you make the transition or not.



Sounds like a good idea as well,ye,I mean have to give some helps to the new comer not everyone like me played 20 years of 1 on 1 in starcraft
2000
MinesMakeWidows
Profile Joined October 2020
21 Posts
October 23 2020 03:01 GMT
#10
I fail to see how making the game automated for lower level players makes any sense at all. This game is not suppose to be easy, you're suppose to learn how to play in order to advance in rank. If someone is playing the game because they enjoy it then their skill level / mmr / artificial ranking shouldn't make a difference.

No amount of automated ez mode game play is going to let someone in silver compete with someone in masters.
jy_9876543210
Profile Joined March 2016
265 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-10-23 04:16:22
October 23 2020 03:49 GMT
#11
Well, every time when people say "it's RTS so it's supposed to be micro-heavy" and they claim something like "Brood war has the 12 units group limit because of balance, some race need more micro so it balances the races" or "it's real time so more micro = more excitement, if it has less micro it's not RTS",
I suggest a simple change.
Let us borrow an idea from fighting games. Let us change the key of casting spells to a sequence of key stroke. You have to type "FeedB" within 1 second to cast feedback. You have to type "PsiStorm" within 1.2 seconds to cast Psionic Storm. Otherwise it fails.
We can easily adjust the balance by adjusting the number of the keystrokes, or the time limit.
And imagine in a tournament, every viewer is holding their breath while the commentator is talking:"Look, player A is trying to cast Psi Storm - oh, he didn't make it in time! What a disaster! Wait- player B failed his spell, too! Player A is trying again - this time it's successful!!!" So exciting!
Definitely a good mechanism we want in RTS games, making it more competitive, balanced and exciting.
Phase 1: F2    Phase 2: A   Phase 3: Profit!
[Phantom]
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
Mexico2170 Posts
October 23 2020 04:06 GMT
#12
The game shouldn't be automated. However I think there's a couple of ideas that could work.

For example, "build order packs" Instead of the game literally doing the build order for you, have it display a selected build order or the left side of the screen. It wouldn't be that different to what most peeople do just blindly following build orders, but it would make it easier for new/casual players.

you would get a notification for you to do this and that. Make this building now, make this other thing now. Pro gamers could create build orders in the game and share it with other people.

Then when you get to gold/plat, this feature would be unavailable on ladder. It would still be available in custom games. By this point you will have enough experience to more or less have learned build orders by memory, or experiment with build orders of your own.

Another is having automatic group controls. You build a barrac it is inmediately put on a group control, and the more barracs you add they are added. Sc2 already kinda does this with warpgates, so Idk why it couldn't be done. At a certain league however you could de-activate thi s feature and personalize it, but you already learned how to do it.
WriterTeamLiquid Staff writer since 2014 @Mortal_Phantom
BabelFish1
Profile Joined September 2015
186 Posts
October 23 2020 04:24 GMT
#13
On October 23 2020 13:06 [Phantom] wrote:
The game shouldn't be automated. However I think there's a couple of ideas that could work.

For example, "build order packs" Instead of the game literally doing the build order for you, have it display a selected build order or the left side of the screen. It wouldn't be that different to what most peeople do just blindly following build orders, but it would make it easier for new/casual players.

you would get a notification for you to do this and that. Make this building now, make this other thing now. Pro gamers could create build orders in the game and share it with other people.

Then when you get to gold/plat, this feature would be unavailable on ladder. It would still be available in custom games. By this point you will have enough experience to more or less have learned build orders by memory, or experiment with build orders of your own.

Another is having automatic group controls. You build a barrac it is inmediately put on a group control, and the more barracs you add they are added. Sc2 already kinda does this with warpgates, so Idk why it couldn't be done. At a certain league however you could de-activate thi s feature and personalize it, but you already learned how to do it.


This here, this is GOLD. Also, include rapid cast as the default hotkey configuration. It's absolutely garbage that people have to stumble upon rapid cast when it gives such a massive micro advantage.

Things like this deter people from the game before they've given it a chance.
eviltomahawk
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States11135 Posts
October 23 2020 04:30 GMT
#14
Is there any precedence in other games for some ranks of a competitive ladder to have fundamentally different mechanics than other ranks? I feel like an appeal of a ladder is that a player would be working with the same tools and ruleset as everyone else, including the top players. The climb is more purely skill-based, and satisfaction would come from the measurable improvement in skill.

I wouldn't mind automation being played around in other game modes as a way of getting new players acclimated to the other mechanics of the game, but it gets way too funky and un-intuitive when ranking plays a role in what features are activated in-game.
ㅇㅅㅌㅅ
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
October 23 2020 05:38 GMT
#15
On October 23 2020 07:49 yuisaka wrote:
Main point is blizzard RTS is too hardcore for the people never played the game my thought is more auto function less click more time to think of how to play instead of to play at lower league.
Eg:At bronze league you can have auto production/auto mining/autocast/build reminder/scouting reminder etc let new people focus on how to not just to play the game.
Each higher league the auto function will be less so can let players to focus on the thing they have to do at lower league plus the parts that not auto anymore.
In the end at GM level everything will be the normal RTS should be just like starcraft/starcraft2.

Stepped auto functions might work in some tutorial. The core games needs to be easy to learn, hard to master. What you describe cheapens the actual game. Getting better at making workers or building depots or producing from structure is it's own reward. Training wheels on automating these tasks prepares you for some child's game (and there's tons of those on the market already)

Third party tools take care of reminders. I've seen configurable alarms and custom game tools work (technically, second not truly third party). GM league should be just as automated as Silver League. You all start with the same number of workers, and it's just how you use them that has changed over time.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
MockHamill
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden1798 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-10-23 06:21:55
October 23 2020 06:21 GMT
#16
Having both descion making and mechanical skill for both the macro part and the micro part of the game is what makes it intresting.

Just micro makes the game shallow.
Just macro makes the game slow and boring.

SC2 has a great balance beween the two.

The one flaw in SC2 is that is too unforgiving when it comes to reaction speed on normal ladder level. It is ok for the game to require fast reflexes on pro level, but the average ladder player should not have to lose the game if he reacts half a second too late against a disruptor shot.

The game should be fun and rewarding, victories should be decided by many small things adding up, not a single micro mistake making everyting good you done in the previous 15 minutes become irrelevant.
deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic12129 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-10-23 09:50:39
October 23 2020 09:09 GMT
#17
On October 23 2020 13:06 [Phantom] wrote:
The game shouldn't be automated. However I think there's a couple of ideas that could work.

For example, "build order packs" Instead of the game literally doing the build order for you, have it display a selected build order or the left side of the screen. It wouldn't be that different to what most peeople do just blindly following build orders, but it would make it easier for new/casual players.

you would get a notification for you to do this and that. Make this building now, make this other thing now. Pro gamers could create build orders in the game and share it with other people.

Then when you get to gold/plat, this feature would be unavailable on ladder. It would still be available in custom games. By this point you will have enough experience to more or less have learned build orders by memory, or experiment with build orders of your own.

Another is having automatic group controls. You build a barrac it is inmediately put on a group control, and the more barracs you add they are added. Sc2 already kinda does this with warpgates, so Idk why it couldn't be done. At a certain league however you could de-activate thi s feature and personalize it, but you already learned how to do it.

It does for warpgate because that's currently the only production which cannot be queued and is the most punihsing in that sense. If you miss a warp in you never get it back. You can queue even injects now If you add what you're suggesting(nothing wrong with that), then you need to make warpgates less punihsing for missing a cycle.

edit> what i mean by missing and not getting back(Which applies for every strucutre ) that there's no mechanic to avoid that. While queuing 5 marines is wrong, you can queue a marine in the half of the cycle and then go on micro rampage like Maru while you're not macroing at all because everything is queued. Protoss cannot do that with the warpgates.
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
112StaminaX
Profile Joined June 2020
37 Posts
October 23 2020 10:27 GMT
#18
Look. Its really simple. recreate sc/wow as their own game, new lore and the real fans will decide. i dont want to let sc go, but ACT/BLI can really suck a fat one right now.
Superouman
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
France2195 Posts
October 23 2020 14:04 GMT
#19
On October 23 2020 09:35 WombaT wrote:
I think a compromise is to automate things, but make automation worse than doing it manually.

So say auto-production but your stuff costs a little more, or takes a little longer or something, have a cooldown between cycles if you’re set to auto.

This way you’ll just organically swap over when you get the grasp and want to step up a level, but it’s kind of up to you when you make the transition or not.

You have less of the different games in different leagues that way. You could end up with players who are terrible at macro but are really good at micro or general strategy still being able to play up to a level too.

I think at higher levels you want players to be just good all-round obviously, macro is an important part of the game, or any potential future competitive RTS imo


I haven't considered automatic but worse features before Monk mentionned it during the Pylon show. I think an rts could be more fun for lower league player with more automation. Something like automatic unit production but there are 2-3 seconds of cooldown between each unit produced.

This doesn't have any impact on pro play since they will never keep such features automated because of the built-in handicap but the game becomes more accessible.

I'm in a way repeating your post so i quite agree with you. It's definetly something that should be tested.
Search "[SO]" on B.net to find all my maps ||| Cloud Kingdom / Turbo Cruise '84 / Bone Temple / Eternal Empire / Zen / Purity and Industry / Golden Wall / Fortitude / Beckett Industries / Waterfall
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19318 Posts
October 23 2020 14:26 GMT
#20
I think the main issue here is that you are talking about competitive 1v1. There are thousands of custom games you can play, and dozens of custom maps that automate unit building and fighting for you. The arcade is a great way to play and learn the game.

If someone decided they were ready to play competitive chess, they would start their 1v1 competition with just pawns and a king until they got to a higher level. If they wanted to play some weird form of simplified chess it would be easier but it wouldn't be competitive 1v1 chess.

We do not need to make competitive 1v1 easier for lower leagues, however I do endorse other game modes that do encourage early learning with simpler mechanics. I just want to make sure we understand the distinction between competitive play and just learning to play.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Big Brain Bouts
17:00
#110
Fjant vs SortOf
YoungYakov vs Krystianer
Reynor vs HeRoMaRinE
RotterdaM743
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 743
LamboSC2 217
IndyStarCraft 146
ProTech121
UpATreeSC 92
Codebar 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 27181
Sea 3119
EffOrt 985
Mini 727
ggaemo 274
firebathero 198
Light 175
hero 78
Mind 57
Aegong 30
[ Show more ]
Shine 28
GoRush 16
IntoTheRainbow 16
yabsab 12
Dota 2
Gorgc8507
Counter-Strike
fl0m4353
byalli439
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor163
MindelVK10
Other Games
singsing1705
B2W.Neo963
Grubby956
Beastyqt619
crisheroes207
Hui .142
ArmadaUGS136
mouzStarbuck131
QueenE82
C9.Mang072
DeMusliM68
Trikslyr58
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1183
StarCraft 2
ComeBackTV 481
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 54
• musti20045 22
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV468
League of Legends
• Nemesis3994
Other Games
• imaqtpie517
• Shiphtur177
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
16h 27m
Cure vs Zoun
herO vs Rogue
Platinum Heroes Events
21h 27m
BSL
1d 2h
RSL Revival
1d 16h
ByuN vs Maru
MaxPax vs TriGGeR
WardiTV Team League
1d 18h
BSL
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Light vs Calm
Royal vs Mind
Wardi Open
2 days
[ Show More ]
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
OSC
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Rush vs PianO
Flash vs Speed
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
BeSt vs Leta
Queen vs Jaedong
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
NationLESS Cup
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

2026 Changsha Offline CUP
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.