EPTWhy? Even if Protoss had mammary glands they don't even have mouths with which to suckle.
I'm confused.
Protoss nipples?
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
YumYumGranola
Canada346 Posts
Why? Even if Protoss had mammary glands they don't even have mouths with which to suckle. I'm confused. | ||
|
royalroadweed
United States8301 Posts
I have no idea whats up with protoss physiology. | ||
|
SigmaoctanusIV
United States3313 Posts
| ||
|
CakeSauc3
United States1437 Posts
 It's one thing I've always wondered. | ||
|
ejac
United States1195 Posts
On November 16 2015 14:27 CakeSauc3 wrote: Really though, how do the Protoss eat? Or do they use photosynthesis or something? It's one thing I've always wondered.Photosynthesis is correct actually, and this is mildly referenced in the campaign when they say something among the lines "the solar core provides nourishment for our warriors". | ||
|
CakeSauc3
United States1437 Posts
On November 16 2015 14:30 ejac wrote: Photosynthesis is correct actually, and this is mildly referenced in the campaign when they say something among the lines "the solar core provides nourishment for our warriors". Makes sense | ||
|
YumYumGranola
Canada346 Posts
Does it? | ||
|
SigmaoctanusIV
United States3313 Posts
| ||
|
ZackAttack
United States884 Posts
| ||
|
imJealous
United States1382 Posts
On November 16 2015 15:18 ZackAttack wrote: It seems extremely obvious that they shouldn't have nipples. I'm actually really surprised they were added. Someone had to conciously put them in there. I think this was probably more a case of someone sub-consciously putting them there... | ||
|
ZombieFrog
United States87 Posts
| ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5214 Posts
| ||
|
jubil
United States2602 Posts
In the end, it's a little ridiculous to speculate, since the entire design of the Protoss is just overtly anthropomorphic. | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11133 Posts
On November 16 2015 16:02 jubil wrote: Well, even if they're not mammary glands they could still be part of a Protoss's reproductive system somehow. Maybe instead of being suckled, they act as little psionic antennas for Protoss mothers to beam nutrients or whatever to their newborns. In the end, it's a little ridiculous to speculate, since the entire design of the Protoss is just overtly anthropomorphic. For we are bound by the nipple, the sacred union of our every lust and desire | ||
|
NukeD
Croatia1612 Posts
| ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
| ||
|
wjat
385 Posts
| ||
|
iMrising
United States1099 Posts
On November 16 2015 15:24 imJealous wrote: I think this was probably more a case of someone sub-consciously putting them there... Also, this is probably the most likely reason? | ||
|
weikor
Austria580 Posts
I believe thats why rohanna was so eager not to sever the bond in the campaign. What man could pleasure her perverted desires without the khala? The question now is, how will beeing severed from the bond that telepathically kept them together influence Protoss - relationships. Think of the kids, divorce is never good. | ||
|
kudlaty_true
Poland158 Posts
| ||
| ||
