|
|
|
|
|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
can we take bets on how long it takes for this thread to become too terrible to live?
|
Here we go again. Hai Otherworld
|
On April 15 2015 21:51 lichter wrote:
can we take bets on how long it takes for this thread to become too terrible to live?
Only if Swoopae observes the lines
|
|
|
Can someone name this "[General] Pinnacle voids sc2 bets" where the op can collect and update all the information we have anytime something happens?
It just is ridiculous to close these threads all the time, even if the discussion on the last page is questionable, the information in the op is relevant for people to see so we can get the information about possible matchfixing in korea out there!
Otherwise nothing will change
|
United Kingdom31935 Posts
On April 15 2015 21:51 lichter wrote:
can we take bets on how long it takes for this thread to become too terrible to live?
10 pages
|
Is there delay in the broadcast or something?
|
On April 15 2015 21:51 lichter wrote:
can we take bets on how long it takes for this thread to become too terrible to live?
It'll be better if you contact Kespa, MVP, Soulkey's team, Blizzard and Pinnacle to comment.
Does everyone want my rundown on what dynamic betting means, why it's impossible for Soulkey to be a big favourite for the series but a big underdog in map 1 and what it all means etc?
|
I want to get my shit in this storm!
|
On April 15 2015 21:55 GumBa wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2015 21:51 lichter wrote:
can we take bets on how long it takes for this thread to become too terrible to live? 10 pages
Can we make a thread when this thread suspiciously closes in under 3 pages?
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Holy balls, well atleast that is a happy medium? At least someone isnt throwing the whole game just a map so we can see who wins the rest of it. Unless someone bets Soulkey to win 3-1 or to win and concede 1 map.
Interesting XD
|
On April 15 2015 21:53 Penev wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2015 21:51 lichter wrote:
can we take bets on how long it takes for this thread to become too terrible to live? Only if Swoopae observes the lines
One of the other posters in the last thread said Soulkey became an 8-1 underdog in Map 1 but thats unconfirmed
Pinnacle confirmed the closing lines in the tweet in OP
|
What happened in that game?
|
Worth noting MVP promised a statement last week, yesterday and then again today on the Marineking situation if someone wants to add those tweets to OP
|
On April 15 2015 21:51 Penev wrote:
Here we go again. Hai Otherworld
I won't participate in this one, since there's nothing more to be said compared to previous threads.
There is more than enough to suspect the involved players.
There is not enough to outright condemn the involved players.
Therefore proper investigation should be made in order to confirm or deny the suspicions placed upon the players.
That said investigation will or will not be conducted is out of our control, sadly.
|
On April 15 2015 21:59 Swoopae wrote:
Worth noting MVP promised a statement last week, yesterday and then again today on the Marineking situation if someone wants to add those tweets to OP
I'll update it when they give the statement.
|
On April 15 2015 21:58 Garnet wrote:
What happened in that game?
Creator tried to cannon SK's natural but it failed. Then Creator did a timing attack off of 3 base (9 gates) with 3 void rays and SK just suicided into it and lost
|
55566 Posts
On April 15 2015 21:58 Garnet wrote:
What happened in that game?
In the game, Soulkey got cannon rushed but defended it, then died to +2 blink stalkers with sentries and voidrays. So nothing at MarineKing level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
