• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:05
CEST 18:05
KST 01:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy1uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event12Serral wins EWC 202549Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple5SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments5[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10
StarCraft 2
General
Rogue Talks: "Koreans could dominate again" Lambo Talks: The Future of SC2 and more... RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event
Tourneys
SEL Masters #5 - Korea vs Russia (SC Evo) Enki Epic Series #5 - TaeJa vs Classic (SC Evo) ByuN vs TaeJa Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Global Tourney for College Students in September RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather
Brood War
General
ASL20 Pre-season Tier List ranking! BW General Discussion BSL Polish World Championship 2025 20-21 September BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL Season 20 Ro24 Groups
Tourneys
KCM 2025 Season 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Gaming After Dark: Poor Slee…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 667 users

HotS Balance Update - November 11 - Page 78

Forum Index > SC2 General
1858 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 76 77 78 79 80 93 Next
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
November 15 2013 14:02 GMT
#1541
On November 15 2013 22:49 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 22:47 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:26 marvellosity wrote:
TheDwf sure does bitch a lot, doesn't he?

He subscribes to the Idra mindset of SC2, which damages your play more that any imbalance ever will.

Yet another random assumption based on nothing.

It's a quote from Jaedong, who told EGxenocider that thinking the game is unfair and imbalanced does more damage to your play than any real imbalance. Do you not trust Jaedongs advice?
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Qwerty85
Profile Joined June 2012
Croatia5536 Posts
November 15 2013 14:04 GMT
#1542
On November 15 2013 22:58 Tiaraju9 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 22:38 Qwerty85 wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:27 Tiaraju9 wrote:
Terran players are definitely delusional. They live in a terrible world where David Kim, the laws of nature and Obama conspires against them, against the hardest and weakest of the Starcraft' races.

Right now I was watching Desmuslim stream and he was making a "interesting" point about how oracles are better than banshes and why this make them imba. Like, doesn't make sense, right? But the master mind of Terran' redditors and TL users soon got the affirmative feedback from his puppets.


So we should just accept your opinion that oracles are not better than banshees as a fact just because you say so?
Demuslim can be whiny sometimes but if you watch his stream regularly, he has very good analytical approach..


Sure banshees are better in some ways, they have more range and they can cloack. But also there are drawbacks. They come full 2 minutes later than oracle, can't directly engage the marines (can kite them but not straight up engage which gives terran more time to get the viking or turret out) and they are much slower and harder to micro than oracle which makes it easier to kill them.

Oracles come faster than banshees, they are good both against workers and terran earliest anti air units (marines), they have superior speed and acceleration and dps (while they have the energy) etc.

So I don't see how you can dismiss that oracles are better than banshees without giving your arguments on the matter instead of just saying that it doesn't make sense.

Also, we must not forget that pro players use what works not what is best on paper. Even some pros like sos and parting said they are very very good and we see them all the time in protoss matchups. We don't see banshee play nearly as much as oracle play.

Edit: and nobody sane is suggesting there is some conspiracy against terran, we just question the competence of the balance team since their reasoning behind the changes doesn't often correspond to the actual changes they make.

If you want to make an early game unit like oracle better in the late game (which is a problem according to Blizz, not the oracle in the early game), why not give it a researchable speed upgrade at a building that can be constructed in late game scenarios. Instead, they make it better without any upgrade, thus making it even better in the early game..

Is there no flaw in their logic?



You missed the point. You can't isolate two units and then to compare them. That's the logical flaw. Makes zero sense.


Can you explain the logical flaw in comparing two units that are designed mainly for harassment? Especially if he compared them in terms of harassment potential (which they are designed to do). What is illogical about it?
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25419 Posts
November 15 2013 14:14 GMT
#1543
On November 15 2013 23:02 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 22:49 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:47 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:26 marvellosity wrote:
TheDwf sure does bitch a lot, doesn't he?

He subscribes to the Idra mindset of SC2, which damages your play more that any imbalance ever will.

Yet another random assumption based on nothing.

It's a quote from Jaedong, who told EGxenocider that thinking the game is unfair and imbalanced does more damage to your play than any real imbalance. Do you not trust Jaedongs advice?

Depends what your goals are.

If nobody complains about the broken things in the game, will they ever be changed?

Yeah as you like to say the 'Idra mentality' harmed his play, but equally he's so often right. At the other end of the positivity spectrum we have Day9 who barely ever criticises core issues with the game and would focus on other interesting aspects of the game.

They're both valid enough. If you want to play the game that YOU find fun, or fair complain all you want if your criteria aren't being met.

'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
November 15 2013 14:15 GMT
#1544
On November 15 2013 22:47 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 22:26 marvellosity wrote:
TheDwf sure does bitch a lot, doesn't he?

He subscribes to the Idra mindset of SC2, which damages your play more that any imbalance ever will.

Except unlike Idra he doesn't curse and actually uses good arguments to explain his reasoning...
Neosteel Enthusiast
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
November 15 2013 14:15 GMT
#1545
On November 15 2013 23:02 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 22:49 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:47 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:26 marvellosity wrote:
TheDwf sure does bitch a lot, doesn't he?

He subscribes to the Idra mindset of SC2, which damages your play more that any imbalance ever will.

Yet another random assumption based on nothing.

It's a quote from Jaedong, who told EGxenocider that thinking the game is unfair and imbalanced does more damage to your play than any real imbalance. Do you not trust Jaedongs advice?

And your statement according to which "[I] subscribe to the Idra mindset of SC2" (whatever that means) is also a Jaedong's quote?

I see no contradiction between thinking the game is unfair on such or such point, and still looking objectively at your play to see the flaws/mistakes in it. You seem to be labouring under the delusion that because I discuss some aspects of the match-up I deem unfair, I think my play is perfect. That is not the case at all.
Pirfiktshon
Profile Joined June 2013
United States1072 Posts
November 15 2013 14:18 GMT
#1546
On November 15 2013 23:02 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 22:49 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:47 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:26 marvellosity wrote:
TheDwf sure does bitch a lot, doesn't he?

He subscribes to the Idra mindset of SC2, which damages your play more that any imbalance ever will.

Yet another random assumption based on nothing.

It's a quote from Jaedong, who told EGxenocider that thinking the game is unfair and imbalanced does more damage to your play than any real imbalance. Do you not trust Jaedongs advice?



I agree the thought of imbalance is more destructive than the imbalance itself.

"The only thing to fear is FEAR ITSELF"

Yet it doesn't take a Genius to see the insane difference in the options as well as the Gameplay now in TvP. As a Terran player I just want even a bone on a string at this point to keep me going because after the past couple days its getting demoralizing when Noob Mid masters can Proxy oracle and micro for good kills and 3 Gate all in FOllow up can make your life a living hell..... Yea I have to get better at defending this but its just annoying that People with considerable lower skill in any other circumstance would not be able to hold a candle to you LOL
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-15 14:19:21
November 15 2013 14:19 GMT
#1547
On November 15 2013 22:45 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 22:15 Big J wrote:
Nope. Like basically anytime you answer me it is again a strawman.

On November 15 2013 21:33 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 18:11 Big J wrote:
yes. But you can say that for other playstyles as well, and man got we a lot of whining when Terrans couldn't just stim into Broodlord/Infestor anymore. And man did we get a lot of "oh, HotS is so awesome" when they finally could do it again.

This is how you summarize Terran problems against Zerg at the end of WoL?


Never said that this was a summary of "the Terran problems at the end of WoL".
But it's a fact that in the early stages of BL/Infestor said composition very often got beaten by stimming under it (of course with viking support, don't even begin to make a list of things I may not be arguing since this is somewhat of a short comment) and same thing works pretty well this far in HotS as well (though mines and drops of course are the enabling powers behind it).
Especially since you considered WoL to be totally balanced in these early BL/Infestor stages middle-end of 2011, even after the ghostnerf (since you said so a thousand times that it was the "queen patch" that broke the matchup and it was balanced before), you should know what I'm talking about.

Oh no, 1at doesn't work anymore, game is broken? Please.

Don't even get what you want to tell me with that. Do you want to make a sarcastic strawmen in which I say something like "Terrans were whining because they couldn't 1a anymore and therefore said the game was broken"
Or do you imply that I'm saying that Broodlord/Infestor was 1a and now you want to show me as someone who claims that the game is broken because it doesn't work anymore?
In anycase, it is a strawmen. Since in the first case I didn't say that Terrans were 1a-ing and in the second case you won't find a comment from me saying that HotS is/was broken.

Is “strawman” the new word you learnt this week? Terrans were complaining at the end of the WoL not because "they couldn't just stim into broods/infests anymore," but because nothing reliably worked against a competent opponent, from this method to Vikings/Ravens transitions, Nukes, multi-pronged drops or whatever. You're putting words in my mouth regarding the balance of WoL TvZ, which is quite ironic when you claim I use nothing but strawman (do I get points for using the word?); I even remember one of my first posts regarding patchs was to explain how the Snipe nerf would leave Terran too vulnerable to tier3 Zerg tech switches because Terran's infrastructure didn't have the flexibility of Zerg's production.


from my comment before:
of course with viking support, don't even begin to make a list of things I may not be arguing since this is somewhat of a short comment
...
...
...
...
...
get it?


And I'm pretty sure we had that discussion about WoL balance/Queen patch before. When I said (something like) "Broodlord/Infestor was going to develop anyways and be broken" and you then responded with (something like) "You're downplaying the results of the queen patch; X, Y, Z got out of control and Terran strategies A,B,C didn't work anymore and therefore, Terrans couldn't deal with Zerg reliably anymore."

- if I'm wrong and you didn't say that Zerg got out of control because of the queen patch, I appologize.
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
November 15 2013 14:26 GMT
#1548
On November 15 2013 23:19 Big J wrote:
And I'm pretty sure we had that discussion about WoL balance/Queen patch before. When I said (something like) "Broodlord/Infestor was going to develop anyways and be broken" and you then responded with (something like) "You're downplaying the results of the queen patch; X, Y, Z got out of control and Terran strategies A,B,C didn't work anymore and therefore, Terrans couldn't deal with Zerg reliably anymore."

- if I'm wrong and you didn't say that Zerg got out of control because of the queen patch, I appologize.

Yes, we had a discussion about the Queen patch and the development of broods/infests, but I did not say whether or not I considered TvZ balanced before said patch.
BEARDiaguz
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Australia2362 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-15 14:32:23
November 15 2013 14:31 GMT
#1549
On November 15 2013 23:04 Qwerty85 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 22:58 Tiaraju9 wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:38 Qwerty85 wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:27 Tiaraju9 wrote:
Terran players are definitely delusional. They live in a terrible world where David Kim, the laws of nature and Obama conspires against them, against the hardest and weakest of the Starcraft' races.

Right now I was watching Desmuslim stream and he was making a "interesting" point about how oracles are better than banshes and why this make them imba. Like, doesn't make sense, right? But the master mind of Terran' redditors and TL users soon got the affirmative feedback from his puppets.


So we should just accept your opinion that oracles are not better than banshees as a fact just because you say so?
Demuslim can be whiny sometimes but if you watch his stream regularly, he has very good analytical approach..


Sure banshees are better in some ways, they have more range and they can cloack. But also there are drawbacks. They come full 2 minutes later than oracle, can't directly engage the marines (can kite them but not straight up engage which gives terran more time to get the viking or turret out) and they are much slower and harder to micro than oracle which makes it easier to kill them.

Oracles come faster than banshees, they are good both against workers and terran earliest anti air units (marines), they have superior speed and acceleration and dps (while they have the energy) etc.

So I don't see how you can dismiss that oracles are better than banshees without giving your arguments on the matter instead of just saying that it doesn't make sense.

Also, we must not forget that pro players use what works not what is best on paper. Even some pros like sos and parting said they are very very good and we see them all the time in protoss matchups. We don't see banshee play nearly as much as oracle play.

Edit: and nobody sane is suggesting there is some conspiracy against terran, we just question the competence of the balance team since their reasoning behind the changes doesn't often correspond to the actual changes they make.

If you want to make an early game unit like oracle better in the late game (which is a problem according to Blizz, not the oracle in the early game), why not give it a researchable speed upgrade at a building that can be constructed in late game scenarios. Instead, they make it better without any upgrade, thus making it even better in the early game..

Is there no flaw in their logic?



You missed the point. You can't isolate two units and then to compare them. That's the logical flaw. Makes zero sense.


Can you explain the logical flaw in comparing two units that are designed mainly for harassment? Especially if he compared them in terms of harassment potential (which they are designed to do). What is illogical about it?


It might be illogical to compare, say, ghosts to templar in a vacuum but I think it's safe to compare two units who have similar roles (early game harassment in this case) when one unit is seeing a lot of play recently and the other sees almost none.

Which doesn't necessarily mean the matchup is imbalanced mind you.
ProgamerAustralian alcohol user follow @iaguzSC2
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-15 14:35:36
November 15 2013 14:34 GMT
#1550
On November 15 2013 23:15 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 23:02 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:49 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:47 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:26 marvellosity wrote:
TheDwf sure does bitch a lot, doesn't he?

He subscribes to the Idra mindset of SC2, which damages your play more that any imbalance ever will.

Yet another random assumption based on nothing.

It's a quote from Jaedong, who told EGxenocider that thinking the game is unfair and imbalanced does more damage to your play than any real imbalance. Do you not trust Jaedongs advice?

And your statement according to which "[I] subscribe to the Idra mindset of SC2" (whatever that means) is also a Jaedong's quote?

I see no contradiction between thinking the game is unfair on such or such point, and still looking objectively at your play to see the flaws/mistakes in it. You seem to be labouring under the delusion that because I discuss some aspects of the match-up I deem unfair, I think my play is perfect. That is not the case at all.

I can only comment on what I know from your posts on TL and make inferances based on that. EGxenocider said on inside the game that he had similar issues with thinking that portions of the game where imbalanced and unfair, and when he talked with Jaedong about it, he that seriously hurt his play.

Or to put it another way, of the top 100 golfers in the world, their scores only differ by about .2%. At some point practice and skill hit their limit and mindset becomes what wins and loses games. Since you are in GM, you might have hit that point and what is really holding you back is your focus on imbalance and the idea that the game is unfair.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
RaZorwire
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden718 Posts
November 15 2013 14:36 GMT
#1551
On November 15 2013 23:15 TheDwf wrote:
I see no contradiction between thinking the game is unfair on such or such point, and still looking objectively at your play to see the flaws/mistakes in it. You seem to be labouring under the delusion that because I discuss some aspects of the match-up I deem unfair, I think my play is perfect. That is not the case at all.


Really wish more people would keep this in mind. Complaining about balance CAN be detrimental to your play, but trying to improve and find solutions on how to overcome problems with your play and at the same time having opinions on balance are not mutually exclusive.
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
November 15 2013 14:37 GMT
#1552
On November 15 2013 23:34 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 23:15 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 23:02 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:49 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:47 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:26 marvellosity wrote:
TheDwf sure does bitch a lot, doesn't he?

He subscribes to the Idra mindset of SC2, which damages your play more that any imbalance ever will.

Yet another random assumption based on nothing.

It's a quote from Jaedong, who told EGxenocider that thinking the game is unfair and imbalanced does more damage to your play than any real imbalance. Do you not trust Jaedongs advice?

And your statement according to which "[I] subscribe to the Idra mindset of SC2" (whatever that means) is also a Jaedong's quote?

I see no contradiction between thinking the game is unfair on such or such point, and still looking objectively at your play to see the flaws/mistakes in it. You seem to be labouring under the delusion that because I discuss some aspects of the match-up I deem unfair, I think my play is perfect. That is not the case at all.

I can only comment on what I know from your posts on TL and make inferances based on that. EGxenocider said on inside the game that he had similar issues with thinking that portions of the game where imbalanced and unfair, and when he talked with Jaedong about it, he that seriously hurt his play.

Or to put it another way, of the top 100 golfers in the world, their scores only differ by about .2%. At some point practice and skill hit their limit and mindset becomes what wins and loses games. Since you are in GM, you might have hit that point and what is really holding you back is your focus on imbalance and the idea that the game is unfair.

But what exactly makes you think that something is holding me back?
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
November 15 2013 14:40 GMT
#1553
On November 15 2013 23:26 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 23:19 Big J wrote:
And I'm pretty sure we had that discussion about WoL balance/Queen patch before. When I said (something like) "Broodlord/Infestor was going to develop anyways and be broken" and you then responded with (something like) "You're downplaying the results of the queen patch; X, Y, Z got out of control and Terran strategies A,B,C didn't work anymore and therefore, Terrans couldn't deal with Zerg reliably anymore."

- if I'm wrong and you didn't say that Zerg got out of control because of the queen patch, I appologize.

Yes, we had a discussion about the Queen patch and the development of broods/infests, but I did not say whether or not I considered TvZ balanced before said patch.


If it wasn't somewhat balanced, the patch could not have broken it.
Pirfiktshon
Profile Joined June 2013
United States1072 Posts
November 15 2013 14:40 GMT
#1554
On November 15 2013 23:34 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 23:15 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 23:02 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:49 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:47 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:26 marvellosity wrote:
TheDwf sure does bitch a lot, doesn't he?

He subscribes to the Idra mindset of SC2, which damages your play more that any imbalance ever will.

Yet another random assumption based on nothing.

It's a quote from Jaedong, who told EGxenocider that thinking the game is unfair and imbalanced does more damage to your play than any real imbalance. Do you not trust Jaedongs advice?

And your statement according to which "[I] subscribe to the Idra mindset of SC2" (whatever that means) is also a Jaedong's quote?

I see no contradiction between thinking the game is unfair on such or such point, and still looking objectively at your play to see the flaws/mistakes in it. You seem to be labouring under the delusion that because I discuss some aspects of the match-up I deem unfair, I think my play is perfect. That is not the case at all.

I can only comment on what I know from your posts on TL and make inferances based on that. EGxenocider said on inside the game that he had similar issues with thinking that portions of the game where imbalanced and unfair, and when he talked with Jaedong about it, he that seriously hurt his play.

Or to put it another way, of the top 100 golfers in the world, their scores only differ by about .2%. At some point practice and skill hit their limit and mindset becomes what wins and loses games. Since you are in GM, you might have hit that point and what is really holding you back is your focus on imbalance and the idea that the game is unfair.



LOL he went from being your Posting Enemy to making an attempt to be your coach hahahaha Yea mindset has a HUGE effect on your gameplay there is no doubt about that. This is a discussion on how the new change had no legitimate reason behind it and actually aggravated the issues at hand and offered no real recompense in return.....
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
November 15 2013 14:42 GMT
#1555
On November 15 2013 23:37 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 23:34 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 23:15 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 23:02 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:49 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:47 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:26 marvellosity wrote:
TheDwf sure does bitch a lot, doesn't he?

He subscribes to the Idra mindset of SC2, which damages your play more that any imbalance ever will.

Yet another random assumption based on nothing.

It's a quote from Jaedong, who told EGxenocider that thinking the game is unfair and imbalanced does more damage to your play than any real imbalance. Do you not trust Jaedongs advice?

And your statement according to which "[I] subscribe to the Idra mindset of SC2" (whatever that means) is also a Jaedong's quote?

I see no contradiction between thinking the game is unfair on such or such point, and still looking objectively at your play to see the flaws/mistakes in it. You seem to be labouring under the delusion that because I discuss some aspects of the match-up I deem unfair, I think my play is perfect. That is not the case at all.

I can only comment on what I know from your posts on TL and make inferances based on that. EGxenocider said on inside the game that he had similar issues with thinking that portions of the game where imbalanced and unfair, and when he talked with Jaedong about it, he that seriously hurt his play.

Or to put it another way, of the top 100 golfers in the world, their scores only differ by about .2%. At some point practice and skill hit their limit and mindset becomes what wins and loses games. Since you are in GM, you might have hit that point and what is really holding you back is your focus on imbalance and the idea that the game is unfair.

But what exactly makes you think that something is holding me back?

The amount of time you spend complaining about balance. I can't know for sure, but it seems to be the focus of the vast majority of your posts in any given thread. I can can only assume that it has a similar level of focus in the way you play and think about the game.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
November 15 2013 14:45 GMT
#1556
On November 15 2013 23:40 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 23:26 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 23:19 Big J wrote:
And I'm pretty sure we had that discussion about WoL balance/Queen patch before. When I said (something like) "Broodlord/Infestor was going to develop anyways and be broken" and you then responded with (something like) "You're downplaying the results of the queen patch; X, Y, Z got out of control and Terran strategies A,B,C didn't work anymore and therefore, Terrans couldn't deal with Zerg reliably anymore."

- if I'm wrong and you didn't say that Zerg got out of control because of the queen patch, I appologize.

Yes, we had a discussion about the Queen patch and the development of broods/infests, but I did not say whether or not I considered TvZ balanced before said patch.


If it wasn't somewhat balanced, the patch could not have broken it.

Things are more complicated. You can go from "who knows" to "one side clearly has the advantage now," just like you can go from "one side has the advantage" to "this side has even more advantage now". A match-up can appear balanced at a time, but contain potential imbalances when further developments occur. Inversely, it can appear broken at the beginning, then even out.
Fowowski
Profile Joined November 2013
Poland6 Posts
November 15 2013 14:46 GMT
#1557
TvP

Basing on this: http://sc2planner.com/?v=hots#PaaaoCafaafaoDaoBaoBaiHaiHoCoFaoCaaoIaaffiY

When I scout after first rax and see 2x gas full saturation, no MSC - how can I know that this is a proxy Oracle not 4 gate blink all-in stalker with delayed MSC?

Would it be wise to delay my Orbital Command to get 1 extra rax earlier and then make OC during 2nd rax?
Pirfiktshon
Profile Joined June 2013
United States1072 Posts
November 15 2013 14:49 GMT
#1558
On November 15 2013 23:46 Fowowski wrote:
TvP

Basing on this: http://sc2planner.com/?v=hots#PaaaoCafaafaoDaoBaoBaiHaiHoCoFaoCaaoIaaffiY

When I scout after first rax and see 2x gas full saturation, no MSC - how can I know that this is a proxy Oracle not 4 gate blink all-in stalker with delayed MSC?

Would it be wise to delay my Orbital Command to get 1 extra rax earlier and then make OC during 2nd rax?



Please post this in the Terran HOTS Help me Thread
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
November 15 2013 14:49 GMT
#1559
On November 15 2013 23:40 Pirfiktshon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 23:34 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 23:15 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 23:02 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:49 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:47 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:26 marvellosity wrote:
TheDwf sure does bitch a lot, doesn't he?

He subscribes to the Idra mindset of SC2, which damages your play more that any imbalance ever will.

Yet another random assumption based on nothing.

It's a quote from Jaedong, who told EGxenocider that thinking the game is unfair and imbalanced does more damage to your play than any real imbalance. Do you not trust Jaedongs advice?

And your statement according to which "[I] subscribe to the Idra mindset of SC2" (whatever that means) is also a Jaedong's quote?

I see no contradiction between thinking the game is unfair on such or such point, and still looking objectively at your play to see the flaws/mistakes in it. You seem to be labouring under the delusion that because I discuss some aspects of the match-up I deem unfair, I think my play is perfect. That is not the case at all.

I can only comment on what I know from your posts on TL and make inferances based on that. EGxenocider said on inside the game that he had similar issues with thinking that portions of the game where imbalanced and unfair, and when he talked with Jaedong about it, he that seriously hurt his play.

Or to put it another way, of the top 100 golfers in the world, their scores only differ by about .2%. At some point practice and skill hit their limit and mindset becomes what wins and loses games. Since you are in GM, you might have hit that point and what is really holding you back is your focus on imbalance and the idea that the game is unfair.



LOL he went from being your Posting Enemy to making an attempt to be your coach hahahaha Yea mindset has a HUGE effect on your gameplay there is no doubt about that. This is a discussion on how the new change had no legitimate reason behind it and actually aggravated the issues at hand and offered no real recompense in return.....

Hey, I will be the first to admit that Dwf is way better at SC2 than I will ever be. I may make snarky comments about people whining about balance because I find it funny, but I do respect peoples skill at the game. I just think he spends a lot of time focused on imbalance. And focusing on something a lot can put you in a bad mindset, regardless if the discussion is balanced or not.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-15 15:08:38
November 15 2013 15:00 GMT
#1560
On November 15 2013 23:42 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2013 23:37 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 23:34 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 23:15 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 23:02 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:49 TheDwf wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:47 Plansix wrote:
On November 15 2013 22:26 marvellosity wrote:
TheDwf sure does bitch a lot, doesn't he?

He subscribes to the Idra mindset of SC2, which damages your play more that any imbalance ever will.

Yet another random assumption based on nothing.

It's a quote from Jaedong, who told EGxenocider that thinking the game is unfair and imbalanced does more damage to your play than any real imbalance. Do you not trust Jaedongs advice?

And your statement according to which "[I] subscribe to the Idra mindset of SC2" (whatever that means) is also a Jaedong's quote?

I see no contradiction between thinking the game is unfair on such or such point, and still looking objectively at your play to see the flaws/mistakes in it. You seem to be labouring under the delusion that because I discuss some aspects of the match-up I deem unfair, I think my play is perfect. That is not the case at all.

I can only comment on what I know from your posts on TL and make inferances based on that. EGxenocider said on inside the game that he had similar issues with thinking that portions of the game where imbalanced and unfair, and when he talked with Jaedong about it, he that seriously hurt his play.

Or to put it another way, of the top 100 golfers in the world, their scores only differ by about .2%. At some point practice and skill hit their limit and mindset becomes what wins and loses games. Since you are in GM, you might have hit that point and what is really holding you back is your focus on imbalance and the idea that the game is unfair.

But what exactly makes you think that something is holding me back?

The amount of time you spend complaining about balance. I can't know for sure, but it seems to be the focus of the vast majority of your posts in any given thread. I can can only assume that it has a similar level of focus in the way you play and think about the game.

That's like saying LaLuSh opened this thread because he sucks at Banshee micro. You assume too much. You don't know me, you don't know if I'm improving at the game or not, you don't even know my commitment to SC2, so you cannot claim that I discuss all those things because I have hit a plateau or something. You make those assumptions because the way I think contrasts with your philosophy of relativism and "positivism" at all costs, and for you someone who criticizes things like that is necessarily someone sour in some way. But I'm sorry, reality is more than black and white.
Prev 1 76 77 78 79 80 93 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Summer Champion…
11:00
Group Stage 1 - Group A
WardiTV1217
IndyStarCraft 203
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .354
IndyStarCraft 203
ProTech94
Rex 76
Codebar 22
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 6190
Calm 5061
Horang2 1734
EffOrt 1588
Jaedong 1394
Bisu 1229
Mini 854
BeSt 379
actioN 260
ggaemo 253
[ Show more ]
Soulkey 216
Barracks 202
Mind 161
Mong 150
Hyun 107
Snow 89
hero 87
yabsab 70
sSak 59
[sc1f]eonzerg 58
Shine 54
Hyuk 52
Movie 51
Trikslyr49
Backho 48
Sexy 30
HiyA 19
Terrorterran 18
soO 13
SilentControl 10
Sacsri 7
JulyZerg 4
Stormgate
TKL 138
Dota 2
Gorgc7198
qojqva3806
syndereN451
XcaliburYe217
420jenkins73
Counter-Strike
ScreaM2725
fl0m1202
markeloff145
Other Games
FrodaN3841
singsing2324
hiko1304
Lowko458
Beastyqt399
Fuzer 252
ceh9226
ArmadaUGS151
QueenE46
XaKoH 29
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 87
• davetesta25
• LUISG 21
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV682
League of Legends
• Nemesis7729
• Jankos1469
• TFBlade985
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
55m
PiGosaur Monday
7h 55m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
18h 55m
The PondCast
1d 17h
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 18h
Replay Cast
2 days
LiuLi Cup
2 days
Online Event
3 days
SC Evo League
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
[ Show More ]
CSO Contender
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
4 days
SC Evo League
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Sharp vs Ample
Larva vs Stork
Wardi Open
5 days
RotterdaM Event
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
JyJ vs TY
Bisu vs Speed
WardiTV Summer Champion…
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

StarCon 2025 Philadelphia
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 20
CSLAN 3
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.