|
On November 01 2013 15:44 lystier wrote: I'm wondering if naniwa will pay his bounty to taeja cuz he did beat revival lol
Nope, he already broke that promise on twitter. Apparently "beating a player" needs to be construed as "beating a player only if that player does not make it to Blizzcon." Also known as, I'm not guaranteed 5k, so I don't want to pay anything to anyone.
|
This is so perfect. This might be the most hyped one-series match we have seen so far, we the highest stakes, i like it. A perfect chance for Naniwa and Revival to prove them self get hyped folks
|
does the loser of the tie-breaker get any money?
|
On November 01 2013 15:47 vthree wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2013 15:45 -RusH wrote: Revival most likely 3-0. Then he goes on to get 3-0'd by Innovation. The fact Naniwa beat him at one of the previous Season Finals makes me want to watch the rematch instead though. The winner of Revival/Naniwa plays Soulkey... Oh yeah. Had no idea Innovation was surpassed. Well either way it's not like facing Soulkey instead is a much better option, the dude's a beast.
|
China6330 Posts
On November 01 2013 17:03 dude1238 wrote: does the loser of the tie-breaker get any money? Nothing, not a single penny. The winner gets at least 5000 bucks.
|
It would be nice to see a foreigner in the finals but I'm not a big fan of Naniwa personally. Will be rooting for Revival!
|
congrats to Revival. I am gonna be cheering for you
|
|
|
so will Naniwa just pay Blizzard for setting it up then?
|
On November 01 2013 15:15 canikizu wrote:EU wins.
FYP
I like how things turned out. Revival helping nani to save some money AND most probably is going to be destroyed in the process by him in the tie-breaker matches
Revival is a true teammate!
EG.EU Fighting!
NANI FIGHTING!
|
Naniwa owes taeja money!
|
On November 01 2013 16:59 Ghanburighan wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2013 15:44 lystier wrote: I'm wondering if naniwa will pay his bounty to taeja cuz he did beat revival lol Nope, he already broke that promise on twitter. Apparently "beating a player" needs to be construed as "beating a player only if that player does not make it to Blizzcon." Also known as, I'm not guaranteed 5k, so I don't want to pay anything to anyone. pretty obvious that was what he meant. If you thought otherwise, and especially if you didnt reach out to accept and clarify his proposition, you only have yourself to blame.
|
So somehow the first position, Soulkey is the worst of all the top positions due to the fact that this player has to prepare for two opponents, where as the rest of the players on the top positions, only have to prepare against one known opponent ... this kinda sucks for Soulkey.
|
|
|
|
|
On November 01 2013 17:23 1Dhalism wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2013 16:59 Ghanburighan wrote:On November 01 2013 15:44 lystier wrote: I'm wondering if naniwa will pay his bounty to taeja cuz he did beat revival lol Nope, he already broke that promise on twitter. Apparently "beating a player" needs to be construed as "beating a player only if that player does not make it to Blizzcon." Also known as, I'm not guaranteed 5k, so I don't want to pay anything to anyone. pretty obvious that was what he meant. If you thought otherwise, and especially if you didnt reach out to accept and clarify his proposition, you only have yourself to blame.
While I appreciate the personal attack /s, I don't see how it's obvious that his words mean something entirely different:
He said in his tweet: "offering 500$ bounty to whoever wins vs revival". That's pretty unequivocal. It was also the interpretation Taeja had, as he contacted Naniwa over twitter after winning against Revival. In the end, Naniwa made the bounty a thing that people were talking about, then failed to pay it. Which misled a lot of people, including the actual beneficiary - Taeja.
|
On November 01 2013 15:09 -JoKeR- wrote: Still can't believe revival got that IEM seed Same, that was so random. Must be something behind it, but we'll probably never know.
|
On November 01 2013 17:34 Ghanburighan wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2013 17:23 1Dhalism wrote:On November 01 2013 16:59 Ghanburighan wrote:On November 01 2013 15:44 lystier wrote: I'm wondering if naniwa will pay his bounty to taeja cuz he did beat revival lol Nope, he already broke that promise on twitter. Apparently "beating a player" needs to be construed as "beating a player only if that player does not make it to Blizzcon." Also known as, I'm not guaranteed 5k, so I don't want to pay anything to anyone. pretty obvious that was what he meant. If you thought otherwise, and especially if you didnt reach out to accept and clarify his proposition, you only have yourself to blame. While I appreciate the personal attack /s, I don't see how it's obvious that his words mean something entirely different: He said in his tweet: "offering 500$ bounty to whoever wins vs revival". That's pretty unequivocal. It was also the interpretation Taeja had, as he contacted Naniwa over twitter after winning against Revival. In the end, Naniwa made the bounty a thing that people were talking about, then failed to pay it. Which misled a lot of people, including the actual beneficiary - Taeja.
Taeja should sue him. I already see the Esports-Lawyers having Esports dollar signs in their eyes.
|
Russian Federation604 Posts
Wow! Naniwa will win, cmon my child
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|