On April 16 2015 01:45 Darthsanta13 wrote:
I bet people said the same thing about BW match fixing allegations.
I bet people said the same thing about BW match fixing allegations.
Yes but they eventually had actual proof, not just betting lines
Forum Index > SC2 General |
LongShot27
United States2084 Posts
On April 16 2015 01:45 Darthsanta13 wrote: Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 01:29 sitromit wrote: This sounds like bullshit to me, sorry. Soulkey is a player who has a legitimate chance at a high finish when he's on form. Why would he throw away not only his chance to get into Code S, but also at making WCS top 16 and going to Blizzcon? I bet people said the same thing about BW match fixing allegations. Yes but they eventually had actual proof, not just betting lines | ||
sharkie
Austria18356 Posts
On April 16 2015 01:29 sitromit wrote: This sounds like bullshit to me, sorry. Soulkey is a player who has a legitimate chance at a high finish when he's on form. Why would he throw away not only his chance to get into Code S, but also at making WCS top 16 and going to Blizzcon? Why would the most popular BW zerg player (savior) ever fix matches? -.- There is no "he is so good and so rich he surely won't matchfix" logic. BW proved us that | ||
LongShot27
United States2084 Posts
On April 16 2015 01:46 maGicc wrote: Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 01:39 LongShot27 wrote: On April 16 2015 01:29 sitromit wrote: This sounds like bullshit to me, sorry. Soulkey is a player who has a legitimate chance at a high finish when he's on form. Why would he throw away not only his chance to get into Code S, but also at making WCS top 16 and going to Blizzcon? That's because it is bullshit I am not sure why you so emotionally invested in this, but all your posts very weak when it comes to arguments. Its a battle of simple data vs emotions, and its clear on which side you are on. Its not an issue of "trusting a bunch of gamblers", its trusting the data. The data is out there, its neutral, its just facts. You are choosing to ignore it, but it doesnt make it less true. Your "data" is betting lines, that does not constitute evidence. Data isn't neutral when it is provided by someone with a staked interest in it. What the hell is wrong with you? | ||
Yorbon
Netherlands4272 Posts
On April 16 2015 01:29 Penev wrote: Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 00:54 Yorbon wrote: On April 16 2015 00:44 Jarree wrote: Wouldn't that be called evidence? English isn't my first language, though.On April 16 2015 00:14 sAsImre wrote: On April 15 2015 23:21 Swoopae wrote: On April 15 2015 23:20 LongShot27 wrote: On April 15 2015 23:17 bananafone wrote: On April 15 2015 22:46 LongShot27 wrote: On April 15 2015 22:43 Swoopae wrote: On April 15 2015 22:41 LongShot27 wrote: I just don't care anymore This is why match fixing will continue. If we don't care, the game is dead. If we do care, we can apply pressure on Kespa to investigate. A few articles, a few tweets, it doesn't take much effort to actually do something about it. No I don't care because this wasn't match fixing, nothing in this match was suspect whatsoever but this godforsaken excuse for a community is believing a bunch of gamblers over their common sense. If you we're to throw a match how would you do it? Clearly a not very obvious way would be good. Everyone who has ever played starcraft have probably thrown lots of games by accident and subsequently raged. Throwing games in a non-suspect fashion isn't hard and it's done all the time by people trying their best to do the exact opposite. This community is not using stupid excuses to witch hunt and forgetting about common sense. At this point probability answers the question for you. I'd suggest you go pick up a book about statistics and probability if you don't understand what is going on with the bet voiding. To simplify massively and make it easy to understand; each of these voided bets can be seen as an extraodinary event (like rolling ten sixes in a row with a normal die). In and of themselves the voided bets are very suspicious, but its hard to conclude that something weird is definetely going on. The same thing is true for the die example. Rolling ten sixes in a row is going to happen if you roll enough times, its just how probability works. However probability also says that if it happens enough times within a short span of time then maybe its time to check if the die is loaded. If someone rolls ten sixes in a row, goes to the toilet, comes back and rolls ten sixes in a row again you'll start to suspect that something is going on. Especially if you had money on that not happening. That is just common sense. "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." Wake the fuck up. You. Have. Zero. Proof. Whatsoever. No, there is plenty of proof, you're just ignoring it because you don't understand it. and you don't understand what proof means. Obviously there is match fixing going on since it plagued everything (Champion's League and WC in football) but the amount of proof is so small that nothing gets done in any sport. Main problem is that betting is a cancer for any competitive activity. No mate, you don't understand. If I post next week's lottery numbers today and they turn out to be right, it's one hell of a lucky guess. But when it happens 2 weeks in a row, or 3 or 4 weeks, it becomes proof that I somehow know the lottery numbers beforehand and the lottery machine is rigged. This is what is happening in Korean sc2 scene. Isn't it the same really? http://www.mijnwoordenboek.nl/vertaal/NL/EN/bewijs It's becáuse it's a homonym in dutch that confusion could rise. | ||
maGicc
Finland134 Posts
On April 16 2015 01:48 LongShot27 wrote: Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 01:46 maGicc wrote: On April 16 2015 01:39 LongShot27 wrote: On April 16 2015 01:29 sitromit wrote: This sounds like bullshit to me, sorry. Soulkey is a player who has a legitimate chance at a high finish when he's on form. Why would he throw away not only his chance to get into Code S, but also at making WCS top 16 and going to Blizzcon? That's because it is bullshit I am not sure why you so emotionally invested in this, but all your posts very weak when it comes to arguments. Its a battle of simple data vs emotions, and its clear on which side you are on. Its not an issue of "trusting a bunch of gamblers", its trusting the data. The data is out there, its neutral, its just facts. You are choosing to ignore it, but it doesnt make it less true. Your "data" is betting lines, that does not constitute evidence. Data isn't neutral when it is provided by someone with a staked interest in it. What the hell is wrong with you? Yes it is neutral. Unless you are implying that Pinnacle is fixing/faking the betting lines to void the match before it even started. Is that what you are implying? Are you serious? Also, "a betting line does not constitute evidence" when it comes to matchfixing? Really? You are a joke, or a troll. | ||
Penev
28463 Posts
On April 16 2015 01:50 maGicc wrote: Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 01:48 LongShot27 wrote: On April 16 2015 01:46 maGicc wrote: On April 16 2015 01:39 LongShot27 wrote: On April 16 2015 01:29 sitromit wrote: This sounds like bullshit to me, sorry. Soulkey is a player who has a legitimate chance at a high finish when he's on form. Why would he throw away not only his chance to get into Code S, but also at making WCS top 16 and going to Blizzcon? That's because it is bullshit I am not sure why you so emotionally invested in this, but all your posts very weak when it comes to arguments. Its a battle of simple data vs emotions, and its clear on which side you are on. Its not an issue of "trusting a bunch of gamblers", its trusting the data. The data is out there, its neutral, its just facts. You are choosing to ignore it, but it doesnt make it less true. Your "data" is betting lines, that does not constitute evidence. Data isn't neutral when it is provided by someone with a staked interest in it. What the hell is wrong with you? Yes it is neutral. Unless you are implying that Pinnacle is fixing/faking the betting lines to void the match before it even started. Is that what you are implying? Are you serious? You are a joke. It seems, indeed, that that's exactly what he's implying. No matter though, the only thing that does is that important people open their mouths about this. So far, none did.. :/ Edit: Also: 11 pages, sorry Gumba | ||
![]()
digmouse
China6327 Posts
| ||
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
On April 16 2015 01:58 digmouse wrote: At this point I'm not sure about the purpose of these kind of thread any more. To let people know that they're watching a fixed sport, which some people actually don't care to do. Some like pro-wrestling, and others like actual competition | ||
Qwyn
United States2779 Posts
![]() | ||
swag_bro
Japan782 Posts
On April 15 2015 22:02 boxerfred wrote: I'm getting closer and closer to being done with Korean SC2. Sorry to break it to you man, but Korean SC2, hell even foreign SC2, has always been like this. | ||
Popkiller
3415 Posts
On April 16 2015 01:58 digmouse wrote: At this point I'm not sure about the purpose of these kind of thread any more. it's true, the discussion doesn't seem to serve much purpose. TL could do a weekly update on all the voided bets and suspicious games from that week. Or a page on liquipedia that keeps track of it. There could even be a leader board for the players involved in the most matches with voided bets. | ||
Penev
28463 Posts
On April 16 2015 02:03 Qwyn wrote: This is dangerous and depressing to speculate about ![]() It is depressing (don't see why dangerous) but probably better than going full ostrich imo | ||
Thax
Belgium1060 Posts
Even if it's hard to proof who exactly is fixing*, the evidence undeniably shows that it's happening and it's happening frequently. *Except MK. My reaction to that as I saw it live was: "He just intentionally threw the match ...", and that was before I knew about dodgy betting behaviour. | ||
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
On April 16 2015 02:05 swag_bro wrote: Show nested quote + On April 15 2015 22:02 boxerfred wrote: I'm getting closer and closer to being done with Korean SC2. Sorry to break it to you man, but Korean SC2, hell even foreign SC2, has always been like this. swag_bro, you're supposed to be funny not sad ![]() On April 16 2015 02:05 Popkiller wrote: Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 01:58 digmouse wrote: At this point I'm not sure about the purpose of these kind of thread any more. it's true, the discussion doesn't seem to serve much purpose. TL could do a weekly update on all the voided bets and suspicious games from that week. Or a page on liquipedia that keeps track of it. There could even be a leader board for the players involved in the most matches with voided bets. MarineKing can finally be the best in Korea at something | ||
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
maGicc
Finland134 Posts
On April 16 2015 02:03 Qwyn wrote: This is dangerous and depressing to speculate about ![]() When the bets getting voided weekly and ppl like Huk/Rekrul confirm matchfixing in korea its not really a speculation anymore in my opinion. | ||
![]()
digmouse
China6327 Posts
On April 16 2015 02:01 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 01:58 digmouse wrote: At this point I'm not sure about the purpose of these kind of thread any more. To let people know that they're watching a fixed sport, which some people actually don't care to do. Some like pro-wrestling, and others like actual competition Sure, maybe, but are we really getting solid evidence/reasoning, constructive discussion or whatever in here now? | ||
phil.ipp
Austria1067 Posts
On April 16 2015 01:50 maGicc wrote: Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 01:48 LongShot27 wrote: On April 16 2015 01:46 maGicc wrote: On April 16 2015 01:39 LongShot27 wrote: On April 16 2015 01:29 sitromit wrote: This sounds like bullshit to me, sorry. Soulkey is a player who has a legitimate chance at a high finish when he's on form. Why would he throw away not only his chance to get into Code S, but also at making WCS top 16 and going to Blizzcon? That's because it is bullshit I am not sure why you so emotionally invested in this, but all your posts very weak when it comes to arguments. Its a battle of simple data vs emotions, and its clear on which side you are on. Its not an issue of "trusting a bunch of gamblers", its trusting the data. The data is out there, its neutral, its just facts. You are choosing to ignore it, but it doesnt make it less true. Your "data" is betting lines, that does not constitute evidence. Data isn't neutral when it is provided by someone with a staked interest in it. What the hell is wrong with you? Yes it is neutral. Unless you are implying that Pinnacle is fixing/faking the betting lines to void the match before it even started. Is that what you are implying? Are you serious? Also, "a betting line does not constitute evidence" when it comes to matchfixing? Really? You are a joke, or a troll. Sorry but, these "data" are not facts, you didnt collect them yourself, you dont even know how they are collected, they are just presented to you, and you, because of reasons unknown to me, believe in them. the only fact here is that you believe these data to be true, you dont know anything. a bit of reservation would do you pretty good. of course all this doesnt mean the data isnt correct. and you are of course free to draw any conclusion you want from it. but lashing out to people who say these data are maybe not neutral, is i think far more than you should ever do, when all your information is just a press release of a gambling site. | ||
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
On April 16 2015 02:10 digmouse wrote: Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 02:01 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: On April 16 2015 01:58 digmouse wrote: At this point I'm not sure about the purpose of these kind of thread any more. To let people know that they're watching a fixed sport, which some people actually don't care to do. Some like pro-wrestling, and others like actual competition Sure, maybe, but are we really getting solid evidence/reasoning, constructive discussion or whatever in here now? No, but do most threads have solid reasoning and discussion? Not really. I'm not sure if it's better to sweep this under the rug and just stop watching Korean tournaments for good or publicize this as much as possible, but honestly people should know they're favorite players are taking bribes. If I were a big Soulkey fan I'd like to know to stop doing that | ||
maGicc
Finland134 Posts
On April 16 2015 02:05 Popkiller wrote: Show nested quote + On April 16 2015 01:58 digmouse wrote: At this point I'm not sure about the purpose of these kind of thread any more. it's true, the discussion doesn't seem to serve much purpose. TL could do a weekly update on all the voided bets and suspicious games from that week. Or a page on liquipedia that keeps track of it. There could even be a leader board for the players involved in the most matches with voided bets. The purpose is to educate as much people as possible. Problem is, community is still being treated as clueless sheeps. I am sorry but when Wolf says on air that "its best we all just forget about it" after the most blatant case of the matchfix - its pretty freaking offensive to any intellegent viewer out there. | ||
| ||
Road to EWC
DreamHack Dallas Group Stage
[ Submit Event ] |
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Dota 2![]() ![]() Calm ![]() EffOrt ![]() Shuttle ![]() Dewaltoss ![]() ZZZero.O ![]() ggaemo ![]() HiyA ![]() Backho ![]() Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • kabyraGe StarCraft: Brood War![]() • Kozan • sooper7s • Migwel ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Replay Cast
SC Evo League
Road to EWC
Afreeca Starleague
BeSt vs Soulkey
Road to EWC
Wardi Open
SOOP
NightMare vs Wayne
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
GSL Code S
Cure vs Zoun
Solar vs Creator
[ Show More ] The PondCast
Online Event
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
GSL Code S
GuMiho vs Bunny
ByuN vs SHIN
Online Event
Replay Cast
|
|