• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:47
CEST 12:47
KST 19:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster10Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week4Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer12Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2
StarCraft 2
General
Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025) Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game
Tourneys
EWC 2025 Online Qualifiers (May 28-June 1, June 21-22) Monday Nights Weeklies RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Soma Explains: JaeDong's Defense vs Bisu bonjwa.tv: my AI project that translates BW videos Pro gamer house photos StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - WB Finals & LBR3 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - LB Round 4 & 5 [ASL19] Grand Finals
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Social coupon sites US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Pro Gamers Cope with Str…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 33602 users

[Now live] New Patch - Warp Prism buff - Page 39

Forum Index > SC2 General
980 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 37 38 39 40 41 50 Next All
Rabiator
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany3948 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-21 12:17:35
June 21 2013 12:15 GMT
#761
On June 21 2013 20:44 DarkLordOlli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2013 20:38 Rabiator wrote:
On June 21 2013 16:14 DarkLordOlli wrote:
On June 21 2013 16:06 Rabiator wrote:
On June 21 2013 15:37 DarkLordOlli wrote:
Watching HerO stream with the new prism speed right now. It's not gamebreaking but he sure gets in the wins - through macro. His third in PvT is earlier most notably as I predicted earlier in this thread. Lategame not directly affected in the slightest except that protoss will have a good lategame army a bit quicker.

As it should be, a player with his insane multitasking should have the tools to use it. Loving the change so far.

I wonder if Protoss will ever use the Warp Prism just to drop off stuff for harrass instead of moving into an enemy base, unloading the four Zealots or Sentries and then warping in additional forces. Why not get three Warp Prisms, get into the enemy base, unload the 12 Zealots and then move the Warp Prisms out again OR keep one of them for warp ins and the other two go to other bases. The point of this would be to kill off a Queen or Spore Crawler in a quick blow while keeping the Prisms safe; even Terran bases (with the production facilities) could be wrecked by this ... at least cost him some addons which take time to rebuild.


Committing 12 zealots and 3 warp prisms to something like that will lose you the game. Unless you're talking about lategame in which case why make 3 warp prisms when you can make one and warp in?

Why will it lose you the game? The big idea is NOT to lose the Warp Prisms - by keeping it mobile - but to overwhelm (4 Zealots dont really "overwhelm" + Show Spoiler +
=kill before the opponent can react properly
a Spore or Queen) the core of the Zerg hatchery defense ... Queens and Spores. If there is just one Queen you could even pick up any remaining Zealots and drop them in another base like Terrans do with Hellbats.

Warping in stuff takes time and having more than one Warp Prism lets you start the battle far faster. The whole point is to kill before the Zerglings have run back to their base to defend.

Oh and obviously this is NOT a late game strategy but rather aimed at the really early game. You have to have a really good wall with more than just one cannon ... just to be safe. It only costs minerals and should be executed before the Zerg has any serious anti-air (Mutalisks, Hydralisks or larger amounts of Spore Crawlers).

After this harrassment is done you can use the Warp Prisms as "mobile forward pylons" to warp in Zealot harrass squads and then get to a safe spot or you could use them as patrol vehicles to look for Overlords. The big part is that you do not use any gas for the units built.


You don't have random 1800 minerals in the early game. And if you did, there's a million better ways to spend them. Like taking a third base for example. Or warping in units that will help you defend that third base. Or teching. Or making cannons to protect your third base. Or building more probes. Building a macro nexus to build even more probes. Building forges. Building 18 pylons.
What have you. All of the things above will probably work out better for me. There's also a few sarcastic ones in there but I won't tell you which ones they are.

There is no way for Protoss to "harrass early" except with their specialized units (Oracle, Phoenix) for the job. This stops instantly when the Zerg builds Spore Crawlers and/or maybe a few extra Queens. If you go for the "dozen Zealots" you might be able to continue harrassing while keeping your units reasonably safe ... I have no idea, but maybe some smart Protoss will figure out a build for it ... like that "counter a CC first by building a hatchery in his natural" build which Catz brought up again + Show Spoiler +
but which was really shown to us first by TLO in the TLOwnage at the end of beta
and which has been used in at least one pro match in Korea (against Innovation - unsuccessfully, BUT with several mistakes made by the Zerg ... it was a good start though and had the Terran on the back foot for a while).

The whole point of my "train of thought" is to be open minded and think about new possibilities. It is not an "every day regular build", but in certain cituations if could work ... if the Zerg is
- greedy,
- likes Zerglings a lot,
- does not build preemptive Spore Crawlers and/or
- does not build lots of Queens.
The bottom line is: It could work because it is something new and thus unforeseen by the opponent ...

----

The most serious of your options is to get a third base up and running, but that will cost a lot of resources simply because you will need at least 800 minerals for a Nexus, a pylon (or two) and a cannon or two at that base, which will leave you with just 1000 minerals worth of Zealots to defend. Not a whole lot. As I said above the point is to potentially GET OUT AGAIN with all your forces without even needing a Mothership Core. The problem of the usual Warp Prism harrass is that you happily warp in tons of stuff and then lose it all if the Zerg simply has more stuff, because you only have space for 4 Zealots in your Warp Prism. If you build more than one Warp Prism you can use your force to attack AND do significant damage AND get out again.
If you cant say what you're meaning, you can never mean what you're saying.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 21 2013 12:50 GMT
#762
On June 21 2013 20:32 Sissors wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2013 20:02 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 19:51 neptunusfisk wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:26 ObliviousNA wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:06 Akusta wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:04 Brett wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:02 GTPGlitch wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:01 FXOTheoRy wrote:
On June 20 2013 06:55 TheDwf wrote:
On June 20 2013 06:54 Akusta wrote:
Prisms move faster than vikings. This is just silly.

Yeah. Can't wait to have Zealots 24/7 rampaging my base because I can't finish a Prism with a Viking...

speed medivacs same problem


afaik barracks can't be put in medivacs

"afaik warp prisms cant heal"

Shall we continue the dumb comparison?


Your argument is invalid. Which is better? 3+ heal to one unit? Or arbitrary instant troop deployment across the map from 30 production facilities?

Nothing changes late-game from right now. 30 warpgates? Current protoss lategame would already have prism speed. If you're going to fear monger, at least suggest some reasonable balance concerns -_-


Well, if the protoss is 60 supply down and spent all money on warpgates, why haven't the terran just walked with a few marauders and killed everything already?

Ah the never ending stories of people warping in 30 zealots from a WP. Because the WP is what lost that game, really. It wasn't that the protoss got to sit there and get 4500 minerals in warpgates.

Are we again designing the game with the idea of: If you let him get to the lategame you deserve to lose? That's kinda the entire problem WoL had.

If you let anyone sit there for so long that they feel confident that they can dump +3000 minerals into production facilities, you are playing the game wrong. You are better off trading out that army with yours so they need to invest in a new army. You gain nothing by sitting there with your maxed army, waiting.

So if the protoss has 30+ warpates, you are doing something wrong or you should have 30+ raxs(or 20 with 10 with reactors).
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Sissors
Profile Joined March 2012
1395 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-21 13:03:33
June 21 2013 13:01 GMT
#763
On June 21 2013 21:50 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2013 20:32 Sissors wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:02 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 19:51 neptunusfisk wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:26 ObliviousNA wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:06 Akusta wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:04 Brett wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:02 GTPGlitch wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:01 FXOTheoRy wrote:
On June 20 2013 06:55 TheDwf wrote:
[quote]
Yeah. Can't wait to have Zealots 24/7 rampaging my base because I can't finish a Prism with a Viking...

speed medivacs same problem


afaik barracks can't be put in medivacs

"afaik warp prisms cant heal"

Shall we continue the dumb comparison?


Your argument is invalid. Which is better? 3+ heal to one unit? Or arbitrary instant troop deployment across the map from 30 production facilities?

Nothing changes late-game from right now. 30 warpgates? Current protoss lategame would already have prism speed. If you're going to fear monger, at least suggest some reasonable balance concerns -_-


Well, if the protoss is 60 supply down and spent all money on warpgates, why haven't the terran just walked with a few marauders and killed everything already?

Ah the never ending stories of people warping in 30 zealots from a WP. Because the WP is what lost that game, really. It wasn't that the protoss got to sit there and get 4500 minerals in warpgates.

Are we again designing the game with the idea of: If you let him get to the lategame you deserve to lose? That's kinda the entire problem WoL had.

If you let anyone sit there for so long that they feel confident that they can dump +3000 minerals into production facilities, you are playing the game wrong. You are better off trading out that army with yours so they need to invest in a new army. You gain nothing by sitting there with your maxed army, waiting.

So if the protoss has 30+ warpates, you are doing something wrong or you should have 30+ raxs(or 20 with 10 with reactors).

You pretty much said you deserve to lose if you allow the toss to get that far. How would it then possibly be a bad idea for protoss to try to get that far and sit happily with a maxed army, waiting? Then they aren't playing it wrong, but they are playing it correct. They have no reason to attack if they get a large advantage by waiting.

Of course you should also have many production facilities, but they can't really warp in directly to the enemies base.

(Btw this is of course all unrelated to this speed change).
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-21 13:15:16
June 21 2013 13:14 GMT
#764
On June 21 2013 22:01 Sissors wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2013 21:50 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:32 Sissors wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:02 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 19:51 neptunusfisk wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:26 ObliviousNA wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:06 Akusta wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:04 Brett wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:02 GTPGlitch wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:01 FXOTheoRy wrote:
[quote]
speed medivacs same problem


afaik barracks can't be put in medivacs

"afaik warp prisms cant heal"

Shall we continue the dumb comparison?


Your argument is invalid. Which is better? 3+ heal to one unit? Or arbitrary instant troop deployment across the map from 30 production facilities?

Nothing changes late-game from right now. 30 warpgates? Current protoss lategame would already have prism speed. If you're going to fear monger, at least suggest some reasonable balance concerns -_-


Well, if the protoss is 60 supply down and spent all money on warpgates, why haven't the terran just walked with a few marauders and killed everything already?

Ah the never ending stories of people warping in 30 zealots from a WP. Because the WP is what lost that game, really. It wasn't that the protoss got to sit there and get 4500 minerals in warpgates.

Are we again designing the game with the idea of: If you let him get to the lategame you deserve to lose? That's kinda the entire problem WoL had.

If you let anyone sit there for so long that they feel confident that they can dump +3000 minerals into production facilities, you are playing the game wrong. You are better off trading out that army with yours so they need to invest in a new army. You gain nothing by sitting there with your maxed army, waiting.

So if the protoss has 30+ warpates, you are doing something wrong or you should have 30+ raxs(or 20 with 10 with reactors).

You pretty much said you deserve to lose if you allow the toss to get that far. How would it then possibly be a bad idea for protoss to try to get that far and sit happily with a maxed army, waiting? Then they aren't playing it wrong, but they are playing it correct. They have no reason to attack if they get a large advantage by waiting.

Of course you should also have many production facilities, but they can't really warp in directly to the enemies base.

(Btw this is of course all unrelated to this speed change).


The same goes for zerg as well. If a protoss lets a zerg get 12 macro hatches, 135 larva and a huge bank the same things happens. If a terran triple expands and then gets 10+ CCs and sacks half their workers, they just want to sit back and let the mule money come so they can make a bunch of super armies. We can make an endless number of late game situations that just shouldn't happen in normal game.

There is always going to be someone who is in a position where they don't want to attack, depending on the race, map or flow of the game. The same goes for Dota 2, when team gets to a point where they just want to soak in the gold. There are points when a protoss doesn't want to attack a terran in some games. That's not a game flaw, its just all games work when one side can get an advantage.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9369 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-21 13:21:00
June 21 2013 13:18 GMT
#765
On June 21 2013 22:01 Sissors wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2013 21:50 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:32 Sissors wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:02 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 19:51 neptunusfisk wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:26 ObliviousNA wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:06 Akusta wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:04 Brett wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:02 GTPGlitch wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:01 FXOTheoRy wrote:
[quote]
speed medivacs same problem


afaik barracks can't be put in medivacs

"afaik warp prisms cant heal"

Shall we continue the dumb comparison?


Your argument is invalid. Which is better? 3+ heal to one unit? Or arbitrary instant troop deployment across the map from 30 production facilities?

Nothing changes late-game from right now. 30 warpgates? Current protoss lategame would already have prism speed. If you're going to fear monger, at least suggest some reasonable balance concerns -_-


Well, if the protoss is 60 supply down and spent all money on warpgates, why haven't the terran just walked with a few marauders and killed everything already?

Ah the never ending stories of people warping in 30 zealots from a WP. Because the WP is what lost that game, really. It wasn't that the protoss got to sit there and get 4500 minerals in warpgates.

Are we again designing the game with the idea of: If you let him get to the lategame you deserve to lose? That's kinda the entire problem WoL had.

If you let anyone sit there for so long that they feel confident that they can dump +3000 minerals into production facilities, you are playing the game wrong. You are better off trading out that army with yours so they need to invest in a new army. You gain nothing by sitting there with your maxed army, waiting.

So if the protoss has 30+ warpates, you are doing something wrong or you should have 30+ raxs(or 20 with 10 with reactors).

You pretty much said you deserve to lose if you allow the toss to get that far. How would it then possibly be a bad idea for protoss to try to get that far and sit happily with a maxed army, waiting? Then they aren't playing it wrong, but they are playing it correct. They have no reason to attack if they get a large advantage by waiting.

Of course you should also have many production facilities, but they can't really warp in directly to the enemies base.

(Btw this is of course all unrelated to this speed change).


Yes I am surprised anyone still think that the "don't let him get there"-concept is good design. As you point it rewards one player for never attacking throughout the entire game which makes the game incredibly boring.

While each race indeed should have different advantages and disadvantages late game, neither race must be superior in terms of mobility ,cost efficiency and production mechancis at the same time.


There is always going to be someone who is in a position where they don't want to attack, depending on the race, map or flow of the game.


Yes but it should be period/timing based. Aka until I get that tech out I don't wanna attack. When I have got my tech out my opponent shouldn't be incentivied to attack untill his economy kicks in or he gets a counter-attack or something like that.
This creates a dynamic game.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 21 2013 13:22 GMT
#766
On June 21 2013 22:18 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2013 22:01 Sissors wrote:
On June 21 2013 21:50 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:32 Sissors wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:02 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 19:51 neptunusfisk wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:26 ObliviousNA wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:06 Akusta wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:04 Brett wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:02 GTPGlitch wrote:
[quote]

afaik barracks can't be put in medivacs

"afaik warp prisms cant heal"

Shall we continue the dumb comparison?


Your argument is invalid. Which is better? 3+ heal to one unit? Or arbitrary instant troop deployment across the map from 30 production facilities?

Nothing changes late-game from right now. 30 warpgates? Current protoss lategame would already have prism speed. If you're going to fear monger, at least suggest some reasonable balance concerns -_-


Well, if the protoss is 60 supply down and spent all money on warpgates, why haven't the terran just walked with a few marauders and killed everything already?

Ah the never ending stories of people warping in 30 zealots from a WP. Because the WP is what lost that game, really. It wasn't that the protoss got to sit there and get 4500 minerals in warpgates.

Are we again designing the game with the idea of: If you let him get to the lategame you deserve to lose? That's kinda the entire problem WoL had.

If you let anyone sit there for so long that they feel confident that they can dump +3000 minerals into production facilities, you are playing the game wrong. You are better off trading out that army with yours so they need to invest in a new army. You gain nothing by sitting there with your maxed army, waiting.

So if the protoss has 30+ warpates, you are doing something wrong or you should have 30+ raxs(or 20 with 10 with reactors).

You pretty much said you deserve to lose if you allow the toss to get that far. How would it then possibly be a bad idea for protoss to try to get that far and sit happily with a maxed army, waiting? Then they aren't playing it wrong, but they are playing it correct. They have no reason to attack if they get a large advantage by waiting.

Of course you should also have many production facilities, but they can't really warp in directly to the enemies base.

(Btw this is of course all unrelated to this speed change).


Yes I am surprised anyone still think that the "don't let him get there"-concept is good design. As you point it rewards one player for never attacking throughout the entire game which makes the game incredibly boring.

While each race indeed should have different advantages and disadvantages late game, neither race must be superior in terms of mobility ,cost efficiency and production mechancis at the same time.

Trading out armies is a critical and basic part of the game design and balance. Remaxing and trading efficiently are the keys to playing SC2. A lot of the stories of "30 zealots being warped" in are a product of people playing to passively once they get maxed. It is similar if you see someone blind double expand and then you don't attack them and just hope it will work out.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Archybaldie
Profile Joined June 2011
United Kingdom818 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-21 14:08:42
June 21 2013 13:28 GMT
#767
On June 21 2013 22:01 Sissors wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2013 21:50 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:32 Sissors wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:02 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 19:51 neptunusfisk wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:26 ObliviousNA wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:06 Akusta wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:04 Brett wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:02 GTPGlitch wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:01 FXOTheoRy wrote:
[quote]
speed medivacs same problem


afaik barracks can't be put in medivacs

"afaik warp prisms cant heal"

Shall we continue the dumb comparison?


Your argument is invalid. Which is better? 3+ heal to one unit? Or arbitrary instant troop deployment across the map from 30 production facilities?

Nothing changes late-game from right now. 30 warpgates? Current protoss lategame would already have prism speed. If you're going to fear monger, at least suggest some reasonable balance concerns -_-


Well, if the protoss is 60 supply down and spent all money on warpgates, why haven't the terran just walked with a few marauders and killed everything already?

Ah the never ending stories of people warping in 30 zealots from a WP. Because the WP is what lost that game, really. It wasn't that the protoss got to sit there and get 4500 minerals in warpgates.

Are we again designing the game with the idea of: If you let him get to the lategame you deserve to lose? That's kinda the entire problem WoL had.

If you let anyone sit there for so long that they feel confident that they can dump +3000 minerals into production facilities, you are playing the game wrong. You are better off trading out that army with yours so they need to invest in a new army. You gain nothing by sitting there with your maxed army, waiting.

So if the protoss has 30+ warpates, you are doing something wrong or you should have 30+ raxs(or 20 with 10 with reactors).

You pretty much said you deserve to lose if you allow the toss to get that far. How would it then possibly be a bad idea for protoss to try to get that far and sit happily with a maxed army, waiting? Then they aren't playing it wrong, but they are playing it correct. They have no reason to attack if they get a large advantage by waiting.

Of course you should also have many production facilities, but they can't really warp in directly to the enemies base.

(Btw this is of course all unrelated to this speed change).


This whole thread is getting entirely too silly.

But lets look at it, If a protoss can warp in 30 zealots (in the terrans base) thats 60 supply and 3000 minerals not being used till the warp in. So a protoss at 3000 minerals and 140 supply not to mention the cost of getting 30 warp gates just goes to show the game is way in the late game. At this point it would generally be safe to assume the terran is on 200/200 supply because frankly if the terran isn't at 200/200 and the protoss is at 140 supply with a bank of 3000 and 30 gates, the terran had probabaly already lost earlier on in the game and this is just a killing blow. So assuming the game isnt over we can say the terran has a close to 200/200 army either back home or out on the field. If the army is back at home the terran can go defend it with a 200/200 army vs 60 supply warp in of non aoe units. Or if the terran is out on the field they can basetrade and lift where the terran army will end up facing against a 140/200 protoss army.

This whole thing is off topic and frankly ridiculous. It also has nothing to do with an upgrade to the warp prisms base speed.


By the way some information about vikings vs phase mode.

So in this scenario the terran catches a warp prism in phase mode and uses a viking to attack it. Upon the viking shooting at the phased prism the protoss reacts immediately un-phases and moves away.

If the viking is attack moved, the viking gets 2 free shots on the warp prism before it's out of range. (pre buff it was 3 shots)

If the viking is micro'd (Fires on the prism then moves towards it etc) The viking can get 4 shots before it's out of range. (pre buff it was 5 shots)

It takes 8 shots for 1 viking to kill a warp prism. So 2 vikings micro'd well would almost guarentee the warp prism doesn't escape.

Onto marines

Stimmed marines are faster then the "buffed warp prism". A stimmed marine has 10.5 dps (prisms have 100 shields 100 hull and start without armour).

1 stimmed marine kills a prism in 19.4 seconds (ingame)
2 stimmed marines kills a prism in 9.5 seconds
3 stimmed marines kills a prism in 6.3 seconds
4 stimmed marines kills a prism in 4.76 seconds
5 stimmed marines kills a prism in 3.8 seconds

All the above numbers vary based on upgrades.


Missile turrets:

http://i.imgur.com/Vvvucet.jpg

Scenario A (Blue) the warp prism goes into missile range then moves out. the warp prism was left with 56 hull.

Scenario B (Green) The warp prism fly's past the missile turret and exit's the other side, again the warp prism is left with 56 hull.

56 hull means 2 viking shots would finish it off (until shields regen)


I should probabaly just add this too (i posted it earlier in the thread):
A speed comparison based on units you're already used to seeing.
Medivac: 2.5
Old prism: 2.5
Banshees: 2.75
NEW PRISM: 2.953
Oracle: 3.375
Speed prism: 3.375
Mutalisk: 4.0
Phoenix: 4.25
Medivac (Boosted) : 4.25
I'm in the bubblewrap league ... i just keep getting popped
ZenithM
Profile Joined February 2011
France15952 Posts
June 21 2013 13:32 GMT
#768
If you have 3000 extra mins to warp in zealots in my base, I'm gonna assume that you have already researched the prism speed upgrade, so I can't really see how the patch makes that whole situation really much worse to handle than before ;D
bittman
Profile Joined February 2011
Australia8759 Posts
June 21 2013 13:33 GMT
#769
On June 21 2013 22:28 Archybaldie wrote:
This whole thread is getting entirely too silly.


You could have just left it at that. I only check this thread to laugh at the fact that people are still complaining.

Schadenfreude rocks.
Mvp - Leenock - Dongraegu - MC - Gumiho - Keen - Polt - Squirtle - Jjakji - Genius - Seed - Life - sC - Dream || LG-IM - MVP - FXO
Wintex
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Norway16838 Posts
June 21 2013 13:57 GMT
#770
On June 21 2013 10:36 GolemMadness wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2013 09:58 Cyro wrote:
On June 21 2013 09:47 GolemMadness wrote:
On June 21 2013 09:43 usethis2 wrote:
On June 20 2013 19:08 tropical wrote:
Sometimes, especially around the time a new balance patch is released, this community makes me very, very sad. How about we just see how it play's out? I am quit sure it won't break PvT/TvP.

Even though I have no quarrel with this specific patch, but your suggestion is disingenuous. People flip out over balance changes because once introduced they rarely are revoked. (exception: bunkers) "Why not see how it plays out," while a valid point, but talking as if Blizzard will quickly change it back once proved broken is not an honest response.

Again, I don't think this patch is ground-breaking. Hopefully this will help out toss to play more "normal" games with consistency instead of their off-putting cheeses.


When has a balance change been so bad that it's needed to be revoked?


Queens.


Does anyone actually think that queens having 5 range instead of 3 is an issue right now?

I don't think so, but that change ruined Wings.
The Bomber boy
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19225 Posts
June 21 2013 14:02 GMT
#771
I can't believe everyone is overlooking the impact this will have in 4v4's.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
neptunusfisk
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
2286 Posts
June 21 2013 14:12 GMT
#772
On June 21 2013 22:01 Sissors wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2013 21:50 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:32 Sissors wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:02 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 19:51 neptunusfisk wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:26 ObliviousNA wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:06 Akusta wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:04 Brett wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:02 GTPGlitch wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:01 FXOTheoRy wrote:
[quote]
speed medivacs same problem


afaik barracks can't be put in medivacs

"afaik warp prisms cant heal"

Shall we continue the dumb comparison?


Your argument is invalid. Which is better? 3+ heal to one unit? Or arbitrary instant troop deployment across the map from 30 production facilities?

Nothing changes late-game from right now. 30 warpgates? Current protoss lategame would already have prism speed. If you're going to fear monger, at least suggest some reasonable balance concerns -_-


Well, if the protoss is 60 supply down and spent all money on warpgates, why haven't the terran just walked with a few marauders and killed everything already?

Ah the never ending stories of people warping in 30 zealots from a WP. Because the WP is what lost that game, really. It wasn't that the protoss got to sit there and get 4500 minerals in warpgates.

Are we again designing the game with the idea of: If you let him get to the lategame you deserve to lose? That's kinda the entire problem WoL had.

If you let anyone sit there for so long that they feel confident that they can dump +3000 minerals into production facilities, you are playing the game wrong. You are better off trading out that army with yours so they need to invest in a new army. You gain nothing by sitting there with your maxed army, waiting.

So if the protoss has 30+ warpates, you are doing something wrong or you should have 30+ raxs(or 20 with 10 with reactors).

You pretty much said you deserve to lose if you allow the toss to get that far. How would it then possibly be a bad idea for protoss to try to get that far and sit happily with a maxed army, waiting? Then they aren't playing it wrong, but they are playing it correct. They have no reason to attack if they get a large advantage by waiting.

Of course you should also have many production facilities, but they can't really warp in directly to the enemies base.

(Btw this is of course all unrelated to this speed change).


Ok, I'll say it: if you let a protoss player have 5000 spare minerals and 60 free supply for several in game minutes and then lose to 30 zealots, you deserve to lose.
maru G5L pls
BestFriends
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada133 Posts
June 21 2013 14:15 GMT
#773
On June 21 2013 23:02 BisuDagger wrote:
I can't believe everyone is overlooking the impact this will have in 4v4's.


Along with the impact it will have on bronze to midmasters...oh wait.
It's not about winning but the prevention of defeat.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9369 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-21 14:40:28
June 21 2013 14:29 GMT
#774
On June 21 2013 22:22 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2013 22:18 Hider wrote:
On June 21 2013 22:01 Sissors wrote:
On June 21 2013 21:50 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:32 Sissors wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:02 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 19:51 neptunusfisk wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:26 ObliviousNA wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:06 Akusta wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:04 Brett wrote:
[quote]
"afaik warp prisms cant heal"

Shall we continue the dumb comparison?


Your argument is invalid. Which is better? 3+ heal to one unit? Or arbitrary instant troop deployment across the map from 30 production facilities?

Nothing changes late-game from right now. 30 warpgates? Current protoss lategame would already have prism speed. If you're going to fear monger, at least suggest some reasonable balance concerns -_-


Well, if the protoss is 60 supply down and spent all money on warpgates, why haven't the terran just walked with a few marauders and killed everything already?

Ah the never ending stories of people warping in 30 zealots from a WP. Because the WP is what lost that game, really. It wasn't that the protoss got to sit there and get 4500 minerals in warpgates.

Are we again designing the game with the idea of: If you let him get to the lategame you deserve to lose? That's kinda the entire problem WoL had.

If you let anyone sit there for so long that they feel confident that they can dump +3000 minerals into production facilities, you are playing the game wrong. You are better off trading out that army with yours so they need to invest in a new army. You gain nothing by sitting there with your maxed army, waiting.

So if the protoss has 30+ warpates, you are doing something wrong or you should have 30+ raxs(or 20 with 10 with reactors).

You pretty much said you deserve to lose if you allow the toss to get that far. How would it then possibly be a bad idea for protoss to try to get that far and sit happily with a maxed army, waiting? Then they aren't playing it wrong, but they are playing it correct. They have no reason to attack if they get a large advantage by waiting.

Of course you should also have many production facilities, but they can't really warp in directly to the enemies base.

(Btw this is of course all unrelated to this speed change).


Yes I am surprised anyone still think that the "don't let him get there"-concept is good design. As you point it rewards one player for never attacking throughout the entire game which makes the game incredibly boring.

While each race indeed should have different advantages and disadvantages late game, neither race must be superior in terms of mobility ,cost efficiency and production mechancis at the same time.

Trading out armies is a critical and basic part of the game design and balance. Remaxing and trading efficiently are the keys to playing SC2. A lot of the stories of "30 zealots being warped" in are a product of people playing to passively once they get maxed. It is similar if you see someone blind double expand and then you don't attack them and just hope it will work out.


No, the 30 zealot story can never be an example of a player playing too passively as that implies that the protoss always wins if he for some reason gets too late game with a bank. It can only be an excuse if the opposing player is a lot behind which is more likely to occur when you are playing overaggressively than too passively. If a terran player is playing passively he will be able to afford to mass OC's and sack scvs, which means he will/should always rape the opposing players army, which shouldn't make 30 zealot warp in that problematic.
So I don't think the "never let him get there" principle is that relevant in Sc2, but it should be something that game designers should have in in mind when designing units (try to avoid that from being implemented). If anything it might be relevant due to protoss micro being easier than terran micro, however that is a design issue not related to warp tech.

Instead, I think the main problem with Sc2 is that the mobility of the protoss deathball is too high which makes army trading quite inefficient (in many situations). If trading armies/harassing were easier I don't think it would be that big of a problem. In pro games we are actually seing that the turtle style really isn't that much of an issue as players are so good at setting them self up in a position to army trade which reduces the warp tech problem. However, I believe that the game should be fun for lower level players as well, and for them army trading is simply too difficult.
NexCa
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany954 Posts
June 21 2013 14:51 GMT
#775
FINALLY ! Hope Protoss is going to do smth now ...
Best Protoss Player 4 ever - Bisu[Shield] || http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=326242 || THIS IS WHERE WE STAND, THIS IS WHERE THEY FALL, GIVE THEM NOTHING, BUT TAKE FROM THEM EVERYTHING ! || SKT FIGHTIIING
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 21 2013 14:55 GMT
#776
On June 21 2013 23:29 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2013 22:22 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 22:18 Hider wrote:
On June 21 2013 22:01 Sissors wrote:
On June 21 2013 21:50 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:32 Sissors wrote:
On June 21 2013 20:02 Plansix wrote:
On June 21 2013 19:51 neptunusfisk wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:26 ObliviousNA wrote:
On June 20 2013 07:06 Akusta wrote:
[quote]

Your argument is invalid. Which is better? 3+ heal to one unit? Or arbitrary instant troop deployment across the map from 30 production facilities?

Nothing changes late-game from right now. 30 warpgates? Current protoss lategame would already have prism speed. If you're going to fear monger, at least suggest some reasonable balance concerns -_-


Well, if the protoss is 60 supply down and spent all money on warpgates, why haven't the terran just walked with a few marauders and killed everything already?

Ah the never ending stories of people warping in 30 zealots from a WP. Because the WP is what lost that game, really. It wasn't that the protoss got to sit there and get 4500 minerals in warpgates.

Are we again designing the game with the idea of: If you let him get to the lategame you deserve to lose? That's kinda the entire problem WoL had.

If you let anyone sit there for so long that they feel confident that they can dump +3000 minerals into production facilities, you are playing the game wrong. You are better off trading out that army with yours so they need to invest in a new army. You gain nothing by sitting there with your maxed army, waiting.

So if the protoss has 30+ warpates, you are doing something wrong or you should have 30+ raxs(or 20 with 10 with reactors).

You pretty much said you deserve to lose if you allow the toss to get that far. How would it then possibly be a bad idea for protoss to try to get that far and sit happily with a maxed army, waiting? Then they aren't playing it wrong, but they are playing it correct. They have no reason to attack if they get a large advantage by waiting.

Of course you should also have many production facilities, but they can't really warp in directly to the enemies base.

(Btw this is of course all unrelated to this speed change).


Yes I am surprised anyone still think that the "don't let him get there"-concept is good design. As you point it rewards one player for never attacking throughout the entire game which makes the game incredibly boring.

While each race indeed should have different advantages and disadvantages late game, neither race must be superior in terms of mobility ,cost efficiency and production mechancis at the same time.

Trading out armies is a critical and basic part of the game design and balance. Remaxing and trading efficiently are the keys to playing SC2. A lot of the stories of "30 zealots being warped" in are a product of people playing to passively once they get maxed. It is similar if you see someone blind double expand and then you don't attack them and just hope it will work out.


No, the 30 zealot story can never be an example of a player playing too passively as that implies that the protoss always wins if he for some reason gets too late game with a bank. It can only be an excuse if the opposing player is a lot behind which is more likely to occur when you are playing overaggressively than too passively. If a terran player is playing passively he will be able to afford to mass OC's and sack scvs, which means he will/should always rape the opposing players army, which shouldn't make 30 zealot warp in that problematic.
So I don't think the "never let him get there" principle is that relevant in Sc2, but it should be something that game designers should have in in mind when designing units (try to avoid that from being implemented). If anything it might be relevant due to protoss micro being easier than terran micro, however that is a design issue not related to warp tech.

Instead, I think the main problem with Sc2 is that the mobility of the protoss deathball is too high which makes army trading quite inefficient (in many situations). If trading armies/harassing were easier I don't think it would be that big of a problem. In pro games we are actually seing that the turtle style really isn't that much of an issue as players are so good at setting them self up in a position to army trade which reduces the warp tech problem. However, I believe that the game should be fun for lower level players as well, and for them army trading is simply too difficult.


Well my response to that is get better at it. I don't do very well against maxed zerg with my protoss army, especially if I have to use storms. I am four levels of terrible and those fights are really stressful and discouraging, but I don't want them to change a thing. If some terran players are afraid of attacking the late game protoss army, I understand, but that a problem they need to look at on their own.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
sage_francis
Profile Joined December 2006
France1823 Posts
June 21 2013 15:01 GMT
#777
On June 21 2013 20:14 Nimix wrote:
Show nested quote +
Major change, no wonder this patch weights 50 MB.

Maybe.. just maybe.. THEY FIXED THE SOUND LOOP BUG? Could it be?? or maybe the technology isn't there yet..


lol... this bug is so annoying^^
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19225 Posts
June 21 2013 15:14 GMT
#778
On June 22 2013 00:01 sage_francis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2013 20:14 Nimix wrote:
Major change, no wonder this patch weights 50 MB.

Maybe.. just maybe.. THEY FIXED THE SOUND LOOP BUG? Could it be?? or maybe the technology isn't there yet..


lol... this bug is so annoying^^

That ruined the campaign for me (among other things). Still getting it too
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
neptunusfisk
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
2286 Posts
June 21 2013 15:19 GMT
#779
On June 21 2013 23:29 Hider wrote:
Instead, I think the main problem with Sc2 is that the mobility of the protoss deathball is too high


Okaaay.. I'm not sure if you're trolling or not.
maru G5L pls
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland24971 Posts
June 21 2013 15:24 GMT
#780
On June 22 2013 00:19 neptunusfisk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 21 2013 23:29 Hider wrote:
Instead, I think the main problem with Sc2 is that the mobility of the protoss deathball is too high


Okaaay.. I'm not sure if you're trolling or not.

A problem with the deathball is that movement speeds are a bit too uniform. Would love to have way slower Collosus, and faster speedlots, that way things would fan out naturally a bit and reward players who can control an army with a more divergent mix of move speeds.

'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Prev 1 37 38 39 40 41 50 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
10:00
StarCraft Evolution League #14
CranKy Ducklings101
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 92
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 806
firebathero 635
Hyuk 468
BeSt 391
Shuttle 388
Rush 370
actioN 281
EffOrt 265
Zeus 241
Pusan 137
[ Show more ]
Mini 114
Hyun 112
ZerO 100
ToSsGirL 67
Light 51
Shinee 44
Aegong 40
Mind 39
sorry 30
Nal_rA 24
Backho 23
Sharp 17
Sacsri 14
Movie 12
Barracks 6
soO 6
scan(afreeca) 5
Stork 2
Dota 2
BananaSlamJamma294
XcaliburYe247
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K3659
olofmeister1871
shoxiejesuss817
x6flipin76
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King207
Other Games
Happy327
crisheroes302
DeMusliM295
XaKoH 205
Fuzer 174
Pyrionflax97
ZerO(Twitch)16
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream13352
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream8659
Other Games
gamesdonequick668
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 32
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• WagamamaTV103
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
13h 13m
Replay Cast
1d 13h
The PondCast
1d 23h
Replay Cast
2 days
HomeStory Cup
3 days
HomeStory Cup
4 days
BSL: ProLeague
4 days
SOOP
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
HomeStory Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
BSL: ProLeague
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Rose Open S1
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.